Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

Trent Lott = Pogo

Wednesday, November 9th, 2005

“We can not remain silent. We have met the enemy, and it is us.”

Thus saideth Trent Lott, letting the air out of an investigation Dennis Hastert and Bill Frist were threatening to have over who leaked the information to the Washington Post that — um — we have Gulags in former Soviet nations… for the information was passed around in a Republican Conference meeting (from Vice President Dick Cheney’s mouth) just before the Washington Post article was published.


The questions we have before us… what is the name of that Republican Senator (or Republican staff member) has a conscience to leak that to the press? And just how much does Trent Lott want to screw with the Republican Leadership that threw him overboard when he embraced Strom Thurmond’s 1948 presidential campaign? And what is the implication of changing the word “he” to the word “it”?

Election 2005 round-up

Wednesday, November 9th, 2005

The trouble with these special elections is that they combine precincts so your polling place can wind up being quite some distance. Mine was and for some reason, I decided to walk to it. Went right through the ballot in about twelve seconds and I felt like I wanted to ask the workers there, “Hey, you got anything else I can vote on? I came a long way to get here.”Mark Evanier.

Even more hoo-hawing than the mid-term elections (and keep in mind that even the presidential year elections are shrugged off by half of us Americans), we have the off year elections. You will remember that in 1993, we found out that the right kind of Republican could take New York City, this is one who’s married three times, once to his cousin, has roomed with gay roommates… 2001, we found out that they can elect another kind of Republican: a billionaire who can ride the coattails of that other type of Republican who’d turned his reputation over overnight on September 11. 2005, we find out that he (one who is in reality a Democrat with an “R” after his name) can basically buy his way to a 20 point victory over a Democrat with a “D” after his name. But this is neither a victory for good or for bad, so let’s move on.

Some things that went right in the Election 2005 Scheme:

#1: The Dover, Pennsylvania School Board Elections. All eight members up for re-election to the Pennsylvania school board that had been sued for introducing the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in biology class were swept out of office yesterday by a slate of challengers who campaigned against the intelligent design policy.

#2: Chris Coleman Defeats Randy Kelly 69 percent to 31 percent. A minority (or pluralistically minority opinion, if the case may be:) Dave Hueffmeier left the Rice Street Library polling place and said he was going to vote for Coleman but changed his mind and voted for Kelly because he got tired of everyone dwelling on Kelly’s Bush endorsement. “I’m so annoyed by this whole idea that you should not vote for Kelly because he supported Bush,” Hueffmeier said. “That has nothing to do with the running of St. Paul. It’s irrelevant and ludicrous.” I’m pretty sure that if you go to the “Democrats for Bush” page circa 2004, you’d find Randy Kelly #3 in the list of “Democrats for Bush” behind Zell Miller and Ed Koch.

#3: Tim Kaine over Jerry Kilgore for Virginia Governor: Bush put his reputation on the line by campaigning at the eleventh hour for Republican Jerry Kilgore – in a reliably “red” state that Bush won last November by eight percentage points – yet Kilgore was hammered by the triumphant Democrat, Tim Kaine. On Wednesday, some Republicans will undoubtedly argue that their Virginia defeat should not be viewed as a barometer of the national mood or as a referendum on the president and the GOP. But the Bush administration raised the political stakes and invited that perception by the evidence of its own actions. The White House sent the Republican National Committee into Virginia to build and run the voter-turnout machine. Bush himself appeared with Kilgore on Monday night in an effort to energize the party’s conservative base. In recent days, GOP officials had privately voiced concerns that a decisive defeat in Virginia could trigger a “meltdown” in the national party, and Kilgore aides complained to the conservative National Review that Bush had become a drag on their candidate.

You will remember the year 2002, when Bush’s last minute stumping moved Norm Coleman and the other close Republican candidates over the top. Times change. I must note, however — and this is a “for what it’s worth” — Virginia was the closest Southern state for the Democratic Kerry in 2004 (short of Florida)… more so than Arkansas… it is the one southern state that seems to be trending slightly in the Democrats’ direction (and thus, watch to see if outgoing Virginia governor Mark Warner wins the Democratic nomination in 2008).

There are some things worth groaing about with the election of Tim Kaine. Democrat Tim Kaine wrapped himself up tightly around the bible, and his Catholic faith. Though, to be fair, he used it to defend himself against attacks on his anti-Death Penalty stance (which he’s politcally moved himself to a position of “I personally stand against, but it’s the law so…) — which means its not a “Republican-Lite” situation or, worse, the creation of a “Sister Souljah”/ Triangulation moment (to embarrass those dastardly “Secularists”)… but that just means the warning signs in the air of a “Faith”-based left to compete against the Religious Right.

#4: Arnold Schwarzenegger’s package of measures to revive California appear to have suffered a knock-out blow in a bruising night at the polls for the Republican Party across the US.

With 90 per cent of votes counted at 1.25am (0930 GMT) today, all four ballot initiatives endorsed by the muscle-bound Republican “governator” had failed, two of them by wide margins.

I’m not going to say “Terminate Schwarzeneggar”, but…

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger showed up to his Brentwood neighborhood polling station today to cast his ballot in the special election — and was told he had already voted. […]

The poll worker told the governor’s staff he would have to use a “provisional” ballot that allows elections workers to verify if two votes were made by the same person. McCormack said the poll worker did the correct thing.

The governor, however, was allowed to use a regular ballot.

Har de Har Har.

#5: Maine Question #1 victorious. The vote reversed a trend that dates back to 1998, when voters narrowly rejected a gay rights law in a special election. Voters again opposed a gay rights law in a follow-up referendum two years later. […] The reason this is a good thing is because it annoys this guy: “I genuinely feel that we should not give anyone special rights,” said George Jablon of Augusta, who is retired. “We built the greatest nation in the world on biblical principles, and now we’ve abandoned that.”

#6: This is good news. Or maybe it’s not. I don’t know.

I’ve run out of steam. I see that an anti-tax measure went down to defeat in Washington, a defeat that paves the way to road pavement. That’s a good thing. Washington’s anti-smoking ban’s passage bugs me, and I can explain my mixed feelings on anti-smoking bans later, particularly if pressed. The “Reform Ohio” measures failed — perhaps it’s those dastardly Diebold Voting Machines? Jon Corzine defeated Doug Forrester in the New Jersey Senate race, which I guess moves us to one of the big 2006 Senate races (is this Jon Corzine’s selected replacement versus the popular New Jersey Republican?) And that “Creationist / Intelligent Designer School Board Ousted” story is meted out over news coming out of Kansas. (For that matter, the Maine gain for gays and lesbians is meted out with a defeat over gay marriage in Texas.)

Okay. Thus end it and, for the Voting Public, 2006 is right around the corner. There, we will get a clearer view of what direction the United States will take for the immediate future.

………………..
UPDATE, and a couple addenums: #1: On second thought, the Texas Marriage Ban was a good thing… its language bans marriage, which — heck — let’s go ahead and throw it out of the state. #2: The Republican spin on Kaine’s victory in Virginia is that it shows how out of touch the Democratic Party is — Kaine ran as a Conservative — late term abortion, gun control, gay marriage. Interestingly enough, the party that ran promotions proclaiming Kaine’s “Conservative Credentials” was The Republican Party, as a dirty trick to suppress the Democratic vote.

old Soviet parables

Tuesday, November 8th, 2005

(I think I heard this one on Thom Hartmann, but I can’t be entirely sure.) After recently gaining power to his premiership, Kruschev is giving a speech before the politboro, promising the end of Stalin’s policies of mass-murder and promising a new Openness to Soviet affairs.

A lone voice yells out from the politboro “Yeah, but where were you when Stalin was in power?”

Kruschev gets angry, and demands “Who said that?” Silence. “Who Said that?” Silence. Pounding on the podium, “Who said that?!” Silence.

Kruschev then smiles. “You are right where I was when Stalin gained power.”
………………………….

II. Oddly, it was `parables’ of this sort which were lurking in my mind way back in 1980 when I predicted the fall of the then USSR…

Another one: Stalin, Kruschev, and Brehznev(sp?) are on a train, discussing the important matters of state that await them at their destination. The train comes to a stop.

“I will remedy this,” says Stalin, when nothing happens to get the train moving again, and proceeds to have the engineers shot.

But the train remains still.

“I will remedy this,” sas Kruschev, and has the engineers `rehabilitated’ (quite the accomplishment, if they were dead – replacement crew?).

But the train still doesn’t go anywhere.

At this point Brehznev reaches over and pulls the curtain down over the window, blocking the view. “Well, we can at least pretend we are moving,” he says as he leans back.

Their actions denoted each leaders style, yet none of their actions was enough to `get the train moving again’. To accomplish that goal would have required change of a sort they could not tolorate – yet very desperately needed all the same. Governments that last any length of time are ultimately rooted in social contracts between rulers and ruled. By the end of the 70’s the leadership of the then USSR was in a position of not being able to full fil its social contract obligations to its subjects without massive change of a sort they could not accept. Modernize (effective end of communist rule), go to very hardcore stalinism, or collapse into anarchy – those were the options I put forth in that long ago high school paper.

A heroine of the time…a not young woman by the name of Tatanya Zaslavanska (sp?). When the USSR’s problems started getting really acute in the early 1980’s, the Poliburo called her in to one of their meetings. She described, in great detail, a catastrophe. All but one of them mere gawked at her, not quite grasping what she was saying – they thought she was *predicting* a crisis they could possibly *avoid* were they clever enough or determined enough. Only one member of the Politburo figured out that she was not predicting a future event, but rather describing the (then) *present* situation. That fellow was Gorbachev.

Worth noting – one of the other Politburo members present at that meeting was a very, very nasty fellow named Romanov. From the few bits that were dropped about him after the fact, had he come out on top…well, very possibly most of the major cities of the northern hemisphere would now be glowing radioactive craters.

And one final soviet parable…

`We pretend to work and they pretend to pay us.’
……………………….

The USSR was already in a state of dire crisis before Reagan became president and reignited the arms race (Detente was the deal before then), let alone before Chernoble happened. It had actually been in extremely serious trouble since the early 70’s. However, it was in the interests of the leadership on both sides to conceal this: the leaders of the USSR could not do so without tossing themselves out of power, and far to many political and economic careers were being made in the US by the Cold War to give the issue serious consideration.

……………..

Thus enter The Committee on Present Danger, re-ignited during the Carter administration to defeat “Vietnam Syndrome”, and with Team B ( information here) supplying the “evidence” of the renewed Soviet threats:

In 1974, Albert Wohlstetter, a professor at the University of Chicago, accused the CIA of systematically underestimating Soviet missile deployment, and conservatives began a concerted attack on the CIA’s annual assessment of the Soviet threat. This assessment—the NIE—was an obvious target.

The vehicle chosen from within the administration to challenge the CIA was the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB). By 1975, PFIAB was a home for such conservatives as William Casey, John Connally, John Foster, Clare Booth Luce, and Edward Teller, but would also later include liberal hawks, such as former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski.

In 1976, when George H. W. Bush became the new director of central intelligence, the PFIAB lost no time in renewing its request for competitive threat assessments. Although his top analysts argued against such an undertaking, Bush checked with the White House, obtained an O.K., and by May 26 signed off on the experiment with the notation, “Let her fly!! O.K. G.B.”

I once said on this board (perhaps even on this blog I’m cutting and pasting this exchange to) that George Bush Sr had a marathon 14 year presidency. This is what I was referring to, tossed in the middle of the Carter administration when Carter relented to a massive military buildup… (from there, we move on to the “October Surprise” and then onto the 12 years of Reagan / Bush.)

rock and roll part two

Tuesday, November 8th, 2005

There was this Phil Hendrie piece about a husband who was angry at his wife, because as his wife kept disrupting his Superbowl viewing (eagerly jotting down the stats of the Ravens blow-out of the Giants) by cavorting around with her friend in lingerie. With that in mind, I forgot about the second NFL sex scandal of the year (the first being Minnesota Viking’s Team Orgy Cruise):

Two Carolina Panthers cheerleaders were arrested at a bar where witnesses told police the women were having sex in a restroom stall, angering patrons waiting in line. […]

Thomas was charged with battery for allegedly striking a bar patron when she was leaving the restroom, then landed in even more trouble after police said she gave officers a driver’s license belonging to another Panthers cheerleader who was not in Tampa.

Thomas, who made the trip to Florida for Sunday’s game between the Panthers and Buccaneers, was released from jail on $500 bail before police learned she was not the person she claimed to be.

In other cheerleading news, apparently the standard homoerotic undercurrent common with jocks and jockery flowed through the locker room of the Cleveland Browns this week:

“We showed really good resolve. It started on the plane home (from Houston). Then we pumped each other up in practice. We had our skirts on. We were cheerleaders. That doesn’t happen everywhere. That’s why this is such an enjoyable struggle, if there is such a thing.” — Trent Dilfer.

This brings to mind bad Pep Rally bits I saw in high school, before I had the means (ie: Driver’s License) to escape those things.

Dynasties

Monday, November 7th, 2005

You can be forgiven if you didn’t notice, but the British Royal Family recently took a tour of the United States, to considerably less fanfare than Princess Diana’s tour(s)… a fact that sparked the British to ponder American aversion to royalty:

America’s history as a republic makes it harder for them than we suppose to embrace our Royal Family with warmth, or even to feel much interest in them. Diana, Princess of Wales won hearts in America partly because she was, as her critics here complained, the antithesis of what most people expected a royal to be like.

Naturally therefore, Camilla, who has taken pains to be a worthy consort to the heir to the throne, arouses less excitement. Much of our own press, taking its cue from the republican Rupert Murdoch, tend to report this visit either as boring to America or a burden on our taxpayers.

That is not fair. This is the most testing royal tour of America since King George VI and Queen Elizabeth responded to President Roosevelt’s invitation in 1939, on the eve of war in Europe. I was fond of Diana, because we shared the dream of ridding the world of anti-personnel mines, so cruel to poor people living off the land; but I admire Camilla for her courage. This is a brave trip that she and Charles are undertaking. We should forget our prejudices and wish them well…

The truth is a bit more complicated. Americans hate royalty, but are we’re thrust with it nonetheless. Occasionally we’re given an opportunity to reject it, and when we do it’s rather liberating and can result in some curious results.

If I were to compile a list of the names of esteemed politicians — Governors, Representatives, Senators, Presidents — who are the offspring of former governors, representatives, senators, presidents… it would be a long list indeed. In 2000, the American people were tossed with George BUSH (son of… um… GEORGE BUSH, who was son of Prescott Bush, who was son of…) and Al Gore (son of… um… AL GORE!!!)… and that was part of why the campaign and election was so uninspired and insipid.

But then again… one of the reasons that Jesse Ventura won the Minnesota governorship (I suspect)… the Democratic primary had been a campaign that had been dubbed the “My Three Sons” campaign: Hubert H. “Skip” Humphrey III (son of … um… HUBERT freaking HUMPHREY!!!), Ted Mondale (at least Walter didn’t name him after himself), and Mike Freeman (not particularly famous outside Minnesota, but the son of a popular governor.) This is in deference to the two non-sons who were running — and who did better than one of the “three sons”, but nonetheless didn’t fit the narrative.

In my blog entry on “1986: Lyndon LaRouche’s Political Peak”, publishing an old article about how LaRouchites screwed up the Illinois Democratic party in 1986, I made a mental note of the gubernatorial candidate they screwed up: The Gubernatorial candidate that was stuck running with LaRouchites was Adlai Stevenson III, son of two-time failed Presidential candidate, Illinois governor, and namesake of that which we call the “Stevenson Moment”… ADLAI STEVENSON, who himself was the grandson of a former vice-president ADLAI freaking STEVENSON!!! My theory on this election was that Adlai Stevenson, circa 1986, was rejected by the public via the elevation of the LaRouchites. The people had had enough with Stevensons.

And so it goes… I was happy when Mary Kennedy Townsend lost her election in 2002. And I hope to gawd that we get out and then “Stay out” the Bushes.

Sports Corner

Monday, November 7th, 2005

I remember when I first saw this Sports Illustrated cover thinking “Mental Note: Remember that cover. The editors are simply tempting fate here.” Yes… it now looks like this cover takes its rightful place in the Curse file.

ESPN analyst Michael Irvin recently said the Eagles would be undefeated if Favre were the starting quarterback.

Asked for his thoughts on Irvin’s comment, Owens said: “That’s a good assessment, I would agree with that, just with what [Favre] brings to the table.

“A number of commentators will say he’s a warrior, he’s played with injuries. I feel like him being knowledgeable about the quarterback position, I feel like we’d probably be in a better situation.”

Speculation exists that Michael Irvin has become a Terrell Owens mouthpiece… in this case this is sort of a Judith Miller — Ahmad Chalabi thing going on.

I will note that the team that Brett Farve is actually quarterbacking, the Green Bay Packers, is now 1-7. My desire for the team to win the division and thus make the playoffs, and do so with a record of no better than 7-9, is — alas– in flames. Further, it looks most probably that the Chicago Bears will do the honor of winning this division — and with a record exceeding 8-8. The NFL dodges that bullet, of watching in embarrassment as a Losing team eeks into the playoffs, once again. Nonetheless for the Packers, Brett Farve is considered by the NFL intelligentsia to be a good quarterback — still — (some say as good as he was when during his Superbowl years), with a team that is simply too bad to pull to any wins.

But… that “Brotherly Love” relationship between Terrell Owens and Donavan McNabb?

Reacting to a report in The (Trenton, N.J.) Times, ESPN and Fox confirmed that Owens brawled with former Eagles player Hugh Douglas in the team’s training room, before charging into the locker room and challenging McNabb and other teammates to put up their dukes.

I can’t figure out that Sports Illustrated Cover. It makes as much sense as the Ryan Leaf cover (the storyline of Ryan Leaf having been that he sucked up the joint the first time, was benched, and now was being given a second time because … whereupon, he resumed sucking up the joint.) Then again, this cover pops up at me once again — as we move through above-average (and frequently exceptional) statistical records that fall flat in the win-loss records which would measure him as “Greatest Ever”, and as he was injured with his replacement providing the team with a victory-lift, and as the current Sports Illustrated cover features the two quarterbacks currently playing most likely to be named “Greatest Ever”.

Sports Illustrated’s covers crack me up.

We Didn’t Start the Fire

Sunday, November 6th, 2005

On a rainy Weekend day, I shrug about, staring at the sky with my shifty umbrella in hand. I head toward the public library, where I sit at a computer, and shift through the “Electric Library” database, looking up esoteric subjects.

Topic at hand: the major news stories of the 1990s. Or the major American news stories according to me, in a peculiarly paranoid frame of mind. The goal is to assure myself that things seemed to be falling apart in the world just as surely as things seem to be falling apart right this minute.

From the magazine American Demographics, I find an article about “Millennial Fever”, and how “marketers can take advantage of them by striking while the iron is hot”. Was the Y2K scare a Conspiracy dreamed up by the World Elite to sell us on bottled water and mass quantities of emergency supplies? Millennial Fever is driving consumer behavior in all sorts of interesting ways, which means it offers marketing opportunities. But it won’t last forever. If you want to strike while the iron is hot, you need to understand the symptoms of the fever and how you can turn them to your advantage. Hm. Well. Anyway. Buy Duct tape, everybody!

The Cultural Logic of Heaven’s Gate Tragic as it was, the Heaven’s Gate mass suicide was a completely predictable bit of cultural logic. It is Millennial Fever in its most virulent incarnation. Techno/apocalyptic episodes are an inevitable symptom of this century’s end. With the fierce economy of the truly crazed, Heaven’s Gate encapsulates four critical themes of Millennial Fever, and drives them to their logical (or illogical) conclusion: technology as disembodiment; mortification and malleability of the body; apocalyptic agents; death and rebirth. Technology as Disembodiment. Marshall McLuhan points out that every new technology involves a sort of “amputation”: The automobile “amputates” the legs, or the television “amputates” conversation. The Internet “amputates” the body, so to speak, as well as personal identity. These cultural realities will dictate the quality of post-millennial civilization.

Everyone knows the famous cartoon: a dog at a computer commenting, “On the Internet, no one knows you’re a dog.” It’s not such a slippery slope to the world of Heaven’s Gate: Web site designers who obliterated their personal identities and had amputations performed upon their bodies. Mortification and Malleability of the Body. The cultists referred to their bodies as “containers,” an image very close to the cyberdelic idea of “meat cages.” Denunciation of the body, followed by its mortification, is an end-time theme that pops up predictably in decades that precede the turn of a century. It was in the 1490s, for example, when Savonarola and his friends threw Florence into an orgy of self-flagellation.

Malleability of the body is a related theme, visible in our current fascination with body art, transvestitism, and the cyberdelic fantasy of computers implanted in the body. No surprise, then, that 8 of the 18 male Heaven’s Gate cultists had been surgically castrated. It’s an extreme version of a popular culture phenomenon, in this case body-piercing. Apocalyptic Agents. Our culture’s heavens flutter with angels and UFOs. They represent the same longing for apocalyptic intervention and delivery. And they highlight the fact that in our fin de sicle, religiosity substitutes for religion. Religion forces us to deal with gods. Religiosity is a cheaper thrill, and angels and UFOs are less disquieting forces. (Carl Jung, a long time ago, referred to UFOs as “technological angels.”)

The cultists killed themselves in order to hitch a ride on a UFO hiding behind the Hale-Bopp comet. In a tragicomic bit of American scientism linking up with a lunatic consumerism, the cultists bought a high-tech telescope, and then returned it to the store for a refund when it failed to reveal the comet’s flying-saucer companion.

Or hitch a ride on a UFO? The 1990s were full of stories of the people who dropped out of society in come manner or other. Oddly enough, I’d have to say the Heaven’s Gate Cult was the least tragic of the batch of stories I have in mind, in the sense that the Heaven’s Gate Cult kept mostly to themselves, and didn’t kill their kids. I can’t say the same thing about Waco or the Unabomber. I hope they latched onto that spacecraft that was trailing the comet!

In 1984, for example, Applewhite’s followers were entranced by the film Cocoon, in which a boatload of Florida pensioners is lifted into a giant spaceship. According to an ex-member, the group’s leaders decided that the film was telling them how they were going to be picked up and taken to the Kingdom level. So some members moved to Galveston, Texas, to prepare a houseboat for lift-off. But then they changed their minds; presumably another movie had come along.

Heaven’s Gate cheerfully acknowledged its debt to the small screen. In a final Internet posting, it referred obliquely to Star Trek: “To help you understand who we are, we have taken the liberty to express a synopsis in the vernacular of a popular science-fiction entertainment series. It is interesting to see how the context of fiction can often open the mind to advanced possibilities which are, in reality, quite close to fact.”

INCLUDING suicide, it seems. Science fiction undoubtedly helped Applewhite’s followers block out the conventional understanding of death. Life at Rancho Santa Fe, says one of the suicide tapes, “is like training on a holodeck. It’s time for us to put into practice what we’ve learnt.”

But what had they learnt? It is true that the immediate trigger for the Heaven’s Gate suicides was provided by reports, circulated by a late-night radio talk show, that a monstrous alien craft was trailing behind the Hale-Bopp comet. Yet it was not the only reason Applewhite’s people killed themselves. Many influences were at work, such as the disorientating regime at Rancho Santa Fe, where near-starvation alternated with pigging out on Ben and Jerry’s, and where members rose in the middle of the night to gaze at their new home in the stars.

And one other factor should not be overlooked, although millions of Americans might prefer to do so. Put bluntly, a revived paranoia is sweeping across the United States, and perhaps Europe too. Conventional wisdom blames this on the unpoliceable Internet, which is why no one was surprised when Applewhite’s followers turned out to be website designers. Yet they weren’t really Internet buffs: they were entertainment junkies who mainlined on the conspiracy-obsessed films and television programmes of the Nineties. Cult entertainment, you might say, though it was more than that. This was how Heaven’s Gate “learnt” things.

We would hear about the destructive power of the Internet, and the dark corners in which the socially dejected can enter into, a couple years later with the Columbine Shootings. (I paraphrase Bill Clinton there, who was bumping around to the safest “Soccer Mom” ground he could find in his efforts to justify his presidency.) I note that we can easily transpose the sentence “A revived paranoia is sweeping across the United States, and perhaps Europe too.” to the current decade, and swiftly run ahead from there. (Care for some “Bird Flu?”)

Also keep in mind that the whole world is having trouble right now coming to grips with American Evangelical and its effect on politics and culture. Who are these “Left Behinders”, and why are people believing in the trans-death conversations held through the medium of John Edward (“Crossing Over”)… Has America Gone Mad? We all come full circle, and some things they never change.

(That batch of excerpting comes from “The Brainwashing of America: Analysis of Heaven’s Gate Suicides Has Missed one Vital Point Argues Damian Thompson: The Influence of Film and Television, Daily Telegraph, 8 – 9 -97.)

Against this backdrop, we have the Bill Clinton presidency, and The Nation assembling a panel of commentators to ponder its meaning.:

The presidency is a Jerry Springer show. The public is variously entertained, appalled and titillated by the smallness and coarseness of it all. Americans’ daily working lives have been transformed by the flows of global capital, by Alan Greenspan’s Federal Reserve and by the wonders of the Internet. But in the evenings, when the work is done, we’re transfixed by the perils of Bill Clinton. News has become an Entertainment Division, a diversion from the daily grind. No matter that Asian economies are imploding, the world’s poor are expanding, more than a fifth of our own children are impoverished, American schools are falling apart, a record 41 million of us lack health insurance and the nation is experiencing the widest divergence of income, wealth and opportunity in five decades. It is more fun to ponder semen stains.

Though the consensus view is that he was Grover Cleveland reincarnated:

What can we demand of good leaders in bad times? Clinton concludes that we should not judge Presidents like Rutherford B. Hayes and Grover Cleveland harshly. According to U.S. News & World Report, Clinton tells associates that they have been “under-appreciated as progressive reformers who tried to limit the power of big business and undercut the nativism and class hatreds of their age–stances he obviously considers parallel to his own.” Like him, they offered no bold initiatives, but, he suggests, they did all they could. If a President had a Depression spurring change, as FDR did, he could do more, but now… AND If he’s lucky, Bill Clinton will go down in history as the ablest President elected to office in the last third of the twentieth century. That would put him roughly on a par with the ablest President elected to office in the last third of the nineteenth century– the Gilded Age Democrat Grover Cleveland. […] The mixture of promise and disappointment continued into Clinton’s second term. A brilliant political counterpuncher, devastating in the clinches, he managed to get re-elected and, in his 1998 State of the Union address, to propose reasonably activist “third way” plans for strengthening Social Security, aiding education, raising the minimum wage and more. It all far exceeded Grover Cleveland’s policies (and was much friendlier to labor than Cleveland, the breaker of the Pullman strike, ever was). But as Clinton spoke, the Monica Lewinsky scandal was filling the headlines.

Regretably, there could be no “Millennium Fever” in the 1890s for which I could parallel Cleveland with Clinton and finish the loop. “Centurian Fever” perhaps?… I will have to content myself in comparing Clinton with Bush and shrug away.

“Perfect Playlist”?

Thursday, November 3rd, 2005

The local “alternative rock” station, 94.7 KNRK (sigh… an “Entercom Station”) has a feature at 5:00 where they play a selection of five songs suggested by a listener. About a week ago, I was listening in and getting a weird fuzzy feeling as I pondered the meaning of the song selection that was unfolding before my ears.

Song #1: Angry Johnny, by Poe. Lyrics sample:

Johnny, Angry Johnny, this is Jezebel in Hell
I wanna kill you, I wanna blow you…away
I can do it you gently
I can do it with an animal’s grace
I can do it with precision
I can do it with gormet taste
Chorus:
But either way
Either (way), either way
I wanna kill you
I wanna blow you…
Away
I can do it to your mind
I can do it to your face
I can do it with integrity
I can do it with disgrace

Okay. So far so good. Next song! It’s… Smashing Pumpkins with Disarm:

I used to be a little boy
So old in my shoes
And what I choose is my voice
What’s a boy supposed to do
The killer in me is the killer in you
My love – I send this smile over to you
The killer in me is the killer in you

Well… you can read into this “killer” whatever you may, but … it’s there. Okay… what’s the next song?

Why… It’s the Latest Single by the band “The Killers”!! (The song itself doesn’t really matter.) Okay. There’s a theme here. I imagine this to be the “Perfect Playlist” suggested by Kleebold and Harris or whomever before going on their shooting rampage as a little signal of what they’re planning. Or something to this effect. What are we supposed to hear next? Pearl Jam’s “Jermey”? Maybe I’ll get to hear Talking Heads’s “Psycho Killer”?

For what it’s worth, the next two songs are some depressed lullabye by Depeche Mode, and the Garbage song “When I Grow Up”. Shrug it off… scratch your head… turn the station… move on.

wire-tapped

Thursday, November 3rd, 2005

From the opening chapter of the 1965 book Night of Camp David, by Fletcher Knebel… the setting is the annual Presidential Gridiron dinner (which, in case you’re uncertain of what is, is most recently famous for Laura Bush making a horse-fucking joke and George Bush joking about those missing weapons of mass destruction)…

“I am delighted to be here this evening,” said President Hollenbach, “and hear the nation’s leading newspapermen tell the truth about me — for a change.” More laughter. “I was especially heartened to see my friends, the Republicans, laughing, … They don’t often succumb to attacks of good humor, you know. Of course, tonight, they never quite got around to laughing at themselves. For a Republican to laugh at himself requires a severe psychological upheaval. Still, tonight, they laughed at me — and that’s a start. After all, they have to begin somewhere. I have faith in this country, and I’m confident that someday, somewhere, somehow, a Republican is going to break out in a big, hearty guffaw, just for the fun of the thing.”

The President paused and took a sip of water. “The Republican capacity for solemnity constantly mystifies me. Perhaps the clue lies in what they say to one another. I’ve often wondered what Republicans talk about in the cloisters of their own minority clan. I’ve given the matter a great deal of thought, and I think I’ve hit on a way to find out. May I advance a suggestion for your consideration …

“I propose,” he said after a brief hesitation, “that the FBI be empowered to maintain an automatic tap on all telephones in the country. The tremendous advantages for crime detection are, of course, obvious. On the other hand, no decent, law-abiding citizen would have anything to fear, since nothing he said could be of interest to a federal investigative body. But — and here’s the point — with a standing wiretap, we Democrats could learn what mysterious substance provides the glue for Republicanism, what indeed it is they say to one another that makes them so gloomy.”

There was a ripple of tittering among the diners and a few laugs. Jim MacVeigh, grinning, turned to Sidney Karper.

“He’s really soaring, isn’t he?”

The Defense Secretary did not smile. “Even in fun,” he replied, “that’s a chilling suggestion.”

MacVeigh eyed his seatmate in surprise, and was about to protest, but another presidential thrust brought a wave of laughter that carried MacVeagh back into the current of Hollenbach’s talk.

[………]

“What did you think of the dinner, Jim?” he [President Hollenbach] asked.

“I liked it. That Republican skit dragged, but those on us were great, really funny. They sure picked on us where we’re vulnerable.”

“O’Malley was duck soup for them, of course,” said Hollenbach. “And it’s always easy to kid the President. He’s everybody’s fall guy.”

“Your little speech at the end was terrific. And you know why — because you spent half the time ribbing yourself after you kidded the opposition.”

“What did you think of the wiretap suggestion?”

“I got a kick of out it,” said MacVeagh with a grin. Then he recalled Sidney Karper’s strange reaction. “But apparently it misfired with some people. I guess the idea of a wiretap on every phone jolted them and they couldn’t take it as a joke.”

“I didn’t mean it as a joke,” said Hollenbach.

“You what?” MacVeagh stared at him.

[ … ]

“Mr. President,” he said slowly, “I’m no civil liberties fanatic, but I do understand our basic freedoms. This thing of yours could be an awful weapon for evil in the wrong hands. Who knows what type of men may succeed you? And then, there are the political repercussions. A proposal like that could murder you this fall.”
…………………………………………….

I suppose the author, in 1965, was looking around the political landscape and seeing Nixon on the horizon. (Or, let’s face it, even looking deeply into the soul of Lyndon Johnson.) But it occurs to me just how quaint this reads. Here in Portland, some group or other has taken it upon themselves to plaster onto public pay phones “This Phone Might be tapped, by Regulation # bibbleybop diddley do of the Patriot Act”.

There is no Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, for all practical purposes. Don’t believe me — next time you’re pulled over and get asked by the police if they can search your car, say “No”, and see what happens. (There’s a circular firing squad in this equation, where the Supreme Court ruled long ago that an answer of “no” to such a question does indeed constituate that probable cause standard by which they may search you.)

Maybe I’m pushing it a little too far here, but maybe I’m not. There is this advertisement on the radio that has annoyed me for the past couple of years…

A 30-second national radio advertisement used the voice of a 20s male with music throughout: “All right, everybody knows “seat belts save lives,” I mean we’ve been hearing that for years – I’m just tellin’ ya your seat belt can save your money and a whole lot of hassle too. Because from coast to coast, cops are cracking down. They have this whole…campaign—“Click It or Ticket.” Pretty simple, you buckle up…or you pay up. Consider this a friendly warning, because cops won’t be giving warnings. Remember, Click It…or Ticket.

The line that chills me regarding this ad, and I’m not entirely sure the Police Association behind the advertisement even realize that they slipped this suggestion through: I’m just tellin’ ya your seat belt can save your money — What this suggests is that the DEFAULT POSITION has you giving money to the government, the police state, what have you… and you get a reprieve from this if you follow through the government’s orders / requests. Otherwise, how are you “saving money”?

Porno for Pyros

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2005

Bill O’Reilly:

Stripping off her bathing-suit, she walked into the huge shower. She pulled the lime green curtain across the entrance and then set the water for a tepid 75-degrees. The spray felt great against her skin as she ducked her head underneath the nozzle. Closing her eyes she concentrated on the tingling sensation of water flowing against her body. Suddenly another sensation entered, Ashley felt two large hands wrap themselves around her breasts and hot breathe on the back of her neck. She opened her eyes wide and giggled, “I thought you drowned out there snorkel man.”

Tommy O’Malley was naked and at attention. “Drowning is not an option”, he said, “unless of course you beg me to perform unnatural acts – right here in this shower.

With Bill O’Reilly, we can compare and contrast his prose style with his phone sex style, thanks to that sexual harrassment suit that was tossed his way a couple years back. The sex life of Tommy O’Malley really does mirror the sexual fantasy life of Bill O’Reilly.

Anyway, from the gripping world of Tabloid Television to the political intrigue found in 1903 Japan… Lewis Libby wrote a novel.

He could feel her heart beneath his hands. He moved his hands slowly lower still and she arched her back to help him and her lower leg came against his. He held her breasts in his hands. Oddly, he thought, the lower one might be larger. . . . One of her breasts now hung loosely in his hand near his face and he knew not how best to touch her.

The breasts don’t properly match? Whose fetish is that?

At age ten the madam put the child in a cage with a bear trained to couple with young girls so the girls would be frigid and not fall in love with their patrons. They fed her through the bars and aroused the bear with a stick when it seemed to lose interest.

Life in rural Japan in 1903 must be pretty similar to the life that Neal Horsley lived growing on the farm in Georgia, as evidenced by:

He asked if they should fuck the deer.

As That New Yorker article tells us, the answer is “yes.”

We can put aside shower scenes and Japanese provincal bestiality and, thankfully Lynne Cheney contents herself with Frontier Lesbianism, which we all know about by now.

What does this all mean? I don’t have a clue.