Archive for April, 2005

RIP, Pope John Paul II

Saturday, April 2nd, 2005

I have often heard that Pope John Paul II has a special charismatic quality and attachment with the youth of the world, particularly Catholic Youth. I suppose I shouldn’t doubt that… talking with devout Catholics of my age-group, they invariably would express great affection to Pope John Paul II.

It had to be seventh grade, given my time-line of CCD classes (basically from 6th grade to 9th grade, nobody wanted my particular grade — thus I have a strange motley crue of semi-reluctant teachers of Catholic Doctrine, most infamously the End-of-Times Fundamentalist that pretty much literally scared the Jesus out of me; most distressingly the dearth of 8th grade when the class dwindled to four kids) when I watched a bad propaganda-ish film, mimicking some production stunts developed by MTV, that called a gathering of Catholic Youth to see the Pope “the Pope’s Woodstock.” My general question was, “Why did they produce this dreck?” (ie: various Protestant Churches oughta be the home of such saccharine.)

After a while, everything and everyone becomes a caricature. Thus, a Jumping Pope on a Pogo-Stick moves through stages of production before being canned.

And the Pope watches someone break-dance. Why? I guess the man loves the art of break-dancing!

None of which shortchanges him from single-handedly bringing down the Soviet Union and Communism (one of four figures who can claim to have single-handedly accomplished that feat — the other three, of course, being Ronald Reagan, The Beatles, and Osama Bin Laden.) Or his ecumenical approach to politics and religion which reshaped the Catholic Church and its relationship with the world. Or anything of any real substance or import.

All I can really say is that… I don’t think the next Pope is going to be so easily transferred as jumping on a pogo-stick.

Saturday, April 2nd, 2005

Flicking pass the National Review’s Rich Lowrey on PBS’s Jim Lehrer, I watched him explain the Republican view of the Terri Schiavo fiasco. This will be forgotten by November of 2006 so there aren’t any political repurcussions (a godspeed for the Republican Party, I… guess…), but in the meantime obviously… judges out of control, and this will strengthen and harden the position of the “Nuclear Option” (the one which will destroy the ability of Democrats to act like Jimmy Stewart?).

I couldn’t quite tell if he believed his own words, which is to say politicos of the pundit variety often say things for the sole purpose of making them the truth… its not the bias that shows, which is what you’d want from a political bias, but the motive and agenda that’s being focused on. Rich Lowrey’s body language was just a little bit… off, and he blinked a little bit too often.

In the meantime, I’m trying to figure out the veracity of this story. A quick google search through their news archives, and I end up with a story from Australia that She may have been Bulimic!… which only goes to show how a foreign press is slow on various details of a national (unfortunately) story.

You do know Tom DeLay’s latest apocalyptic words on the matter?

This loss happened because our legal system did not protect the people who need protection most, and that will change. The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior, but not today.

“Answering for the Behavior” meaning… what, exactly? Dunno. A weird Political Jihad, which probably can only take place with enough of a concerted political propaganda push? Torment in Hell after the ever-loving God decides that they don’t quite measure up? Something like this carried out by a sort of individual who’s may be attracted (not all of them, mind ye) to something like this? Dun…no.