{"id":5316,"date":"2010-01-17T15:18:48","date_gmt":"2010-01-17T22:18:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=5316"},"modified":"2010-01-19T15:34:05","modified_gmt":"2010-01-19T22:34:05","slug":"ready-to-take-on-pelosi-frank-and-the-guy-who-represents-the-houston-district-nasa-is-headquartered","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2010\/01\/17\/ready-to-take-on-pelosi-frank-and-the-guy-who-represents-the-houston-district-nasa-is-headquartered\/","title":{"rendered":"ready to take on Pelosi, Frank, and the guy who represents the Houston district NASA is headquartered"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Three candidates for the Congress coming out of the Lyndon Larouche Youth Movement.\u00c2\u00a0 And I guess we have the question, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=FyqvdfWU2L4&amp;\">What would the org do without youtube?<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0 Interesting feedback, seemingly all coming from within Basement Team headquarters.<\/p>\n<p><em>thbyrnes (2 days ago)\u00c2\u00a0 Rachael is attractive, but she is way too stiff at this point.<br \/>\n<\/em>A rule in Politics:\u00c2\u00a0 Everybody is an Elitist except when they are Populist, and vice versa.<br \/>\n<em>Idiots vote (literally, I live in the 4th Dist), she needs to be more likable at their level&#8230; they&#8217;re never going to understand anything beyond a sound-bite. That is how bail-out Barney got the job, he gets that.<br \/>\n<\/em>And one word of advice.<br \/>\n<em>Loose the talk about treason and about higher moral issues (at least broad audiences)&#8230; stick with the bail-out Barney shtick and hammer the economy and make LaRouche&#8217;s ideas her own&#8230; (not his) that&#8217;s\u00ef\u00bb\u00bf her ticket.<br \/>\n<\/em>Don&#8217;t mention Larouche?\u00c2\u00a0 What&#8217;s the point of a Larouche ticket unless you keep repeating Larouche&#8217;s name over and over again, such as <a href=\"http:\/\/obamashow.com\/obama-campaign\/sen-reid-addresses-racial-remarks-made-about-obama-during-presidential-campaign\">the comments section with this guy<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>larouche<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/em><em><strong>larouche \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6<br \/>\n<\/strong>larouche<br \/>\nlarouche<br \/>\nlarouche<br \/>\nBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO<br \/>\nReid is scum scum<br \/>\n<\/em><cite>Comment by VoIPpoetry \u00e2\u20ac\u201d January 16, 2010 @ 12:13 am<\/cite><\/p>\n<div>Instant credibility!<\/div>\n<div>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<\/div>\n<div><em>MTL911Truth (2 days ago)<\/em><\/div>\n<div><em>It&#8217;s\u00ef\u00bb\u00bf great to see LaRouche candidates running for Congress but LaRouche himself should be running for Congress as well. He isn&#8217;t going to be President now, and what a great legislator he would make. He would undoubtedly be the greatest mind on the Hill. Please Mr. LaRouche, run for Congress! We need your ideas in there.<\/em><\/div>\n<div>Yes.\u00c2\u00a0 Represent the various generations.\u00c2\u00a0 Three twenty-something year olds to lower the median age, and just to off-set it back to its current marker as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/washington\/2009-01-05-new-congress_N.htm\">Oldest Congress<\/a>, mr. 8 time presidential candidate.<\/div>\n<div>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<\/div>\n<div><em>McWalker25 (2 days ago) <\/em><em>Yay, Humanity and\u00ef\u00bb\u00bf LaRouche FTW!!<\/em><\/div>\n<div id=\"comment_body_t--c7Hz8QQrwQImfh6w787jINuYDLFB2w6qrzelA71o\">\n<div>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"comment_body_t--c7Hz8QQpGwTsU1532s0zBQm6lIVoXEk-8_vfgvNY\">\n<div>Regarding Mr. &#8220;If I chant his name several times&#8221;,<\/div>\n<div><strong>\u00c2\u00a0<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>@VoIPpoetry, I can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t make heads or tails of where you are coming from. Are you for LaRouche? Are you against him? If so, why or why not?<br \/>\n<\/em><em>Clearly, you think Harry Reid is \u00e2\u20ac\u0153scum\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, but, again, why do you think so?<br \/>\n<\/em><cite>Comment by classic14rider \u00e2\u20ac\u201d January 16, 2010 @ 12:13 am<\/cite><\/div>\n<p><em><strong>Pro LaRouche.<br \/>\n\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6<\/strong><br \/>\nPro LaRouche.<br \/>\nHarry Reid was the dumbest lawyer in his entire class.<br \/>\nHarry Reid is corrupt and has been caught in dirty land deals with his friends.<br \/>\nHarry Reid slipped in an \u00e2\u20ac\u0153in Perpetuity\u00e2\u20ac\u009d cluase on page 1020 of the Health care bill.<br \/>\nThis means congress can NEVER overrule it.<br \/>\nThis is far worse than Hilter or the NAZIs.<br \/>\n2\/3 of people oppose this crooked healthcare just like they did the bailouts and NAFTA.<br \/>\nThis is NOT representation by politicians anymore.<br \/>\n<\/em><cite>Comment by VoIPpoetry \u00e2\u20ac\u201d January 16, 2010 @ 12:13 am<\/cite><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Worse than the \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6<\/strong><br \/>\nWorse than the Nazis? Get a life.<br \/>\n<\/em><cite>Comment by JBeatty17 \u00e2\u20ac\u201d January 16, 2010 @ 12:13 am<\/cite><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Do you have \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6<\/strong><br \/>\nDo you have anything of substance to say?<br \/>\nNot even Hitler had \u00e2\u20ac\u0153in perpetuity\u00e2\u20ac\u009d clauses on his useless eaters program.<br \/>\nYou really are out to lunch. Maybe you outta check out some football or something.<br \/>\nGo to LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s site and read if you are literate. Any objective reader will conclude that Harry Reid is totally corrupt and must be removed prior to the elections.<br \/>\n<\/em><cite>Comment by VoIPpoetry \u00e2\u20ac\u201d January 16, 2010 @ 12:13 am<\/cite><\/p>\n<p>\u00c2\u00a0I didn&#8217;t get very far in watching the press conference.\u00c2\u00a0 I saw Harley Schlanger, <a href=\"http:\/\/labvirus.wordpress.com\/2010\/01\/15\/audio-harley-schlanger-of-larouche-foundation-matthew-buchanan-ron-patterson-islam-rising-filmmaker-caryl-matrisciana-on-todays-nutrimedical-report-hosted-by-dr-bill-deagle-md-aaem\/\">of the &#8220;Larouche Foundation&#8221;<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0(???), and my computer sputtered out after a couple of minutes of the great Hope to Defeat Nancy Pelosi.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 But I guess the message is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hcnonline.com\/articles\/2010\/01\/13\/conroe_courier\/news\/protest011410a.txt\">always the same<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><span><em><span>Conservative protesters achieved their goal of attracting attention to their cause in Conroe Wednesday but drew criticism for their tactic of depicting President Obama as Hitler.<br \/>\n<\/span>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re here to let people know they have a choice between a Hitler or a Roosevelt,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said LaRouche organizer Craig Holtzclaw, referring to Franklin Delano Roosevelt. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We are advocating for a peaceful repudiation of his policies that are bankrupting this country.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8230; with that annoying reference to &#8220;conservative protesters&#8221;.\u00c2\u00a0 Just as well, the comments section show everyone skipping past the topic of the Post Office Warrior Team &#8212; because there&#8217;s not a whole lot worth saying &#8212; and heading over to the more significant topic of Sarah Palin.<\/p>\n<p>One odd comment from the Larouche name chanter:<br \/>\n<em>Maybe you outta check out some football or something.<br \/>\n<\/em>Wait.\u00c2\u00a0 Is this guy reading xlcer&#8217;s posts at factnet?\u00c2\u00a0 The one that referenced the Eagles losing?<br \/>\nNever time for such frivulous bourgeoise pursuits that get in the way of the creating the new Renaissance.\u00c2\u00a0 I barely care, but I care just a tad nonetheless.\u00c2\u00a0 My prediction a few weeks ago was that the Superbowl would end up the Chargers and the Saints.\u00c2\u00a0 For all I know, by the time I post this half of that equation will be scuttled.<\/p>\n<p>If we want to look around for other pieces of Entertainment news for a few minutes of diversion&#8211; the &#8220;something&#8221; in the phrase\u00c2\u00a0&#8220;check out some football or something&#8221;, I am fascinated by the Late Night Television scuttle between the various late night talk show personalities.\u00c2\u00a0It is\u00c2\u00a0 hard to take seriously, but has inspired\u00c2\u00a0these at-times complacent comics to unload some hilarity.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s this popular <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=LOQvsuJ5wIA&amp;feature\">Hitler Internet mememade to use from a Conan O&#8217;brien fan<\/a>.<br \/>\nNow, if you look up &#8220;Obama&#8221; and &#8220;Hitler&#8221; on youtube, you will find plenty of variations of the theme. (The Republican Party got into a minor kerfufle when one of them was linked to\u00c2\u00a0a sanctioned GOP twitter\u00c2\u00a0feed.)\u00c2\u00a0 I&#8217;m not sure why the Larouche Youth Basement Team hasn&#8217;t stuck one up themselves.\u00c2\u00a0 Maybe it&#8217;d be too easily lost in the shuffle, or maybe we&#8217;re now stuck moving forward to the three congressional campaigns.<\/p>\n<p>Are the candidates going to be manning the card-table shrines, and if so will their faces be\u00c2\u00a0placed on the signage, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/11\/rachelbrownobamaizedimage.png\">this for instance<\/a>?\u00c2\u00a0 Or are we just going to see Pelosi and Frank with a Hitler mustache?<\/p>\n<p>Some more <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businesswire.com\/portal\/site\/home\/permalink\/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20100106007105&amp;newsLang=en\">things to consider for in these campaigns<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><em>Congressman <span>Ron<\/span> <span>Paul<\/span> today endorsed John Dennis in his Republican bid for United States Congress. Mr. Dennis, a successful entrepreneur and longtime liberty-minded GOP activist, is Some more rtunning to unseat Nancy Pelosi in California&#8217;s 8th district.\u00c2\u00a0 [&#8230;]<br \/>\nCongressman <span>Paul<\/span>&#8216;s endorsement comes through his Liberty PAC, a Republican leadership PAC committed to supporting Liberty minded candidates across the country.<br \/>\nSaid Liberty PAC director Jesse Benton, &#8220;John Dennis is a terrific candidate who is going to ask tough questions like: &#8216;Why is Nancy Pelosi running up crushing budget deficits?&#8217;, &#8220;Why has she allowed President Obama to expand the war in Afghanistan?&#8217;, and, &#8216;Why has Nancy Pelosi refused to support transparency and accountability at the Federal Reserve.&#8217; The constituents of California&#8217;s 8th district deserve answers to these questions. John Dennis will hold her accountable.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t really think that John Dennis has much of interest in really even a percent watch &#8212; when was the last Libertarian Party candidate who did, and this John Dennis campaign strikes me in that same basic pattern.\u00c2\u00a0 But, if you are trying to explode a vote total into the twenty percentile, in Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s district, there are issues to hammer where he is &#8220;so right, he meets the left&#8221; &#8212; foreign policy, generalized discontent over party politics and all that, <em>damned them Wall Street Bailouts<\/em>.<br \/>\nStill, it looks from afar that Mr. Dennis has a clear path to the General election &#8212; I imagine the seven percent or thereabouts of Republicans in the district grasp toward some of these Libertarian hot-bed issues, and an aura of anti-authoritarianism in there.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, are the Larouchies deployed in Massachusetts right now, manning those card tables?\u00c2\u00a0 If not, why aren&#8217;t they?\u00c2\u00a0 There&#8217;s a major\u00c2\u00a0special Senate election between two candidates I wouldn&#8217;t much want to see in the Senate.\u00c2\u00a0 It&#8217;s an an embarrassment for the Democrats, even if, the best case scenario for that Donkey Party prevails and Coakey wins by\u00c2\u00a0like eight percentage points.\u00c2\u00a0 Surely plopping down there can be presented to everyone as a successful interaction of the &#8220;Mass Strike&#8221; &#8212; seen on display when everyone cheered the Great Escorting Out at the Harry Reid Town Hall Meeting.\u00c2\u00a0 Or is the fact that it&#8217;s MLK Day getting in the way?<br \/>\nOr is this too other-directed at this late date?<br \/>\nI park this link here, <a href=\"http:\/\/hot-topic.co.nz\/source-for-the-goose-footnotes-to-history\/\">expecting myself to return to it later<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 (Not as interesting is <a href=\"http:\/\/davefromqueens2.blogspot.com\/2010\/01\/lyndon-larouche-is-terrible-human-being.html\">this page<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 I see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politicsdaily.com\/2010\/01\/15\/gillibrand-has-early-lead-over-ford-for-n-y-senate-if-he-runs\/\">dominickseid has found himself a new Lair<\/a>.)<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Three candidates for the Congress coming out of the Lyndon Larouche Youth Movement.\u00c2\u00a0 And I guess we have the question, What would the org do without youtube?\u00c2\u00a0 Interesting feedback, seemingly all coming from within Basement Team headquarters. thbyrnes (2 days ago)\u00c2\u00a0 Rachael is attractive, but she is way too stiff at this point. A rule [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5316"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5316\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5319,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5316\/revisions\/5319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}