<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there no end to the treachery of the British Empire?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.struat.com/election/2008/12/03/is-there-no-end-to-the-treachery-of-the-british-empire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.struat.com/election/2008/12/03/is-there-no-end-to-the-treachery-of-the-british-empire/</link>
	<description>Political discourse.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:28:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.struat.com/election/2008/12/03/is-there-no-end-to-the-treachery-of-the-british-empire/comment-page-1/#comment-59919</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.struat.com/election/2008/12/03/is-there-no-end-to-the-treachery-of-the-british-empire/#comment-59919</guid>
		<description>tap tap tap.

Okay.  A conservative Internet magazine, &quot;conservative&quot; of the Pat Buchanan school so maybe I should find a different term.  (Terminology is damnedable at times.)  And a column by Pat Buchanan.  Followed by comments.  

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=803
&quot;george&quot; sees an opening for where this conversation takes us.  British did what now?:
http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=803#comment-182740

And, defending larouche, brings us to the exchange:

1.“Yes EVIL RUSSIA that most Americans hate helped keep the US united…”
2. Are you trying to turn me against Russia?
3. What do you mean?
Is it because you don’t like Lincoln?

The Larouchie&#039;s flagrant desire, incidentally:  &lt;i&gt;Starting to look like 1917 all over again.&lt;/i&gt;

And then, selling Larouche&#039;s premise of what brought on World War I, he links to a site for Benjamin Freedman, wikipedia article available here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman

TJF: &lt;i&gt;I am instructing the webmaster to ban anyone who cites Larouchie propaganda on this site. If you believe Larouche, I am an agent of the British government, the pal of Prince Phillip, Conrad Black, and the late Queen Mother. I am a leader in a plot to break up the USA and feed the bits to the British Empire, and–what’s more–the man who hired me was part of a murder plot against Larouche. Please, please, please, no more infantilism!&lt;/i&gt;

AND, after wading through anti-semitic crap, a final money shot:

&lt;i&gt;Etienne Gervaise
@24 Tom

Re: LaRouche

While I don’t subscribe to the man’s crackpot notions, I will vote for him in democratic primaries. Since I view all Democratic Party candidates as crackpots, and Virginia has not voter registration by party, I’ll vote for the local bull-goose loony! When I announce my actions the looks of horror are priceless.

Furthermore, a late friend of mine who sat on the Loudoun County bench said the trial of LaRouche was a complete farce. The feds had it in for him, just hope they don’t come after the Rockford Institute the same way.&lt;/i&gt;

That last paragraph deserves a bit of unpacking.  George chimes back in, two items of interest.:

&lt;i&gt;Although he definitely avoids the Jewish issue (fails to mention the Rothschild’s, Kissinger, Schultz, Soros, etc are all Jewish) and focuses to much on Fascism.

LaRouche is the only one for decades who has been warning about the financial system, it’s state of decline and how to solve it or at least deal with it. &lt;/i&gt;

Yep.  Larouche avoids the &quot;Jewish issue&quot;.  Damneditall.

tap tap tap...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tap tap tap.</p>
<p>Okay.  A conservative Internet magazine, &#8220;conservative&#8221; of the Pat Buchanan school so maybe I should find a different term.  (Terminology is damnedable at times.)  And a column by Pat Buchanan.  Followed by comments.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=803" rel="nofollow">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=803</a><br />
&#8220;george&#8221; sees an opening for where this conversation takes us.  British did what now?:<br />
<a href="http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=803#comment-182740" rel="nofollow">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=803#comment-182740</a></p>
<p>And, defending larouche, brings us to the exchange:</p>
<p>1.“Yes EVIL RUSSIA that most Americans hate helped keep the US united…”<br />
2. Are you trying to turn me against Russia?<br />
3. What do you mean?<br />
Is it because you don’t like Lincoln?</p>
<p>The Larouchie&#8217;s flagrant desire, incidentally:  <i>Starting to look like 1917 all over again.</i></p>
<p>And then, selling Larouche&#8217;s premise of what brought on World War I, he links to a site for Benjamin Freedman, wikipedia article available here<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman</a></p>
<p>TJF: <i>I am instructing the webmaster to ban anyone who cites Larouchie propaganda on this site. If you believe Larouche, I am an agent of the British government, the pal of Prince Phillip, Conrad Black, and the late Queen Mother. I am a leader in a plot to break up the USA and feed the bits to the British Empire, and–what’s more–the man who hired me was part of a murder plot against Larouche. Please, please, please, no more infantilism!</i></p>
<p>AND, after wading through anti-semitic crap, a final money shot:</p>
<p><i>Etienne Gervaise<br />
@24 Tom</p>
<p>Re: LaRouche</p>
<p>While I don’t subscribe to the man’s crackpot notions, I will vote for him in democratic primaries. Since I view all Democratic Party candidates as crackpots, and Virginia has not voter registration by party, I’ll vote for the local bull-goose loony! When I announce my actions the looks of horror are priceless.</p>
<p>Furthermore, a late friend of mine who sat on the Loudoun County bench said the trial of LaRouche was a complete farce. The feds had it in for him, just hope they don’t come after the Rockford Institute the same way.</i></p>
<p>That last paragraph deserves a bit of unpacking.  George chimes back in, two items of interest.:</p>
<p><i>Although he definitely avoids the Jewish issue (fails to mention the Rothschild’s, Kissinger, Schultz, Soros, etc are all Jewish) and focuses to much on Fascism.</p>
<p>LaRouche is the only one for decades who has been warning about the financial system, it’s state of decline and how to solve it or at least deal with it. </i></p>
<p>Yep.  Larouche avoids the &#8220;Jewish issue&#8221;.  Damneditall.</p>
<p>tap tap tap&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
