{"id":4769,"date":"2009-10-04T14:53:29","date_gmt":"2009-10-04T21:53:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=4769"},"modified":"2009-10-04T14:55:31","modified_gmt":"2009-10-04T21:55:31","slug":"the-world-watches-david-letterman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2009\/10\/04\/the-world-watches-david-letterman\/","title":{"rendered":"The World Watches David Letterman"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I find international press attempts to explain American cultural items bemusing.\u00c2\u00a0 Case in point: David Letterman.<\/p>\n<p>Aussies explain two lingering items.:<em>\u00c2\u00a0Under the terms of his contract, Letterman&#8217;s <strong>quaintly named company Worldwide Pants<\/strong> leases airtime on CBS, so he is not an employee.<br \/>\nThe network is believed to be concerned about <strong>some sections of its audience with puritanical views<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>From Great Britain, and the BBC: <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/entertainment\/8286534.stm\">How do you\u00c2\u00a0relate Letterman to a\u00c2\u00a0British audience<\/a>?:<\/p>\n<p><em>Some suggested Letterman was less irreverent at 2230 than he had been at 2330, for all his pointedly sarcastic, sometimes prickly brand of humour.<br \/>\nYet that did not stop him incurring the wrath of a Colombian beauty queen in 2001 whom he suggested had a talent for ingesting heroin balloons.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Not the first thing that pops to my mind in the history of Letterman&#8217;s programs.\u00c2\u00a0 OR, from the Telegraph, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/comment\/6257911\/David-Letterman-Happiness-has-never-been-one-of-his-objectives.html\">explaining what it is this &#8220;late night talk show<\/a>&#8220;, and why it holds any sphere in American pop culture, as against Oprah:<\/p>\n<p><em>Sharp and pesky, Letterman captures something of the essence of the prevailing American mindset. In a sense, his show, like Oprah Winfrey&#8217;s, has helped to fashion the mood of forgiveness-for-all-things of which he is now the beneficiary. Celebrities and politicians sit beside his desk to get things off their chests, but until last week no guest \u00e2\u20ac\u201c let alone the host himself \u00e2\u20ac\u201c had ever arrived at the studio straight from giving evidence before a grand jury.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>And to further describe American geography:<br \/>\n<em>The son of working-class Midwesterners, he was raised in a dreary suburb of Indianapolis \u00e2\u20ac\u201c the middle child between two sisters. His father ran a flower shop, and his mother made the fried bologna sandwiches which he still drools over on air. Like many who have made it from America&#8217;s sparse heartlands, he appears to harbour a sense of irreducible farm-belt emptiness.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br \/>\nThere have been certain &#8220;landmarks&#8221; in the rises and slides of the various late night talk shows.\u00c2\u00a0 The history of Jay Leno is that he was being beaten to a pulp by Letterman.\u00c2\u00a0 And Jay Leno was a bit lost at sea, until he did a week in New York in a smaller more &#8220;comedy club&#8221; venue, which refocused his show, and started a march upwards in the ratings.\u00c2\u00a0 He cemented a climb above appeared on Jay Leno&#8217;s first to promote whatever movie he was promoting at the time of his prostitution\u00c2\u00a0bust.\u00c2\u00a0 Conan O&#8217;brien was getting hammered at his new show, but he found his confidence and bearing when Letterman appeared on his show as a guest.\u00c2\u00a0 Or something.<\/p>\n<p>Five years ago, NBC decided they needed to lock in Conan O&#8217;brien, so they planned for the future with him as Tonight Show host.\u00c2\u00a0 Watching their ratings fall in prime-time, they just &#8220;re-invented&#8221; television, as it proceeds in an era of &#8220;transition&#8221; with arbitrary lines falling, by giving him the 10 o&#8217;clock hour &#8212; cheap to produce, and nothing else was working for them.\u00c2\u00a0 The effect was that Letterman was now newly beating The Tonight Show in the ratings.\u00c2\u00a0 Until last week, NBC still could hold on to &#8220;winning the (marketing friendly)\u00c2\u00a0young demographic&#8221;.\u00c2\u00a0 But then, Letterman&#8217;s ratings rose last week to &#8220;the highest margin over The Tonight Show since the 1994 Winter Olympics&#8221;.<br \/>\nI suppose the &#8220;biggest loser&#8221;\u00c2\u00a0Letterman&#8217;s scandal was Conan O&#8217;brien, who&#8217;ll continue to be beaten badly in the ratings.\u00c2\u00a0 <em>Why, this is Letterman&#8217;s Hugh Grant Moment<\/em>!\u00c2\u00a0 And, by the time, Letterman retires from Show Business, who knows what the structure of television will be like?<\/p>\n<p>There is one thing that bothers me, and puzzles me a bit,\u00c2\u00a0about Letterman: since when is he a partisan figure?\u00c2\u00a0 Is it just Palin, or was there something that justifies anything at all with a strong label? \u00c2\u00a0I can&#8217;t help but think that&#8217;s mostly a signifier against the partisanship of the partisan detractors.<br \/>\nOne question that pops to my mind about the would be extortionist, suggested by Letterman himself in his monolouge: Who wants to pay eight dollars to watch a movie about David Letterman having sex?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I find international press attempts to explain American cultural items bemusing.\u00c2\u00a0 Case in point: David Letterman. Aussies explain two lingering items.:\u00c2\u00a0Under the terms of his contract, Letterman&#8217;s quaintly named company Worldwide Pants leases airtime on CBS, so he is not an employee. The network is believed to be concerned about some sections of its audience [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4769"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4769\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4771,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4769\/revisions\/4771"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}