Archive for September, 2004

1980: Reagan and the Jewish Vote

Thursday, September 16th, 2004

My father, a Warsaw ghetto survivor, will vote for Ronald Reagan on Nov. 4 — casting his ballot for a Republican presidential candidate for the first time in his 32 years as an American. He says he is voting against Carter.

The president’s failure, in the eyes of the Jewish-American community, overshadow his one real triumph in foreign policy, bringing Israel and Egypt to the bargaining table at Camp David. His waffling on the UN vote against Israel in March and Billy Carter’s relationship with anti-Zionist Libya have bred suspicion and resentment, solidifying the disllusionment with the Democratic Party that began with George McGovern’s candidacy in 1972.

But whatever objections Jewish voters have to Carter, they should carefully ponder the implications of the alternative: electing a man whose major supporters wish to “re-Christianize” America. Fundamentalist right-wing Christianity, both in the US and abroad, historically has incorporated or tolerated anti-Semitism. Fueled by a fear of social change and a sense of moral self-righteousness, its followers viewed Jews as outsiders, or worse.

Today’s fundamentalist New Right clings to a simplistic, paranoid perception that “radicals, perverts, liberals, leftists, and Communists” are responsible for the nation’s woes.

“We’ve got to bring some holy fear to the American system before it destroys us,” declared one preacher at an evangelical rally featuring Reagan as a keynote speaker.

Not long ago, the ideological forerunners of the New Right blamed America’s problems not on secular liberalism, but on a conspiracy of Jews. During the 1920s and 30s, men like Henry Ford and Father Charles Coughlin carried on the tradition of what historian Richard Hofstadter scalled “the paranoid style of American politics.” They explained away economic and political difficulties with tirades against the “International Jew”.

Anti-foreign, protectionist tendencies reached a peak in the 1920s, when the wholesale immigration of Italians and Jews coincided with a conservative backlash. One historian described the era as “probably unmatched in American history for xenophobia and paranoid suspicion.”

The national mood was set by the 1919 Red Scare (which warned of a conspiracy by German – Jewish bankers and Russian – Jewish Bolsevicks) and US Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer’s raids on thousands of aliens and suspected Communists, anarchists, and radicals. During the postwar depression beginning in 1920, Ku Klux Klan membership grew from 5,000 to 5 million, and Ford began to repring in his widely read Michigan newspaper excerpts from “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”

The 1930s saw a new wave of Christian conservative reaction, this time with avowedly fascist leanings. The Silver Shirts was a group that advocated the creation of an American fascist dictatorship, to be called the Christian Commonwealth. Father Coughlin, a popular radio personality, harangued about the Jewish role in the origins of coumminism and urged the creation of a “state-capitalist” system. Coughlin’s organization put its own presidential candidate on the ballot in 1936, and got 2 percent of the vote.

World War II redirected America’s concerns to a more threatening enemy than “internaional Jewry,” and so right-wing paranoia was held in check until the mid-1950s, when McCarthyism ushered in the New Right.

The relatively moderate public voice of the New Right still seeks scapegoats on whom to blame for the society’s ills. Phyllis Schlafly, the prominent anti-Equal Rights Amendment activist and long-time Reagan supporter, wrote in a 1964 pro-Goldwater tract that a “small group of secret kingmakers” within the Republican Party are “perpetuating the Red Empire in order to perpetuate the high level of federal spending and control” and are nominating only those presidential candidates who “will sidestep or suppress the key issues.”

Schlafly has addressed such overtly anti-Semitic groups as the Liberty Lobby and the Rev. Billy James Hargis’ Christian Crusade. She has also named Henry Kissinger as a member of a conspiracy to weaken America from within. (Other plotters, according to her, have been Robert McNamara, Walter Lipmann, Clark Clifford, Averell Hariman, Dean Rusk and J. William Fulbright.)

Schlafly represents a new generation of Christian right-wing ideologues who are far too adroit to make anti-Semitic statements. After all, anti-Semitism went out of style after the Holocaust, due as much to the submergence of European – Jewish idenity into mainstream culture as to Christian guilt pangs. There are occasional slips by public officials, such as the 1974 warning against the “Jewish influence” in media and government by the late Gen. George S. Brown, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. But most Americans treat then with embarrassment and disdain.

American Jews must not view this fashion of intolerance with a blind eye to the past. The fundamentalist New Right, like the old, does not share the pluralistic, secular, democratic ideals that make America safe for Jews and other religions, racial and political minorities. Even if Jews are not now castigated by name, the political strategy of someone like the Rev. Jerry Falwell (“Get them saved, baptized and registered”), clearly excludes them.

The reactionary right has been looking for an “acceptable”Republican ever since Barry Goldwater’s 1964 defeat gave the party back to the relatively liberal Eastern wing. A President Reagan would not mean an American pogrom, but as Paul Weyrich of the right-wing Committee for the Survival of a Free Congress said, “We are no longer working to preserve the status quo. We are radicals, working to overturn the present power structure in this country.”

Jewish voters did not support such rightwing presidential contenders as Goldwater or George Wallace, who ran as a third-party candidate in 1968. But as the case of my father shows, a conservative mood has shaken loose the liberal hold of the Jewish vote.

In this close race, that vote is being wooed as never before by beoth major parties (and by independent candidate John Anderson). Carter may be unacceptable to many. But can a Jew vote for Ronald Reagan?

Herb Fox, October 1980.

Campaign Literature

Wednesday, September 15th, 2004

I saw this at www.rickemerson.com …

Today, for no readily apparent reason, we received a package at the Max 910 studios, the content of which was all about Measure 36. Mixed in with all of the info packets and lists of reasons to *ahem* support the measure, there was, FOR NO REASON, a big photo of a smiling black woman. No text, no explanation, just a cheerfully grinning Nubian princess. I’m unclear about what, exactly, this woman has to do with Measure 36. More puzzling is the fact that she’s not identified or acknowledged in any way, apart from her picture’s inclusion.

We at the Rick Emerson Show welcome theories about her inclusion in the packet. I’m honestly curious—if you can figure it out, lemme know. Until then, remember: only you can stop the Pink Menace!

Your photograph:

The one thing I can say about this is that at the moment, Right-wing circles believe that they have a wedge issue with gay-rights and gay marriage. Polls show Black people are cold on the idea, and indeed my personal experience tells me that in general young African Americans are a bit more … um… gay hating than urban White Americans (I won’t venture into Rural America here, because at that point it all goes flat.) Feel free to consider the sociology behind the reasonings, if you feel you must.

Here’s The Village Voice. Here’s the Washington Times.

Beyond that, I haven’t a clue as to the precise nature of that particular black woman. A “Family Values” / “Inclusion” document of some type?

Gordon Allen Pross and Guys Waving Fetuses at You

Wednesday, September 15th, 2004

I’m wondering if Gordon Allen Pross made a concession speech yesterday, after receiving a bit more than one percent and a bit less than two percent in the Republican Primary for US Senate seat.

A scan of the Internet yields nothing. But, it occurs to me that if it were online, I’d probably have seen the 1998, 2000, and 2002 concession speeches… somewhere alongside his argument in the minutes of his Church Council. (Gordon Pross presented his formal objection to installing a viewing screen that would hang in front of the Sanctuary cross when it was pulled down.)

My best guess is that if any media at all covers such an event, it would be the local paper in his hometown Ellensburgh, Washington… probably a weekly newspaper. But… that’s not available to me.

Sooo… heck, I don’t care if Gordon Allen Pross himself emails me his parting shots on the 2004 campaign… but I kind of want something.

In other area political news, I just heard a blurb for Oregon Considered today on Oregon Public Radio.

“She’s one of the most popular politicians in Oregon, and has a seat in the Oregon Senate. And she faces just token opposition. But her opposition will be heard. One’s an editor of Erotic Fiction. The other’s an anti-abortion activist who’s advocated violent means. Today, on Oregon Considered.”

A sudden chill runs through my spine, and I find myself groaning. I think I know who both of them are. Needing confirmation on their names, I google to find, yes indeedy:

State Senator, 21st District
Kate Brown (D)
Paul deParrie (C) Theresa Reed (L)

Right here and right now, I am endorsing Theresa Reed.

But, for the Hell of it, here’s an online exchange with some guy named Barry and Paul deParrie:

deParrie declares that he was against the first Gulf War and protested it, and was a hippy from way back…

Barry: I realize you went to an anti-war rally to rail against the so-called “hippie freaks” and “educate” them on the evils of abortion, however, that’s not exactly being a part of the demo. Counter-demonstrating on a pet issue isn’t including yourself in a protest.

Me: I hear that Paul not only protested the Gulf War in 1991, but he formed an anti-war organization called “Fetuses for Peace”, combining his two activist impulses I suppose.

Paul deParrie: And you founded Fetuses in Pieces.

I eye Aye. Never mind.

………

If you’re despairing due to the polls, I’m directing you to July 25, 2004: Things Move Fast In Politics Part Two.

The Things that Don’t Make Sense to Me.

Wednesday, September 15th, 2004

I have this desire to write some hi-faluting, pretentious or psuedo-pretentious bit about current foreign policy, culling half-heartedly and half-bakedly from Virgil and Thucydides.

But I don’t want to go through with it now. I’m tempted to take a riff from Pinkwater’s “Young Adults” — where they, dejected and rejecte, the Young Dada Ducks must go to their “Doctor Wizardo” comics for spiritual guidance.

But I know next to nothing of the bastardizations from Greek history and mythology that mainstream comics has to offer. Thor? Wonder Woman? Nay. (I did pick up a few of Jack Kirby’s “Devil Dinosaur” comics from the bargain bin… I like that comic.)

Things I wonder about.

The rationale for Iraq, the current rationale and a reason B that Bush gave politically and a fig-leaf item in the PNAC Document: “Build a democratic nation in the heart of the middle East that will serve as a model for the Muslim World… Freedom draining the Terrorists out… and…”

Wasn’t there this war in Afghanistan? A war that was far less controversial than the one in Iraq? In a nation that has, in its past, a bonafide Democratic tradition (right before the Soviets invaded — the quaint, rugged democracy we like to pretend that we’ve built for them… when you hear the occasional story about Afghan pop culture icons– say, well-known Afghan singer — they come from that period of Afghanistan’s history…)?

Why the heck could Afghanistan not have been this “Democratic Nation” in the Muslim World? I thought that was part of the point.

Nay. Everyone knows pretty much that this administration’s hearts were never in Afghanistan. (Notice the Rumsfeld press conference two entries down … And they say we shouldn’t worry about Bin Laden indeed… It’s all about Iraq right from the start!)

I can’t find the chart showing the amount per capita for various nations “post-conflict” (nebulous in the case of Afghanista) but… that nation is at the bottom of the heap.

And… I’ve never been sure quite what to make of this:

SY HERSH: Okay, the cream of the crop of Al Qaeda caught in a town called Konduz which is near … it’s one little village and it’s a couple hundred kilometers, 150 miles from the border of Pakistan. And I learned this story frankly– through very, very clandestine operatives we have in the Delta Force and other very…

We were operating very heavily with a small number of men, three, 400 really in the first days of the war. And suddenly one night when they had everybody cornered in Konduz– the special forces people were told there was a corridor that they could not fly in. There was a corridor sealed off to– the United States military sealed off a corridor. And it was nobody could shoot anybody in this little lane that went from Konduz into Pakistan. And that’s how I learned about it. I learned about it from a military guy who wanted to fly helicopters and kill people and couldn’t do it that day.

JANE WALLACE: So, we had the enemy surrounded, the special forces guys are helping surround this enemy.

SY HERSH: They’re whacking everybody they can whack that looks like a bad guy.

JANE WALLACE: And suddenly they’re told to back off–

SY HERSH: From a certain area–

JANE WALLACE: — and let planes fly out to Pakistan.

SY HERSH: There was about a three or four nights in which I can tell you maybe six, eight, 10, maybe 12 more– or more heavily weighted– Pakistani military planes flew out with an estimated– no less than 2,500 maybe 3,000, maybe more. I’ve heard as many as four or 5,000. They were not only– Al Qaeda but they were also– you see the Pakistani ISI was– the military advised us to the Taliban and Al Qaeda. There were dozens of senior Pakistani military officers including two generals who flew out.

And I also learned after I wrote this story that maybe even some of Bin Laden’s immediate family were flown out on the those evacuations. We allowed them to evacuate. We had an evacuation.

JANE WALLACE: How high up was that evacuation authorized?

SY HERSH: I am here to tell you it was authorized — Donald Rumsfeld who — we’ll talk about what he said later — it had to be authorized at the White House. But certainly at the Secretary of Defense level.

AND then… According to MSNBC.com (2/18/02) “officers of the 82nd airborne division and elements of the 101st— pleaded with the generals running the war to have their men dropped along the Afghan-Pakistan border region to cut off the retreat of al-Qaida and its leader, Osama bin Laden. To the fury of these officers, their pleas went unanswered, turned aside by the high probability of casualties.”

….

It appears that the great success of the Iraq War was in convincing Colonel Qaddafi, the Dictator of Libya, to dismantle his programs for devloping weapons of mass destruction.

For a brief, shining moment, I heard this message: “Qaddafi has learned the lessons of Iraq. And you notice that North Korea and Iran are pretty quiet these days…”

Yes. North Korea has learned the lessons of the Iraq War.

Which, as far as I can tell: we can topple dictators, particularly if their military is about the size of the Idaho National Guard. At that point, we really don’t… know… what… to do.

At which point, we can alienate that nation’s population… and… lose a war through perpetual bombing?

What lesson did Iran learn? “Better build up the arsenal… FAST” and “We like that ‘Pre-emptive War’ Rhetoric! Let’s goof around with it a bit.”

…..
Actually, about Iran. In January of 2002, they had a moderate Reform-minded government (naturally restrained by the Islamic hierarchy), the hardliners on the outs a bit, a population that had the greatest of sympathies toward the US population for 9/11, and a burgeoning student population enthralled with the promises of the West. Sure, their government had disgusting elements in it… but…

Question: What was the point in calling Iran an “Axe of Evil”? Doesn’t that mostly just feeds into the goddamned hardliners, and reinforces their power.

Did you catch this statement by some Pentagon official (perhaps even Rumsfeld) at the time of the somewhat overhyped Student Demonstrations? “Even if Iran develops a Westernized Democracy, we’d still have to be weary of them, because Iran has a history such that they’ve developed a sense of destiny to them… the Persian Mystique…”

My thought then was “Wow. Those bastards are hedging their bets!”

Why 40% of Americans Believe Utter Crap

Tuesday, September 14th, 2004

Take it away, Donald Rumsfeld.

“In Afghnistan, the leader of the opposition Northern Alliance, Masoud, lay dead, his murder ordered by Saddam Hussein, by Osama bin Laden, Taliban’s co-conspirator.”

Ahmed Shah Masoud, who opposed the ruling Taliban, was killed by suspected Al Qaeda operatives — not Hussein — two days before the Sept. 11 attacks.

“Saddam Hussein, if he’s alive, is spending a whale of a lot of time trying to not get caught. And we’ve not seen him on a video since 2001.”

Hussein was captured by U.S. forces in Iraq; Bin Laden has not been found. We have seen Hussein on a video since 2001: don’t you remember him opening his eye saying “Aye”. Actually, we’ve seen Bin Laden on a video since 2001: don’t you remember “Bin Laden’s new duds”?

DONNELLY: Mr. Secretary, you said earlier that Saddam Hussein hasn’t done a video for a while. You meant Osama bin Laden, right?

RUMSFELD: I did. I meant that we haven’t seen Osama bin Laden. Thank you.

And I made one other mistake, I’m told. This says that the flag- draped policy was established not in the last administration but in the one before that, which would have been Bush 41. And for that I hasten to correct myself. I want to thank whoever sent the note up. (Laughter.)

Have you forotten? Has Rumsfeld forgotten?

As an aside, there’t… this:

DONNELLY: The Financial Times today editorializes that it is, quote, “time to consider Iraq withdrawal,” close quote, noting the protracted war is not winnable and it’s creating more terrorists than enemies of the West. What is your response, this questioner asks.

RUMSFELD: Who put that question in? He ought to get a life. If he’s got time to read that kind of stuff — (laughter) — he ought to get a life. (Scattered applause.)

Novak

Tuesday, September 14th, 2004

Take it away, Robert Novak:

On the CNN panel show, “Capital Gang,” Novak expressed grave doubts about the CBS documents, then said: “I’d like CBS, at this point, to say where they got these documents from. They didn’t get them from a CIA agent. I don’t believe there was any laws involved. I don’t think we’ll have a special prosecutor, if they tell. I think they should say where they got these documents because I thought it was a very poor job of reporting by CBS ….”

Fellow panelist, Al Hunt, from the Wall Street Journal, then replied: “Robert Novak, you’re saying CBS should reveal its source?”

NOVAK: Yes.

HUNT: You do? You think reporters ought to reveal sources?

NOVAK: No, no. Wait a minute.

HUNT: I’m just asking.

NOVAK: I’m just saying in that case.

HUNT: Oh.

NOVAK: I think — I think it’s very important. If this is a phony document, the American — the people should know about it.

HUNT: So in some cases, reporters ought to reveal sources.

NOVAK: Yes.

HUNT: But not in all cases.

NOVAK: That’s right.

I wish I had great insight or a fresh perspective to add to this, but I don’t. Therefore, I’ll just act like every other blog and just pass it on.

Rock and Roll Part TWO

Monday, September 13th, 2004

Anyway, read about him (Ullysseus Simpson Grant), he is far more interesting than Estes Kefauver ever could have been. BTW, I met Kowfever once. I was not impressed with him but then he probably was not very impressed with me either. No matter, he was strictly a one-trick Pony as far as I could tell and I did not do any work for him in any way. I do not remember him as doing anything at all at the Convention that year, just faded away into the great southern slough and was never heard from again.

I eye Aye…