1979

Carter: And this is one of the most vivid statements: “Our neck is stretched over the fence and OPEC has a knife.”

Economic warfare via the gasline? A tit for tat, I suppose.

Flashback to the 2000 election. (and do read the entire article, because it’s quite hilarious.)

Gov. George W. Bush of Texas said today that if he was president, he would bring down gasoline prices through sheer force of personality, by creating enough political good will with oil-producing nations that they would increase their supply of crude.

…

Asked why the Clinton administration had not been able to use the power of personal persuasion, Mr. Bush said: “The fundamental question is, ‘Will I be a successful president when it comes to foreign policy?’ ”

“I will be,” he said in answer to his own question about whether he would be a successful president. “But until I’m the president, it’s going to be hard for me to verify that I think I’ll be more effective.”

…

Flashback to an earlier story:

What does “jawbone” mean?

“Our country better become less dependent on foreign crude,” Bush said during the last Republican debate before a pivotal primary vote here next week.

“OPEC has gotten its supply act together and it’s driving the price like it did in the past. The president of the United States must jawbone OPEC members to lower the price,” he insisted.

………….

Well, flash forward to your gas price of the moment.

An explanation from someone more radical than I.

…………..

Conspiracy theories of the partisan type suggest that this is a set-up of sorts. Get the oil drilling going up in ANWR, blocked by the Democrats for the past few years to protect the pristine environment. Then chuck a deal, get the oil prices down in time for the election… two birds with one stone.

Better still, We’re running around in circles getting more desparate by the minute… “Peak Oil”, “Peak Oil”, “Peak Oil.”

First post April Fools Post (I managed to botch it anyways):

Say what?.

O’REILLY: I don’t care about the – colonel, I don’t care about the people of Fallujah. You’re not going to win their hearts and minds. They’re going to kill you to the very end. They’ve proven that. So let’s knock this place down.

O’REILLY: .you know it, the colonel knows it. The colonel and I are disagreeing on the tactics, but we know what the final solution should be. Why hasn’t the U.S. command done this? And why do they continue to absorb the level of terror that is coming out of — this isn’t a big town. We’re not talking about Cincinnati here. Right? It’s not a big town?

Thomas Friedman, late last summer or early last Fall, advocated “re-invading the Sunni Triangle.” Which the US (er… “Coalition Forces”) did. Now I guess we’d have to “re-re-invade” Fallujah.

Or perhaps Destroy that city in order to save it.

Or… er… “Sanitize” the city?

I’m thinking that mayber the term “final solution” has a proud legacy, that was only tarnished a bit by Adolf Hitler. Maybe the term is due for a comeback.

Stick. Beehive. Stick to Beehive.

The hostility toward the secret societies that sparked the formation of Diggers also led to teh establishment of a more threatening group. In 1866, a group of seniors, armed with the knowledge that since they had not been tapped for a secret society, they had no one left to try to impress, created a satirical society at first called Bowl and Stones and later changed to Bull and Stones. The object of the organization was to attack its skewed namesake, Skull and Bones, by roaming about the campus during and after senior society meetings. The Stones men blocked the senior socieor societies’ doorways, sang mocking songs (“Hauty Bones is fallen, and we gwine down to occupy the Skull”), and wrought general havoc. The Stones men also offered fake taps to the more naive undergraduates, often successfully persuading them that they had been elected to the real thing. In 1867, the Stones men shattered ink bottles on the front of the Skull and Bones tomb and ripped the chain from its fence. Class of 1870 members wore in public a gold pin portraying a bull standing on stones, as if it were an authentic secret-society badge. In 1870, the Stones men overtook the confectioner who was delivering food the Bones tomb for initiaion night and confiscated the ice cream that caught their fancy. (Eventually, Bones stationed a police officer in front of the tomb to discourage such behavior.) By that time, the group had become so well known that any student not elected to Bones or Keys was said to “belong to Stones.” Anti-society sentiment continued, with society members occasionally becoming the targets of violent attacks, particularly when they returned home from meetings. In 1878, a group of students painted graffiti in the tomb, [… etc etc blah blah blah …]

Alex Robbins, Secrets of the Tomb page 62

As far as I can tell, John Kerry has had two interesting moments in his more or less staid political career. No less; no more. His 1972 stint at the head of “Vietnam Vets Against the War”, and a prosecutorial stint getting the ball rolling on Iran-Contra.

This last weekend, C-SPAN aired a 1972 broadcast of with him debating the head spokesman for “Vietnam Veterans For A Just Peace” (euphemism for “Vietnam Veterans for the War”) on the Dick Cavett Show.

They’ll show it again. They’ve probably shown it before.

I suppose I might’ve gotten more out of the airing if it were not for the boorish friend of my roommate, who sat down saying “This is b-s”, “f#ing John Kerry, man!” and “This is stupid… they just keep saying the same sh## over and over again.”

But never mind — I disgress. I’m a little weird anyway. I’m boorish in my own way…

I’m not sure if I can say that I saw anything transferrable to our current political scene, even if it did feed a history-jonsing of sorts. Kerry either had an idealism that he’s since lost to career politics, or he was setting his political future. (Note that Gary Tradeau weighed in with his opinion.) Whichever one, the young Kerry was an impressive young speaker.

And the other figure managed to sneak in some “America Right or Wrong” “Support the Troops” rhetoric in his debate. Rhetoric that was easily enough smashed.

Maybe my roommate’s friend was right, and watching this was b-s… watching the same old sh$$ coming at us again and again…

John Kerry cited a Bible verse Sunday to criticize leaders who have “faith but has no deeds,” prompting President Bush’s spokesman to accuse Kerry of exploiting Scripture for a political attack.

I don’t know. Somehow I imagine there are plenty of mailings going around to the true-believers regarding Abortion…

At least John Kerry’s biblical quotations aren’t creepy as of yet… Remember Bush’s Inaugural Address?

After the Declaration of Independence was signed, Virginia statesman John Page wrote to Thomas Jefferson: “We know the race is not to the swift nor the battle to the strong. Do you not think an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm?”

This work continues. This story goes on. And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.

Biblical References for you:

“I have seen something else under the sun: The race is not to the swift or the battle to the strong, nor does food come to the wise or wealth to the brilliant or favor to the learned; but time and chance happen to them all” (Ecclesiastes 9:11)

“The Lord” is slow to anger and great in power; “the Lord” will not leave the guilty unpunished. His way is in the whirlwind and the storm, and the clouds are the dust of his feet” (Nahum 1:3)

UPDATE: Okay. Google seaches tend to bring up interesting items…
For Your Illuminati Needs. Thank you very much, you’ve all been good.

Just about one year ago, Al Franken parlayed a Book Expo joustle with Bill O’Reilly (Molly Ivins was there; Tucker Carlson was absent) at a Book Expo panel broadcast on C-SPAN into a career advancement opportunity.

I don’t know. Prior to that event, I’d peg Al Franken as “Stuart Smalley on Saturday Night Live, and Conan O’Brien’s easily-scheduled emergancy guest.”

Next week, he’ll be the anchor of the new “Air America Radio” network, broadcast in a small handful of markets… its New York City affiliate made sure to purchase the “WLIB” station.

Between the C-SPAN broadcast and the liberal radio network release, Bill O’Reilly convinced Fox News to sue Franken for the use of the phrase “Fair and Balanced”. A judge threw that out, saying that “there are easy cases and there are hard cases” and that “this case is wholly without merit.” Fox News declined to appeal.

This lawsuit propelled every blog that gave a damned to rename their blog “Fair and Balanced”, and shoved the release schedule of Franken’s book up…

Last December, Bill O’Reilly made the absurdly easily verifiably false claim that “his book is outselling Franken’s book and is almost catching up with Hillary Clinton’s book.

Al Franken has evidentally gotten under Bill O’Reilly’s skin…

And now Air America Radio…

Just what the nation needs. To combat the right-wing dominance of the talk radio airwaves, disseminating Republican talking points, a couple liberal radio programs to disseminate Democratic talking points…

I wonder if the Kerry administration will follow the Bush II administration’s lead and schedule “Talk Radio Day”, White House tours for synchoprantic hosts where they get to have soft-ball interviews with White House staff…

Deborah Norville’s Friday, March 12 show on MSNBC:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4533441/
NORVILLE: Finally tonight, if you were watching the show earlier this week, you heard Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson encourage Americans to work out and watch what they eat.

Thanks for watching. I’m Deborah Norville.

The source?
Where else?

A lot of hubbub has been made concerning a joke that George W. Bush made at the annual Radio and Television Correspondents Association dinner…

Nope, no weapons over there. (Laughter and applause.) Maybe under here. (Laughter.)

Poor taste? Meh, I say, meh…

But not enough has been made, except perhaps in certain corners, of the next joke out of his mouth:

Oops, this photo wasn’t supposed to be in here. This is the Skull and Bones secret signal. (Laughter.)

The names keep popping up.

Bob Kerrey, former Senator from Nebraska, is being talked up as a possible John Kerry running mate option.

His “star” just “rose” after his 9/11 Investigation performance this week, where it is said he was tough, judicious, and fair (bi-partisan in his criticism toward both the Bush and Clinton administrations).

There were two moments from yesterday’s questioning that it is at least possible to imagine that Kerrey was telegraphing political messages, seemingly at odds with one another:

All of us who have provided background briefings for the press before should beware. I mean, Fox should say ‘occasionally fair and balanced’ after putting something like this out, because they violated a serious trust.

Fox News is, of course, the RNC News Network… and this criticism does not go unnoticed with the Democratic base.

Quote #2, just asserting a hawkish stand that John F. Kerry will more than likely want to attach himself toward:

And secondly, I don’t see it as you do, that the war in Iraq has increased the threat of terrorism. I honestly don’t.

They feel much more threatened by having an Arab democracy than they do by having a democracy in the United States.

Second figure to watch for.

AND… Zbigniew Brzezinski might be telegraphing his desire to be part of a Kerry administration, travelling the lecture circuit in support of his new book… Brzezinski of this fame.

Confidence-inspiring, ain’t it?

Somehow the Earth just seems a little unbalanced, and I can’t quite put my finger on why the thought that the “Favourite Leftist Academic to Hate” has set himself up a blog makes me lose all bodily sensation (at least for a second).

I had a similar reaction when I saw that Jimmy Carter was “blogging”, but for different reasons… besides which, Carter’s blog didn’t have the trappings of your typical blog.

The comments section can be rather funny, and at times they can be rather infantile. I know I shouldn’t laugh at some of the more infantile stuff (and I know I should laugh at some of the satire from his critics), but the following I found amusing:

I am very confused by this. I am at this site to look for a nice Garden Noam to put in my front lawn. I am going to put a red Garden Noam next to my bird-bath.

But this website has a bunch of articles with poor grammar (I should know I’m an English teacher) written by a schizophrenic. WHERE ARE THE GARDEN NOAMS FOR SALE?

But he overdoes this joke by posting it several times, only able to add this to a later post:

NOAM, I AM WRITING AN EMAIL TO A FRIEND TELLING HIM THAT THE HOLOCAUST DIDNT HAPPEN. PLEASE WONT YOU “FORWARD” THE EMAIL.

(I could annotate the joke, but I’m not clear on the details of Chomsky’s accidental praise of a Holocaust Denier.)

WARNING!!! THIS SITE IS NOT, repeat NOT, RUN BY NOAM CHOMSKY, BUT IS A FASCIST CIA FRONT TO INFILTRATE THE LEFT.

THIS “BLOG” MUST BE STOPPED!!!!! FUCK CORPORATE MEDIA!!!!

Anyway, for your… Noam Chomsky’s blog for you

Maybe Howard Zinn is thinking of starting a blog. (Actually, I would go for that one, without the smirking you see me with toward Chomsky.)

Update: the Comments section of Chomsky’s blog have been turned off… within the past hour.