Sometime ago, somebody or other referred to a particular negative political ad as a “New Low”.\u00c2\u00a0 The ad was a take-off of Lyndon Johnson’s “Daisy” ad, which made me wonder — “How can this be a new low if it’s been done before?”<\/p>\n
I tend to view these comments <\/a>from Noam Chomsky in the same way.\u00c2\u00a0 He has never seen anything like this before.\u00c2\u00a0 And we’re lucky previous charismatic figures that this nation has gone over, in similar circumstances as today, during his lifetime, were all crooks sowing the seeds of their own downfall.\u00c2\u00a0 He negates himself. Anyway, it looks like Obama survived Larouche’s stupid Assassination dread<\/a>. (If I could get find with any ease the “Larouche with a Hitler Mustache image”, I’d link to it right here.\u00c2\u00a0 The best I can do right now is this<\/a>.) In consideration of the “Tea Party”.\u00c2\u00a0 An interesting “Moment Of Truth” has just come upon us.\u00c2\u00a0 Immigration!\u00c2\u00a0 And with that the “Reason Magazine” someones depart<\/a>, and we find out that the “Tea Party” means different things to different constituents.\u00c2\u00a0 A bit more mixed, I would think, is the “Daily Paul” blog — and the comments there show considerable division. Obama as a Joker — incidentally — while it originated with this artist <\/a>(who disdains the “Socialism” that was affixed to the image), it was popularized in part by Alex Jones — and really, you can see how<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Interesting to note — two images that accompany this Maccleans article<\/a> in its print edition: the “Obama Joker” thing and the Obama with a Hitler Mustache — and the “larouchepac” url wasn’t even clipped out! <\/em>The National Review blog, meanwhile, snubbed Larouche <\/a>by citing the “Obama as Heath Ledger” instead of Obama with a Hitler Mustache in their cry of unfair double standards and unfair focus on inflammatory signs. Okay, so Howie G is no longer giving me a\u00c2\u00a0back-ways reference\u00c2\u00a0to the mainstreaming of Alex Jones.\u00c2\u00a0 He does give us some good little ret-conning<\/a>.<\/p>\n Ret-conning!<\/a><\/p>\n Chator:\u00c2\u00a0 According to LPAC<\/strong>, the next EIR<\/em>, will feature a piece of historical revisionism which centers around LaRouche’s SDI proposal, as the missed opportunity from the 70s and 80s that has lead to the present nightmare. Yes, I did find it a bit odd that in the latest DWTT campaign show, Matt and Leandra dug up an “old school” LaRouche campaign video to make the point that the world has been sliding downhill since the Reagan administration axed “Lyn’s” SDI proposal in the mid-80s, which you can hear him calling “my baby”.<\/em> I remember in the late nineties, it was JFK’s assassination that was responsible for the present mudslide into economic disintegration. I guess that theory wasn’t appealing enough to the space-obsessed, LaRouche geeks in LYM. So Lyn has thrown them another bone.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n Blegh.\u00c2\u00a0 Another bit of Historical Re-invention<\/a>: South Park.\u00c2\u00a0 I was discussing on an Internet message board the matter of the New York Islamic lunatics who threatened Trey Parker and Matt Stone — they would meet the fate of Theo van Gogh –\u00c2\u00a0after South Park dared to mock the fury over images of Muhammad<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 A line of interest: Lyndon Larouche on 9\/11<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 What\u00c2\u00a0notches him\u00c2\u00a0his recent (mis-leading) title of “Intellectual Author of the 9\/11 Movement”. As for the other Richard Cohen, I can tell you something about him. He is opposing John Hechinger, the incumbent, and the chairman of the Hechinger Co. Cohen is 37 years old and works for the Executive Intelligence Review<\/span>, a journal published by Lyndon LaRouche<\/span>, an extreme right- wing figure. The Journal advertises a reprint in which it reveals that “associates of Henry Kissinger, Swiss financiers acting in behalf of the Nazi International” and others are planning to “rebuild Solomon’s Temple” in Jerusalem. This Cohen is also not qualified to run for anything.\u00c2\u00a0 (<\/em>The Candidate With My Name, Washington Post, <\/em>April 30, 1984) Other Zionist Plots and schemes?\u00c2\u00a0 You hear about Archie Comics introducing a gay character into Riverdale?\u00c2\u00a0 You know how that happened?\u00c2\u00a0 Zionists<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 A rather broad definition of “Zionist” with many a false synonym, but that’s the way it has to be if you’re going to accuse Archie Comics as being part of the Zionist Plot.<\/p>\n Meanwhile a debate between “Roger Ogden” and “Toaster” Anyway.\u00c2\u00a0 Get back Glass-Stegal.\u00c2\u00a0 Sounds good.\u00c2\u00a0 Hey!\u00c2\u00a0 Bad Immigration Act.\u00c2\u00a0 So true.\u00c2\u00a0 Pecora Commission, of sorts.\u00c2\u00a0 Good.\u00c2\u00a0 I think they’re throwing up crap with “Four Party Alliance”, but it’s a good thought nonetheless — God bless the Wilsonian Impulse!<\/em> Hey!\u00c2\u00a0 What about the BRITISH<\/strong><\/em> Petroleum<\/em>, eh?\u00c2\u00a0 No — we can’t go there — all environmental disasters are solved by sending humanity to Mars.\u00c2\u00a0 Answer to Carol Johnson Smith: Hm.\u00c2\u00a0 No<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Incidentally<\/a>:\u00c2\u00a0 John Bottorff, of Jasper, isn’t delusional. <\/em>No comment, though at least CSJ doesn’t believe she has a chance, so that is something.<\/p>\n
\nCripes!\u00c2\u00a0 The Birther Phenomenon isn’t even new.\u00c2\u00a0 Warren Harding was accused of being a “negro”, and Franklin Roosevelt was a Jew named “Rosenbaum”!<\/p>\n
\nThen again, what is this fantasy?
\nThe crash of the world system is a fait accompli, and the European events are just playing out with a desperate denial for the moment. It’s the same kind of thing as Weimar: it’s a denial of reality, because they’re afraid to face reality.
\nIt points up the extent of our responsibility. “We have to be the strong people,” LaRouche said. “There are no others available.”<\/em><\/p>\n
\nI posted that last link in part because I am having trouble finding something from Howie G’s constellation of blogs this week.\u00c2\u00a0 A reference to Noam Chomsky. A\u00c2\u00a0 reference to the “Tea Party”.\u00c2\u00a0 Most importantly, a reference to Alex Jones.\u00c2\u00a0 So we almost have something of a Larouchie response to the recent “Jones – Tarpley – Larouche infiltrating the Scene” commentary from Kincaid and Deweese.<\/p>\n
\nLast week, I made note of Larouchie signs being kicked out of a Tea Party event (I can link\u00c2\u00a0there because it’s\u00c2\u00a0at the top_ <\/a>— perhaps a bit sympathetic people kicked out — well<\/a>.
\nYou’ve lost your “Tea Party”.\u00c2\u00a0 Or some of them, at least.<\/p>\n
\nSomewhere within the scope of Tea Party History (or perhaps “Pre-History”, if you affix its origins to when Freedom Works effectively bought it out), was the Ron Paul “Money-bomb”, evoked by “V for Vendetta” and its reference to Guy Fawkes.\u00c2\u00a0 “Remember the Fifth of November” — donate money on that day.\u00c2\u00a0 The Republican Party has carved it out<\/a> (and the Time blogger has left out the film’s source material<\/a>).
\nA round about trigger back to Alex Jones<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Confused though he may be<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\n4. Finally, although this is 10 days old, mark it down: On April 13, 2010, Lyndon LaRouche announced that the Queen of England pushes dope. Not only that, but he declared that anyone who denies it is “worse than a Nazi-like liar.” <\/em>http:\/\/www.larouchepac.com\/node\/14157<\/em>
\nI mention this only because we old-timers all remember the hilarity generated decades ago by Lyn’s running around insisting that he had never said that the Queen of England pushed dope, and that anyone who said he’d said that was a Nazi and a liar.
\nThis was, of course, after Lyn had run around saying that the Queen of England pushes dope, and that anyone who denied it was a lying Nazi.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nA wild claim is starting to percolate on the more paranoid sites that the originator of this warning was actually a one time jewish settler of the west bank…
\n<\/em>What?\u00c2\u00a0 Is it second nature?\u00c2\u00a0 Always a Zionist Jewish Plot, isn’t it?\u00c2\u00a0 While it’s a dime a dozen and you can toss anywhere near this cult and land with this one, I’ll go straight to…<\/p>\n
\nOR… Executive Intelligence Review with… well.<\/p>\n
\nNo, you mean the Masons<\/a>.
\nMossad?<\/a>
\nThe Pope\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Masonic Jewish Zionist government. <\/a><\/span>
\nJust google “rebuild Solomon’s Temple” (with or without Kissinger) and see what you come up with.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s an old fear, I guess.<\/p>\n
\n<\/a>However, that is where I stop agreeing with the rouchies, as everything that follows in discourse with them is like falling down the rabbit hole…reality is replaced by the wildest ravings.
\n<\/em>Now hear my wild ravings!<\/p>\n