Okay.  Where were we?

Writing in the Oct. 31 edition of Executive Intelligence Review, leading U.S. statesman and economist Lyndon LaRouche issued a major report, one which, he wrote, “may come to be considered by some among the world’s leading circles of today, as the most important political document you have read, or might have read, during your lifetime to date.”

You know how television shows always advertise with “The final 15 minutes of Tuesday’s night program will be the most shocking 15 minutes in television history”?  You know how the major comic book publishers always used to plaster their covers with “Special Collector’s Edition”, salted liberally?  You know how a used car seller or a mattress seller advertises with “The Deal of the Century”?  How many of these proclamations of “most important political document you have read, or might have read, during your lifetime to date” can there be?

But this is all old and stupid.  When I get the chance I am going to look into the functionality of Alex Jones’s websites — are these things user input with a helpful editor that tracks the desired conspiracy mongering to the front?– because I note this:

Conspiracy theories abound throughout the Internet, as occurs when anything of this magnitude occurs – and one of the most astounding theories I’ve come across is that Great Britain was actually behind the attacks as published on Alex Jone’s site.

That actually is a rather unastounding and very boring theory.  And you know why that is.  If I hadn’t plucked this from the realms of the Internet by way of the keyword search “Larouche”, I would still know the source of this crap.  The British Empire — to quote the fellow, “And the British are also in heat right now.”  Is there no end to their sex-starved treachery?  What will they think of next?  (Well, this.  But that’s been floating in Larouche’s mind since the summer.  To paraphrase a drunk Mel Gibson, “The British are responsible for all the wars in the world.  And presidential assassinations.  Are you a Brit?”  I look forward to the upcoming Robert Beltran narrated L-Pac video on the British treachery of germ warfare which gave President William Henry Harrison pneumonia.)

Continuing:
This is an article that all should read, and when I first read it, my first thought was “WTF???” Then, I took the time to read-up on Lyndon LaRouche’s track-record for being correct – and if you read it yourself – it’s mind-numbing how often Mr. LaRouche has been correct in his predictions and analysis of several issues that have actually been absolutely correct, and this time, I hope that he’s dead-wrong!

Is there some sort of memo on how a Larouchie interacts on the Internet?  “Always act surprised, yet intrigued at the reading of a Larouche tract.  State that you’ve heard about him, and some bad things, but have never looked into him yourself.”  Anyway, I’m eating my 20 dollar loaves of bread and am waiting with the horror of our up-coming Michael Bloomberg Administration.

The link, I guess, came to us from sort of the fringes of the Alex Jones website.  Meaning, the fringe of the fringe.  The front page would tend to entreat you with information that Webster Tarpley will be on the next Alex Jones show, Alex Jones to be on the next Webster Tarpley show — Tarpley having more credence in the world of Kookery than Larouche (though, this may be by design).  The last time I spotted, in my slightly askewed glance over the Internet, Larouche being in the Alex Jones web-sphere — it was with a youtube clip where Larouche babbled on about how everyone is going to be killing everyone else — and, if you imagine 2 straight days of speeches along those lines, the not entirely unfeasible portrait of a lone LYM taking things into his own hands at an isolated conference in Germany becomes a little easy to picture.

If the Alex Jones sites operated with this sort of user-based variety, I can entertain myself with an odd version of how things work with dailykos — where we see this post has been deleted.  Karole Noymann contributed for consideration and deletion an entry which began:  Maybe Lyndon LaRouche isn’t so crazy after all25 Nov 2008
OK maybe my title is a bit misleading since this diary is about Mrs. Helga Zepp-LaRouche, for over thirty years the wife of Lyndon LaRouche, who has worked closely with her husband and reflects his own views and philosophy.  Perhaps this makes Markos Moulitsas and his website are one of those dreaded “Gate-keepers” conspiracy theorists talk about, keeping this view or that view outside the purview of respectable opinion.  I wonder if I were to create an account and post some rather tame donkey versus elephant partisan horse race item at Alex Jones’s website if I would be similarly deleted.  Well, it’s a thought.

But, in terms of the Internet, wikipedia is probably the front-line of any Larouchian fight.  I tend think the wikipedia article on Larouche right now is a little lame, the Larouchies have successfully gotten a good focus on their roaming batch of any figure who has given the man validation.  On the other hand, I appear to have indirectly affected the entry on “James Bevel”, this post seeming to have lead to a further explication of Bevel’s career of the time — which had been posted at wikipedia as simply “getting his educational viewpoinits to the public” (appreciate the dark humor there) to include such items as “booed off stage in front of black Nationalists” and more importantly the Nebraska Child Molestation hoax he played a part in propagating (irony or ironies) and… Perhaps there is more to the story of Bevel’s career in his Larouchian phase and why, but researchers would have to figure it out and document it.

In other news, Funny this, though ironically something of a Larouchian tactic:

The lowest of low blows was lodged anonymously against a House GOP leader candidate, New Hampton Rep. Fran Wendleboe.
Titled “The Truth About Fran,’’ the two-page attack called her the “Lyndon LaRouche of NH politics’’ in referring to her past unsuccessful bids for Congress, party chairwoman and state Senate.
It had a character assassination of Sam Pimm, who had led the Reagan Network political action committee that Wendleboe formed and which opposed the renomination of moderate-to-liberal GOP House members.
And it contained a picture of Miss Piggy the Muppet and a picture of Wendleboe with the caption “Separated at birth?’’
The letter was sent with no return address to all House Republican members the weekend before Monday’s leadership vote.

And,  Satanists are upset with Larouche.  Supposedly a pivot for the org would be to seek funding sources and feign support for and around a sort of Sarah Palin supporting Christian sources — this  a good start to that goal, I suppose.  (Look into this story yourself.)

In other news — David Icke has been making some rounds and figuring in the Franken — Coleman recount here in the states… in Britain — it gets even odder.  (Franken is seen here playing Henry Kissinger in an enactment of the scholarly polemic “Henry Kissinger and the Politics of Faggery.)

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008 at 10:10 am and is filed under The LaRouche Challenge, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.