Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

My Unheralded Battle against Ahistoricality

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

Maybe you won’t really get a whole mass of wisdom from political magazine blog comments, but this comment bothered me:

Of course Franken “won” the seat since the state of Minnesota is run by Dems. It was a foregone conclusion. The GOP has stolen a lot of votes in its history, but it’s small potatoes compared to the Dems record. The last honest Dem was William Jennings Bryan and he’s been out of the picture for a century or so. You couldn’t point to an honest Dem in high public office right now if your life depended on it.

BTW the Minnesota Sec of State and his cronies apparently already have the 2010 election results in hand, are drafting those for 2012, and are giddily anticipating 2014. RIP, Democracy, RIP.

William Jennings Bryan? Wow. He was, like, 3 or 4 poltical alignments ago. In the meantime, names of high profile Democrats who’ve floated onto the national stage include everyone from Benjamin Tillman to Paul Wellstone to Harry Byrd to Shirley Chisholm to Champ Clark to John Davis to Strom Thurmond to Alton Parker to Richard Daley to Gary Hart to Henry Wallace to George Wallace.

I guess the reference was hyperbole, but it’s a weird one nonetheless.

Peggy Noonan’s chilling vision of things to come

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

A pretty strange stray sentence within Peggy Noonan’s editorial, attempting to get her fellow Republicans to ever-so-gingerly move past Sarah Palin:

Here are a few examples of what we may face in the next 10 years: a profound and prolonged American crash, with the admission of bankruptcy and the spread of deep social unrest; one or more American cities getting hit with weapons of mass destruction from an unknown source; faint glimmers of actual secessionist movements as Americans for various reasons and in various areas decide the burdens and assumptions of the federal government are no longer attractive or legitimate.

All due respect to the Governor of Texas, the Texas “secessionist” sentiment is long-held and largely joking — it is a sort of nationalist pride that it’s in the constitution that “Texas can leave any time it wants”.  That was the most visible “faint glimmer” of “actual secession”ism to pop up in the mainstream press.  At least, since the New York Times Magazine covered Second Republic of Vermont’s spear-heading of a union of Secessionist movements as one of several “Ideas”.  (That was during the Bush Administration.  Secessionist sentiment has necessarily moved across the political spectrum, I guess.)

Well, Kennedy’s bringing the US into Vietnam brought on the borderline Insurrectionist sentiment in the Johnson and Nixon administrations (Seymour Hersh’s sentiments in “Dark Side of Camelot”).  , or to  Moynihan’s defense of Nixon that he averted our second civil war.

I guess Noonan is saying Noonan would be our second President Buchanan?

Bullet point on bullet point stories

Friday, July 10th, 2009

Arizona state Senator says the Earth is 6,000 years old.  My thought on hearing this story, honestly?  Dog bites man.  This is the type of item which is fodder for various bloggers and MSNBC hosts, but not worth too much mention in the grand scheme of things — wait a week and we’ll have someone else saying it again.

The same might be said for the Fox News dolts who leapt into commentary on a scientific study by observing that we Americans “keep marrying other species and other ethnics.”   Okay.  That was a stupid comment.  But what’s the point?  “Fox and Friends” is the dumbest part of a dumb line-up, a set of “news” commentary dolts whose vacuuousness is not exceeded by anyone anywhere.  I know and basically understand the “movement conservatives” attracted to “Hannity”, but I am puzzled by your Fox and Friends.  Who watches this crap?

A bit more substantial, as these things go, was the Glenn Beck interview with a CIA creep where the (Michael Scheure) suggesting that a new 9/11 would whip us Americans back into shape.  Intelligence creeps, I believe, are a dime a dozen — yet… it needs to be noted that the man was tasked with the capture of Osama Bin Laden.  At any rate, Alex Jones has a feather in his cap to differentiate himself from Glenn Beck and consign Beck back to the category of “neo-con”.  (Even with Scheure’s somewhat more “realist” notion for perpetual war than a neo-conservative would have, a difference which sees him posted at… antiwar.com(!!!) )

Also in that realm lying in the gray area of matters of import, lies a furor over Obama Hitler signs admist the Tea-bag gathering vaguely associated with Republicans.  It is the bizarro version of the Republican chomping at a couple of moveon.org “Bush Hitler” videos in a sea of moveon.org contest entries.  This would be worth pushing to the side, except that the “Obama Hitler” is in the water — in Maryland — and that ends all well and good enough, I suppose , in Georgiadrawn back to attention with this ad, from Saturday Night Live alumnis — I don’t think Victoria Jackson is going to follow in the footsteps of Al Franken anytime soon, and from Oklahoma.
Contrary to reports, South Carolina is not giving us Obama Hitler  comparisons.  Jim DeMint compared Obama to the social democrats who came before Hitler — either Philipp Scheidemann  or Paul von Hindenburg, I guess.

Those matters out of the way, we can now turn our attention to the matters that really matter.  For instance, was Obama looking at a French girl’s butt?  AND… how about the seedy details of John Ensign’s sex scandal, and how it figures into other sex scandals?
The things… that really matter.

Nixonland

Thursday, July 9th, 2009
nixonland1
Something odd about the 1968 presidential election:  Hubert Humphreyalmost won.  With everything working against him — tied to an unpopular president who likely didn’t even vote him anyway (just as, I imagine, Humphrey didn’t vote for McGovern), his party financially bankrupt, his party’s coalition fractured every which way whose public image was that of a riotous convention.
Give the election one more week, and the nation would have been spared President Nixon.  And then what?

American would have left the Vietnam War sooner, which I guess would have thrown Humphrey one historical advantage, and then he would have been defeated in 1972.  By California Governor Ronald Reagan.
A more straight-forward and less messy political re-alignment, I suppose.

Regarding Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”, I never quite realized how much of a necessity it was moreso than an opportunity  Goldwater’s defeat had structually changed the Republican party, in its delegate count to the next convention, apportioned by how well the party did in the previous election — when Goldwater winning those four deep South states and his home state and nowhere else.  Meaning Nixon had to woo the new king-maker, Strom Thurmond, going into his election.

Our national Consensus unravelled under Johnson, moving beyond the congragulatory half-measures on civil rights under Eisenhower, and with Vietnam the fundamentals of Cold War thinking came to a head.  What might be said about the ensuing Apocalypse is that we’re always mired in it and always have been.  The pop cultural signposts represented by the three books atop the best-selling list in 1971 (The Population Bomb, Beyond Freedom and Dignity, The Late Great Planet Earth) is always available to crack our cultural psyches — that remains remarkably unchanged.  Rick Perlstein knows this well enough — his next book taking off with Patty Hearst — and our rampant cultural paranoia of 1976 through 1986 is covered in similarly apocalyptic terms with this book.

A pretty interesting factoid to consider right about now, which has some bearing, with a poll results:  Nearly 80 percent of those surveyed said there is a major schism between the values and mindsets of younger and older Americans. That’s a bigger gap than in turbulent 1969, when 74 percent reported generational culture clashes over Vietnam, civil rights and women’s liberation.
What does that mean?  It’s folly at every juncture to deny “schism” between attitudes of generations, today as with forty years ago, which doesn’t mean it has to be confrontational.  I don’t know what makes the difference with six percentage points today as against then — the absense of “great silent majority” of twenty-somethings who weren’t barricading down Columbia Univeristy and went off to cast their vote for Nixon, which had that margin of the population nodding their head with a “no great difference”?

Kim Jong Il hacking your computer

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

 A widespread computer attack that began July 4 knocked out the Web sites of the Treasury Department, the Secret Service and other U.S. agencies, and South Korean government sites also came under assault.

South Korean intelligence officials believe the attacks were carried out by North Korean or pro-Pyongyang forces. U.S. officials so far have refused to publicly discuss details of the attack or where it might have originated.

The Washington Post reported Wednesday that its own Web site was among several commercial sites also hit.
KOREA-NORTH/
“We will sternly smash the US imperialist forces and South Korea’s puppet regime anti-unification plot.”  — spotted at a memorial service for the anniversary of his dead dad…. where, it is reported:

The servicepersons and people of the DPRK are hardening their will to hold President Kim Il Sung in high esteem for all ages and to firmly defend his revolutionary ideas and undying revolutionary feats and thus add luster to them generation after generation on the occasion of the 15th anniversary of his demise.
The world witnesses the outstanding greatness of Kim Jong Il, the greatest incarnation of the revolutionary moral obligation, through the realities in the DPRK in which he is holding the leader in high esteem invariably.

Here we see Kim Jong Il instructing the assassins of the cyber-war on how to smash the Imperialists:

KOREA-NORTH/

Unless that’s him leading the man to add new insults to the North Korean news service to South Korean President Lee Myung-bak.  Nearly 10 times a day, the official state news agency of neighboring North Korea insults Lee, calling him a “stooge,” “lackey,” “fascist,” “dictator” and other names. He has been disrespected 1,700 times so far this year, according to a study released this month.

Who can say?  One or the other.

By the way:  if you come to this website, and see it dominated by haliographic portraits such as this, and odes to “Dear Leader”, suspect the Korean hackers.  I wouldn’t know why they’d chase away from bringing down the Treasury website — maybe a quick respite to an easier target as a lark?

I’d be a bit of a jerk, sitting here making light of heavy matters, if I didn’t mention — if nothing else than to pierce the faded story out from its long ago news cycle — that Euna Lee and Laura Ling are still captive in North Korea.

Did I lead a Larouchie to call the Mark Levin show?

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

I think I just might be responsible for leading a Larouchite to call the Mark Levin show — seen (heard?) here, posted by this conservative radio fan.  To wit, I mentioned Mark Levin in relation to Larouche on this post, saying simply that the current line for Larouche in “Obama’s Nazi Health Care Plan” aligned under Mark Levin’s current rhetoric about “knowing the history”.

It is interesting that the cult-caller, John from Lansing, Machigan, chose the “Larouche is a Federalist” line, apparently thinking it matched better the right wing host’s political predilictions better than what the Larouchies might say to a Democrat — which would be something along the lines of “Rooseveltarian”.  (Though, I take it from his current take on the situation in Hondurus — aligned with the coup , never mind the tangeantal lump in of  health care politics– that he’s sort of charging to and fro in right-wing paranoia during the Obama Administration as opposed to the left-wing paranoia during the Bush Administration — the “recruiting for the LYM” would necessarily be off now.)

A note to John from Lansing, Michigan… if this weird course of deployment surfaced from out of this blog.  HA HA!!  No, really:  HA HA!!!

Maybe they can try for some synergy on the fringes of the “tea-party”, which in its sort of “down to the core” state has hit its “Obama Hitler Mustache” sweet-spot — slightly better than handing out to (go to item #2) pictures of Nancy Pelosi which protesters can then slice the “l-pac” line at the bottom for use with the bigger earlier crowd.

But John from Lansing, Michigan must have missed my point.  The guru views these political movements (left or right) — in this case, against “socialized health care” [for the sake of Alexandar Hamilton’s Federalism, I guess?]– as entities to trail, for some implantating of anti-British and “international” conspiracy to public discourse (or to ride the wave of the already existent ‘paranoid style’?) and for implanting “Historic World Importance” in the membership, and off the margins for recruitment and donations.

Such is the case for demonstrations as:

Also Thursday, a group of activists gathered in Sioux Falls to protest what they consider to be a Democrat-led drive for “socialized medicine.” Some of that unrest spilled over to Mitchell when, at the end of the hearing, a man stood up in the audience to loudly proclaim that Herseth Sandlin and Johnson should have “listened to Lyndon LaRouche,” a perennial presidential candidate whose brochures were distributed Thursday by supporters. One brochure depicted President Barack Obama alongside Adolf Hitler with an admonition to “Act now to stop Obama’s Nazi Health Plan!”
When the LaRouche supporter was talked down by moderator Duffett and some audience members, another man stood up in a different part of the audience and shouted “They work for us! They need to listen to us!” The hearing wrapped up quickly thereafter, and the second man carried on a private conversation with Herseth Sandlin for several minutes.
Johnson and Herseth Sandlin told the panelists and the audience members — who were given the opportunity to fill out comment cards — that they were playing a vital role in an important process of reform.

So I await the Larouche response to Al Gore’s comment.  I suspect Winston Churchill will get a work-out moreso than an analogy about a weak will in fighting the nazis.  But that’s just a guess.
……………………………………

Question:  who took this interview off of youtube?  The “We Are Change Virginia” 9/11 Truthers, or LPAC?  (One or the other needed it removed to avoid embarrassment, I gather.)  Not that it’d be worth 40 minutes of one’s life to find out what’d embarrass whom.

Hey!  Here’s a twitter feed to subscribe to!

http://twitter.com/StormfrontWPWW … It seems to be clip each new thread posted to the neo-nazi website “Storm-front” for twitter feed purposes.  In the mix of that  came:

StormfrontWPWW: Breaking News: LaRouche calls Obama insane..: Here’s the webcast..

And to think, Larouche went on a jeremiad against twitter not that long ago.
Some more fandom seen in the comments here.  I’m puzzling over this one:

 :  TheInternetGanger says:
Your smile captivates me.

 Huh.

And, this is as good a conspiracy as any.  I am a bit surprised they haven’t shown up to leave comments to “keep hoping a large truck swerves and at least clips the f*cktards” comparing themselves to the accosted civil rights struggle , as seen here (commented on by me in this post.)

I wonder too if something waving the Guardian into the neo-conservative universe is in the offing, since they just saw print new developments in the Jeremiah Duggan struggle.  Actually, seeing the new administration in America, they may be might have the politics aligned in a semi-more-sensical way.
…………………

Alan Colmes???

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

It’s pretty easy to miss, but KPOJ 610 “Portland’s Progressive Talk” broadcast on Sunday during the hours of 1 pm to 4 pm…

Alan Colmes.

I turned on the radio at 3 pm, ready to turn the dial to anything moderately interesting, and heard on KPOJ… Alan freaking Colmes.  A quick scan over the Internet shows that few people noticed.  A Democratic Underground thread pops up, with one interesting “management response” to a complaint.

David Bender is no longer doing a radio show. He has been replaced by Alan Colmes. Sometimes Alan likes to go “behind enemy lines,” but, I must admit, I was surprised to hear Ann Coulter and Dick Morris on the show. I will monitor the program in the future to see if it is something KPOJ should continue to air.
Operations Manager

If Alan Colmes has done nothing else, he aired three memorable interviews with Neal Horseley where the anti-abortion extremist was side-tracked to discussion of his loss of virginity to a mule.  That was radio worthy of enshrinement to the Museum of Radio Broadcasting.  He does bring on the crazies, which may or may not be worth anything in political discourse, but is worth something in entertainment value.  (The pastor praying for Obama’s death being another figure, something which came out from his disccing public declaraction that he had been praying for the death of George Tiller, another example.)

Unfortunately, Colmes is also stuck with a strange Fox News sphere of entertaining chummily the likes of Ann Coulter and Dick Morris.  There is no entertainment or enlightenment to be garnered there — there are far more substantial people to find if one is interested in discussions or debates with conservatives — fish around Thom Hartmann’s guest list.  But these are not associations he plucked from his time with Fox News.

It’s a mixed bag.  And consigned to three hours at roughly the least listened to time possible.  The execs at KPOJ probably have no particular reason to do anything but take the “replay” feed passed to them, but it’s a mineable 15 hours of programming — probably three hours are available ready to please a liberal audience.  (If they can get past the Fox News association and advertisements.)

Embarrassed fifth grade teacher

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

A local teacher accidentally put pornography into a DVD that was meant to be filled with school memories from the past year, and nobody caught the error until after it was sent home, shocking parents and students alike. […]

The offending DVD starts with a menu screen that displays various school trips and functions, and when you click on one of them, you see kids in a classroom sharing stories. They start clapping, then the video suddenly cuts to sex.
“It goes from my son, straight to her on the couch,” said ‘Joe,’ who saw the video along with his son and did not wish to be identified. “My son’s reaction was, ‘Dad, is that Ms. Defanti?'”

 

Boy Howdy!

Actually this story is a little boring.  What’s amusing me moreso than the unfortunate accident of fifth graders getting a glimpse of their teacher self-pleasuring and the awkwardness that followed… is the stock photographs that the various news sites are inserting into the story.

The Inquisitr
Daily Contribut…
WLFI.com
Daily Mail
San Francisco C…
CBS News
KTLA
Manolith
 
To review… one blurred out footage of the dvd scene in question (the CBS local news story has the video of blurred out class members followed by this blurred scene.  Kind of pointless, I say.  And by that I’m not calling out to see the danged footage, so much as questioning the news value of showing it — it strikes me as not so much illustrative as a few second item that exploited by the news casters exiting to each commercial break “and later… how do you explain to your child their teacher doing this?!!  Stay Tuned!”)  Two images of a pair of horrified kids looking at a computer screen.  Two “naughty school teacher” poses — one specifically a teacher; the other — hm?.  (Not what the teacher would like, I assume.)  Two generic “X Rated” screens, which have a pretty broad based existence on “moral decay / porn / sex trade” stories.  One image of a homemade dvd being opened up (whether or not that is the dvd in question), and one of the school.

Joseph Biden Watch

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

biden1

To take stock of what Vice President Joseph Biden said last weekend, noted by people who note things and thus trending toward being heralded to “Gaffe” status:

#1:  “We misread how bad the economy was.”
This, I think, is extrapulated to the “Nobody could have predicted” syndrome.  A politician should know never to say that, at least, as when “nobody could have predicted”, one can immediately google and find the “everybody” who predicted it.
This floats past fairly easily, even if it was plastered in giant type at the top of “Huffington Post” on Sunday.  The Politico-Economic picture remains the same.  In four years, Obama will be up for re-election.  The classic question “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?“  will determine his re-election chances.  If you under-estimated the severity of the economic picture, now is the time to say so — six months in instead of four years in.

#2:  BIDEN: Look, Israel can determine for itself — it’s a sovereign nation — what’s in their interest and what they decide to do relative to Iran and anyone else.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Whether we agree or not?
BIDEN: Whether we agree or not. They’re entitled to do that. Any sovereign nation is entitled to do that. But there is no pressure from any nation that’s going to alter our behavior as to how to proceed.  What we believe is in the national interest of the United States, which we, coincidentally, believe is also in the interest of Israel and the whole world. And so there are separate issues.   If the Netanyahu government decides to take a course of action different than the one being pursued now, that is their sovereign right to do that. That is not our choice.

Considering the way this plays in the world — much of it assumes Israel is America’s 51st state anyway, which includes headlines that include “Go Ahead Bibi:  Drop the Bomb“, and considering the dangers of this statement in relation to the hoped for “regime change” in Iran, President Obama had to walk this one back.
Perhaps with forked tongue?  The message is out there, I’d guess.

But these less than political smooth statements are at least more meaningful than Biden’s “Hide!  Hide!  Hide!” reaction to the Avian Flu, which you just go ahead and chalk up to “just one of those things.”  They bear down on policy decisions.  Of course, if you want to flicker around to personality political calculations, you might go down the route of the “Biden versus Clinton” game and assume Biden is getting air-time, despite the fact that he will say something, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s 2012 Presidential Bid.  If you want to play that game.

Evolutions in “Nigerian” Spam stories

Monday, July 6th, 2009

The email spam item of the day:

“Respond Before they Kill Me”.

It’s an attachment, so I’m not about to open it.  I first assume it’s evoking the, quote-de-quote,  “Green Revolution” in Iran.  Surely we’re not fishing around the South Carolina serial killer on the loose?  But the name doesn’t stick for that one.

 This, I gather, is it.  It’s not giving me any Iranians to save from Khamenei.  But maybe I guess the foreign situation has to be somewhat more in the background for these scams  to work?

But it does mark an evolution in subject lines from the purely cynical “deal” to a more altruistic plea — one gilded with the old promise of the rich ruling class’s money, perhaps, but altruistic pleading nonetheless.  Or perhaps the storyline of the “Nigerians” just needs to get more desperate?