{"id":7780,"date":"2011-04-02T17:23:37","date_gmt":"2011-04-03T00:23:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=7780"},"modified":"2011-04-04T12:10:08","modified_gmt":"2011-04-04T19:10:08","slug":"7780","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2011\/04\/02\/7780\/","title":{"rendered":"The 5 Biggest Larouche related news stories of the past 2 Weeks"},"content":{"rendered":"

STORY NUMBER ONE<\/strong>:\u00c2\u00a0 OLIVER STONE’S SORT OF FAMOUS SON BRINGS TOGETHER HISTORIC MEETING BETWEEN THE LYNDON LAROUCHE MOVEMENT AND ALEX JONES<\/p>\n

But… But… But…<\/p>\n

If you listen to LaRouche you will understand \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Who is the Enemy\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, and what is the solution to the control of our nation. Jones just likes to scare people and make it seem as if the enemy is all powerful. He is full of shit. …<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Certainly a red-letter day in the recent history of this org.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s a match up that the public has been begging for, and believing probable<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 See here<\/a>:\u00c2\u00a0 Hey Alex, very good points. I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m an Argentinean and they run the same experiment in my country 10-15 years ago. We definitely know all of this by heart guys\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s VERY real. They took our pension funds, invested them, crashed them. All the time selling it as it was a great thing.<\/em>
\nI\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve been following you for the last 6 years, and I keep wondering why you don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t join forces with the Larouche gang: Just asking.<\/em>
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

It’s The question David Icke forum participants wondered some time ago<\/a>.
\nAnd our dear friend, Cliff Kincaid, comes closer to the truth<\/a> — and Tom DeWeese<\/a>.
\nAnd Webster Tarpley and his confessed “break away”, and previous intimations from Jones and articles on his website that the Oligarchy is using the Larouche Cult as a boogey man to side-step 9\/11 Truth and Malthusian plots goes by the way-side.\u00c2\u00a0 As does the phrase “Credulous populist media<\/a>“, and the warning to the org not to trust this sector of information (even while posting to the comments sections on “Webcast Day”s).<\/p>\n

Jeff Steinberg, already a staple on Iranian Press TV<\/a>, pops up on Alex Jones<\/a>, and is followed by Hollywood Celebrity, Sean Stone<\/a>, son of Oliver Stone, and if you listen to Jones’s clip, you will see Jones state that Stone is the one who suggested he bring on Jeff Steinberg,\u00c2\u00a0 (Did Sean Stone drug up with Charlie Sheen sometime recently?)<\/p>\n

Does anybody want to know what Sean Stone’s view on what’s happening is, really?\u00c2\u00a0 (Apparently more people than want to know Jeff Steinberg’s views on things<\/a>.)\u00c2\u00a0 Solar Spot activities intensifying, electromagnetic waves, the Giant Moon — 100 percent that’s what did it –and the issue of the “End Game and End Times converging” as the Mayans suggested, all not hidden about the Masons particularly interested in the Book of Revelations… Ancient Egyptians and Mayans and Sumerans understood all this better and…<\/p>\n

Now I understand Larouche’s current issue … it’s a means of getting traction with a contingency of nutty b level Hollywood celebrity figures <\/a>— all of um have money.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 And it is a strange clash from this<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Ok you guys. Honestly I love you guys and believe in what you stand for. I know that is important to advance your technology for the greater good. By making these video\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s people start to think that you guys are a little cooky. I personally love you guys but right now your prime focus should be on the issues at hand, and preventing the New World Order from consuming your country and putting us into the next dark age. You are not going to win the fight by posting this stuff.<\/em><\/p>\n

I think it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s far more kooky to watch pro sports, worship celebrities, watch tv, and <\/strong>post vacuous comments on Facebook than it is to talk like this. This is real and this is what actually matters, not your gossip, fashiow show, snob culture.<\/em><\/p>\n

@procack1 You are thinking with a fear mindset. This video present brilliant visions for mankind. Anybody who thinks they are \u00e2\u20ac\u02dccooky\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t watching their videos anyways, so they are irrelevant.<\/em> (har de har)\u00c2\u00a0 LPAC members are presenting literally the best logical realistic solution for the major world problems. The visions that they offer are going to be what will save mankind and put us in a new Golden Age, we must think long term, centuries ahead, to regain our optimism and love of our God given genius.<\/em><\/p>\n

Or, in Stone’s case… Hollywood nepotism? Hm.<\/a><\/p>\n

4 Atticus Thraxx March 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM<\/em> I have it on good authority that Tom Hanks eats babies.<\/em> And voted for Lyndon LaRouche.<\/em><\/dt>\n
9 Sonar March 26, 2011 at 10:16 PM<\/em> @ Atticus: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Build beam weapons or learn Russian\u00e2\u20ac\u009d <\/em><\/dt>\n
<\/em>
\n <\/em>Anyway, the comments at the youtube clip are kind of interesting.\u00c2\u00a0 Larouchies come on board to shove Stone out of the way.\u00c2\u00a0 Some people say Stone is the Truth Teller there.\u00c2\u00a0 A fan of David Ickes tells Jones to shut up.\u00c2\u00a0 All good stuff; all good stuff.<\/dt>\n

the deceivers are going to come out of the woodwork and they will appear\u00ef\u00bb\u00bf to be on our side and use alternative media to push their agenda
\n<\/em>we have to be EXTRA vigilant right now<\/em><\/p>\n

That\u00ef\u00bb\u00bf dude is on that cocaine son! He couldn’t form a coherent thought. It looked like Alex knew something was off. He got a little uncomfortable and didn’t let the guy speak too long.
\nOh\u00ef\u00bb\u00bf I was talking about Steinberg by the way. Sean Stone was right on the money. Levitation what!
\n<\/em>wtf is this guy talking about? Ghosts\u00ef\u00bb\u00bf and demons..what a bunch of bullshit. I hope AJ isn’t becoming Coast to Coast AM.<\/em><\/p>\n

Next up for Mr. Jones — \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Office of Net Assessment <\/a>“.\u00c2\u00a0 Right?
\nAnyway… Kremlinology time… Steinberg does Jones.\u00c2\u00a0 Schlanger does Cleagel again<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 So who references Steinberg and who references Schlanger out there?
\nLarouche next week.\u00c2\u00a0 The merger… is coming fast and furiously.<\/p>\n

Only last night I came across this<\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6<\/em>
\n A discussion on the existential crisis of our civilisation.<\/em>
\n \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Rim of Fire, the Mass Strike, and the Crisis of Civilization.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Hosted by Harley Schlanger.<\/em>
\nMany out there, like Revolution Harry, are pretty well convinced this denouement has been planned for centuries.<\/em>
\n Looks to me they are one and the same.\u00c2\u00a0 Take you pick.<\/em><\/p>\n

STORY NUMBER TWO<\/strong>:\u00c2\u00a0 Sure, Whatever…<\/strong><\/div>\n
Killer Seismic Dangers? Don’t Blame San Andreas; It’s Obama’s Fault!<\/em><\/div>\n

Shields in California and Kesha Rogers in Texas, have escalated their campaigns on campuses in the two states, to mobilize them to join us in implementing the LaRouche Plan, to address the intersecting galactic and financial crises.\u00c2\u00a0 There is a new degree of openness among students — and faculty members, including especially those in the sciences — as it has become clear to them that merely squawking against budget cuts will not bring about a solution. The new urgency for action, from the galactic crisis, is striking a raw nerve, as they are coming to realize that their future now depends on them taking action, as they can no longer rely on an older generation, the Boomers, to act for the future.<\/em>
\nMore on that later.
\n<\/em>
\nTo Protect Our Nation From the Galaxy’s Challenge to Our Existence, Obama Must Be Removed From Office.<\/em>
\nMarch 30, 2011 (EIRNS)\u00e2\u20ac\u201d”The existence of humanity is being challenged,” stated Lyndon LaRouche in his opening statement on the Lyndon LaRouche PAC (LPAC) …<\/em>
\nIn a later period of the discussion, LaRouche PAC Basement team leader Sky Shields detailed, with graphic representation, some of the leading satellite technologies which Obama has taken down, and which have otherwise been taken out of service for lack of a U.S. or European commitment. While done in the name of “saving money,” Shields said, these takedowns can only be understood as intentional moves toward implementing Obama’s British master’s drive for genocide.<\/em><\/p>\n

It’s what’s got Sean Stone excited, and that’s all that matters, this game of\u00c2\u00a0“Galaxy Quest”.<\/p>\n

LaRouche democrat Diane Sare reports from the the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant<\/a>, exposing the anti-nuclear, genocidal agenda of Barack Obama and his New Jersey co-thinker, Gov. Chris Christie<\/em>.\u00c2\u00a0 Yeah, if Jones can meet with Steinberg, why not?<\/p>\n

Satan’s Fake Apocolypse chimes in\u00c2\u00a0here<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 Check this out — it’s hilarious!\u00c2\u00a0 First we start with this story: \u00c2\u00a0 KABUL \u00e2\u20ac\u201d Violent protests over the burning of a Koran spread to the heart of Taliban country Saturday, as clashes between demonstrators and Afghan police in Kandahar left at least nine people dead and more than 90 injured, according to Afghan officials.
\n<\/em>And his response: <\/em><\/p>\n

The only solution to this is Glass-Steagal,
\n<\/em>Cures rashes too!\u00c2\u00a0 This guy’s funny. <\/em><\/p>\n

On the contrary<\/a>, I suspect that this crisis was planned long ago in order to provide the oligarchy with “undeniable evidence” that nuclear power is inherently dangerous.<\/em><\/p>\n

Howie G chimes in here<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 To tell the truth, from that perspective, I don’t think Obama would be noticed at all.<\/p>\n

<\/ins><\/ins>STORY NUMBER THREE — \u00c2\u00a0 THEY LOVE THEM IN SAN FRANCISCO!!!:\"\"<\/a> <\/em><\/strong><\/strong> <\/p>\n

<\/strong>What is interesting is that this gets a bit of a contrast with what the LPAC is publishing on the SAME EVENT.<\/p>\n

Obama, explained a young woman with tidy braids, was failing to protect us from imminent earthquakes by not preparing us with the needed “infrastructure.” And this, she said, was despite repeated warnings from the Russians that an earthquake is on its way.
\n<\/em>“We’re shutting down programs to send manned satellites into space,” explained her male compatriot.
\n<\/em>The satellites, he said, could help us predict earthquakes, which was ever more important, “after what happened in Japan.”
\n<\/em>Obama, he continued, is “destroying what makes the human species unique from all other forms of life,” and “condemning the human species” by failing to adequately prepare California, and the United States, for a large earthquake.
\n<\/em>Building up steam, he said, Obama was failing to invest in research that would shed light on how the solar activity relates to tectonic activity.
\n<\/em>“We know there’s a correlation, but we don’t know what,” he said
\n<\/em>The LaRouchies claimed\u00e2\u20ac\u201dand still do\u00e2\u20ac\u201dthat we’re in for another Ice Age. But go ahead.
\n<\/em>“Everyone has been really nice so far,” he said cheerfully. “Even people within the city.”
\n<\/em>Which makes sense when you think about it. San Francisco has adopted Frank Chu as its unofficial mascot, made the World Famous Bushman a tourist attraction, and bemusedly watches local nudists Lloyd and Rusty strut their stuff through the Castro.<\/em><\/p>\n

Yeah, well…\u00c2\u00a0 In what may be the greatest touch\u00c3\u00a9 in history, my Democratic sister just sent me this video in response to the one I posted earlier of Lyndon LaRouche<\/em><\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0It is of an, um, passionate Republican candidate for local treasurer in Stark County, OH speaking at a forum (needless to say he was less than victorious.) \u00c2\u00a0I am rendered speechless.\u00c2\u00a0 Please tell me it was an April Fools’ Joke.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Actually it’s a classic (disposable)\u00c2\u00a0viral video.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 Go check it out — you will enjoy it.\u00c2\u00a0 Still, you kind of like his spirit more than the way your Larouchies tend to go about things:<\/div>\n
\n

<\/cite><\/p>\n

@Bunnies4wool<\/em><\/a>
\n I reckon there are way fewer of them now <\/em>(are you sure?<\/a> — Craig begs to differ.) but LaRouche people still appear on Campuses or other high traffic areas. Its the same LaRouche. They do print many small magazines and give them out to people, yes. When I was at Cal they were there a number of years back. Back then he wanted to erect some kind of international railroad and thaw ice everywhere. Amusing business is the kids who distributed his pamphlets could be identified straight away because they were so rude and aggressive.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

They love them everywhere!<\/div>\n

Ron Paul! Because the Democrats had Lyndon LaRouche first<\/a>…<\/em><\/p>\n

I should have been a tad more verbose in my reactions. It’s been pretty well established that LaRouche is a complete whackjob, but I’d be VERY reluctant to paste that tag on Ron Paul. <\/em><\/p>\n

Pat Buchanan is just an older less gay version of Glenn Greenwald<\/a>. They used to work together and both share a fringe LaRouche affinity. <\/em>I think the word “Larouche” is being used as an adjective here, and not referencing the man himself.<\/p>\n

I love this one<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 In reference to the “Boldness” of a Senate Freshman.<\/p>\n

Matt, you could say the same thing about a screed published by Lyndon LaRouche. The guy may be bold, but you don’t want him in government. The last thing we need is a George Bush \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Freedom Agenda\u00e2\u20ac\u009d protege seeking to convert the great<\/em><\/p>\n

I think this is a mistake<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Rockewell Libertarians put Hilter mustaches on everyone. (Looking at the Left has all pictures)<\/em><\/p>\n

I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m certainly no fan of Lyndon LaRouche or the idiotic comparisons of Obama and hitler, but<\/a> if this crowd had risen up and killed these security guards and cops, and I was on the jury for their murder trial, I wouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t have voted to convict. <\/em>Good news for the Alaska activist, I guess.<\/p>\n

Once again, the faithful followers of Lyndon Larouche were present to tout their program<\/a> of impeachment, restoration of the Glass-Steagall Act, and massive reindustrialization, including a huge expansion in nuclear power \u00e2\u20ac\u201d just a hair out of touch, you reckon? That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s the meaning of the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Smash the Solar Panels\u00e2\u20ac\u009d slogan above.<\/em><\/p>\n

They love ’em in East Bay!<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Not only was this toddler upset, but numerous pedestrians enjoying a sunny spring day on Park Street and Central Avenue in Alameda were angered […] Police were summoned after a woman tossed her frozen drink on the the controversial photo illustration of Obama.<\/em><\/p>\n

STORY NUMBER FOUR:\u00c2\u00a0 WHY DON’T THE WIKIPEDIANS EVER ASK THAT QUESTION ABOUT HATS?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Quick David Goldman update before we proceed: Will Beback more or less converted the Goldman article back, and the isp # which floated in amongst the referenced David Goldman identity changed it all back.\u00c2\u00a0 This is going places!<\/p>\n

The neat thing about Slim Virgin’s failed attempt to put Jeremiah Duggan into the main article is that amongst the ordinary run of the mill Wikipedians saying “no”, we also got some Larouchians out of the woodwork.\u00c2\u00a0 As in, an editor who has quit editing, announced loudly<\/a>, but came back Just for this purpose <\/em>(probably from Wikipedia Review) and to give this passive aggressive note in editing, than having it reverted, the Jeremiah Duggan deletion at “Larouche Movement”:<\/p>\n

I prefer to remove unfounded accusations, you prefer to add them back. I’m moving on, as I don’t obsess over LaRouche.<\/em><\/p>\n

Also noted, a neat little isp # who has never edited anything but Larouche articles, and made a somewhat random attack of James Wales.
\nAnd chimes in complaining about how the article handles the “Party Line” issue:”<\/p>\n

This wiki article sums up an unproven, slanderous, biased and highly personal opinion “by “he” I mean all LaRouche followers; internal dissent is not a big number with them” into the sentence “LaRouche’s views are the party line of the LaRouche movement.” This is first, Kaul’s own opinion (I doubt he seriously checked it) and can by no means be summed up the way it is done here, it is too weak for this purpose. I don’t know why you are constantly coming up with the WLYM article, which by the way just uses bare facts and which you did not even link properly.\u00c2\u00a0\ud83d\ude09<\/em><\/p>\n

“Other Choices” believes that “this material deals with allegations of typical behavior from the 1970s and 1980s, and gives the misleading impression that this old stuff is representative of current practice<\/em>.”\u00c2\u00a0 Huh.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

To a question posed about how to handle the articles, and the “big one” — to what degree are Lyndon Larouche and the Lyndon Larouche inseparable, I can suggest one interesting item of note<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Jewish 22-year-old had become mixed up with a right wing group called La Rouche before he died.
\nBut Mrs Duggan claims despite collating new evidence from eyewitnesses who claim to have seen Jeremiah being attacked before he died, the German authorities refuse to do anything about it.<\/em><\/p>\n

JN466 has become fond with using Scott McLemee’s little piece about Larouche for reference in the wikipedia section.\u00c2\u00a0 This presents the promise of, puzzlingly enough, having a section in the wikipedia articles devoted to the book “Dialectical Economics”, since this makes for two references of some notability.\u00c2\u00a0 (Sigh).<\/p>\n

In figuring out how to attack the “Verdi Initiative”, SilverSeren chimes in on:
\nActually there’s no point in comparing the Verdi Initiative and Duggan.\u00c2\u00a0 The former is something that Larouche was personally involved in and has been a major part of his life.\u00c2\u00a0 The latter is an event that brought large amount of criticism to his movement, but really didn’t affect his personal life at all, which is why it should be covered in the movement article.<\/em><\/p>\n

Actually half of the Larouche articles have no business existing.<\/p>\n

To this WIll Beback statement, So he spoke about it in his TV commercials. He also used those expensive platforms to address a number of other initiatives (including the colonization of Mars), to declare that Carter intended to initiate thermonuclear war of reelected, and to declare that Walter Mondale was an agent of Soviet influence. I’m not saying that it’s inconsequential or shouldn’t be included somewhere in the encyclopedia. I’m just saying that it in the scope of this biography it’s a minor initiative. I’ve proposed before that we cover all his minor initiatives, like the Verdi tuning and the Mars colonization, in a single paragraph.<\/em><\/p>\n

comes Silverseren with:\u00c2\u00a0 In English, this means “I’m so glad that you’re willing to allow space for more of the crazy things LaRouche has supported and more remarks that make him look like a nutcase.” I think that’s a pretty good translation. We don’t care about WP:BLP here, let’s find all of the most horrible things about LaRouche that we can, are you with me?\u00c2\u00a0:D\u00c2\u00a0:D\u00c2\u00a0\ud83d\ude00 (\/sarcasm…but only that last sentence.<\/em><\/p>\n

If you deem those “crazy things” that’s your business.<\/p>\n

It is true that sometimes we seem to go out of our way to make him look kooky. Part of the problem here is a temptation to seize upon good one-liners in press sources rather than available books that present his ideas in context. Where more deeply researched analysis is available, we should use it. —JN<\/span><\/a>466<\/span><\/a><\/strong> 21:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)<\/em><\/p>\n

LaRouche’s attacks on Carter were not just off-hand one-liners: they were the basis for two of his presidential campaigns. \u00c2\u00a0 Will Beback<\/span><\/a> talk<\/span><\/a> <\/strong> 02:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)<\/em>
\nIn many cases, I think reporters were simply mystified. For example, I came across one article from 1981 about LaRouche’s surprising defense of a liberal congressman, Harrison A. Williams, caught selling influence in the Abscam sting. Criticizing the investigation and doubting that the Senate would have enough moral courage to exonerate Williams, LaRouche is quoted as writing
\n<\/em>There are members of Congress on both sides of the aisle so degenerate or so swayed by political opportunism that they variously promote or condone policies more hideous in their consequences than those perpetrated by Albert Speer and others under Adolf Hitler.<\/em>
\nThat’s an odd thing to for someone defending a Senator accused of bribery to write. I guess LaRouche’s point may have been that mere bribery is mild compared to the indescribable, unnamed atrocities condoned by other congressmen. \u00c2\u00a0 Will Beback<\/span> talk<\/span> <\/strong> 08:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)<\/em><\/p>\n

The most amusing debate that popped up over the past couple weeks concerned images of Plato and Aristotle for use.\u00c2\u00a0 JN466 wants one image in as “it does a good job of illustrating the Plato \/ Aristotle debate that Larouche references so much<\/em>” and “the point is that this image illustrates the precise philosophical debate that Larouche makes so much of — Aristotle pointing at the ground; Plato pointing the sky<\/em>.”
\nThis is part of JN466’s overall project in arguing to the neoplatonist philosophy, which is the “intellectual foundation of his movement, is not even mentioned in the Views article at present, despite the fact that the 24 page chapter on Larouche in George Johnson’s<\/em>” [book] covers it.<\/p>\n

Apparently the AIDS crisis was a (gasp) British plot?\u00c2\u00a0 LaRouche has alluded ambiguously to this before in his conspiracy theories, but in this video it becomes shockingly explicit: http:\/\/www.larouchepac.com\/node\/17802<\/em><\/p>\n

In the end:\u00c2\u00a0 “The group itself refers to its methods of harrassment and denunciation as a ‘psywar technique’ and defends them as necessary to shake people up’ Johnson has written that believing the general population to be hopelessly indoctrinated by the mass media, they “fight back with words that stick in one’s mind like shards of glass.”\u00c2\u00a0 “Why be nice?\u00c2\u00a0 We’re in a war and the human race is up for grabs.”
\n<\/em>… An info-war, if you will…<\/p>\n

No one bit of Slim Virgin’s suggestion to emphasize the Larouchian attitude on the “British”, except a “Gonfaloniate”, who sums everything up well enough:\u00c2\u00a0 “I figured I’d stop by and mention that for those who are only peripherally aware of Larouche’s existence (like myself), bringing his name up in conversation will probably elicit, ‘Oh, that guy from the 70s and 80s who thinks everything is a British conspiracy?”<\/em><\/p>\n

STORY NUMBER FIVE: THE GREAT DEBATE CONTINUES!!!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Observing a rash \u00ce\u00bff Anti-Zionist news. Ar\u00d0\u00b5 th\u00d0\u00b5 core issues really being challenged? I\u00d1\u2022 th\u00d0\u00b5 Anti-Zionism \u00d1\u02dc\u00cf\u2026\u00d1\u2022t a cover \u00ce\u00bfr a distraction? I\u00d1\u2022 Zionism a symptom, \u00d0\u00b0nd \u00d0\u00b0r\u00d0\u00b5 th\u00d0\u00b5 produce(s) being ignored?<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

Th\u00d0\u00b5r\u00d0\u00b5 w\u00d1\u2013ll b\u00d0\u00b5 n\u00ce\u00bf jewish revolution even though th\u00d0\u00b5r\u00d0\u00b5 \u00d0\u00b0r\u00d0\u00b5 many wh\u00ce\u00bf \u00d0\u00b0r\u00d0\u00b5 disgruntled.<\/em><\/p>\n

1776Matthew If I \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6<\/strong><\/em>
\n @1776Matthew If I could convince you to read one thing by LaRouche, look for a 1978 \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Campaigner\u00e2\u20ac\u009d article called \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Secrets Renowned Only to the Inner Elites,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d (free pdf online) which goes into splendid point about how Judaism was one of many \u00e2\u20ac\u0153polymorphous\u00e2\u20ac\u009d cults made in ancient Babylon. It has lasted so long by being (by all accounts) monotheistic. But you can find Judaic principles in many other cults and religions.<\/em><\/p>\n

@deadeyedick1933 I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t completely trust LaRouche. He puts out some excellent info from time to time, but it is certainly to be taken with a grain of salt.<\/em><\/p>\n

CIA, SAS, Wal-Mart\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 Sure, there are some shabbos goys involved in all this. But all these \u00e2\u20ac\u0153intelligence agencies\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and \u00e2\u20ac\u0153secret societies\u00e2\u20ac\u009d have their roots in jewish subversion. The judaic nature of Freemasonry is well documented. The whole global \u00e2\u20ac\u0153zeitgeist\u00e2\u20ac\u009d is judaic. Usury, fraud, deception, aggression, decadence\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6.<\/em><\/p>\n

…………………….<\/p>\n

Yeah, well… this seems to float in as well…<\/p>\n

Here I am, deep in Power Elite territory. I cannot give out personal information, details as to people, places, or activities. That would be my death knell and a step back for World Peace. Not that I am a key player or anything, but I am sure it is comforting to find out a little news can come from the opposing front lines every once in a while.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

I contacted Doctor Sternum a little while ago. I used a hacker program from one of my Newby Power Elite friends from my boarding school days that I trust implicitly.<\/em><\/p>\n

I modified an existing message in his inbox on February 17, 2011: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Dear Doctor Sternum. I am Agent Power Elite. I am on the inside. They are now scrambling. Watch!\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em>
\nIn other items:<\/p>\n

This is not a “controversial case”<\/a> by any real definition.
\nThey remember it!<\/a> March 27, 1986… a red letter day in the history of WORLD CIVILIZATION.
\nThe Larouchies tie the two cases together too<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Though not so much thematically as the case is here.<\/p>\n

Bob Dreyfuss… again<\/a> and again<\/a>.<\/p>\n

ENOUGH!<\/a>
\n<\/a>While neoconservatism and the literal fascists may be travelling different roads, their ultimate destination (as determined by their common root premise) is the same.\u00c2\u00a0 All that differs is the scenery \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and as the destination is approached, not even that.\u00c2\u00a0 (That, by the way, is why the arguments over whether such as Jared Loughner\u00c2\u00a0 or the Texas IRS plane crasher were \u00e2\u20ac\u0153left\u00e2\u20ac\u009d or \u00e2\u20ac\u0153right\u00e2\u20ac\u009d wing, are such a joke; the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153scenery\u00e2\u20ac\u009d of their writings would have been unremarkable in any of the following: Free Republic, Democratic Underground, the commenters at Zero Hedge, or the groupies of Lyndon Larouche and Ron Paul.)<\/em><\/p>\n

But good for:<\/p>\n

Meg Whitman’s failed bid for California governor hilariously sucked $178.5 million out of her wallet, but a Trump presidential spending spree would be funnier than Lyndon LaRouche’s diary<\/a>. <\/em>
\nRon Paul is a meepbag in the mold of Lyndon Larouche. Some of what he says sounds legit, but mostly he’s a hole.<\/em><\/a>
\n <\/em>I think “LaRouche” is French for Fruit Loop<\/em><\/a>. <\/em> <\/em>
\nI think Paultards are disenfranchised LaRouchies<\/a>.
\nMost people aren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t stockpiling gold or seeds. Gold often appeals to older people whose parents drilled the lessons of the Great Depression into their heads. The only person I know personally who is planting his own garden \u00e2\u20ac\u0153just in case\u00e2\u20ac\u009d is a big Larouche guy, not a conservative<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

George Shollenberger<\/a> seems to have Seasame Street in his mind here.<\/a>
\n <\/strong><\/p>\n

The other form of dark energy is presented by theological scientists who believe in God. The ‘Big Thinkers’ on this dark matter are theologian scientists such as Abraham, Moses, Anaxagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Jesus Christ, Anselm, Nicholas of Cusa, Johannes Kepler, Galileo, Gottfried Leibniz, Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupetuis, Ben Franklin, Bernhard Riemann, Georg Cantor, Ernst Cassirer, Suzanne Langer, Kenneth Burke, and Lyndon LaRouche.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Hey…\u00c2\u00a0 You lose me at this sentence<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Frank\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s somewhat humorous response to the woman was perhaps not politically savvy, because in general politicians should not appear frustrated in public; moreover, the video ended up circulating on the Intertubes for months (an important issue for public speakers that we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll take up later in the book).<\/em><\/p>\n

Savvy enough.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

STORY NUMBER ONE:\u00c2\u00a0 OLIVER STONE’S SORT OF FAMOUS SON BRINGS TOGETHER HISTORIC MEETING BETWEEN THE LYNDON LAROUCHE MOVEMENT AND ALEX JONES But… But… But… If you listen to LaRouche you will understand \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Who is the Enemy\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, and what is the solution to the control of our nation. Jones just likes to scare people and make […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7780","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7780","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7780"}],"version-history":[{"count":41,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7780\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7869,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7780\/revisions\/7869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7780"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7780"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7780"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}