Rand Paul wooing voters still angry about Monica.

Rand Paul is partying like it’s 1999!

Or, probably 1998.

In recent weeks, one Republican after another has come forward to rebut the Democratic claim that the GOP is waging a “war on women.” The responses have ranged from homey (Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers responding to Barack Obama’s State of the Union address by noting that she’d given birth just eight weeks earlier) to creepy (former presidential candidate Mike Huckabee saying Democrats think women can’t control their “libidos.”) But perhaps most puzzling has been the tack taken by Rand Paul, who in interview after interview after interview has accused Democrats of “hypocrisy” for claiming to support women’s rights while giving Bill Clinton a pass for his “predatory” behavior towards Monica Lewinsky.

The pundit-ocracy is speaking.

What Rand Paul needs to stop doing.

Apparently there’s a whole treasure trove of new materials from the Clinton era about the whole brohauhau about Monica Lewinsky.  A right wing blog news source has had a field day publishing a bunch of stuff.

The funny thing about it is… none of it is all that much interesting.

(And check out that photoraph down a ways on the NYT piece of Rand Paul WALKING RIGHT AT YOU.  It needs to be printed in 3D, to give you the total effect of Rand Paul WALKING RIGHT AT YOU.)

You know… when Ron Paul voted for impeachment… he took the opportunity to explain his vote as … erm… War.  What is it good for?  Though, he didn’t follow up on it for Bush.  But Rand Paul isn’t Ron Paul, and Rand Paul needs to somehow appeal to 60 something year old conservative activists in Iowa, and repeating Monica is sexier than repeating Benghazi over and over again.

Leave a Reply