Appropo of next to nothing, revenire charged out with this:
Ban me… I know a teeny weeny bit about IP etc.Â
Hm. Perhaps it was a mistake to indulge him and plead for a generic sense of “etiquette”. An Internet troll will take this as a sense as a weakness for the silly games they play. Does revenire have anything to say about Wyoming or squares, and the relation between Wyoming and Squares? No. He does not seem to. Hence my problem with him. I may indeed “do something about that” after all. Ideally I would reconfigure the comments section of my blog such that revenire’s comments not posted to the Larouche category would go in to the “Approve / Disapprove” channel, to be judged on a simple matter of relevancy — Larouche topics going through automatically. (Isn’t Larouche fixated on Squares, and makes a Calculus problem with them a matter of Gnostic meaning?) I don’t think I get that specific, though. As it is set right now, everyone’s first comment goes through that channel, and I approve them, and their comments go through automatically from then on out.  I will look into it, I suppose. In the meantime, I plan on posting about my desire to Square off Wyoming again shortly, so Revenire will have another crack at that.
Appropo of… nothing… revenire chimed in with:
Or, better yet, call the cops.
This came out of nowhere. In this light, I do reserve the right to call the authorities if and when I see revenire engage in illegal activities. But I have yet to see such a thing, so I’m just left scratching my head at this one. Not having seen such, I do not know what he is referring to, so I will just have to ask: Is there something in your conscience that is bothering you, revenire?
And appropo of revenire’s state of being, we get… this:
For all I care you can jump off a bridge.
Go ahead, jump… because you’re a nothing and the rest of your soap opera characters are empty husks… dead souls.
Interesting. This appears to be second nature. Is this a greeting amongst Larouchies?
“Hey! Have you killed yourself today?”
“No. Not yet. Got a deployment to the college campus. Have one of those “Renaissances” to ignite. Hoo Hoo! Kill me.”
Nay. revenire is mocking the death of Ken Kronberg, who as we all well know, jumped off a bridge to his death — on the day that the Dcaily Memo mentioned the advisibility of suicide before unleashing a broadside against his Printing Press as the reason for the problems of the organization. Actually he also may well toss in that he is mocking Jeremiah Duggan here, who I am lax on mentioning so I suppose revenire does a service by reminding me about him. Anyway, whatever the circumstances that lead to his death — in that remote conference in Germany — German officials did rule it a suicide. So, he’s mocking two deaths.
Or I could count this as the knife’s edge within that which we call “ego-stripping”. Not so much a concerted effort here, but a frame of mind, boiling down to a litany of largely incomprehensible insults. Case in point, his willful reading incomprehension of my innocuous anecdote about confusion over Sputnik and the city of Krasnoyarsk. I puzzled over his reaction to that, and just threw my hands up in the air and submitted the question of “What is revenire’s problem” to FACTNet. The answer to the inability to abide by a simple personal anecdote lies in the individuality of such … to be assimilated in the Borg, those concepts of human experiences need to be scuttled. Mind you, this isn’t a thought through process, just a state of flinging crud.
But revenire: If your come on during your career as perennial political candidate included “I don’t care if you kill yourself” — no wonder you didn’t much crack a couple percentage points. Then again, garnering votes is never the purpose of a Larouche themed electoral campaign. So, if it’s a part of the pitch to join the LYM — no wonder the numbers in that organization are dwindling.