Somebody has dumped red paint on the screens of all the parking meters up and down the streets, rendering them not usable. I am thinking that I hope this is a political act — a means of communicating maybe “You all have Blood on your Hands” for “the deaths of Palestinians” or “all the babies lost to Abortion”. Either one, or any number of things I can’t think of right now — though I think the climate fighters favor tomato soup. I know it isn’t — it is just wanton vandalism of public property for its own sake and the sake of jollies. Beside which, the fact that splashed red paint could signify any cause as much as not signify any cause gives away the problem of messaging.

After an hour I get bored of it and drop out. When I return I catch the bottom line right at the very end which negates just about anything of the previous so two hours — and it is up to Tim Walz to poke it toward JD Vance as he fished for an equivalency that, well may work for Matt Taibbi and there is no other means of getting by in the reasonable sounding broad political middle from the right he had managed to work his way to for the duration of his time here.

Performances were about what I expect. Walz had said he was not that good at this, a word of warning to Harris when she picked him. And as much as Democrats want to fix Vance as the man who stumbles his way through a doughnut shop and roll through his podcast interviews, there is a reason he was elected Senator — he was not going to blast his way through the rhetoric of “cat ladies” for the edification of the audience of Bronze Age Pervert and listeners — or, if we want to slide to a wider audience Tucker Carlson. What I pick up here is his one moment to get himself to the role Pence served for Trump in 2016 — if you can’t stomach Trump you can convince yourself you are voting for the undercard. The final exchange of the debate –and years from now the only thing history will remember of it — served to show how Vance would not serve as another Pence — and, as Walz says off of everyone who prepped him for the one moment in a long series of blah — why he is there in the first place.

Someone should have figured the reason for the opening statement. Hey the “I’m a hick out of Appalachia, son of an Opoid Addict” / “Coach and teacher from Minnesota” out of the way, so a Question about Iran and Israel is not filibustered with all that. After that, Grand take away of anything I see any mention of in the discourse. I don’t exactly know what the Tiananmen Square story is, but I am fascinated by the idea of the Bulwark crew barking about what a bad answer he gave and how he should have answered it — and giving the suggestion of the answer he effectively gave. Vance barks out “you are not supposed to fact check” as the hosts clarify that the Haitian migrants are legally so. Walz clearly avoided dogs and cats, and I guess people don’t like his lowest common denominator approach in calling out demagoguery here. Vance got cute by half and laughable in framing Trump as “saving” Obama’s ACA healthcare. And Walz made a funny boo boo in saying he has been friends with school shooters, which to be sure as a teacher these days and at the point in time he had been you are probably tasked with guiding kids away from such.

I do have the sense the man opened the door back up for his 2028 run, the door that had seemingly closed with cat ladies and doughnuts. Sure, we have good reports of MAGA faithful not much liking him — but remember, Kamala Harris “is a cop”. And if we see Vance not much bothering to distance from the Trump election denying here, recall Ronald Reagan was a vociferous supporter of Nixon throughout Watergate. Things turn, Vance can push it aside and complete his formation into Vance version number four that this debate served to start him out as —

Entering the last full month of the election and Trump’s hair now has this purple floral it. The irony is that his base of support attached purple hair to that which is wrong with America — the indoctrinated youth with woke gay marxist hair dye. Or maybe it is the hair color of some his base — some old blue hairs.

Jason Linkins insists that the Democrats he is speaking out a face on the miseey Trump wrecks. Apparently the face is that of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. Which is. A regrettable placement of image to headline, I assume. We wander into the deep cynicism of the immigration politics where JD Vance bluntly states the dogs and cats thing is a lie to get the focus on their topic, and where Harris can’t run against a stated “mass deportation” — a horrible idea even if you can justifiably stand to move right on the border — because polling shuts it out.

Hey! Iran strikes Israel! And this probably is actually about the biggest issue of the next president, even as there are no pat solutions and even as it polls nowhere.

A warning. This vote is rigged. When you push down to click a vote for the left choice, it takes you to the same link as the right choice.

Looking for a hero in a rhetorical sense if you have a sympathy toward “tilting at windmill”s figures amongst the third party candidates, you are forced to skip past Jill Stein. Pretend that is nothing untoward with the photograph of her dining with Putin, the symbol of just how everyone views her — Captured by Russia, main point of a campaign to undermine NATO and has a strong double talk hypocrisy in an ability to call Netanyahu a war criminal while qualifying anything with Putin. Individually, you can make policy arguments on what the US ought behave with respect with Israel and what the US ought behave with respect with Russia — it is just that when you lay it side by side it becomes revealing. But Jill Stein is then asked a rudimentary American government question. How many voting members of the U.S. House of Representatives there are. Her answer — “600”. Question mark inflection.

The big perennial candidate names of the past slotted as left-wing voices — Eugene Debs and Ralph Nader — they knew the House count.

This leaves us, probably, with the Libertarian’s Chase Oliver for any sense that something is right with no shot third candidate voices of conscience. A bane of the comments section of Reason magazine’s blog who are a bunch of Trump fans. They should love him, as his vaguely cultural left effects and disruptor of the dominant Mises Caucus overtakes make him more likely a draw for a couple otherwise Harris voters than a couple otherwise Trump voters.

Looking down ticket, the Libertarian candidate in Montana has a question — Why is Trump leading Biden in Montana by double digits while @SheehyforMT is tied with @jontester? He presumes to have an answer but his answer doesn’t account for the fact that he is way behind both of them not answers why he is tied with the Green Party candidate.

I don’t think the latest news-headline claimed “assassination attempt” oughta count. Or, if you count it, you are now obliged to count the myriad of not close attempts that came to all the other presidents, and then quickly flipped out of the news — the car that crashed into the White House gate in the Clinton Administration, the wacky message board announcement on plans against Obama at his inauguration. Maybe these are one and two steps back of the golf course assailant, but the golf course assailant is one and two steps back from the man who got to Trump’s ear — so I mark it as — oh, something the Secret Service has to figure out — even if the figuring out here is figuring out how to talk Trump into a more private golf course — but not more.

Good news! Allan Lichtman and Bill Maher have each declared Harris will win. No need to sweat anything anymore! And I guess the logic comes through. Maher passed by a reference to the Joseph McCarthy as means of historical comparison of a passing of a darkness. “They are eating the dogs; they are eating the cats” apparently analogous to when the generals turn. I can’t decide whether JD Vance’s role here — dipping in and holding further to “if we have things up” to get the media to pay attention to Springfield — an admission he has to scramble to cover up — moves me off of “want to have a beer with” idea or solidified it. Maybe I am still trying to figure out something with this guy, but it is hard to say I would get it. A new old podcast chat from him dropped. He is talking with someone, apparently I am told an Alex Jones lawyer — very much holding onto his claim to an avatar of the Appalachian hill-billy, though an avatar stripped of any humanity. Whether many of the new gawkers of the podcast interview know it or not, he is taking off the “Nine Nations of North Americ”, useful in thinking of regional political alignments, but as presented by Vance rather deadening. The takeaway people seem to take from Vance on his hillbillies of Appalachia being the swing vote on the plantation Southerners and the New England Yankees, insufferable wokes — is a puzzled “is this a defence of slavery?” – – and on to “where do the other parts of the nation sit in this?”. The book probably gets a recommended for Amazon purchasers of, say, Thom Hartmann’s favorite, Strauss and Howe’s Generational Turning books — the same ball park and something that may explain something but nothing on a person’s decided approach on public policy. The map is not the terrain. You don’t want color commentary on your political prejudices and biases. Might be why he underperformed the party ticket in his Senate campaign?

What percentage of the vote is Mark Robinson getting? 42?

2016 and I walk by a bar with a Hillary Clinton – Donald Trump debate on, and the crowd reacting. I catch a response of “that’s right!” to a parry of Hillary Clinton to a Donald Trump name-drop of Bernie Sanders over – – it would seem — trade issues. I get a sick feeling on this — the missed point as they cheer on Hillary Clinton dousing Trump because obviously Sanders is — however shakily — supporting her. It misses a point that Trump is reaching a set of rust belt Sanders or Sanders sympathetic voters in this one. The debate answer works in Trump’s favor, the post show punditry and theater review poll analysis showing Hillary with a win be damned. A threshold holds up for Trump for a section of the that belt electorate — the poll question on “who won the debate?” is as meaningless here as Romney’s smashing of Obama in 2012.

2024. Light years away from a Trump who held it together at key points of 2016. The previous debate had the pre-chatter of a Biden plan to “rattle” Trump, lay out the bait and let Trump show himself to be Trump. Biden, at the end of his effectiveness for the presidency and past the end of effectiveness for performative aspects for the presidency, was not up for it — the big take away is a visual of Biden staring befuddled by Trump’s beguiling mendacious barrage and then Biden unable to weave a response out of it. And that was the end of him. I can deliberate on the meaning of the bad performance, but a good cross-section of the electorate will view anything other than “he’s senile!” as stanning for Biden. The trouble is if the lowest common denominator ask for a vote on Biden over Trump is “normal” versus abnormal, the pointers against that frayed greatly against him now.

There is this desultory feeling I get wading about the political spectacle going into a presidential debate. The key, the staff of political campaigns past say, is to have your one liners and singers at ready. Wait for the moment it comes. Then throw it out there. And! Blam! “You are no Jack Kennedy!”. And with that, meet the next vice president, Lloyd Bentsen.

In the aftermath of the big show, joint appearance with infectious person and one not serious man taking up the issues, I look about the clips of cable news figures. The hackiest of hacks, Fox News’s Jesse Waters, chimes in that Trump got in the lines everyone will know. “See Spot Run” apparently amongst them. A little hard to get there, as Trump moved into the hyper-Internet space of dogs and cats eating Haitian migrants, and that was the end of everything.

Memo to Erik Erikson: your culprit is JD Vance. Further memo: they are running with this one. They got the cop backing it up!

At the risk of doing a hint of that thing Rod Dreher hates for left-wing culture war goal post shifting … Even in the insane scenario that there was some handful of cases of Haitian immigrant cat eating totalling five or so — why should that in the national conversation of immigration issues? Also, aside in that Dreher vantage… What ever happened to slamming Trump for January 6 as the “Beerbelly Putsch”?I

The big line from the “Right” has long been “the left can’t meme”. Sure. The right can meme all right. And if this is “meme-ing”, why would the Left want to bother?

I guess we sit to see how much this skin is back to the ground of “addressing illegal immigration”, and the appeal to those five cross current Pennsylvania voters that will decide the election.

Lost in the sea a bit are a couple other great items. Transgender surgeries for illegal immigrants in prison. Funny that, I would think that would be in the Republican platform — don’t dare cross the border (jump over that wall) or you will face the consequences! It is also interesting to dissect the “Venezuela on Steroids” — on that spectrum that has transgender surgeries for illegal immigrants in prison — what does Venezuela’s government do that falls short of that? Also worth noting, Trump rhapsodized about leaving to Venezuela to Elon Musk. So… He is fleeing to a Hellhole?

A quick jump over to Matt Taibbi and Walter Kirn. I see that their line on the latest DOJ droppings on Russia TV – paid personalities. Taibbi is somewhat hilarious, as he appears to be the big bugaboo for a Bulwark personality — intimating sinister-wise who might get ensnared and exposed as paid by the Russia government — the man JVL trailed off at the end after a list of the usual suspect — Greenwald and Ritter — and the quick mention indicates he wants him revealed. For his part, I do see the Taibbi comment is a Fox News headline — “The Russia Hoax just Will Not Die” — presenting intriguing questions on just what the “Russia Hoax” be and be not to form “hoax”.

I do say Kirn and Taibbi did a fantastic job dissecting the ridiculous celebration on Tim Walz. On this new news item, where Taibbi is required to laugh off people’s casual dumping of him in any mid-length list, it is interesting to hear them move to one woman in the indictment, and kind of scratch their head at her fringe casual. Yes, it is an anti-19th Amendment advocate. Ponder the nature of Russia social and cultural conservative attempts and how they slide off of American political chatter. Or, simply keep within the terrain of online weirdness.

Out in the mists of our political sideshows, Senator Rob Johnson of Wisconsin has endorsed the conspiracy classic The Creature at Jekyl Island — and the fight against the Fed commences, and Ron Paul has won. Ticket Carlson, prime spot speaker at the RNC convention, veers to a guest wanting to take Winston Churchill down a peg — the true villain of World War 2. And the Lieutenant governor of North Carolina, the Republican gubernatorial candidate Democrats hope can drag Harris to winning the states’ electoral votes — was really big customer of our of state porn.

Actually one weird thing on the last guy, a hitch in the manner Democrats rail on him. It was a somewhat canned and rehearsed spiel from a Democratic official getting to carry forth on MSNBC. “Holocaust denier”, she said, and then “Abortion denier”. I sighed, muttering “knock it off”. Like, take the biggest anti-abortion figure — Constitution Party Presidential nominee Randall Terry. The man does not deny the existence of Abortions. Words appear to cease having any meaning here.

I see a Kennedy yard sign. Something about Declaring Your Independence. The sign is off because I do not think I saw it up there before his “suspended his campaign”. And I guess such a sign does not necessarily work against the Kennedy drop out speech, as the man did state that outside of ten states where you need to vote for Trump to stop Harris you should feel free to vote for me — Kennedy — I still wonder if the lawn sign owner is paying attention with this one. I do not even not what ten states Kennedy refers to — we have things down to seven swing states — eight of you toss in the Omaha district of Nebraska. Maybe he has figures Oregon for the additional states? Maybe California, which Trump believes would go his way of Jesus were counting things because — Jesus is just that in the tank for Trump.

In terms of ad purchases, Trump has actually gotten it all down to two states. Basically. Pennsylvania and Georgia. We can plausibly see little else for the man in the coming months except rallies in those states. Trying to read the tea leaves and sanity of the Trump campaign, I do sense some method to some of the madness. He called out and insulted Brian Kemp as one step to bring him to heel when we need to stop counting.

He has made a first into a few weird niche YouTube figures and podcasters — sub Joe Rogans. A guy by the name of Aidin Ross who — to glance over at his ouver is to fear for the “Generation Zoomer” future. There is. No. Substance. With him. All suppositions that the man is somehow “fascist adjacent” in “alt-right” ideology fall by the wayside because — if he were, he would at least be communicating something. By most accounts Lex Fridman is better — but a sort of free floater soft ball allowing “just let whoever I am interviewing answer what they want to answer” — what little I see is hardly impressive. Here we do get a new blip that was also there in his rambling answers to the head of “Moms for Liberty” — Trump stating that he lost the election of 2020. That is a new one, isn’t it? Throw it into the crapper in consideration of January 6. It don’t.

I see Joe Trippi selling his upcoming social media platform, rejoinder to a post Elon Musk twitter, and one of a bunch frankly. What I would want to know is when The Babylon Bee comes and posts the same material it does on x formerly twitter, are they going to be banished under the same complaint rule they had been in pre Elon Musk twitter? If the answer is yes, I don’t understand this social media fees except just another “Blue Skies” and etc. Facilitating conversation and etc means whatever it means to you, and you are may than free to sell your Overton Window of social media-ing, as I guess is Trump and company.

The presidential campaign of absurdism. continues. Yes, bottom line is always Vote for Harris, “generic Democrat, and it shows”. But things flutter along with some contemplative parcels here and there. I stare at a National Review headline insisting “JD Vance is Good at This After All”, and weigh whether, despite it all, there is some point here. That as much as he becomes a punchline in the modern Democratic Party toadies of late night talk show hosts, and as much as he slides in the backdrop as Trump rather wants bombastic cranks on stage with him — RFK Jr and Tulsi Gabbard — he is sneaking in the margins off in the states at play. We do see a suggestion that he is playing the role Pence did in 2016 in keeping the wayward Republican politician / influencers in line.

Then Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, got Kemp on the line.

Within hours of their phone call last week, Kemp, who along with his wife had been the target of vicious Trump attacks, was on Fox News publicly declaring his support for the GOP ticket. Soon after that, Trump was thanking Kemp for the kind words.

Looking for an excuse, Kemp was, but if Vance provides it Vance provides it.

Comedy here, Vance paints as good a picture as he can on the doughnut shop workers who were just not into him.

Vance said he enjoys engaging in that kind of retail politicking and added that he has made it clear to his staff that such visits must be planned more carefully in the future.

“We don’t want to have these scripted events — I don’t want to go and do three takes of buying Doritos at a Sheetz,” Vance said, referring to a recent Harris stop at a Pennsylvania gas station. “I like to get out there and talk to people, and we want to make sure we’re doing it but definitely make sure that people are at least OK with being on camera, or we’re going to walk in and you’re going to have a person who has, practically, a panic attack because she’s got 15 cameras in her face.”

Nervous nelly, her. And I suppose him — the other guy standing awkwardly supplying him with doughnuts. It does out a hamper on the “speaks for the rust belt working class” — a funny headline for his Drehrer interview, “I would like to see European elites actually listen to their people for a change“. He the man whose such great rapport with such people?

Look. The Democrats once tried to replace Ted Kennedy with Martha Coakley. Unless you saw a way to play the long game and saw you could wait out a couple years of Scott Brown to get to an Elizabeth Warren Senatorship, if you were a liberal Democrat you were voting for Martha Coakley. A woman who did not know who Curt Schilling was. Awkward personalities happen, people disconnecting completely with parts of “The common clay”. The problem here is — aside from the particular weird “common clay elitism” of JD Vance — is that to flip it over on a “if this were a Democrat” — well, we do see what happened to Martha Coakley. Placing us to points of more relevance — the party now upholding a defense of Trump’s politicking at Arlington and campaign altercation with a worker trying to stop the inappropriate and illegal photographing — up to Vance’s performative “Go to Hell” declaration to Kamala Harris — was the party making hay of John Kerry’s “troops end up in Afghanistan” that seemed to suggest they were uneducated dummies — in 2006, so upholding of the dignity of veterans.

I do come back to some things with Vance – – a point of inference in the National Review “Doing good” column. We have a whole part of the electorate who think they have him pinned and down on a reference to couches. He makes a bad joke, as all politicians do, on the stump, which references a couch. The watch a commentator say “he should know by now not to bring up the couch!”. Should he? My advice to Vance is that in his Senate re-election bid, he make sure to allude to couches. Because there are whole parcels of the electorate who are not clued in on this thing which is — in the end just an inside (immature) joke, who will brush up against it and need something explained. Once it is explained, they will respond with a “so — you just made something vulgar up just to be mean?” , and be more inclined to vote for him.

The political posturing in the party roll call is sometimes interesting. The major hubs have political figures needing to posture — governor Hochul gets her face, never mind how underperforming she is against the Democratic vote in New York. States have got their connections with Carter, Clinton, Obama — and I guess Massachusetts has moved on from Kennedy and Texas from Johnson — that state has Ann Richards to sell. Then there are states hovering in the mind as Republican bastions. Florida gets a “we are fighting back”. Idaho has a wisp of Libertarian Party pride of accomplishment in their “fighting back” declaration — a candidate in every legislative district! I do not know what to make of Utah — “the next battleground state” — the other states attempting the mantle are on former ground.

A number of the southern states can get in with dissertations of civil rights history. Important when you look at a barren party. I was curious to see what Tennessee was going to do. The speakers were those two kicked out of the legislature for bullhorn disruption. Cause celbres are what they got there. Wyoming plucked in the “first woman elected governor” — making sure to put in that she was a Democrat, which is not anything Montana can do when they put in “first congress-woman”.

Missouri seemed the most curiously cautious in addressing a political legacy. While other states pronounced proud Progressive political figures, their speaker told of “Moderates” like Eagleton and President Truman. And I guess the reason for this came in when they pumped up a Senate race “we will dump Josh Hawley”. It seems a thankless job at the moment — a d it is either to Hawley’s credit or not that he is acknowledging his Democratic opponent as though the opponent were within earshot in the race. I was curious here to see how Montana and Ohio — with the two incumbent Democratic Senators needing to run ahead and clearly ahead of Harris and not be tied to this race — would address their man. The show of political stature and partisan positioning differs from Brown and Tester. Ohio placed Brown into their spiel. Montana did not mention Tester.

And I guess in Oregon’s delegation loved them.some Modest Mouse. Washington’s attempt to put in NirvanaSoundGardenPearlJamAluceInChains must have gotten vetoed with a “this isn’t a nationally broadcast Seahawks game!”