your beckian larouchite jones crew and the whole boston done by whatever explanation

I.  Once again, we have that Larouche / Jones / Beck confluence.  Larouche has always claimed an “I Got there First” on 9/11 Conspiracy.  He was on the radio in Utah when the attacks happened, on one of his big media validators, and he threw out “Mossad!”  Whether this can credit him as first or not, when numbskulls all over the place were doing about the same, I don’t really kno.  But from somewhere, the rightwing source of “AIM” picked up the phrase, “Intellectual author of the 9/11 Truth Movement” to describe Larouche — more in the ground of the logic othat pulls the conspiracy world together than the conspiracy theories themselves.

And, wait, I thought this was Tavistock.  Or… Columbia University?  He also called MIT, where the suspects reportedly killed a police officer, “mind control central.”

For the Boston Maratahon bombers, we have Alex Jones able to claim “FIRST!”  Because, apparently, he jumped in to tweet right as it came about, complete with the hash-tag “FALSE FLAG”.  When we throw in the fact that the first question asked in a press conference from Massachusetts Governor Duvall Patrick was for Jones’s Infowars — something to do with a supposed glitch in the timeline — there we have it — Alex Jones is here cornering the market on “Fill in the Blank Latest Tragedy” Truth Movement.  Not to say the mainstream and particularly 24 Hour News Channels are particularly useful in relaying information at a time like this — just because they have 24 hours to fill doesn’t mean I feel obliged to “stay on top of the moment” — and we have here basically Fox News speculating on Islamic Terrorism and MSNBC speculating on McVeigh — which, naturally, beats Alex Jones which tosses up all the Internet speculation concerning a reworked Family Guy episode hoax, a random Guy on the Roof that left corners of the Internet buzzing, and all manner of useless crap.  And after all that, his site has the galls to “demand” an apology from those whose speculations steered over toward “patriot” groups.

POINT:   OTOH, Jones and the Infowars crew on my shitlist now. Not even LaRouche is that fucking stupid, or runs such a shit cult org. (Yes, you just heard me call Infowars a cult.) Sure, shock jock gotta shock, but there are limits and AJ & Company fucking moonwalked over that line.

COUNTERPOINT:  Especially if you’re going cite sources from the LaRouche Loons. Those people make Alex Jones look totally mainstream.

For the record, the word from Larouche himself…  So, I would  say: Well, somebody wants to make a mess. And I would say, the present administration, Presidential administration, becomes one of the first areas which you have to look at. Can he prove that he was not in some way
involved, either directly or indirectly in some of this? Or that people who were working so-called in his interest might not have been doing it?
I think what we have to do as a nation, is simply realize that this pattern of incidents, coincides with nothing, except somebody being clever and popping off terrorist effects in various parts of the United States, all in the same short time. Who has an interest in doing that? The question is out there to be asked. But the question remains.
Because, as he told Alex Jones last month and as we see Massachusetts’s own perenial Congressional candidate Rachel Brown reiterate… Obama’s out to kill 6 Billion people for the love of the Queen of England.

Glenn Beck has called for the President’s Impeachment because of — well, see it yourself— and the good news for Larouche’s cause of rattling for money, Benghazi gets thrown into the mix.   For whatever reason, Alex Jones thinks Beck’s beck and call to “come clean by Monday” is worth relaying.  Naturally, Beck slides more mainstream and partisan than Jones, and moreso than Larouche, but there’s a tail chasing a dog somewhere that becomes fascinating to slice apart.

What say Larouche favorite Vladamir Putin?  Oh wait… this works well with his war with Chechnyn Rebels.  It’s a little difficult to align the causes to fit Putin for Russian TV exposure.  In waiting for a line, the Larouchies fell back to this for Iran’s Press TV.:

Acts of terror are often rooted in social and financial problems and the U.S. should “create a road toward prosperity and hope for all people” to stop acts of terror from happening, says Bill Jones of Executive Intelligence Review.
“Creating again a road toward prosperity and hope for all people should be the long-term goal and unfortunately this is not the goal today of the present administration and the measures that are being taken are simply defensive and not positive,” he added.

And they don’t get to Obama yet with this:

“Whether it [the bombing] be internal, domestic in the United States or whether it be some kind of an international operation, it was obviously sending a signal on a very important holiday for Americans and for Bostonians specially,” said Jones in a phone interview with the U.S. Desk on Tuesday.  “I think it [the bombing] is a continuation of a general threat which the world, not only the United States but the world, is living under now because of the very unstable international economic situation,” he added.

Hard to tell if this had ANYTHING to do with the “holiday”.  But I suppose we’ll still see the sign slogan “Glass Steagal or Die”.  They’ll take it even more literally.

II.  A bit of “Comparative Cult Studies”.
I note that Bob Avakian showed up out of nowhere on a telephone pole.  Kind of.   Hard to figure the meaning here.  But this one stray photocopy… is more a literature dropping than I’ve seen from the Larouche Movement for quite some time.  But I guess they’re running around gun shows and what exists of Tea Party — and the Occupy Wall Street.  (Note:  Links mixed up for the Hell of it.)

More worth watching… the current state of Team Fred Newman, post Fred Newman’s death.

As the reflections of the mayoral term of Bloomberg come in — national focus will always be on the soda ban attempt and gun control — this will always be tucked right in as we close in on New York media.

Not to pile on the mayor, but there really is more. So we have the strange tale of the Independence Party, a bizarre amalgam of right-wing populists married to black leftists and once led by Fred Newman, a Marxist therapist who, The Daily News reported, advocated “friendosexuality” — translated as having sex with patients.
Whatever. Mr. Newman controlled a party line and Mr. Bloomberg all but purchased it. He gave the party more than $400,000 over the years and promised to support nonpartisan elections.

And, aha… Bloomberg Remarks for 2012 IPNYC Anti-Corruption Awards.

And they march on to the next mayoral election.

Pressed by the News about criticisms of the party by people like Manhattan Media Publisher — and Democrat-turned-Republican mayoral hopeful — Tom Allon, who has characterized past statements by IPNYC figures Fred Newman and Lenora Fulani, as grossly anti-Semitic, Carrion responded forcefully.
“Anybody who knows me — I’m a Puerto Rican kid from New York City who’s practically half-Jewish by virtue of… by birth and association here in this city,” he said. “So give me a break!
“You know, I would never be associated with anything that’s anti-Semitic. I can see it a mile away,” Carrion said. “Every Jewish leader in this town and in this country knows I’m a friend of Israel. I’ve been there five times. I’ve fought for all their causes, and I will continue to do that.”

Surely ye jest.

Always worth lobbing the Jackie Salit in there…  And we seem to have that Post Modernist Marxist Multidirectional Centrist Independence, what Salit and company can glue in on is a media friendly item that seems to pop up with a different name each election cycle.

A No Labels a ha movement, eh?  Never had one of those.  But they’ll give us this “social innovation” through destruction of partisan fighting.

ITEM NUMBER THREE:  PO TOUR UPDATES

Dateline Seattle:  Anastasia Mares, a Seattle-based organizer for LaRouche PAC, laughs freely as she hands out anti-Obama and anti-bailout literature outside the Coos Bay post office Wednesday afternoon. LaRouche PAC seeks to advocate public policy based on the ideology of 90-year-old Lyndon LaRouche, a perennial presidential candidate  who was convicted of mail fraud and conspiracy in 1988. LaRouche  contends the bailout is an attempt to reduce the world’s population by starving the poor.

Dateline Hudson Valley:  I went to a militaria show here in the Hudson Valley, NY on Saturday. As I was pulling into the parking lot, I saw a huge “IMPEACH OBAMA” sign on the corner. Now, as someone who is not a fan of the President, I approached the table where the sign was with great interest. My disappointment grew as I saw the sign next to the big impeach sign, which was an ad for LaRouchePAC.  That really would suck.

BURN!  I wonder how often you stand around your local county annex trying to collect money for Lyndon Larouche.

Dateline Chicago0:

Frank Mathis, a LaRouche PAC representative from New Jersey, said they were touring the Panhandle. “This is where (U.S. Representatives) Jeff Miller and Steve Southerland are,” Mathis said. “In 2011, Miller said he would not support restoring the Glass-Steagall Act. We want to know what he thinks now.”  Sounds good so far as it goes.
Monday in Chipley, the PAC was taking money from new members. “We need to spread out the organization’s support,” Mathis said. “I’m from New Jersey, and there isn’t much support or awareness of what we do. We’re trying to get the message out.”  Yeah, sucks to be them.
“The people that support us suspect that Obama and the government are not on their side,” Vullo said. “The people who don’t support us are in denial.””  Hm.

Dateline Chipley:

The City Council was not happy with the LaRouche Political Action Committee’s visit to Chipley.  Must be an Obama Police State Town. […]
“Our ordinances don’t really have the teeth in them to let us enforce them,” said Police Chief Crews. “Normally, when we arrest someone, we use the state statute, and we’re dealing with criminals.”
Miner said toward the end of the day, he and Crews had decided that arresting the LaRouche representatives was really the only way the city could respond, and that had the potential of opening the city up to a lawsuit.  If it’s any consolation, I’m not sure they want to deal with their lawsuit either.  If it’s any grief, I’d be siding with the Larouchies… I think.
“When she finds out what can be done, I think we should bring this ordinance back to the council and fix it,” said Councilman Kevin Russell.
And the basic problem.  Councilman Reed said he saw one person write a check to the LaRouche people for $200. He asked for a copy of the membership form that Mathis was having donors complete, but was refused a copy.  Yeah, you can get people to throw two hundred dollars away down the toilet.
“I was there for about two hours, and every time they got a donor, he would fold that form up and put it in his hip pocket, then he would put the check in his front pocket,” Reed said. “Then they would laugh about it.”

Here’s a quasi-supporter.  Won’t defend his lifestyle of the man, apparently, but is for mass transit.   I won’t comment further — I haven’t taken a time to a’listen.

ITEM NUMBER FOUR:

Event Date:
Saturday, April 27, 2013 - 2:00pm to 5:00pm
Sare for Governor Town Hall Meeting

If Glass-Steagall is not immediately rammed through both houses of the US Congress, get ready to do just that.  […]  Call your US Senator and demand that he or she stop acting like a British subject or Wall Street slave, and introduce and pass Glass-Steagall now.

Be there or be Square.  They should use that phrase, actually.

ITEM NUMBER FIVE:

Selling for Philipino sympathy.   Noted election results.
Gerald Celente EXPOSED — and … compared to … well.
BTW American has a Socialist Party, did you know that? They always try to compete on the ballots. There was one guys called Lyndon LaRouche who had some money and every election time he would buy TV time talking and talking and talking! Sometimes he gets a few votes.
Why couldn’t we have someone like him as President? Scratch that, I know why, we don’t vote for anything, the “Powers that Be,” would NEVER put someone like Mr. Larouche in, he would do too much good.
Lawrence Freeman of EIR on Syria on RT.
Michael Billington regarding WW3 and Korea.
Harley Schlanger on Dr. Deagle.
Harley Schlanger blog talk radio — John J Mazzone.
The Daily Tribune references Iran’s Press TV appearance by Mike Billington, noting him with Larouche, which is something worth watching — when the validators mention Larouche and when it doesn’t.
And we see the reaction from the paranoid peanut gallery … “Let the Fight Begin“.  yes.  World War 3.
Lunatic Outpost posits a grand debate between the Larouche Movement and Bill Still as an epic Hamilton versus Jackson debate.
Sure, whatever.  Lyndon Larouche is BRILLIANT!!! Why couldn’t we have someone like him as President? Scratch that, I know why, we don’t vote for anything, the “Powers that Be,” would NEVER put someone like Mr. Larouche in, he would do too much good for this country.
Mike Billington of the LaRouche movement in an interview with Iran’s Press TV had this to say: “There has been a concerted effort in the Western press… to falsify the warning coming from China … Xi Jinping… in a forum yesterday said no country should have the right to create a regional or even global crisis for their own self-interests … That was recorded in the New York Times this morning adding falsely the words in front of that speech that no ‘Asian country’ should have the right to do that.”

ITEM NUMBER SIX:  Your neo-nazi corner.  A bit of fun.

VNN FORUM.   We must beware of Zionist disinformation. The jew, Makow, apparently maintains his view of Holocaust Veracity.
Previously, another kosher club, perhaps the LaRouchies, alleged that there’d be a ‘war’ between the Rothschilds & Rockefellers.
Now, it seems that Makow, Fulford et al. are promoting the allegation of a split between western & eastern drug & money mafias in regard to the “inoculation of diseases” mentioned as jew policy in The Protocols.

And then there’s the “swept into a Larouche Conspiracy” corner:

For MN GunTalk.  The Larouchies claimed (and do yet today) that I was an agent of MI-5. At the time of the small window war over Obamacare, I was denounced by Kurt Nimmo.

The Wenzel trying to get web traffic conspiracy.  No, this is all kind of … dopey?

And this is just mean.
For the record, Kinsella is a very sleazy, dirty fighter.  His personal attacks against me don’t seem to stop, as bizarre as they might be. I am not going to spend the rest of my career going over every one of his attacks. This is just a blanket warning to all about the sleazy tactics used by this guy. I will provide only two examples to show you what I mean.
There’s this:  ” Wenzel is a shadowy character. Who knows where he came from. Some former Lyndon Larouche type? Who knows.”

Notice the question mark after the Lyndon Larouche quip. He knows full well that I have never been affiliated with Lyndon Larouche. He’s afraid of a lawsuit and throws in the question mark. Sleazy. No facts, total innuendo. I have been a libertarian since the early 1970s when Harry Browne’s first book came out. I said so in an interview back in February.
There is a Robert Wenzel that did contribute to the Lyndon Larouche Political Action Committee in 2007. He lives in Spring Lake, New Jersey. I have never lived in Spring Lake, NJ and I don’t think I have ever even passed through it. It appears this Robert Wenzel was85 years old, when he made the contributions. I am not quite 85 years old, even now, 6 years later.
It’s a total Kinsella smear. As was this slimy move by him during the debate, in the same cute way, discussing me and Scientology, where it’s not really clear whether he has facts. Total smear.
For the record, I will pay anyone $250,000 if they can link me with Scientology. Good luck. I have never as much stopped to take one of their sidewalk stress tests. Come to think of it, I will offer $500,000 to anyone who can link me to Lyndon Larouche.

Well…

 Look into it.  Connecto ameutuers.

 Did you know that Glencore once had a secretive hedge fund called Asteri Capital, and that its senior managers had weird past connections to Lyndon LaRouche? Did you know that the guy who ran it ended up at J.P. Morgan, presiding over Bruno Iskil, the trader implicated in the ‘London Whale’ scandal? Questions need answering, so check out this secret history of Glencore’s hedge fund.

meh.

Per Dr. Webster G. Tarpley, former long-time associate of Lyndon LaRouche, his organization is a CIA operation for many years now. This was the reason for Tarpley’s departure after 20 years of collaboration. There are strong links between LaRouche’s NCLC and Cantor-Fitzgerald in the N. America and LaRouche’s Schiller Institute and Dresdner Bank in Germany. The two are tied to CIA money laundering, and LaRouche’s people provide “intellectual cover”. LaRouche has always denounced strategic threats to the drug trade, such as Hugo Chavez, while letting the real kingpins off the hook. Tarpley is among those who claim Tower 7 of the World Trade Center was deliberately destroyed by the CIA because it held all Cantor-Fitzgerald’s records pertaining to its funneling CIA drug money into the markets.

Finally.  Comedy Relief.  Slack!  That’s the old time Internet stuff.

 

Leave a Reply