And a one and a two and a three… I have heard of high school kids cribbing their school papers from Wikipedia, but here we have an example of an editorial/blog that was written in precisely the same way. Your description of LaRouche and his views is utter nonsense. He is a Franklin Roosevelt Democrat, and has been consistently so for decades. The Wikipedia article is simply tripe recycled from poison pens like Chip Berlet.
COUNTERPOINT!

Dateline Sweden:
Bumper-sticker-type sticker on a rubbish bin I pass every day on my cycle ride in to university. According to someone (besides the man himself, who last ran for POTUS in 2004), the next US president will be… not a re-elected Barack Obama, not Mitt Romney, not Newt Gingrich, but… Lyndon LaRouche. Talk about leaping out of the frying pan (Obama), sailing over the fire (Romney) and the industrial-scale furnace (Gingrich), only to land in the Hellmouth itself.
I have had to deal with LaRouchites (as his extremely devoted followers are called) on at least one occasion: when Daniel Ellsberg of Pentagon Papers fame came to speak at Northwestern. They heckled Ellsberg mercilessly about… IIRC, the importance of building a nuclear missile shield, which had nothing whatsoever to do with the subject of his talk. At least based on that experience, LaRouchites (along with, I think, the man himself) have the teeth and the tenacity of bulldogs.

Dateline Seattle, from flickr user Wonderlane:

The demonstrators, who were handing out flyers and seeking donations, represent the Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee, a known anti-government entity based in Leesburg, VA, who partake in peaceful demonstrations depicting Obama as a member of the Nazi regime.

Neither of the demonstrators would comment publicly. However, one did ask for a $100 donation.

Lyndon Larouche himself is a convicted felon and how the Dickens anyone would give his organization financial support totally bafles me. He was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment in 1988 for
Actuary, the Larouche campaign organization is distinctly anti-government, anti-semitic, and generally anti most anything that does not fit his conspiracy-laden view of the world.

V.  It probably tears Ron Paul fans to pieces to see the Romney — Santorum side by side in the papers, a modification from the earlier Romney — Santorum — Paul when it became clear they’d finish a virtual tie in the Iowa caucuses.  There’s an uncomfortable trick of the media at work in this nomination — we’ve had Romney sitting there all along, the eventual nominee — and we’ve had Paul sitting there all along, trending his askew electorate.  And the anti-Romney has simply gone from one candidate to the next, as the media focuses on each one individually, and then his/her… problems come to light.  And so Santorum comes in, simply because he was the last in line.

With increased Ron Paul attention, we have increased Ron Paul comparisons to…

The biggie is Commentary Magazine, which is blunt with the title “Is Ron Paul the New Larouche?”  And here is its history:
Into the vacuum left by LaRouche came Ron Paul.
Two comments worth picking up:
When you can show me Lyndon be elected to Congress 12 times and gain the amount of support of Paul, then we can talk… Until then stop with these ridiculous articles..
 More to the point.  But we should understand that unlike Ron Paul, Lyndon LaRouche actually ran a classic cult, the real deal: top down thought control, indoctrination, self -promotion of a world-redeeming prophetic charismatic cult of personality, self-criticism of lieutenants, psychological depersonalization and directed de-indiviudualion of disciples. etc. Ron isn’t doing any of this.

This whole fascination with Ron Paul (whose prognostications on the one issue he purports to be expert – monetary policy – have been all wrong) is analogous to if Lyndon LaRouche actually, finally, managed to get the Democratic nomination, or be competitive in Iowa.

 Still, if LaRouche could get Democrats to vote for him in 1992, I suppose that Ron Paul can collect some of these true believers to form something that looks like a coalition.

From Democratic Underground forum on the Ron Paul supporters.
I remember back in the early 90’s the talk was the same with the Larouche’s
Same here. Paul is filling the void left by LaRouches’ 3 decades of not getting any attention
What a bunch of fools! I saw a bunch of them at the Boston Occupy, no they were not a majority, but they are hanger ons, sort of like the Larouchies. It’s like a cult.

Will an eccentric Texas billionaire jump into the campaign and throw everything into chaos?  (I’m looking at you Lyndon LaRouche!).

I ‘ve always seen Paulians as leftoverLaRouchies..

And Ron Paul supporters are demented cultists, a teensie bit more rational than LaRouchies, which isn’t saying much.

When it comes to the cult of personality for which Lyndon LaRouche has been accused of doing that for a very long time….it’s no wonder why LaRouche seems to be quite fond of Philip Giraldi, a former foreign policy adviser from wRONg Paul’s 2008 campaign.
Giraldi is well noted for being pro-Iranian.  He pushes regular anti-Israel conspiracy theories daily on Antiwar.com and other websites.  The fact that LaRouche is praising Giraldi and his propaganda expose there is something sinister affort.  Giraldi’s former boss is basically tied for first with Mitt Romney in Iowa.

I tell you, the whole Ron Paul thing is scary to me. Those people act and look like LaRouchies. …
Ah, yes, the LaRouchies! Yikes! I’ve had my run in with them down at Zuccotti (I’ve written about OWS – some very funny stuff, if I do say so myself). I was a Tory for one year…in 1988…when I was 10. If I HAD to affiliate with any British party, …

 possibly a Lyndon Larouche person.

Ana from NY:

But here’s a novelty. From David Lindsay, who lives in some concern about an emerging Larouchie electorate.
I knew that Newt Gingrich reminded me of someone, and now I know who. Gingrich is the Republican Party’s Lyndon LaRouche. […]
Gingrich has all of LaRouche’s lunacy and none of his occasional flashes of brilliance. Mainstream Democrats need to become the party to end the bailouts, restore Glass-Steagall, bring home the troops from Afghanistan, eschew future such adventures, invest in key infrastructure, uphold the traditional definition of marriage, really fight against drugs, introduce single-payer healthcare, resist climate change hysteria, and defend both classical education and working and middle-class access to it. Or the LaRouche Movement will. But, in spite of its history even into the fairly recent past, the Republican Party will not.

Newt gets some of this love too.

As does… Christopher Hitchens, like Lyndon Larouche, used to present himself as a leftist.
Fun idea: look up the verbal jousting Hitchens did to some Larouchies a few years’ back.

Alan Grayson‘s staff …  Matt Stoller, the former Senior Policy Advisor to Rep. Alan Grayson and a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute
I was called in meetings of Democratic legislative assistants a “Larouchie”, and the bill to audit the Fed was referred to by one staffer as a “piece of shit”. Yet, despite the staff opposition, the number of sponsors continued to climb, first hitting ..
Thank you, Barney Frank, for efforts on that one.  And we know he’s a Larouchie.  (Actually oddly enough Barney Frank figures in some of those wackadoodle Ron Paul newsletter solicitations.  Politics swerves in odd directions sometimes — Frank was name-checking Ron Paul in his last quasi-tough re-election campaign.)

Say… When you’ve lost Godlikeproductions and David Icke…

That douchebag and his organization are scam artists.

lyndon laroach, neo nazi and as many described him a cult leader, very suspect guy, fuck him!

Niewert’d get along great with the LaRouchies, or those who think that the Freemasons control world events.
This one’s pretty comical.  After dredging through NWO conspiracy theories and picking at Chip Berlet, we get the Larouchie comparison.

… Hm.

The next time one of the Larouchies… Schlanger, Steinberg, Larouche… goes on Alex Jones… they need to alert the masses of Alex Jones listeners to the full dimensions of the Hitler problem.  Rand Paul is Hitler too, right?  Not just Obama?

VI.  Rick Potvin Corner.
I’m now a category at Rick Potvin.
He recommends Ed Hamler.
And he gives into the Larouche War on Christmas.
“Reviewing Nero”.  Yeah, there was also a movie about fish you could compare Obama with.

 The bottom line:
“The End of the Line of the Anglo-Dutch System” makes for entertaining if not quite accurate reading. It is beyond me how a drastically weakened Britain at the end of WWII set out to “systematically the American economy” by undermining the Bretton Woods system. Wouldn’t such a weakened country have a similarly degraded bargaining position? Nor is it explained why the British Bretton Woods delegation led by John Maynard Keynes of all people would be more keen on “neoliberal” principles than his American counterpart, Harry Dexter White. Ah, but why quibble about historical accuracy when you can do creative writing?
Surely, there’s some entertainment value with this.

“Anti-ZIonists” cut into the Larouche cause of the moment:
Obama’s “work” might be concluded, but that just means that our job has only just begun. Yesterday there was message that was released concerning the beginning of World War Three by Lyndon LaRouche.Many have not heard of him, but I’ve followed his antics for almost as long as I’ve been involved in this nightmare. He has run for president many, many times, and always without even minimal success. Rumor has it that his wife is the Chancellor of Germany, but I don’t know this to be a fact. What I do know is that he has studied world Affairs for decades, and in many respects his views can often carry a great deal of weight. (1)However he began his message by suggesting that the USA use Section 4 of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to free ourselves from the insanity of Barack Obama. I wondered at the time why he had not bothered to quote that amendment for his viewers. Here it is:  […] (2)Of course after reading it, the entire offering from LaRouche becomes a farce because Israel has penetrated all three levels of control over the office of the presidency—with the Zionist occupiers of Israel.
There you go.  Larouche working for the Zionists.

Game for everyone.  What is this comment referring to, and who is this Jacque Fresco?
I can’t remember what the third one was about but basically its sort of like a pseudo-cult. It isn’t a political cult in the exact same way Ron Paul, Lyndon LaRouche, and Alex Jones are because these people do not seem to hold Peter Joseph and Jacque Fresco up to that level. Of course Jacque Fresco doesn’t really care too much for these people, but it is these movies that have increased his visibility and I give them credit for that.
Give up?  Here’s your answer. 
Personally I have mixed feelings on Zeitgeist. It has some good ideas but it sort of reminds me of the LaRouchies and what the Ron Paul people are becoming.

And finally…