{"id":6146,"date":"2010-05-19T18:58:59","date_gmt":"2010-05-20T01:58:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=6146"},"modified":"2010-05-19T19:03:57","modified_gmt":"2010-05-20T02:03:57","slug":"sestak-halter-paul-dudley-abstinence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2010\/05\/19\/sestak-halter-paul-dudley-abstinence\/","title":{"rendered":"Sestak! Halter! Paul! Dudley! Abstinence!"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sigh.\u00c2\u00a0 There’s one problem with this chart and this question from Ezra Klein and answer from Robert Boatright<\/a>.<\/p>\n

But primaries — and the anti-incumbency sentiment that’s supposedly generating them — are the big news of the day. To get some context, I called Robert Boatright, a professor of political science at Clark University. Boatright had previously written a <\/em>paper<\/em> (pdf) tallying every primary challenge in which the challenger received more than 25 percent of the vote since 1970<\/strong>. It’s an interesting data set, and as you can see in the graph atop this post, it suggests that, in the aggregate, serious primary challenges are declining rather than increasing. That doesn’t mean 2010 won’t see a spike (look at how 1992 skews those results), but it helps keep things in perspective.<\/em><\/p>\n

25 percent is not a “Serious Challenge” threshold.\u00c2\u00a0 For instance: had DC Morrison received that against Blanche Lincoln, sans the Bill Halter campaign, would anyone consider his campaign a “Serious challenge”?<\/p>\n

BUT… interesting results last night, right?<\/p>\n

#1:\u00c2\u00a0 The Obama Administration reportedly braced\u00c2\u00a0themselves for the Pennsylvania Senate Outcome.\u00c2\u00a0 Obama, Biden, and Kerry did their horse-trading duty in backing Specter.\u00c2\u00a0 One more Specter Incoherency for the road: “Must Be Smoking Dutch Qualades<\/a>!”: “When You talk about ‘Vigor’, it’s all on Arlen Specter’s side.”
\nGo Sestak!<\/p>\n

#2:\u00c2\u00a0 Rublican House Minority Leader John Boehner predicted Republicans will pick up 100 seats. Newt Gingrich predicted 78.\u00c2\u00a0 If they say so.\u00c2\u00a0 To pick up the 40 necessary for a “Speaker Boehner” Republican Majority, they really would need to win that Pennsylvania House seat — carried by McCain in 2008 — vacated by the deceased Jack Murtha, or seats with that profile.\u00c2\u00a0 The fact that they didn’t suggests that we’ll still have Speaker Pelosi to kick around next year.<\/p>\n

#3:\u00c2\u00a0 I’m thinking about declaring War on Rand Paul, on this blog.\u00c2\u00a0 I suppose the good news is his Democratic opponent is Jack Conway beat Daniel Mongiardo — meaning the “good parts” of Rand Paul where he’d outflank a Democrat are offset by a “good Democrat” as opposed to a bad Democrat.\u00c2\u00a0 The problem is reading through Rand Paul, I get the distinct impression — as I said before — he’s like Ron Paul with everything I like about Ron Paul chopped off — his civil liberties positions are weakened as compared to his father.<\/p>\n

I can’t quite make sense of where this race is going.\u00c2\u00a0 Is there this base of the “sensible” within Grayson’s voters who’ll turn against Rand Paul?\u00c2\u00a0 We’ll know fairly shortly.
\nI’ve been batting about this Cliff Kincaid piece, for AIM, about Alex Jones’s supposed “Infilitration” into the Tea Party.\u00c2\u00a0 Kincaid is full of it on several counts,\u00c2\u00a0and something worth mentioning to Kincaid as Rand Paul declares his victory a “Message from the Tea Party”.\u00c2\u00a0 During the primary campaign, a campaign ad popped in — a donut hole with Alex Jones shouting about how the New World Order and the Globalists, in the middle Rand Paul on the Alex Jones show saying how thankful he is for crashing his server with donations.\u00c2\u00a0 It was up yesterday on youtube.\u00c2\u00a0 Today, it has been “removed” by its user — perhaps a suggestion that the Grayson supporter has pulled up stakes, ready to vote for the Republican Rand Paul.
\nGo to the Rand Paul videos on Alex Jones — whose favorite American politicians are, in order #1: Ron Paul, #2: Ron Paul, #3 Rand Paul, #4, Ron Rand Paul, #5: Dennis Kucinich, #6: Jesse Ventura, #7: Alan Grayson, #8: Cynthia McKinney, #8: Ron Paul, #10: Rand Paul<\/em>, and you will see why this comment <\/a>is laughable:
\nI don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t worry about the general, since he could simply say that if he had to agree with the interviewers, he wouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t talk to anyone. He couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t talk to the Fox News hosts who supported the bailout.
\n<\/em>I think it is safe to say that Alex Jones was pretty instrumental in fund-raising for Rand Paul, particularly early.<\/p>\n

The “Tea Party Movement” is not\u00c2\u00a0really a unified entity — but Alex Jones fits into it more than Cliff Kincaid does — Kincaid managing to call various Libertarian strains from out of Cato and Reason magazine — and thus infiltrating the Glenn Beck Show — “Leftist<\/a>“.<\/p>\n

#4.\u00c2\u00a0 Chris Dudley.\u00c2\u00a0 I saw and heard the reports on Chris Dudley’s Election Day Victory Party.\u00c2\u00a0 It was at the freaking Rose Garden.\u00c2\u00a0 A host of Portland Trailblazers — the play by play radio announcer and former player Terry Porter — were on hand.\u00c2\u00a0 The total effect is naseau.\u00c2\u00a0 It is sort of telling that John Kitzhaber made his media interviews last night, and Chris Dudley took off for the night — weird, because Election Night is going to throw at the candidates softball interviews.
\nSo, Chris Dudley is Oregon’s Celebrity Candidate.\u00c2\u00a0 It speaks to the small fry nature of Oregon that the state’s Celebrity Candidate is a Journeyman NBA player — he holds the record for longest string of missed free-throws.<\/p>\n

#5:\u00c2\u00a0 Not an election item, but utterly hilarious<\/a>, and probably more people are talking about it than goddanged Specter and Sestak:<\/p>\n

Rep. Mark Souder (R-IN) had an affair with a part-time staffer named Tracy Jackson, Fox is reporting. Jackson played the role of interviewer for a Souder Web video show on the issues of the day — including one on the value of abstinence.
\nDubbed “Congressional Update with Congressman Mark Souder,” the show hit on issues like intelligent design and fencing the border.
\nIn the November 2009 abstinence video, Jackson introduces Souder this way: “You’ve been a longtime advocate for abstinence education and in 2006 you had your staff conduct a report entitled ‘Abstinence and its Critics’ which discredits many claims purveyed by those who oppose abstinence education.”<\/em><\/p>\n

#6:\u00c2\u00a0 In the end, I don’t think the Bill Halter \/ Blanche Lincoln match-up adds up to much.\u00c2\u00a0 Either candidate will lose in November.\u00c2\u00a0 But yesterday was a good outcome, as Blanche Lincoln falls into a two week legislating window where she has to hew to a Primary Battle electorate — Deriviatives Reform Game On!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sigh.\u00c2\u00a0 There’s one problem with this chart and this question from Ezra Klein and answer from Robert Boatright. But primaries — and the anti-incumbency sentiment that’s supposedly generating them — are the big news of the day. To get some context, I called Robert Boatright, a professor of political science at Clark University. Boatright had […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6146","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6146","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6146"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6146\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6148,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6146\/revisions\/6148"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}