{"id":7670,"date":"2011-03-08T06:56:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-08T13:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=7670"},"modified":"2011-03-09T14:06:10","modified_gmt":"2011-03-09T21:06:10","slug":"shortening-the-degrees-of-separation-to-charlie-sheen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2011\/03\/08\/shortening-the-degrees-of-separation-to-charlie-sheen\/","title":{"rendered":"Shortening the Degrees of Separation to Charlie Sheen"},"content":{"rendered":"

I gotta say, people were annoying me this week<\/a>.
\n<\/em>From the asshat LaRouche supporters who harassed me outside the post office when I refused their literature (worry not, I unleashed hell on them), to Charlie Sheen refusing to STFU.<\/em><\/p>\n

A fantastic week or two for some of the people on the Conspiratorial Junket.\u00c2\u00a0 Alex Jones.\u00c2\u00a0 His good friend, Charlie Sheen, made an appearance on his show.\u00c2\u00a0 It was Charlie Sheen’s first media appearance before moving on to every other program on Earth.\u00c2\u00a0 A lot can be said about the Charlie Sheen situation, somewhere along the lines of “What is wrong with our culture?” maybe.\u00c2\u00a0 Whatever your misgivings in\u00c2\u00a0leering over\u00c2\u00a0at a car-wreck, you did no worse than Jones — his interview, I think it’s fair to say, falls into the category of “enabling”,\u00c2\u00a0 [Note: someone who has to repeat over and over again that they’re\u00c2\u00a0‘winning’ … isn’t really winning.]\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0was pretty well full of signs that he knew was going to get some further media attention worth capitalizing on in order to further the Alex Jones Brand — and on he went to The View<\/a> to get in “Takedown of Building Seven!” and “Infowars.com” where he could find the space.<\/p>\n

An item of collision has occured with Jones and Beck — meehaps.\u00c2\u00a0 Beck’s ratings are tanking, and for the basic reason of partisan political tribalism: Beck’s conspiracies plowed deepest to a political listenership identified with a political party at its low ebb — now that its had some electoral success, perhaps there’s hope after all.\u00c2\u00a0 Meantime,\u00c2\u00a0who’s Hitler now?<\/p>\n

U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown has apologized for a speech in which he invoked <\/a>the names of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin while he criticized Republican efforts in Ohio and Wisconsin to curtail the power of public-employee unions to bargain with state and local governments.<\/em><\/p>\n

Yes.\u00c2\u00a0 First they came for the Public Employee Unions… right after that, they opened the Concentration Camps.\u00c2\u00a0 Just like that!\u00c2\u00a0 I note that the Huffington Post comments are pretty much jam packed with “Agree wtih Brown’s original statement<\/em>.”<\/p>\n

For Beck,\u00c2\u00a0Mother Jones proposes this question<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s a familiar question that arises throughout history when viewing any number of demagouges.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 Rolling Stone puts Alex Jones together with Glenn Beck<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0The author\u00c2\u00a0should have figured that out before he released his Beck book, which is hep enough to stick changes in Cleon Skousen’s evolution with Carroll Quigley as a pivot point.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n

Alex Jones and his guests have long covered the history of eugenics, including the role of George Bernard Shaw, the playwright and unabashed eugenicist. Alex\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s 2007 documentary film Endgame takes an in-depth look at Shaw, who has been discussed on-air many times, including here. In January, 2010, Glenn Beck\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s documentary The Revolutionary Holocaust included the exact same clips of Shaw as those discussed or shown on The Alex Jones Show. Later, <\/strong>Beck would revisit the subject to link eugenics and Fabian Socialists to the London School of Economics and his favorite new target, George Soros.
\nFrom the beginning of the recent unrest in Egypt, frequent Alex Jones guest Dr. Webster Tarpley was often on-air discussing the destabilization of Egypt and other nations in the region. In these interviews, Tarpley and Jones discussed the role of U.S., British and Israeli intelligence agencies in the creation and backing of the Muslim Brotherhood. Glenn Beck was soon on TV and the radio giving a similar explanation for the Egyptian protest, with one key and all-too typical twist: In Beck\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s telling, it was a leftist-oriented and -inspired revolution led by the Muslim Brotherhood.<\/em><\/p>\n

Hey.\u00c2\u00a0 Wait a minute<\/a>…\u00c2\u00a0 Joel Skousen is a frequent guest on Jones, and he\u00c2\u00a0has the galls to go after the man who brought renewed popularity to his uncle.\u00c2\u00a0 And so it goes.<\/p>\n

Louis Farrkhan spoke before a crowd of thousands for four hours\u00c2\u00a0<\/a>in support of Qaddafi, L Ron Hubbard, in anticipation of popular uprisings in the US akin to the Middle East’s, and to attack pop musician Rihanna.\u00c2\u00a0 Say what you will about Farrakhan, but he did speak to a crowd of thousands.\u00c2\u00a0 When was the last time Lyndon Larouche gave a speech to thousands of people?
\nInteresting, as always, the attack on Rihanna garnered Farrakhan the most attention — and a response tweet from Rihanna.\u00c2\u00a0 Which suggests the way for a forgettable off-the-mainstream-grid politico to get some media attention is to snipe at a celebrity.\u00c2\u00a0 See also, Mike Huckabee and Natalie Portman.
\nCurious thing about Mike Huckabee’s <\/a>other quotable for the week.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s counter-Larouchian.\u00c2\u00a0 Obama is displaying dangerous anti-colonial views in snubbing the British Empire.\u00c2\u00a0 He hates Winston Churchill, as his dismounting of a Churchill bust in favor of a Lincoln bust demonstrates.\u00c2\u00a0 This meme made its way into the tabloids with a supposed snub by the British family by not inviting him to Prince Philip’s wedding.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n

The Queen of England has been in power for nearly sixty years, and nobody besides Lyndon Larouche seems to be complaining about her tenure<\/a>. Well there are those anti-monarchists in Scotland, but I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t unfortunately break haggis with those folks often enough to get a personal rant from that p.o.v. <\/em><\/p>\n

Indeed, the cat is out of the bag from Mike Huckabee and presidential pre-candidate Newt Gingrich<\/a>:\u00c2\u00a0 we’re slithering down the neck of the British Monarchy.\u00c2\u00a0 But the fight continues:\u00c2\u00a0 we are just days away from the next Lyndon Larouche webcast.\u00c2\u00a0 Unfortunately, the rush of web traffic that Alex Jones has garnered from his Charlie Sheen hit will have long subsided, so the usual bombardment of promotional comments on every prisonplanet site at the time of the webcast from larouchies will not get to as many people as it might have just a week ago.<\/p>\n

If you think Lyndon LaRouche is crazy<\/a>, check out a James Dobson newsletter sometime …
\n<\/em>Maybe Gene Scott is to Pentecostalism what Lyndon Larouche is to the Democratic Party<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Maybe the Larouche org can gnab some attention\u00c2\u00a0with a webcast of\u00c2\u00a0Robert Beltran shouting “WINNING” over and over again?\u00c2\u00a0 Or, maybe not.<\/p>\n

…………………………..
\nWear two buttons over a Lyndon Larouche tank top?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0 \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

@anunnaki2006 the Bush family? If the Bush family were Nazis, why would they be supporting illegal immigration? Why would they be supporting homosexuals? There are no Knights of Malta, but there are Bolshevik\/Zionist. The Bush family is controlled by the illuminati, a Jewish imitation of Freemasonry. I bet you don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t know the difference. You\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve been reading too much articles by Lyndon LaRouche, he tries to sidetrack people from focusing on Zionist. it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a Catholic conspiracy, what a joke<\/em><\/p>\n

Either blame the pope, blame the healthcare industry, or blindly blame at another uninvolved public figure. Me? I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m going to blame Lyndon LaRouche. Why? I do this entirely at random, but with the confidence that my decision is more apt than blaming an ineffectual, weakling of a president.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

looks like more of the general population are catching on to the british schemes….. but a little to late<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

A\u00c2\u00a0debate rages.\u00c2\u00a0 Ron Paul 2012<\/a>… Ron Paul 2012… because, um, Lyndon Larouche is no longer running, and we can somehow ignore that Paul’s Austrian Economics are sort of opposite Roosevelt’s because Paul may be attractive to believers in the International Jewish Conspiracy?\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n

Ron Paul 2012 says:<\/div>\n
March 4, 2011 at 6:58 pm<\/a>
\nFDR was going to take on the City of London Banksters that have fed on the United States like a parasite to this very day.<\/em>
\nBut unfortunately, he DIED.<\/em>
\nYou guys have become so cynical you rip apart everyone and everything that ever represented your country.<\/em>
\nWith \u00e2\u20ac\u0153patriots\u00e2\u20ac\u009d like YOU no wonder we are being destroyed by the financial oligarchy from the City of London.<\/em><\/div>\n
Penumbra says:<\/div>\n
March 4, 2011 at 7:35 pm<\/a><\/em>
\nKeep dreaming RP. You are too naive by far. The key facts I have presented to you are more than readily available if you bother to do some research. FDR was a traitor and a key player in the downward slide of this nation. Wake up and get informed please.<\/em><\/div>\n
<\/cite><\/div>\n
Ron Paul 2012 says:<\/div>\n
March 4, 2011 at 7:56 pm<\/a><\/em>
\nYeah like the Hoover damn.<\/em>
\nYou know Pen you are and endless cynic with absolutely no answers.<\/em>
\nWhat is the point of your existence exactly?<\/em><\/div>\n

\n<\/cite>wolf says:<\/div>\n
March 4, 2011 at 5:03 pm<\/a>
\nAh, if ONLY a Democrat had been elected\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6<\/em>
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153No Iraq war, no Afghanistan war, no economic crash, no depression and gas prices at $1.75 a gallon. 80 million Americans who are homeless, living with relatives or on the streets, dead or in prison would be employed, safe and paying taxes.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em>
\nhmmm\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6why don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t I believe that??? Could it be because, for example, that John Kerry and George Bush were BOTH members of the \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcSkull and Bones\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 society at Yale and are distant cousins???<\/em>
\nHow bout Al Gore?? Gore is a descendant of Edward I, Roman Emperors Louis I, II, and Charles II and is direct descendant of Charlemagne which makes him a distant cousin of Richard Nixon and George W. Bush. So the top \u00e2\u20ac\u0153democratic\u00e2\u20ac\u009d candidates against Bush in 2000 and 2004 were actually his cousins!<\/em>
\nI guess I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve just become too CYNICAL\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6thinking that BOTH parties are owned by Jewish money and Jewish interests and that BOTH parties are playing their parts in destroying our Liberties and National Sovereignty in order to usher in Global Governance under a few (mostly Jewish) wealthy elites who want to reduce population by 90% (which includes you and me and all our children). Silly cynical me\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6maybe I should just learn to trust Democrats.<\/em><\/div>\n
OS says:<\/div>\n
March 4, 2011 at 11:10 pm<\/a>
\nEvery time people start exposing more about 911, events are created as to refocus everyone on something else.<\/em>
\nOver and over\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6..as if created.\u00c2\u00a0 <\/em>(I’m a bit out of the loop — some big break in 9\/11 Truth?)<\/div>\n
Ron Paul says:<\/div>\n
March 4, 2011 at 8:12 pm<\/a>
\nI guess it must be odd for you people to watch a Ron Paul supporter unhold FDR ideas.<\/em>
\nBut then again, most of you are not very smart.<\/em><\/div>\n

\n<\/cite>Ron Paul 2012 says:<\/div>\n
March 5, 2011 at 8:37 am<\/a>
\nMy internet connection just conveniently went down for HOURS.<\/em>
\n( strange things happening lately)<\/em>
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Other War: FDR\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Battle Against Churchill and the British Empire\u00e2\u20ac\u009d by L. Wolfe
\n<\/em>Full article: http:\/\/american_almanac.tripod.com\/FDRlw95.htm
\n<\/em><\/div>\n
Michael J Volz says:<\/div>\n
March 4, 2011 at 7:47 pm<\/a><\/div>\n

OBAMA IS A DESCENDENT OF CHARLEMAGNE TOO IF I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122M NOT MISTAKEN(THE JEWS DIDN\u00e2\u20ac\u2122T WANT THE BLACKS TO KNOW THAT OR THEY WOULD THINK HIM TO WHITE) . THAT IS NOT HIS PROBLEM. HIS PROBLEM IS THAT HE HAS BEEN HANGING OUT WITH TOO MANY JEWISH MANIPULATORS.
\n………………………………………..<\/em><\/p>\n

Has Gadhafi Been Reading Lyndon LaRouche<\/a>?
\nDunno.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0The more common game people have been playing is “Qaddafi or Sheen?”\u00c2\u00a0
\nA blast from the past from the Lyndon Larouche Movement<\/a>, September 1991.
\nToday, they’re… um<\/a>… ripping off Solson Publications’ “Daffy Qaddafi<\/a>” comic book (next up: Reagan’s Raiders<\/a>!)<\/p>\n

……………………..<\/p>\n

Yeah, EITHER ONE<\/a>. Donate all of your money to Lyndon LaRouche, grieving friends and family! That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s better than finding a cure for cancer.
\n<\/em>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Hmm, how many puppies should we let be euthanized so we can donate this money to Lyndon LaRouche?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n

Ask this guy<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In wikipedia news –\u00c2\u00a0
\nDelia Peabody has finally been deleted (a couple of crude new creations were as well, but they were meant to be immediately deleted) \u00e2\u20ac\u201d Cla68 remains as what appears to be the Larouchie Administrator (the other somewhat Larouche defending Administrator, self described anarchist, seems to have his own \u00e2\u20ac\u0153wikipedia ideology\u00e2\u20ac\u009d.)
\nInterestingly, Cla68 linked to the yahoo image of the LA \u00e2\u20ac\u0153America Systems\u00e2\u20ac\u009d office building from yahoo, in urging that maybe more than a handful of people are working there \u00e2\u20ac\u201d so maybe the sock-puppets are all types of different people. Either Cla68 read my blog, or had the same impetus to look it up just a bit after I did.\u00c2\u00a0 Things get further amusing as s\/he refers to the fact that EIR is in google news as a validation for that source.
\nIn requesting the need to get \u00e2\u20ac\u0153International Reception\u00e2\u20ac\u009d in the article. When paired with getting \u00e2\u20ac\u0153more recent\u00e2\u20ac\u009d stories in, this leads to British articles over the last decade, Duggan-related. But I guess they have a stash of materials that each merits a sub-category.
\nFor the standby “Must get term Economist in Lede” dispute,\u00c2\u00a0a reference is made to\u00c2\u00a0a\u00c2\u00a0citation from King’s book\u00c2\u00a0book for that purpose.\u00c2\u00a0 The “Economist in the lede” is currently “support” over “oppose” by a 3 to 2 margin, the balance being tipped by an anonymous isp # whose edits are composed entirely of Larouche items.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n

Finally, for “International Reception”, Iranin Press TV continues bringing on Bill Jones of EIR.\u00c2\u00a0 If that means anything.\u00c2\u00a0 Comments abound<\/a>:\u00c2\u00a0
\nI would enjoy it if more reputable sources were found and engaged.
\n<\/em>Probably can be argured into wikipedia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I gotta say, people were annoying me this week. From the asshat LaRouche supporters who harassed me outside the post office when I refused their literature (worry not, I unleashed hell on them), to Charlie Sheen refusing to STFU. A fantastic week or two for some of the people on the Conspiratorial Junket.\u00c2\u00a0 Alex Jones.\u00c2\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7670"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7670\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7729,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7670\/revisions\/7729"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}