Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

DNC to Plagarize RNC’s 2000 Platform

Saturday, May 15th, 2004

There are two ways I can look at this.

#1: As a partisan hack: the Democratic Party ought just to plargarize the most ironic elements. (And keep the parts from the Democratic Platform that look great in retrospect.)

#2: As a cynic: they will. John Kerry will win in 2004. And in 2008, the Republican backlash to Kerry Interventionalist foreign policy, Intelligence abuses, and civil liberty abuses will have the RNC re-creating the same damned platform yet again. So… the 2000 RNC platform, the 2004 DNC platform, and the 2008 RNC platform will look identical, as we all run around in circles…

William Kristol Shrugs

Friday, May 14th, 2004

William Kristol– leading neo-conservative hawk, spokesperson for the Project for a New American Century, and editor of the Weekly Standard– was on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart last night.

A fascinating interview. Kristol looked dazed, off-kilter, and defeated.

Two weeks of unimaginable bad news undercutting your stance will do that to you.

At one point, this was nearly the exchange:
Stewart: But… how can we re-elect a man who’s driven us into a ditch, you know?
Kristol: Well, he’s driven us into a ditch… well, maybe not a ditch but…
(audience applause)

You will notice, too, that just a few days ago George Will used the word “Empire”, in his forlorn column of disappointment:

David Byrne, from his latest album “Grown Backward”… the song is “Empire”:

In national elections
In songs raised on high
With stirring emotions
As tears fill your eyes

In democratic fever
For national defense
I am a mountain [3x]
Like birds upon a fence [2x]

Young artists and writers
Please heed the call
What’s good for business
Is good for us all

And as it is in Nature
So it is in life
The weak among us with perish [3x]
The strong alone will survive [2x]

Voices like thunder
Decisions like steel
The past and the future
They belong to us all

From every mountain
The water and the air
The world that we’ve created [3x]
By working hand in hand [2x]

Dissect the Humour

Thursday, May 13th, 2004

Question:
At what point does a truly horrific event enter the popular culture landscape in such a way that it becomes socially acceptable to laugh at it?

The JFK assassination has long since become an easy target for merriment.

I think we’ve passed the point where it’s acceptable to mock school shootings… as long as you’re not actually attending K-12.

Some people have a problem with singing chirpy songs while being bled to death in the same manner as a Messiah figure.

9/11 is probably still a bit too… edgy.

Hitler is tossed around casually enough that Howard Dean and George W. Bush have both been compared to him.

On the market right now is a bizarre deriviation of an certain serial killer that you eat as part of an unbalanced diet.

A few hundred years from now, we’ll be choking on Osamiques. Why Osamiques? Because the cutsey “o” endings to mockowords will fall out of fashion… (Does that mean that the French will enjoy some cultural expansion? Nay… I’m thinking more along the lines of the Quebecers…)

Anyway…

Let the Eagle Soar

Wednesday, May 12th, 2004

“Let the eagle soar,

Like she’s never soared before.

From rocky coast to golden shore,

Let the mighty eagle soar.

Soar with healing in her wings,

As the land beneath her sings:

‘Only god, no other kings.’

This country’s far too young to die.

We’ve still got a lot of climbing to do,

And we can make it if we try.

Built by toils and struggles

God has led us through.”

http://www.cnn.com/video/us/2002/02/25/ashcroft.sings.wbtv.med.html

Laura Bush’s buzz-word: “Sad”

Tuesday, May 11th, 2004

Cut and pasted from the forum over here. No, I don’t believe in aliens…

WASHINGTON (AFP) – US First Lady Laura Bush says she was deeply saddened by the scandal over US troops’ abuse of Iraq prisoners. Saying the abuses made her “sad, really sad,” the first lady told ABC television: “To be perfectly frank I can’t bear to look at the ones that have been in the newspaper.

“It is really, really sad, I mean, it is sad. I think we — we agonize as each of those pictures come out and as we see them. It is a picture we don’t want the rest of the world to have of us,” she said, adding that she was concerned about US troops safety noting the scandal “makes our troops more vulnerable.”

She said President George W. Bush had been “very anguished” by the affair which has done serious damage to the US image abroad, and especially in the Arab world.

“Those photographs don’t represent America. They don’t represent our troops. And they don’t represent the way people in the United States of America think or act, Laura Bush added. “It is not a fair picture of the United States military”

“When we look at what we have done in Iraq where — you know they have water, they have electricity, schools have been refurbished. I’m working on building a children’s hospital in Iraq,” the US first lady said.

“In Afghanistan, where little girls are in school for the first time in their lives because they have been liberated from the Taliban, I think all of those are the really good things that the United States military and the actions of the United States government have taken. We need to remind the world of that as well,” Laura Bush said.

She insisted however, that there is a silver lining.

“This is the really good news about the United States of America, though. That is the pictures came to light. People will be prosecuted. Unlike under Saddam Hussein , where there were torture rooms and know one knew about them and didn’t come to light,” the US first lady said.
……………..

Remarks excerpted by Mrs. Laura Bush At the National Press Club – November 8, 2001

“The United States is now a “sadder and less innocent” nation …”

“We have felt sadness and anger and fear, yet out of those emotions have risen courage and hope.

I’ll say “I’m sad,” and they’ll nod and say they are sad too.

“For over an hour I believed that it had been hit, and for the people there — people we worship with almost every weekend.”
……………………..

Conciously getting away from the image of Hillary Clinton… Laura Bush, dynamic librarian / house-wife.

Maybe I’m unfairly riffing off of pure tragedies here, but…

Stilted? Perhaps

Tuesday, May 11th, 2004

The conversation was, plainly , not going where Roosevelt had intended. “Your press incited–violence and class hatred. Do you deny that?”
“I don’t deny or affirm anything. Do you understand that? I’m here at your request, Roosevelt. Personally, I have no wish to see you at all, anywhere, ever–unless, of course, we share the same quarters in h*ll. so I must warn you, no one says ‘Do you deny’ to me, in my country.”
“Your country, is it?” Roosevelt’s falsetto had deepened to a mellifluous alto. “when did you buy it?”
“In 1898, when I made war with Spain, and won it. All my doing, that was, and none of yours. Ever since then, the country’s gone pretty much the way I’ve wanted it to go, and you’ve gone right along, too, because you had to.”
“You exaggerate you importance, Mr. Hearst.”
“You understand nothing, Mr. Roosevelt.”
“I understand this much. You, the owner–no, no, the father of the country, couldn’t get the Democrats to nominate you for president even in a year when there was no chance of their winning. How do you explain that?”
Hearst’s pale close-set eyes were now directed straight at Roosevelt; the effect was cyclopean, intimidating. “First, I’d say it makes no difference at all who sits in that chair of yours. The country is run by the trusts, as you like to remind us. They can’t buy me. I’m rich. So I’m free to do as I please, and you’re not. In general, I go along with them, simply to keep the people docile, for now. I do that through the press. Now you’re just an office-holder. Soon you’ll move out of here, and that’s the end of you. But I go on and on, describing the world we live in, which then becomes what I say it is. Long after no one knows the difference between you and Chester A. Arthur, I’ll still be here.” Hearst’s smile was frosty. “But if they do remember who you are, it’ll be because I’ve decided to remind them, by telling them, maybe, how I made you up in the first place, in Cuba.”
“You have raised, Mr. Hearst, the Fourth Estate to a level quite unheard of in any time…”

— Gore Vidal. Empire. Nay, I haven’t read it. Ought I to?

Today’s William Hearst, aka Citizen Kane. Do you have to ask?

Schadenfreude

Tuesday, May 11th, 2004

It’s an imperfect measure, since the use of the word “puts
you right on the border of Pretentia”
— and amongst the enemies of those there “Conservative / Right” are the “fancy pants liberal elites”, “fancy pants liberal elites” I suppose being more prone to use the word “schadenfreude” than the “plain-pants conservative populists”.

Still… it does, in a limited way, guage a zeitgist… any drip into the sewer represents a greater flood elsewhere. A handful of blogs have used the word “schadenfreude” as an attack on “liberal-left” reaction to the prison abuses in Iraq. (A useful protective stance and a wistful redirection, I suppose… today, fed into by remarks from Senator James Inhofe.)

See: here and here.

There is a reason I have that term tracked. And this is it.

……………………
Note: There are 3 blogs linked. Only one is from the “conservative / right”. One is mocking the “psuedo – liberal / left” from a position of Marxist purity — and I’m almost prone to — more out of half-hearted hope than anything else — call it “satiric in nature”. The “long story short pier” entry has nothing to do with the topic at hand, and was included in a moment of haste.

Vote Satan

Monday, May 10th, 2004

“VOTE SATAN FOR PRESIDENT: why settle for the lesser of two evils?!”
— Clyde Lewis

Though, a google search reveals that others have said it before. Say, for example, A bumper sticker in 1997.

Three “No” Votes

Monday, May 10th, 2004

John Negroponte, confirmed as ambassador to Iraq.

No votes?
Tom Harkin of Iowa, Mark Dayton of Minnesota, and Richard Durbin of Illinois.

There are occasional votes, when the vote-tally is overwhelmingly lop-sided, when one is able to ascertain some wheat from the chattle. Representative Ron Paul deserves some kudos for voting “no” on every superfluous piece of legislation that doesn’t actually do anything (and kudos for many, many other votes, actually). Russ Feingold deserves kudos for being the lone Senator voting against the Patriot Act. And Harkin, Dayton, and Durbin deserve kudos for voting “no” to John Negroponte.

(Note: this was posted roughly con-currently with everythingisrunined.

Uh… huh.

Friday, May 7th, 2004

Courtesy everything is ruined, I have been delivered to some commentary from first-rate psychiaitrist Charles Krauthammer

We think of torture as the kind that Saddam practiced: pain, mutilation, maiming and ultimately death. We think of it as having a political purpose: intimidation, political control, confession and subjugation. What happened at Abu Ghraib was entirely different. It was gratuitous sexual abuse, perversion for its own sake.

That is what made it, ironically and disastrously, a pictorial representation of precisely the lunatic fantasies that the jihadists believe — and that cynical secular regimes such as Egypt and the Palestinian Authority peddle to pacify their populations and deflect their anger and frustrations. Through this lens, Abu Ghraib is an ‘ told you so’ played out in an Arab capital, recorded on film.

Jihadists, like all totalitarians, oppose many kinds of freedom. What makes them unique, however, is their particular hatred of freedom for women. They prize their traditional prerogatives that allow them to keep their women barefoot in the kitchen as illiterate economic and sexual slaves. For the men, that is a pretty good deal — one threatened by the West with its twin doctrines of equality and sexual liberation.

You know… this general attitude* regarding this particular incident is leaving me horrified for the future of our nation.

Maybe I should read this book.… but it’d only depress me further.


* See also Joseph Lieberman.