Wait.\u00c2\u00a0 Stop me if you’ve heard this one.<\/p>\n
Briefed on Monckton’s findings\u00e2\u20ac\u0161 American statesman and physical economist Lyndon Larouche charged\u00e2\u20ac\u0161 \u00e2\u20ac\u0153What this 180-page document represents is a policy worse than Hitler\u00e2\u20ac\u0161 which is the policy behind the Copenhagen summit<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n When last I heard that… was that then?<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Whatever.\u00c2\u00a0 Last night I heard the Phil Hendrie Show <\/a>for the first time in a while.\u00c2\u00a0 I haven’t bothered listening to the man of late, because when I heard the latest version of his radio show, he was rolling out his character (parodies of various political and societal \u00c2\u00a0foibles) without any callers, and was doing his straight and tedious political commentary.\u00c2\u00a0 He’s apparently gone back to his old formula, baiting callers with incedinary comedic fake guests.<\/span><\/p>\n … which was “Conservatives of Kern County” head (for a short time in the last administration, had a converstion to “Democrats of Kern County”) Larry Grover.\u00c2\u00a0 Who defended the Dachau sign — which made the rounds last month<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0for “Offense of the Moment”, baiting callers “If we pass Obama Care, this is what we’ll see right outside Dick Durbin’s office” — and the obvious baiting comment from Phil Hendrie “Now, do you claim to represent the Tea Party movement as a whole?”\u00c2\u00a0 (Enter Conservative callers disclaiming him.)<\/span><\/p>\n What we saw here was it lumped it to Larouche<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0— which, I still don’t believe to have been the case — jusst a lone enterprising individual, mucking up the scene .\u00c2\u00a0 Organic and understandable enough, lest you witness the latest “outrage of the day” directed to the right wing radio host Laura Ingraham’s recitation of the “First They Came” poem<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n But you know<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 To that link,\u00c2\u00a0I do find the bottom banner for “Mustang Man’s” “Enemies of the People” kind of interesting, in its ahistorical charge\u00c2\u00a0if you consider the “Enemies of the People” would be the expressed opponents of the Soviet state — or, if you, will: the “good guys” fighting tyranny.\u00c2\u00a0 Unless this poster is coming from the point of view of the Soviet State?\u00c2\u00a0 It’s all so very confusing.<\/span><\/p>\n I don’t know what’s going on with the CEC in Australia<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0— to what extent we just see a dumping on an Australian politician.\u00c2\u00a0 I do want to try to work some further explanation or other on “Russia Today” — here, it occurs to me to mention that Igor Panarin ‘s doomsday prophesy received more attention in American media than Larouche in the after-effect of the Economic Fall in 2008.\u00c2\u00a0 That must have been due to his general freshness and novelty — he hasn’t been visibly spouting stuff off for 40 striaght years.<\/span><\/p>\n Continued link dumping here<\/a> and here<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Though, the only two real worthwhile articles there are this one<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0and this one<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Oh, and a special endorsement from Salt Lake radio host — whatever his name is <\/a>, the guy Larouche was talking to when 9\/11 happened.<\/span><\/p>\n
![was that then?<\/a><\/span><\/p>\nWhatever.\u00c2\u00a0 Last night I heard the Phil Hendrie Show <\/a>for the first time in a while.\u00c2\u00a0 I haven’t bothered listening to the man of late, because when I heard the latest version of his radio show, he was rolling out his character (parodies of various political and societal \u00c2\u00a0foibles) without any callers, and was doing his straight and tedious political commentary.\u00c2\u00a0 He’s apparently gone back to his old formula, baiting callers with incedinary comedic fake guests.<\/span><\/p>\n… which was “Conservatives of Kern County” head (for a short time in the last administration, had a converstion to “Democrats of Kern County”) Larry Grover.\u00c2\u00a0 Who defended the Dachau sign — which made the rounds last month<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0for “Offense of the Moment”, baiting callers “If we pass Obama Care, this is what we’ll see right outside Dick Durbin’s office” — and the obvious baiting comment from Phil Hendrie “Now, do you claim to represent the Tea Party movement as a whole?”\u00c2\u00a0 (Enter Conservative callers disclaiming him.)<\/span><\/p>\nWhat we saw here was it lumped it to Larouche<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0— which, I still don’t believe to have been the case — jusst a lone enterprising individual, mucking up the scene .\u00c2\u00a0 Organic and understandable enough, lest you witness the latest “outrage of the day” directed to the right wing radio host Laura Ingraham’s recitation of the “First They Came” poem<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\nBut you know<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 To that link,\u00c2\u00a0I do find the bottom banner for “Mustang Man’s” “Enemies of the People” kind of interesting, in its ahistorical charge\u00c2\u00a0if you consider the “Enemies of the People” would be the expressed opponents of the Soviet state — or, if you, will: the “good guys” fighting tyranny.\u00c2\u00a0 Unless this poster is coming from the point of view of the Soviet State?\u00c2\u00a0 It’s all so very confusing.<\/span><\/p>\nI don’t know what’s going on with the CEC in Australia<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0— to what extent we just see a dumping on an Australian politician.\u00c2\u00a0 I do want to try to work some further explanation or other on “Russia Today” — here, it occurs to me to mention that Igor Panarin ‘s doomsday prophesy received more attention in American media than Larouche in the after-effect of the Economic Fall in 2008.\u00c2\u00a0 That must have been due to his general freshness and novelty — he hasn’t been visibly spouting stuff off for 40 striaght years.<\/span><\/p>\nContinued link dumping here<\/a> and here<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Though, the only two real worthwhile articles there are this one<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0and this one<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Oh, and a special endorsement from Salt Lake radio host — whatever his name is <\/a>, the guy Larouche was talking to when 9\/11 happened.<\/span><\/p>\nWhich finds me over to this one particualar interesting attempt to convert the Ron Paul supporters<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0with “common cause”.\u00c2\u00a0 My basic question: is this royal “we” reference an admission of organizational strategy?\u00c2\u00a0 It seems to be.\u00c2\u00a0 Jay Giallombardo — his job description is to leave comments in Internet message boards and blogs to bring up the name “Larouche”.<\/span><\/p>\nJay Giallombardo:\u00c2\u00a0 <\/cite>By the way, we are on the <\/em>Ron Paul<\/em> site because he is in a position to abolish the FED which is what we want. […]<\/em><\/p>\nYou are right to support Ron Paul, as I do, to abolish the FED; but, not all governments are immoral. There have been a few in American history that did well. Washington \u00e2\u20ac\u201c JQ Adams\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6Lincoln-McKinley\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 FDR, and JFK, and Reagan, somewhat.<\/em><\/p>\nYeah, that’s going to go over well with\u00c2\u00a0the hardcore Randian\u00c2\u00a0Mises wing of the Ron\u00c2\u00a0Paul crowd.<\/p>\nI am unconvinced by your assertion that not all governments are immoral though: Since man runs them, they are immoral by definition; It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s just a question of varying degrees.\nPersonally, I believe FDR and JFK\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s policies rank pretty high on the immoral.<\/em><\/p>\nAND<\/p>\nThe USA was formed as a bullwark against tyranny and oppression through economic control. If practiced as intended, like FDR, JFK, and a few others did, American Economics can beat the British oligarchy every time.\u00c2\u00a0 <\/em>AND HERE’S A HOOT AND A HALF.<\/p>\nOne more word on FDR\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6if you read the history from Lincoln to the assassination of McKinley, and then the actions of the President\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s that followed\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6you will see clearly that from Teddie Roosevelt through Hoover\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6we were under the direct corruption of the British Empire.<\/em><\/p>\nAfter the defeat of the south in the Civil war (that was initiated by the British as a last ditch attempt to destroy the US), the British gave up direct overthrow of our country and went into subterfuge-mode to destroy America through war-monger and corruptions of economic principles.<\/em><\/p>\nWhen Henry Carey continued with Lincoln\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s plans for the Inter-continental Railroad, the British were soundly defeated because our Economy shifted from Maritime trade to intercontinental development which they could not undermine so readily undermine.\nAlthough they did so with the Robber-Barrons, JP Morgan and others (that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s another story). And they West remains relatively undeveloped until this day. Lincoln envision a US population of 500,000,000 by 1950 had the West been fully developed.<\/em><\/p>\nThe America system flourished in the latter part of the 19th century not only in America but in the world, Germany, Russia, China. The British were losing control most everywhere.<\/em><\/p>\nThey shot Garfield and McKinley. McKinley was a staunch \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Lincoln\u00e2\u20ac\u009d supporter and kept high tariffs on British goods. With these two great President\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s out of the way, in came British stooge, Teddie Roosevelt, followed by a line of Presidents which included Woodrow Wilson, former KKK leader. British destroyed Germany in WWI getting France and Russia to ally against them.\nThe devastated the Germany economy (Weimar 1923) and gave rise to Hitler.<\/em><\/p>\nI would like to ask start picking at this, but I have the wonderment of “Where to Begin?”<\/p>\nOne must admire LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s passion but the man is borderline insane. He\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s much like Hamilton and FDR.<\/em><\/p>\nThey’re\u00c2\u00a0seeking out the\u00c2\u00a0this Randian brand of Ron Paul supporters\u00c2\u00a0after a light bulb flashed when seeing\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0the shared emnity from Paul Krugman<\/a>, right?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Wait.\u00c2\u00a0 Stop me if you’ve heard this one. Briefed on Monckton’s findings\u00e2\u20ac\u0161 American statesman and physical economist Lyndon Larouche charged\u00e2\u20ac\u0161 \u00e2\u20ac\u0153What this 180-page document represents is a policy worse than Hitler\u00e2\u20ac\u0161 which is the policy behind the Copenhagen summit When last I heard that… was that then? Whatever.\u00c2\u00a0 Last night I heard the Phil Hendrie […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5187"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5187\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5202,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5187\/revisions\/5202"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}](\"http:\/\/media.eyeblast.org\/newsbusters\/static\/2009\/08\/2009-08-19-CBS-EN-RBrown.jpg\"){kind=link}