Archive for the 'The LaRouche Challenge' Category

Latest LaRouche Update

Friday, March 11th, 2005

Lyndon Larouche wrote THREE books called, “Children of Satan”. That is why he is so awesome. Also, he knows sea-shell math.

And with that blog post, I know it’s time to bring up the LaRouchites again.
Las Saturday, or maybe two Saturdays ago.

I walk by Pioneer Square. Some bible thumpers are handing out tracks. I look around at what they have in their hands, and gravitate toward the man with the Jack T Chick tract, and pocket it — wholly ignoring the less rewarding and more apt to be tossed in the trash piece of scribblings they probably don’t know anything about anyway.

I wonder if this fellow has parked himself at his now-usual corner in front of the Washington Mutual building, hawking his pamphlets on “Left-wing Jewish perspective” on the evils of the Bush Administration. (Easily spottable with the “Krugman / Obama 2008” sign.) He isn’t. Instead there are the LaRouchites. They begin to sing, something straight out of a Catholic Mass (I don’t know the proper name of the type of church music) with the words “George Bush is Insane.”

I walk back toward the Bible thumping tract-givers. They’re singing in the same tone! “Jesus Died for Your Sins.”

Gawd that was weird.

I’m not Paying for It…

Saturday, February 12th, 2005

The LaRouchites hand me a pamphlet while I’m walking past. Something like “Why LaRouche is Driving Bush Crazy (Literally)”. I go ahead and take it.

“It’d be nice if you pay for it.” I’m a good number of feet from them by now. I walk back, and place it on their desk. (The thing has a $5 sticker on it, and I’m not paying a penny for the glories of reading the latest LaRouche rag…)

They grumble. I have to wonder, though: Why did they hand it to me in the first place?

LaRouche, anybody?

Thursday, January 13th, 2005

I spent a good amount of time yesterday shifting through the stats page trying to figure out where on this LaRouche Warning Page, which focuses on events described in this Washington Post article.

I have a passing interest in Lyndon LaRouche and his followers, which minor though the quantity may be does mean I have more interest in the man than 99.9% of Americans. It’s an easy enough mass experience in city, blogged with enough frequency that I can keep track of people’s encounters with his followers, and for my purposes back in covering the Democratic Primary, he showed up on more than just his page.

If the emailer of this comment doesn’t want this published here, I’ll delete it, but…

The reason I was interested is that I frequent a martial arts forum online. We’ve recently gained a member who is one of their political flacks, claiming a 5 year association with them. He’s interested in martial arts because, and I’m paraphrasing, “people get irrational when you discuss politics with them”.

Which is all a little discomforting.

Type in “LaRouche” and “martial arts” into google, and this odd nugget pops up:

Operation Mop-up raged from May to September of 1973. LaRouche’s followers in NCLC were ordered to brutally assault rivals from the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) and the Socialist Workers Party (SWP). NCLC thugs used bats, chains, and martial arts weapons in a campaign to establish “hegemony” over the American revolutionary movement. There were many injuries and some persons required hospitalization.

Which… old though that may be… is a little more discomforting.

Battle for ALL the Wiki

Tuesday, October 5th, 2004

Well, it looks like not only is Lyndon LaRouche trying to gain control on the Wiki entry for his name, he’s also trying to gain control over the history and origin of the “great(?)” wikipedia.

Whoever controls the past… or, at least the past in the minds of the converted. A historical re-writing. If you asked any members of the LaRouche Youth Squad, you’d learn that the man nearly received the base 15% of the Oregon primary vote in 2000.

I guess LaRouche likes that website so much that he wants to cliam it as his own. Meanwhile, my bloglines indexing shows that the contentious dispute for the Wiki entry continues.

The Battle for the Wiki

Tuesday, September 28th, 2004

The Wikipedia is an online user-created encylopedia where ideological and factional debates fight for the heart and soul of the content.

Don’t like the content? Dispute it. And the denziens of judgement will push it through a path toward alteration.

Something I posted online became the basis for an entry. And, as you can see, the dispute over whether to keep it online or dump it raged on for a while: the sides were “Yes, barely. Keep.” to “Sheer Idiocy. DUMP!”

I notice, from bloglines, that the two sides over the facts and basic tenor for the entry on Lyndon LaRouche are currently being disputed. Thus, we find revision after revision after revision, and a wikipedia entry in complete limbo.

I can’t say that I’m terribly interested in the content, but I find the process a little fascinating. Just try to give a “neutral point of view” on a political cult figure / truth-teller. And try to convince two sides of the correct “facts” that matter and / or actually exist.

You could pare it down to its most noncontroversial elements. But, the LaRouche Youth Squad would demand nothing short of a glorified portrait. (And if you wish to parallel it to something more understandable, replace “LaRouche” with “Reagan” and the fight to get something named after Reagan in every county in America.) Vice-versa too, I suppose.

Edgar Allen Poe Would Have Stopped 9/11

Saturday, August 28th, 2004

I posted this link to the sidebar back on August 7, pointing to the one sign that I found most incongruous…

Edgar Allen Poe Would Have Stopped 9/11.

Apparently, this is a reference to The Purloined Letter, and apparently, Mr. LaRouche has been sprinking his writing with references to Poe.

That’s where the LaRouchite has picked it up from.

That’s where other LaRouchites have picked it up from.

This classic mystery story shows clearly a little known principle of deception: A secret is best hidden by placing it in plain sight, but by adding calculated misdirection that prevents its proper appreciation by the onlooker! This insight, which I owe to Lyndon LaRouche, explains the lack of awareness of the British Monarchy as the center of the ruling class/conspiracy even in conspiracy research circles! While preoccupied by the search for and analysis of secret documents, always supplied abundantly by the conspiracy itself, the conspiracy researcher overlooks the obvious. Remember that the Royal Family was the first English language publisher of the “Protocols”!

I guess it’s now on the official LaRouche reading list. Alongisde The Occult Technology of Power: The Initiation of the Son of a Finance Capitalist Into the Arcane Secrets of Economic and Political Power–Rends the veils of ideology, propaganda, confusion, and self-delusion to expose the terrifying evil which plunders and tortures the 20th Century by The Transcriber

(In other news of this type: LaRouche has joined forces behind the Kerry camp… I guess that means he’s in the “Anybody But Bush” camp.)

Okay. I challenge you to find any political-oriented blog or website out there not by a LaRouchite that has paid him as much mind as I have.

………….
(UPDATE: more here:

If Americans understood Beethoven, would George Bush be President?
No algebraic formula can prove the necessary existence of five Platonic Solids!
Only classical singing can get Bush and Cheney the fugue out of the White House.
If you can’t double the cube, your degree is worthless.

LaRouche, Right?

Tuesday, August 10th, 2004

This broadstand attack from the halls of a new convert to neo-conservatism from the grips of old paleo-conservativism (I’d like to say that he’s a neo-neo conservative, but I think that term should be reserved for Christopher Hitchens). His beef comes through here:

What’s more, these “unpatriotic conservatives” aren‘t particularly conservative – in a post 9/11 sense – at all.

‘Cause, you see, 9/11 changed the very definition of the word “Conservative”. (Not that I really care… I suppose the strain of conservativism he’s a part of can very easily tap into the root foundation of Post WWII American Conservatism, rabid anti-communism, as the historical model tying him to “Post 9/11 Conservatism”. It’s a pretty logical and coherent string, and thus I don’t know if I understand Pat Buchannan’s claim of a “high-jacking” of his precious “conservatism”.)

But what seems to have caught the ire of the current writers at Lew Rockwell of this editorial from a former Lew Rockwell writer?

The mention of the name “Lyndon LaRouche”.

The paleo-conservative response:

Gancarski’s claim doesn’t really mean anything. If I were going to a foreign policy forum, you’d better believe I’d rather see a panel of speakers from the Old Right and the New Left, than hang out with the New Right and Old Left that the neocons represent. So what? Just because Chomsky and Cockburn understand it is wrong to bomb civilians and falsify intelligence doesn’t mean it isn’t true.

Likewise, even Lyndon LaRouche is right once in a while, about half as often as a broken clock. So what that his outfit is a cult-of-personality pyramid scheme with 1930s corporate socialist ideology? Does that mean I can’t believe that the ban on DDT has been a humanitarian catastrophe — something LaRouche has said — without being considered a LaRouchie? Insanity.

Makes perfect sense to me.

Just to distance themselves from the spector of Lyndon LaRouche, well…

In the end, I read the half-mea culpas from the Establishment Liberal Editorial Pages of the NY Times and Washington Post and New Republic — frequently saying “We just trusted Bush too much, and thought he wouldn’t screw this up”, I stare at the and I wonder whether the modern day equivalents of the Vietnam War Protesters aren’t just electing the modern day equivalent of LBJ…

LaRouche’s Presence at the DNC Convention

Tuesday, July 27th, 2004

What good is this blog if I don’t keep the reader abreast of the latest movements of the Lyndon LaRouche campaign?

What is it that they are singing?

Entertainment was provided by a group of Lyndon LaRouche supporters. About 30 of them arrived with posters sporting messages like “Will Cheney postpone the election?” and “Future generations will want an open convention.” The LaRouchies then started to sing songs. From a distance, the songs sounded like Russian choral work, actually quite pretty. But as the protesters approached us, the tone of the singing started to remind me of Maoist martial parade songs. “La-Rouche, La-Rouche,” they sang, practically stealing the “Marchons, Marchons!” refrain from La Marseillaise.

AND THEN THERE’s:

Seemingly immortal presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche’s youth followers are upset that they’re having to stay in youth hostels. At a Democratic National Convention Committee briefing Sunday, a young man stood up during the Q&A session and asked Democratic Party Chairman Terry McAuliffe why the DNC had canceled contracts for the LaRouche Youth Movement’s hotel rooms.

McAuliffe said he had no idea what the guy was talking about, but the young man pressed further, accusing the DNC of colluding with the Homeland Security Department to squelch criticism of Vice President Cheney, who, according to the Youth Movement’s press release, is one of “LaRouche’s leading enemies.” (The release goes on to note that “McAuliffe is aware, of course, that, if Cheney were to be removed before or during the Democratic convention, all the credit would go to LaRouche.”)

After listening long enough to the tirade, McAuliffe finally said, “I think Dick Cheney was behind the cancellation of your rooms.”

Hm. Well, here’s the LaRouche side of the story. I’m still wrapping my mind around the idea of if Cheney were to be removed before or during the Democratic convention, all the credit would go to LaRouche.

It looks like LaRouche is pleased with Terry McAuliffe’s statement:

And, today, in what I think was a very significant occurrence—and I think that it’s actually good, that Terry McAuliffe had finally adopted a fighting stance, and I applaud him for doing one good thing: But, today, in a public statement, Terry McAuliffe said, that he was not responsible—not responsible—for locking the LaRouche Youth Movement out, that he was not responsible for the cancellation of the contracts. And when he was pushed on it, he said, “I think Dick Cheney did it.” And therefore, we will, in fact, issue a press release—the press release is being written right now—saying that the Democratic National Committee Chairman has accused Vice President Dick Cheney of cancelling the contract!

It’s tough being a member of the LaRouche Youth Squad. Constantly picked on by the man. Having to stay in Hostels. And even in the event that LaRouche gains a few delegates during the primary, the results are voided anyways.

Okay. Enough of LaRouche. Later I’ll blog out the convention schedule for Michael Dukakis.

Scott’s Comment on LaRouche

Monday, July 12th, 2004

From here, a Scott sayseth this:

So to all of you out there who are active, and who know who Larouche is, I would like to say we have a problem. The problem is that Lyndon, that dirty old man, is up to his dirty old tricks again, and I don’t mean spinning ever wilder conspiracy theories, or even stealing a few bucks from the local widow (though he’s doing that too)–no I mean brainwashing kids. I fell for their rhetoric for a short time, and since I left have been writing about what I saw there. The following is part of a letter I wrote to a professor who asked me what her students could expect if they joined the “movement” (read:cult).

Do not focus on the “politics” of his organization. For all intents and purposes the political side of the organization is just a sham–it really is more of a religion than a political movement anyway–the mantra really is give me your life and I’ll give you salvation.
Your students will be having the same methods of coersion used on them at the table that is used on members in closed rooms, on your campus on their lunch breaks, Larouchies will be out there preaching:”The end is near, join the Leader and be like him, and that will save the world.” And they will tell them to drop out of college to join, they will literally be brought into group meetings where every person in the room is pressuring them to drop out. You know when they have classes? Usually what happens is maybe one or two people will be from a local campus, usually someone they met that day. That person will walk into a room of twenty or so people, not really knowing that almost everyone there is already a member. As soon as someone comes to more than 1 or 2 meetings, they are psychologically profiled by the Regional leader and then the leader will talk to everyone about that person.
Example:”Frank has mommy issues, everybody needs to tell him he needs to stop sucking off his mother’s milk.” So then as Frank hangs around more and he is brought in for conferences and meetings, everyone is nice to him, but they in their own way, will make comments about Frank being a Mama’s boy. This may be true, or it may be that Frank just has a very close relationship with his mom, he’s 18, and still just a kid. So this “campaign” makes Frank begin to question himself, it undermines his confidence in his beliefs and values, while all around him there are people constantly restating the normal line of Larouche politics; nothing is what it seems, the world is ending, drop out of school, join me..yada yada. And there may be ten of these directives given by the regional leader. All designed to make the person, basically, have a nervous breakdown in a controlled environment. They will attack his hobbies, his friends, his values, his family,and his personality traits in these secret “campaigns”, and Fred will think that people he has hardly talked to think he’s a mama’s boy(or whaever they’re attacking that week)–his insecurity will soar.
Then what happens if that person decides to drop out and join full time is the real work on their mind begins. The same type of thing goes on, but then added in is a host of other tactics–the working for 12-14 hours a day will soften him up quite a bit, and the leader will keep a very close eye in the very early stages. After a few days of work the leader might lean in and say “hey you guys should all do something tonight, take Frank over to so-n-so’s house and read poetry. Frank will be up until 3 am, get up a few hours later and go back to arguing at a card table shrine for Larouche with everyone who walks by, all this time reinforcing what he has “learned” by taking the position for 12 hours a day. Frank will be plied with Larouche books to read from every side. Then something will come up that Frank has a problem with. He’s organizing at at a table one day and his partner, someone who’s been around for years, breaks someone down in the street who begins crying. Fred thinks it was cruel, so he goes to talk to the regional leader(the boss at each office). Now, all this time the leader has played “good cop”.
“Umm, Steve?” says Frank, “I saw Alex make someone cry at the college today, he was yelling at this kid about how he can’t understand Larouche because he’s a homosexual, and when the kid said no, Alex just kept poking him with it until the kid broke down and sarted crying.”
From out of nowhere the bad cop shows up.
“So do you need to go suck off your mother’s tit some more is that what this is about Frank? Alex has been off his momma’s tit for ten years now and he’s mastered Riemann’s geometry, have you?”
“Uhhh..no.”
“So the mama’s boy who’s never done anything in his life is going to come here and say ‘Alex made some homosexual kid cry and I want my mommy’…are you homosexual Frank? Is that it? Is that why you haven’t been able to raise any money out there? You’re too busy thinking about Mommy’s tits and Daddy’s dick to be a potent organizer?”
And this may go on for a half an hour. Mind you that Frank has just moved in to an apartment with 4 other Larouchies, he has just dropped out of school, and probably alienated most of his friends, and his parents, who all argued against him joining the Larouche Youth Cult. The leader will use every bit of personal information he has gathered about Frank in order for him to have a real breakdown. Frank, who now has nowhere to go, but has made a few “friends’ in the LYC, finally gives in. He sees that Alex was right for breaking down that kid, because that kid is evil, and Frank realizes that he is too. Frank realizes that he hasn’t worked hard enough for humanity to criticize Alex, and so he confesses to Steve.
“I’m sorry Steve, you’re right, I’ve been dependant on my mom forever, and she was turning me in to some crazy brainwashed consumer, I mean geez, she was sending me to college to learn about computers, like Larouche says that’s not even real. I guess she’s just like every other boomer.”
After he does so he feels a little better and stops crying, and his pulse slows down.
Steve says,”Well good. What I think you need to do is read Lyn’s book “The Reason Why Everyone in the World is Insane But Me”, and you should get Alex to help you on some geometry. Are you still into painting?”
“Yes, Sir, I like to paint at night sometimes still, it eases my mind.”
“You should focus on something else…try reading Lyn’ s book “They’re All Out to Get Me, I Swear”. Ok well, good talking to you.”

And Frank walks out feeling a little closer to Steve, and Steve has shown Frank that he is able to instill terror in him at any moment. This makes Frank unconsciously more pliant, he won’t raise another questoin like that for a month. But he will raise a question. And now Frank hasn’t had a good night’s sleep in 5 weeks, and he is becoming slightly malnourished as his pay has dropped from 300 a week to 100 a week because of a “mass leaflet mobilization” [and Lyn is going to travel Europe for a while, and he needs the nice table at the restauraunt]. The pay will continue to decrease.
Frank tells Steve he has to ask him about something again. Steve tells him to come to his office at 5. At 5 Frank walks in, and a Security Squad member is in the office also, the S.S. member stands in front of the door, and this time the yelling is more severe, and the psychological profile, having been honed, allows the leader to play Frank like a piano. Frank is a blubbering mess in twenty minutes. Frank’s brain which has initiated fight or flight, tells him to get up and walk out. He tries to do so, and the SS member begins working on him (verbally)while blocking the door, the two of them work on him until he sits back down, and takes his medicine.
It’s called “Beyond Psychoanalysis” a method devised by Lyndon Larouche in the late seventies in a series of papers (and subsequently taught to members after they are in for 6 months or so and have gone through the process–at least Scientologists are upfront about their psychobabble!)
Recently a young man, Jeremiah Duggan, committed suicide while at a Larouche conference, the clues to this case are found in the words of Lyndon himself:
From Beyond Pschoanalysis:
“The program [Beyond Psyche]is safely undertaken in the NCLC, where it could not be so with laymen, since the LCer has a self-conscious identity in the world, which the ordinary laymen lacks. Under some unfortunate circumstances, this experience, absolutely the most terrifying the human mind can know, can prompt suicides, or provide the impetus for psychotic collapse”

Well I guess NCLC (National Committe of Labor Caucuses) needs to be updated to ICLC (International CLC)–Jeremiah safely undertook his Beyond Psychoanalysis in Germany.
I ask you all not to treat LHL as just a kook, he’s a dangerous kook, and our society, as free as it should remain has given this monster far too much rope (or maybe not enough).

The LaRouche Doctrine versus the Bush Doctrine

Friday, May 28th, 2004

I looked over an old Lyndon LaRouche flyer. I noticed something. If I had it with me, I would transcribe it here… since I don’t, I’ll just have to paraphrase.

The third, and most important part of the LaRouche Doctrine, is that it must be MUST BE named “The LaRouche Doctrine”. Because only LaRouche has the credibility to save the world.

Actually, come to think of it, this may not be too far from the insinuations that we get from the latest “alert of terror threat not applied to color”…

“al-Qaida had such success disrupting the Madrid election, they want to try it here, too.” sayeth John Ashcroft. Which flies us over to “I can tell you one thing. We won’t be like Spain.”

… Which is as much a threat as it is a prediction …

And bounce us over th CNN Grade A reporting:
there is some speculation that al Qaeda believes it has a better chance of winning in Iraq if John Kerry is in the White House

… which, of course, suggests that if al Qaeda (or one of its newly decentralized offshoots) does not strike the USA… you can count that as an October Surprise working to install their chosen American politico in office…

Vote Bush / LaRouche for President.

……………………….

Note: to add Kerry into the equation: Recall this bizarre news item.:

“Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilisation.”

“Because of this we desire you (Bush) to be elected.”

But then I’d have to move even further back into forgotten news cycles to find that “Discovered Letter” saying “Bush is suffocating us!” or some such, heartening to the Bushistas.

My head spins.