Did I lead a Larouchie to call the Mark Levin show?
I think I just might be responsible for leading a Larouchite to call the Mark Levin show — seen (heard?) here, posted by this conservative radio fan. To wit, I mentioned Mark Levin in relation to Larouche on this post, saying simply that the current line for Larouche in “Obama’s Nazi Health Care Plan” aligned under Mark Levin’s current rhetoric about “knowing the history”.
It is interesting that the cult-caller, John from Lansing, Machigan, chose the “Larouche is a Federalist” line, apparently thinking it matched better the right wing host’s political predilictions better than what the Larouchies might say to a Democrat — which would be something along the lines of “Rooseveltarian”. (Though, I take it from his current take on the situation in Hondurus — aligned with the coup , never mind the tangeantal lump in of  health care politics– that he’s sort of charging to and fro in right-wing paranoia during the Obama Administration as opposed to the left-wing paranoia during the Bush Administration — the “recruiting for the LYM” would necessarily be off now.)
A note to John from Lansing, Michigan… if this weird course of deployment surfaced from out of this blog. HA HA!! No, really: HA HA!!!
Maybe they can try for some synergy on the fringes of the “tea-party”, which in its sort of “down to the core” state has hit its “Obama Hitler Mustache” sweet-spot — slightly better than handing out to (go to item #2) pictures of Nancy Pelosi which protesters can then slice the “l-pac” line at the bottom for use with the bigger earlier crowd.
But John from Lansing, Michigan must have missed my point.  The guru views these political movements (left or right) — in this case, against “socialized health care” [for the sake of Alexandar Hamilton’s Federalism, I guess?]– as entities to trail, for some implantating of anti-British and “international” conspiracy to public discourse (or to ride the wave of the already existent ‘paranoid style’?) and for implanting “Historic World Importance” in the membership, and off the margins for recruitment and donations.
Such is the case for demonstrations as:
Also Thursday, a group of activists gathered in Sioux Falls to protest what they consider to be a Democrat-led drive for “socialized medicine.” Some of that unrest spilled over to Mitchell when, at the end of the hearing, a man stood up in the audience to loudly proclaim that Herseth Sandlin and Johnson should have “listened to Lyndon LaRouche,” a perennial presidential candidate whose brochures were distributed Thursday by supporters. One brochure depicted President Barack Obama alongside Adolf Hitler with an admonition to “Act now to stop Obama’s Nazi Health Plan!”
When the LaRouche supporter was talked down by moderator Duffett and some audience members, another man stood up in a different part of the audience and shouted “They work for us! They need to listen to us!” The hearing wrapped up quickly thereafter, and the second man carried on a private conversation with Herseth Sandlin for several minutes.
Johnson and Herseth Sandlin told the panelists and the audience members — who were given the opportunity to fill out comment cards — that they were playing a vital role in an important process of reform.
So I await the Larouche response to Al Gore’s comment. I suspect Winston Churchill will get a work-out moreso than an analogy about a weak will in fighting the nazis. But that’s just a guess.
……………………………………
Question: who took this interview off of youtube? The “We Are Change Virginia” 9/11 Truthers, or LPAC? (One or the other needed it removed to avoid embarrassment, I gather.) Not that it’d be worth 40 minutes of one’s life to find out what’d embarrass whom.
Hey! Here’s a twitter feed to subscribe to!
http://twitter.com/StormfrontWPWW … It seems to be clip each new thread posted to the neo-nazi website “Storm-front” for twitter feed purposes. In the mix of that came:
StormfrontWPWW: Breaking News: LaRouche calls Obama insane..: Here’s the webcast..
And to think, Larouche went on a jeremiad against twitter not that long ago.
Some more fandom seen in the comments here. I’m puzzling over this one:
 : TheInternetGanger says:Your smile captivates me.
 Huh.
And, this is as good a conspiracy as any. I am a bit surprised they haven’t shown up to leave comments to “keep hoping a large truck swerves and at least clips the f*cktards” comparing themselves to the accosted civil rights struggle , as seen here (commented on by me in this post.)
I wonder too if something waving the Guardian into the neo-conservative universe is in the offing, since they just saw print new developments in the Jeremiah Duggan struggle. Actually, seeing the new administration in America, they may be might have the politics aligned in a semi-more-sensical way.
…………………
July 10th, 2009 at 1:14 pm
Note this.
http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090630/NEWS07/906300333/-1/NEWSMAP
They either added the paranthetical “affiliated with Larouche” item, or this is a different obituary than “European” posted at factnet. But I have to wonder about:
Ron was a conscientious supporter of the environment and social justice issues, and a strong supporter of the political movement of Lyndon LaRouche, political statesman and economist.
Mutually exclusive, I’d say.
As is Hamilton whatever and “Genesis Farm”.
…………………….
I suppose I should make note of this and wait a week, but I need also point to these rattlings:
The Obama Presidency, with its made-in-London policies, is melting down on nearly every front, leaving many in Washington stunned at how dramatically and suddenly his administration is unraveling. “He’s going down, in the short term,” Lyndon LaRouche stated yesterday. “Time, boys, to jump ship!” LaRouche continued, explaining that more and more people are recognizing that we’ve been right, generating an opening in the political landscape, “an interval between Hell and Heaven,” that we have to take advantage of. We are essentially operating as a government in the wings, LaRouche said in further discussions on Tuesday, but we must make sure that we defeat Obama and his British masters on our policy terms, not the tertiary issues that others may throw up.
That’s the World Historical mission of the moment… but it’s in the hands of…
“We do have a situation of opportunity, and we won’t be able to capture the thing unless we have a better understanding of how the mind works, and what the role of music and art is, how it has to be approached,” LaRouche said; Thus, the central strategic importance of LaRouche’s current writings, and the related scientific work underway by the LaRouche Youth Movement’s Basement Team.
THE LYM BASEMENT TEAM!!! Who, up until now, I assumed had only been up to posting the newly to the forefront LPAC videos, such as “If Obama Only Had a Brain”.
For example, the White House is interfering in Democratic Party state electoral processes in New York, Pennsylvania, and other states, trying to dictate who will be party candidates for the House and Senate—an unprecedented action in an area that has never been the White House’s prerogative.
Not withstanding the quite typical politicking — mostly along the lines of “Incumbent Protection” … er… that was the complaint levelled against Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1938
http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3314
Aren’t these people supposed to go into a full and immersive study of FDR, or something?
Why do I bother?
July 18th, 2009 at 7:03 am
When it comes to ordinary American politics, LaRouche and his fellows might as well have beamed in from their favorite planet, Mars.
That is to say, they know NOTHING about American politics–a remarkable record after 40 years of doing whatever it is they’re doing.
(That’s why, e.g., they thought Michael Bloomberg was going to the Democratic or Republican or both candidate for President.)
So, despite their slavish loyalty to FDR (now, that is–in the 1970s LaRouche characterized FDR as a Mussolini fascist), they have NO IDEA what FDR did and didn’t do.
Also, they apparently have NO IDEA that the White House ALWAYS tries to pick candidates.
G.W. Bush did it. Clinton did it. G.H.W. Bush did it. Reagan did it. Nixon did it. (No clue what Carter did.)
LBJ did it. Kennedy would have done it.
To call this practice “unprecedented” is to reveal just how far removed from poitical reality the LaRouche folks are.
The White House also gets to pick the head of its party–Obama picked Kaine, and Bush picked his various RNC heads, and so forth.
But this is all news to LaRouche et al. because they are already far advanced in their own personal Moon Mars Mission.
July 19th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
It popped out at me as ungirded to not even any reality, but any normalitive partisan spinning. Through the Clinton — Obama primary battle, which from Super Tuesday onward I never found any purpose in pretending that Obama wasn’t the nominee but I understood why anyone with an incentive to either see Hillary Clinton president or a compelling storyline for these purposes, I read Larouche’s Clinton press as at least girded to chasing Clinton campaign spin.
It seems a line that seems thrown out there to pretend that they have something to say, and pretend they have some role in domestic politics. New York? Well, there are some Democrats grumbling about Senator Gillibrand, and any opposition to her has been pretty well steam-rolled away such that any primary opposition will rather negligible. Pennsylvania? Obviously, Arlen Specter — who is facing a real primary challenge.
But a little over a year ago they threw up that “1932” video. I watched some of it, more than I can say about most of their video output — a bit toward the beginning, a bit toward the middle, and the last ten minutes. I would think they’d understand Roosevelt’s party elbowing, if nothing else than as part of the grander darkness versus lightness epic (FDR battling the forces that tie John Wilkes Booth, Woodrow Wilson , John Raskob, and the half a dozen Conservative Democrats targetted for primary defeat?).
Well, it is just a throw-away line.