{"id":7921,"date":"2011-04-13T01:39:21","date_gmt":"2011-04-13T08:39:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=7921"},"modified":"2011-04-12T18:55:11","modified_gmt":"2011-04-13T01:55:11","slug":"countdown-the-five-biggest-larouche-stories-of-the-past-10-days","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2011\/04\/13\/countdown-the-five-biggest-larouche-stories-of-the-past-10-days\/","title":{"rendered":"Countdown: the five biggest larouche stories of the past 10 days"},"content":{"rendered":"

STORY NUMBER ONE:\u00c2\u00a0 ALEX JONES WELCOMES NEW MEMBER IN THE LEAGUE OF VATICAN ASSASSINS!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yes, congratulations to the Org for joining the horde of “Vatican Assassins”.\u00c2\u00a0 For the sake of getting as large an audience as possible, from some lead in from media attention, nothing beats the day of the Charlie Sheen interview.\u00c2\u00a0 But the day Larouche got on Alex Jones falls into the next rung — though it is a distant second in terms of attention.\u00c2\u00a0 Fox News fired Glenn Beck, and due to their symbiotic relationship (which gets complicated<\/a>) — and while it pains me to do so, I do have to give Beck kudos for that one), Jones would have to address the matter.
\nBut this only goes so far.\u00c2\u00a0 I don’t remember who Jones had on after Charlie Sheen, and I would be more likely than most to catch that.\u00c2\u00a0 Media Matters stops at Jones discussing Beck<\/a> — not much gist for the partisan mill to be mined in sticking around, no way to slam Fox News.\u00c2\u00a0 The Examiner won’t bother to shift past that either<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Had they, we would have seen Lyndon Larouche and David Icke — The British Empire and then the Lizard People.<\/p>\n

Hm.<\/a> Given that, wait a few years and Jones will bring on Beck and vice versa.\u00c2\u00a0 Maybe Joel Skousen will decide that what Beck did to promote his uncle deserves them to be pulled together.
\nLike Sean Stone brought together Jones with the Larouche Movement.\u00c2\u00a0 Or so was said as Stone followed Jeffrey Steinberg.\u00c2\u00a0 Actually, I don’t really believe that.\u00c2\u00a0 There’s something a little funny going on, and I don’t know what it is.\u00c2\u00a0 I see the benefits for Larouche — they really do need a platform, and this is the largest available for their market segment.\u00c2\u00a0 Jones, I guess, just has the need to throw as many “truth Seekers” into his tent to be pissing outside his tent instead of standing outside pissing into his tent.\u00c2\u00a0 (Is that how that metaphor goes?)\u00c2\u00a0 I think someone really needs to do an investigative documentary dvd on this — show how the Cabal of Conspiranoid Junkets works — call it, in reference to Jones, “When the Mask Slips”.\u00c2\u00a0 I’ve got the final scene: it’s of someone shouting at Jones’s house in a bullhorn.<\/p>\n

I can’t figure out whether to recommend actually listening to this interview.\u00c2\u00a0 Jones and Larouche spend a good deal of time talking past each other, and I imagine that I would not know the difference between the transcript of what Larouche says here and the transcript of a Larouche webcast.\u00c2\u00a0 Larouche makes sure to stay a top of Jones, and we see that when — at one point — he responds to some conspiracy posited by Jones with “Th — That’s part of it.\u00c2\u00a0 That’s part of it”, a mere part of it — you understand.\u00c2\u00a0 (12:17 here<\/a>.)
\nAlso of some note, I guess… Who killed Kennedy?\u00c2\u00a0 (They did.)<\/p>\n

Larouche brings out the biggie at 9:50 here<\/a> — “We’ve got intel that tells us they’re planning on overthrowing the Monarchs<\/em>.” …
\n“What we’re looking at is the famous mythical story of Zeus and Prometheus.<\/em>”
\nAnd it goes on and on. The 62 Million Year Cycle brings us to the verge of our Crisis of Humanity.\u00c2\u00a0 And in the Ventian Inner Alpha Group, we see the Face of Pure Evil.<\/p>\n

Demonstrating his judicious research skills — the type that lead Jones to review the work of the Larouche movement and look further to see its validity — Jones quotes Jefferson.\u00c2\u00a0 He ran into this “an hour ago”.\u00c2\u00a0 Yes, here it is — on snopes<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The mention of FDR draws Jones to find common ground.\u00c2\u00a0 We can debate these things about welfare, but first we have to break down the common enemy — as Ron Paul said the other day on his show<\/em>.\u00c2\u00a0 This, I suppose could nod to a divergence of matters — how do they each view Rand Paul?\u00c2\u00a0 To Alex Jones, Rand Paul is a mole within the beast — to Larouche, Rand Paul is a Hitler mustached partner in crime with Obama.\u00c2\u00a0 Maybe next time, they can get into this issue?\u00c2\u00a0 (Whatever happened to the Rand Paul Hitler Mustache campaign anyway?)<\/p>\n

The reviews are coming in<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Now I know what Stephen Zarlenga, founder of The American Monetary Institute, was talking about in one of his interviews when he said that LaRouche supporters jump off the deep end with some of their proposed solutions. In this case, I think LaRouche did multiple Olympic gold medal winning jumps off the deep end throughout most of his interview.<\/em><\/p>\n

It is funny how these things come together.\u00c2\u00a0 This line now comes with a new meaning now that they’re all together<\/a>. <\/em><\/p>\n

I knew it, blame it on the jews<\/em>
\n You sound like David Ike.<\/em>
\n Lyndon Larouche ?<\/em>
\n Here come the lizard people.<\/em><\/p>\n

STORY NUMBER TWO:\u00c2\u00a0 SAN FRANCISCANS\u00c2\u00a0 HITTING MISIDENTIFIED SIGN WAVER CAUSES CONFUSION, MIXED ATTEMPTS AT PARTISAN GAME-WINNING, CLARIFICATION ON WHAT GOES VIRAL
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

When the show comes up on youtube lets make this go viral!<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

I admit I had my doubts when I saw this suggestion.\u00c2\u00a0 But I was impressed to see that they had succeeded in getting the discussion between Alex Jones and Lyndon Larouche to go “viral”.\u00c2\u00a0 The trick was to clip it down to its most important and succinct two minutes, and it became the biggest thing on the Internet for a day or so.\u00c2\u00a0 Here it is — Alex Jones and Lyndon Larouche holding forth<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Actually there was something Larouchian that did “go viral”.\u00c2\u00a0 It was big enough to make memeorandum<\/a>, at least.\u00c2\u00a0 Larouchie card table operator punched.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s, unfortunate, and people really should not do that, but it’s instructive to see why it received the amount of attention it did.<\/p>\n

The San Francisco paper botched the story, and also published a file photograph of an Obama supporter sign waver, giving a suggestion that it was this man who was punched.\u00c2\u00a0 Charges of media bias in focusing so much on conservatives behaving badly and not showing liberals behaving badly were mixed with allegations of conspiratorial plants and mixed with charges of “Leftist” overplaying a victim card<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Oddly, the “Even in San Francisco<\/a>” meme could straddle before pre and post correction.\u00c2\u00a0 Next a post correction came in, the assailants and victims were identified, and liberal commenters came in with a “Can’t you read?”\u00c2\u00a0 The conservative commenters and bloggers general line shifted to “Left on Left Violence!”, charged the liberal assailant with being over emotionally to their “Dear Leader”, and we got some discussion on which dictator Obama better resembles,\u00c2\u00a0 As well an attempted clarification of circumstances<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Other false notes bob up: Why wouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t this be classified as a hate crime? Oh, that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s right white victims don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t count<\/a>.
\n<\/em>A decent amount of extricating the Larouchies from any real partisan battle takes place<\/a>:
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

Another young, impressionable 20-something brainwashed by the Lyndon LaRouche Cult.<\/em><\/div>\n
Don’t know why anyone would waste their time on this dolt. Idiot isn’t worth the effort put into a punch.<\/em><\/div>\n
“…the victim supports left-wing activist Lyndon LaRouche.” It’s not enough that anyone to the left of the extreme right is accused of being a communist. Now, we’re to be lumped in with the likes of Lyndon LaRouche? Give me a break. LaRouche’s political philosophy is so incoherent as to defy any description. He is not a left wing activist; he is a crazy man. <\/em><\/div>\n
don’t think you’ll find too many left-wing extremists who, for example<\/a>, are adamant about their view that Leibowitz invented calculus rather than Newton, or who believe that nuclear-powered maglev trains are the way to go for a public transit infrastructure in the US.<\/em><\/div>\n
\n
\n

I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m not sure LaRouche can be categorized as left- or right-wing<\/a>. His wing is in a direction that doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t exist in three-dimensional space.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sympathy for the assailants is expressed<\/a>:<\/p>\n

I saw those \u00e2\u20ac\u0153LaRouchies\u00e2\u20ac\u009d in Costa Mesa with their card table and both Bush and Obama pictures with Hitler mustaches. I told them that I was voting for Ron Paul and they both went off like a couple of idiots. Good for whoever it was who messed with them. They deserve that and more.<\/em><\/p>\n

According to a witness, he was farther left than President Obama!?!?<\/a> Isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t complete socialism the only thing farther left than President Obama. I kind of don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t feel sorry for this guy getting beaten up.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n
BTW, those LaDouche (get it?) people deserve all the beat downs they can get.<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Hm.<\/p>\n

Those LaRouche people are just out there to enrage people. I was waiting in line to cus them out a while ago on 16th and Mission until a hail of eggs came flying at their table and they had to pack up and leave.<\/em><\/p>\n

Bottom line: All I know about the guy is that their supporters rang every single buzzer at my old building early one Saturday, and thinking it was a neighbor who was locked out, I went downstairs. Once I figured out what was going on, I think I interrupted their schpiel with “Wait, I came down here for this? It’s barely 9am. What the hell?” – turned around and went back upstairs, grumbling. Their flyer somehow made it into my hands though. I’m still pissed.<\/em><\/p>\n

Or, botome line: troll<\/a>?<\/p>\n

It’s spreading… kind of.\u00c2\u00a0 Dateline Heald<\/a>sburg:<\/p>\n

Wesley Vanderschaaf, one of the two activists at the table, said he and the other person, who declined to give her name, were there to oppose Obama’s policies on taxes, Wall Street bailouts, budget issues and healthcare and to solicit support for six congressional candidates backed by the Leesburg, Va.-based Lyndon LaRouche political action committee.
\n“We’re just getting contact information,” said Vanderschaaf, pointing to a mailing list that people could sign.<\/em> [..]
\nAsked about the Hitler-style mustache on Obama, Vanderschaaf said Obama’s policies are “indifferent to the wishes of the population,” similar, he said, to those that Hitler espoused in the 1930s and which led to the Holocaust. He also referred to the earthquakes in Japan, saying that Obama’s budget decisions would lead to shortages in emergency services in the U.S.
\nFelix, however, who is Jewish, said she was so upset by the display that she later called a local peace group to let them know about it.<\/em><\/p>\n

Not too bad, I guess, call the Peace Groups — police won’t “do something”.\u00c2\u00a0 McWhirr chimes in:
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

Henry McWhirr:\u00c2\u00a0 Secondly, in response to your statement about “defiling the memory of those who died in the Holocaust,” I should think that the best way to honor their memory is to be vigilant against any recurrence of those policies.<\/em><\/p>\n

Uh huh. There’s nothing all that much to get upset over.\u00c2\u00a0 Besides which, it feeds them a false Messianic claim of Martydom.\u00c2\u00a0 Note how the trifling San Francisco incident made the Alex Jones description<\/a> — mass strike indeed.<\/p>\n

STORY NUMBER THREE:\u00c2\u00a0 LAROUCHIES LAUNCH ATTACK ON ANTI-LAROUCHIE COMMENTERS, LEAVE ALONE JEW TALK<\/strong> <\/em><\/p>\n

And so it goes:\u00c2\u00a0 <\/a>Obamer-Listen to anything this guy has to say-Study this man<\/a>– He has something to say—-LISTEN TO HIM—-He studies what you are seeing now- We see what he is saying because we havent listend before- Is it to late? I dont know but I do know this – If we dont do anything we are in TROUBLE——-The movement has begun- where do ou stand-Ed<\/em>
\n He’s alright, I disagree with a bit of his stuff. Mos def on our side though.<\/em><\/p>\n

And so it goes:
\nWHY IS THURSDAY\u00e2\u20ac\u2122S PODCAST OF LYNDEN LAROUCHE UNAVAILABLE?!!<\/em>
\n It is, without question, THE most important, most concise and direct briefing to the American people and to the world who exactly the enemy is and what can and MUST be done in order to reverse course and rout humanity\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s enemies.<\/em>
\n […]Keep up the good fight until the Lord Jesus Christ comes to finish the war once and for all!!!
\n<\/em>Interesting audience segment<\/a>, that one<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

But a few comments leap out at the infowars page<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Lyndon LaRouche knows perfectly well that when he looks in the mirror he sees the face of evil.<\/em> I have followed this truly wild eyed nutcase sine the early 70s and he is as wacko as they come.<\/em>
\n fuck you douche bag your so full of shit your eyes are brown.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

I agree 100% it is the zionist, and Im not buying into the middle east riots as a spontanious or mass whatever. any fool can see it is organized Im not taking anything away from Lyndon LaRouche, but i dont think he really knows what hes talking about.. as to who is behind it all.Lyndon is a fake? Yeah\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6right. Lyndon has been fighting the good fight since before you were an itch in your daddy\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s pants, pal.<\/em><\/p>\n

Gotta say, I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m a little dissapointed that AJ interviewed Larouche. Larouche is basically a cult leader and con man. Its not enough that he says something occasionally correct, AJ shouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t support tyrannical people.<\/em>
\n go away and don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t back\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6and knock on my door for food<\/em><\/p>\n

I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve seen the LaRouche people at my University campus several times with their Obama Hitler mustache posters. I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t talk to them.<\/em><\/p>\n

These receive responses.\u00c2\u00a0 Well, not that last one.\u00c2\u00a0 What doesn’t?<\/p>\n

Search for \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Secrets Known Only to the Inner Elites,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d a LaRouche essay from the late 70s where he addresses this issue at length.<\/em>
\n To paraphrase his view of judaism, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s at its roots an irrational cult, but certain versions of it (ie that of Moses Mendelssohn) are perfectly tolerable. The elite \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Jews\u00e2\u20ac\u009d you see (with a few exceptions like the Rothschilds) are basically a shield for people with real money and power, most of whom can be traced back to the venetian \u00e2\u20ac\u0153fondi\u00e2\u20ac\u009d (family funds) of the middle ages.<\/em>
\n Judaism isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t a root doctrine. So while Jews like the Rotschilds have the same outlook as the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153satanic\u00e2\u20ac\u009d outlook of certain European nobility, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153satanism,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d or whatever you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d call it, is older. Judaism was created to advance the same agenda \u00e2\u20ac\u201c LaRouche often refers to the story of prometheus \u00e2\u20ac\u201c keep the people stupid and scared so you can control them.<\/em>
\n Zionism is a British franchise. The history of Israel is laid out pretty clearly in LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Dope, Inc.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n

The truth of 311 seismic terror\u00e3\u20ac\u20ac\u00ef\u00bc\u0161\u00e3\u20ac\u20acIt\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a D. Rockefeller\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s job.<\/em>
\n 1. 311 quake was the combination of 3 consecutive<\/em> [blah blah blah]
\n 6. D.Rockefeller will implement the similar tactics in U.S. and other area in order to let Christian consider this could be the initiation of Armageddon before \u00e2\u20ac\u01532nd coming\u00e2\u20ac\u009d. But, one should know D. Rockefeller is a Marrano Jewish who tries to make use of Christian to establish ONE WORLD to be reigned by STEALTH JEWISH.<\/em><\/p>\n

It is a lie to focuse on terms like \u00e2\u20ac\u0153the Queen,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and the British crown\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s machinations or the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Rothschilds\u00e2\u20ac\u009d when in fact a racial element is obviously central\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 not everything\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 not even the majority numerically for sure\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 but central.<\/em>
\n By not confronting Jewish people at the Ashkenazim\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s racist control, we deny them the opportunity to break their tribal programing and to join us\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 that is humanity without a racial caveat.<\/em>
\n (He then proceeds to ask a series of questions of “Who controls this” and “Who did that?” to which his answer is “The Jews”.)<\/em>
\n The sublimating the above facts to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153England,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d the Queen, etc. does not help. Yes Britain is controlled by the same entity and British Intelligence worked American before WW 1 and 11 etc. and yes Jewish men have been members of the English aristocracy since they bought their way in after they elevated Cromwell with their money. Hell\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 THE CITY is a sovereign nation is my understanding! For the Deity\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s sake! Who controls The City? […]<\/em>
\n The Elite is a Treasonous element within all the world now\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 just go through the Aspen Institute\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s site and look at the pictures\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 but my objection is that if we don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t tell the whole truth we are too bending information and will not be given the power of the great force of Light in the Universe that in the end is what judges us all for our survival \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 its terms are these: do we bring Light to the Universe? Do we bring knowing?<\/em> [blah blah blah
\n <\/em><\/p>\n

Well, it’s all a merry circus!<\/p>\n

I am sure you, and many of your listeners are Christians. As such, I want to address the issue of conspiracy that so often is raised in your program. […]<\/em>
\n So either people like Soros or the Queen of England are directly working in cooperation with Satan, or they are his \u00e2\u20ac\u0153useful idiots\u00e2\u20ac\u009d doing his bidding thinking they are working to ultimately help humanity. As you say Alex -\u00e2\u20ac\u009dthey are deluded\u00e2\u20ac\u009d.<\/em><\/p>\n

Maybe Webster Tarpley can be reunited sometime soon…<\/p>\n

This was a terrific interview. Perhaps Alex\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s greatest strength is his respect for many diverse opinions \u00e2\u20ac\u201d all pointing in the general direction of truth. La Rouche has some fabulous ideas and solutions for the current crisis. Its a shame W. Tarpley had a fallout with him<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c they both are lighthouses. There is a cult-personality though within La Rouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s movement which is slightly disturbing, but then again how many in the truth movement are stupid Jesus freaks or marginalized high school dropouts as well ?<\/em><\/p>\n

STORY NUMBER FOUR:\u00c2\u00a0 WIKIPEDIA MADNESS<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

David P Goldman defended his notability, a step in with his desire to be sole author of his wikipedia article.\u00c2\u00a0 I have passed by any number of people of notability level on part with Goldman, and who have had their problems with wikipedia, who have taken the opposite tact — desiring to have their wikipedia articles be gone.\u00c2\u00a0 Goldman goes the other way.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s not as though the less Goldman – authored piece is detrimental to him.\u00c2\u00a0 I think I see part of his motivation around here<\/a>:
\nEven Spengler\u00e2\u20ac\u201ca reformed La Rouche follower\u00e2\u20ac\u201cnow legitimate\u00e2\u20ac\u201c calls DEBKA crazy.
\n<\/em>The key word is “even”.
\n<\/em>For Dreyfuss… the answer is ‘no’<\/a>, and I guess here’s one of his defenders<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 He probably has more to gribe about with his wikipedia article, but I guess some things are in his court.<\/p>\n

The most random editing attempt happened from a “MAINEiac 4434” who added “Plato Truman”, apparently a candidate in 1986 for Maine’s 1st Congressional district on the US Labor Ticket, to the party’s list.\u00c2\u00a0 Will Beback removed this for lack of citation, but I trust the person whose description suggests he’s a keeper of all thins Maine.
\nThe second most random editing attempt came from an ISP # with a history showing unrelated to larouche interests, who in the Larouche Criminal Trials article changed the sentence “Following the convictions, the Larouche movement mounted failed attempts at exoneration” to “following the convictions, the Larouche movement mounted several successful attempts at exoneration, showing Larouche to be the victim of overwhelming cconspiracy.”\u00c2\u00a0 It’s all in the eye of the beholder, I suppose.<\/p>\n

The discussion between Javen466 and Will Beback over which Plato image best illustrated the “Views” article continued, and may have ended, in its absurd fashion.\u00c2\u00a0 Meantime, when Will Beback urged more prominent emphasis on the Queen of England as their “most famous view”, the ISP # (the more larouched one) guarded the house.\u00c2\u00a0 He also engaged in a campaign to rid the use of “Columbia Free Press”, a publication he found written by “undergraduates” and full of “flip, jocular, highly biased” citations “designed to ridicule their subjects”.\u00c2\u00a0 Bemused, Will Beback asked in relation to “only college graduates” without all that?\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 Curiously, the ISP # made a great leap on a sentence I would agree with them is dubious and not worthwhile in the article — that the “LPAC appeared to have deliberately copied the look of the barackobama.com website” — the leap being a, perhaps telling, that it “implies unlawful conduct by the editors of LPAC” — which, strictly speaking, no it doesn’t.\u00c2\u00a0 Meantime, bits on “Gore’s population reduction” were removed, with the Larochian’s ascension — a sign that Gore is not a person of interest for the moment.\u00c2\u00a0 As for the basement team, “We don’t have any third party sources for the basement team.\u00c2\u00a0 If we can’t find any mention of this team and the video controversy in Independent sources, maybe we should delete it<\/em>.”\u00c2\u00a0 The Card Table team needs to start referring to the Basement Team in their media interviews.<\/p>\n

STORY NUMBER FIVE<\/strong>— <\/em>DAILY KOS USERS’ OBAMA DISSATISFACTION LEADS TO MOCKING DEBATES ABOUT Larouche<\/strong><\/p>\n

Y’know, it’s funny.\u00c2\u00a0 People are checking this stuff out and finding some amusement<\/a>.<\/p>\n

After having my normal reality tunnel assaulted today during a seemingly innocent trip to the Post Office, I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve just spent the last several hours immersed in the world of Lyndon LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 now, I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m not endorsing any of this personally, some of it reeks of Mr Rightism and other parts of it seem to make a bit of sense and sombunall is at the very least, entertaining […]<\/em><\/p>\n

Here\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s some enjoyable light reading, its Larouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s “Lies about Larouche” page. \u00c2\u00a0I guess it was supposed to debunk rumors and build credibility for Larouche but its so full of conspiracy stuff that it does the opposite. \u00c2\u00a0He accuses Kissinger and Wolfowitz of masterminding 9\/11 too. […]\u00c2\u00a0 That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s who is spreading lies about LaRouche. You hear them repeated, often by people who don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t know their source, but who would rather be<\/em>
\n overheard repeating these lies, because they think it will make them popular.<\/em><\/p>\n

(It left out Albert Pike’s place in the conspiracy<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

It was not so long ago that we relied on the LaRouchians (LaRouchites? LaRouchistanis?) for our R.D.A. of full blown loony arsed gibberish spigots and spouters of conspiracy theories so deranged Mulder and the dudes of The Smoking Gun would perform a brilliant display of synchronized eye rolling disguised as a political party.
\nOh, how times have changed.
\n[…]<\/em>
\nThey. Still. Have. Their. Chops.
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Shorter LaRouche PAC Flyer I Found on the Train: We must remove President Obama from office because he took our spaceships so meteorites can kill everyone! Dead!<\/em><\/p>\n

They take further glee in looking around the larouchian literature, laughing at this:<\/p>\n

During a meeting held in \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Basement,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d to review the aftermath of the contents of the LPAC Weekly Report for yesterday, we discussed the revolutionary implications of certain astonishing recent developments in the Crab Nebula, developments to which I had alluded in my concluding remarks for that occasion.<\/em><\/p>\n

Then again:<\/a>
\nLyndon is kind of hard to figure out sometimes , but he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a well meaning fellow in my opinion. I went to a Schiller Institute gathering with a friend in 2001. Most of their proposals are pretty complicated for a working class stiff like myself, but very interesting to contemplate.<\/em><\/p>\n

A punchline:\u00c2\u00a0 I have no doubt that Bachman will be adopting this verbatim as her platform in the primaries. <\/em>Similar punchline to:
\nI heard a rumor that a splinter group of the Larouche crowd has an exploratory comittee<\/a> already returning favorable information for this guy as an independent candidate to unseat the obama regim.<\/em> As well<\/a>:
\nRon Paul, LaRouche, Buchanan, Duke even. All would have been our greatest and finest Presidents, I think.<\/em><\/p>\n

Yeah, well, everyone chooses their heroes:
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

Sounds as though this Mike Norman person is the Lyndon LaRouche of monetary<\/a> economics.<\/em>
\nActually Lyndon LaRouche has his own brand of economics, and yes, it is pretty bizaare.
\n<\/em>Swizzle Tree complemented their drugs with Larouche<\/a>, or vice versa:
\nAh yes, Swizzle Tree. The ones who voted most likely to make DGS famous in the yearbook. First off, I can GUARANTEE you that they were high while they were performing. I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m still friends with most of these guys and, even though some of them have subscribed to\u00c2\u00a0 the Lyndon Larouche newsletter, I always thought they had musical chops.<\/em><\/p>\n

What’s interesting is that there’s a schism in attitude emerging at dailykos.\u00c2\u00a0 After this statement<\/a>—<\/p>\n

Who cares? No, he’s a craven, caving, wimpy, weasel and that’s all there is to it. Next time I’m voting for LaRouche.
\n<\/em>Interestingly enough, for at least one person the give away that it was all a ruse<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 But maybe it shouldn’t have been.\u00c2\u00a0 You know there’s trouble abrewing because this question could see its place in a free republic forum.<\/p>\n

Fun Quiz Time: Daily Kos recommended comment, or Lyndon Larouche?<\/a>
\nThat’s not an honest question, frankly.<\/p>\n

\n

That was obvious after reading only the first few sentences and even that much was a waste of time. <\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The author clarifies in the comments section one item: Larouche does have that weird science fiction thing going on. That’s one difference I omitted.<\/em><\/p>\n

Could have gone all over the place here.\u00c2\u00a0 There are other omissions which would have told the difference moreso than mentions of Money Elite ruling over the System.\u00c2\u00a0 The commenters also describe larouchies who have surfaced at dailykos, some “out” — interesting to note:
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

I must confess openly that my point of views about currency systems follows the vein of what has been expressed by Bill Still and Lyndon LaRouche<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Is that something you can do in polite society?
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

Other things not common to daily kos commenters:<\/p>\n

But if the NWO doesn’t want Putin in power then we should want the opposite, shouldn’t we?<\/em><\/a>
\nPerhaps, then, his crime<\/em> (Gifford’s would be murderer) wasn’t part of a black operation, and the get-Palin response of Obama’s “re-election committee” was just opportunism<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

As Lyndon LaRouche noted today, the desperate current occupant of the White House seems intent on announcing his wish to be re-elected–before he is thrown out of office.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

And is this guy, upset with Pete Olson,\u00c2\u00a0 ready for another Kesha Rogers run?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

STORY NUMBER ONE:\u00c2\u00a0 ALEX JONES WELCOMES NEW MEMBER IN THE LEAGUE OF VATICAN ASSASSINS! Yes, congratulations to the Org for joining the horde of “Vatican Assassins”.\u00c2\u00a0 For the sake of getting as large an audience as possible, from some lead in from media attention, nothing beats the day of the Charlie Sheen interview.\u00c2\u00a0 But the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7921"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7921\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7927,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7921\/revisions\/7927"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}