{"id":3671,"date":"2009-04-05T14:52:35","date_gmt":"2009-04-05T21:52:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=3671"},"modified":"2009-04-12T08:23:49","modified_gmt":"2009-04-12T15:23:49","slug":"just-so-you-know-howie-g-yes-i-am-a-composite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2009\/04\/05\/just-so-you-know-howie-g-yes-i-am-a-composite\/","title":{"rendered":"just so you know Howie G: Yes, I am a composite."},"content":{"rendered":"

Okay.\u00c2\u00a0 Can somebody explain to me what the hell “Howie G” is talking about here<\/a>, because I’m not entirely sure.<\/p>\n

Howie G<\/span> said…\u00c2\u00a0 European, I would like you to prove you are a real person.<\/strong> Your point of view is absurd. You are actually, or like a compilation of a team of intelligence (or stupidity) agents. How can you quote LaRouche, admit that he has always been slandered in a disgusting way, and then reject everything? You’re the one who needs to be “deprogrammed.” Still trying to cash in on that money and sex chit you thought was coming from the Larouche org?<\/strong><\/em><\/dt>\n
European<\/em><\/span> [explains his position, obviously not mine, not important in this narrow question.]<\/em><\/dt>\n
Howie G<\/span> said… But prove you are real, not “composite.”<\/strong><\/em><\/dt>\n

Seriously.\u00c2\u00a0 Which is it:\u00c2\u00a0 Does Howie G
\n(a) believe that “European” is a fictional entity — anti-Larouche agents set up this blog and factnet poster , or
\n(b)is this his way of saying that his personality was “created” by the anti-Larouche agents?<\/p>\n

This is not a rhetorical question.\u00c2\u00a0 ‘Tis one or the other.\u00c2\u00a0 The former would be a literal reading of his words, the latter a figurative reading.\u00c2\u00a0 The latter would make some sense of some kind, the former is completely nuts.\u00c2\u00a0 I simply do not\u00c2\u00a0know which side of the coin I fall on, but get the feeling that to solve this problem is to\u00c2\u00a0have the key\u00c2\u00a0to a\u00c2\u00a0few locks.<\/p>\n

Next question.\u00c2\u00a0 What is this<\/a>?, from October 2008 — and from someone who evidentally heralds from Montana:<\/p>\n

It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s common knowledge in the conservative community that William Ayers recruited Barack Hussien when he was 8 years old. In addition to being used to deliver bombs to the homes of American Patriots in The Heartland, the young boy was also converted to a life-long homosexulist by the all-pedophile Liberal class and he spread this deviancy throughout the many madrasses he attended during his religious indoctrination. As a member of a ring of Muslin call-boys, Barack Hussien was able to infiltrate the Defense Department, where he entrapped, blackmailed and eventually assassinated Texas Senator John Tower, all on Ayers orders. This was only one of a long string of murders Ayers directed the boy to commit, all in an attempt to bring down our Democracy in order to replace it with a Stalinist-Muslamo hybrid state of repressive religious influence and strange food.<\/em><\/p>\n

Ayers continues to control him. In the early 1970\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s, the radical bomber put together a devious plan to take out Lyndon LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s printer, Ken Kronberg. The genius of the plan was the length of time it would take to execute, which would in turn, leave Ayers off of the list of suspects. He finally concluded his devious machinations on Aprill 11, 2007 by having Barack Hussien run Kronberg over with his own Toyota Corolla, making it appear to be a suicide. Curiously, all records of this event have been lost and the FBI has refused to make any statement on it.<\/em><\/p>\n

Barack Hussien is the ultimate \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6.ummm\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6.what was the name of that Frank Sinatra movie where the guy gets brainwashed and then he gets elected? The Stepford Wives? Well, he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s the ultimate Stepford Wife, ready to go insane as soon as the layer cake is frosted, speaking metaphorically. You LIE-brals need to get your heads out of the sand and recognize that John McPalin is the only thing standing between us and a life of eating chick peas and pita bread for the rest of our lives, wearing a turban the whole time under the threat of the Muslin clothing police.<\/em><\/p>\n

Okay.\u00c2\u00a0 I recognize this as a partisan Democrat mocking a Republican tying candidate Barack Obama to Bill Ayers more tightly than real\u00c2\u00a0— but in this rambling of conspiratorial tropes, WHERE DID KEN KRONBERG COME INTO THAT PICTURE?\u00c2\u00a0 Maybe I was wrong after all in saying that I don’t think Kronberg should have a wikipedia entry, except that the whole Larouche villa of wikipedia entries is screwy.\u00c2\u00a0 Apparently he’s lodged into the popular psyche somewhere.<\/p>\n

Such matters tend to be pretty strange.\u00c2\u00a0 But everything is strange hereabouts.\u00c2\u00a0 Case in point:\u00c2\u00a0 In December, I ran into this list of British Jews<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Um… “a list of most of the Jews that occupy top positions in our country, some are very influential in many areas of our society while others in the list are not, at this stage of the investigation it is impossible to determine which Jews are guilty and which Jews are innocent<\/em>.”\u00c2\u00a0 Interesting starting supposition.\u00c2\u00a0 Jeremiah Duggan made the list, which struck me as just a little bit weird.\u00c2\u00a0 Well, here’s another list of Jews that Duggan made<\/a>, a tad more positive a purview.<\/p>\n

And there’s this comment<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0— which brings me back to the Howie G question — “Prove to me you’re real and not composite.”<\/em>:<\/p>\n

The Geithner\/Paulson\/GoldmanSachs plan is so bad even Lydon LaRouche makes sense ranting against it!<\/em><\/p>\n

Couple that one with this guy, who last week I spotted at his blog wading into the tide of Larouche\u00c2\u00a0in having done a tad of research to convince him that there is “FAD” about him swarming about — but anways<\/a>:<\/p>\n

I am bracing myself for those dismissive comments that often arrive immediately after I point to a thought provoking video, article or speech that happens to reside on a site supported by Lyndon LaRouche or his various organizations. However, I have learned to base part of my judgement about thinkers and leaders by the people that they have influenced. If LaRouche can convince people like Portia that he is no “nutter”, then it seems to me that he has passed a very important test of legitimacy.<\/em><\/p>\n

With a statement like that, it demands what he is requesting, hence comment #1:<\/p>\n

\"Gravatar\" The Introduction which stated “it is time to listen to the wise words of Lyndcn LaRouche,” got to me. A definate turn off. LaRouche once said:
\n“America must be cleansed for its righteous war by the immediate elimination of the Nazi Jewish Lobby and other British agents from the councils of government, industry, and labor.”<\/em><\/p>\n

At least LaRouche has an original explanation for his anti-Semitism, the Jews are the agents of the Queen of England, who is the real ruler of the United Kingdom. The Jews are not the only tools of the British monarch, “Adolf Hitler was put into power in Germany on orders from London.”<\/em><\/p>\n

I could not watch anymore.<\/em><\/p>\n

Is this Ron<\/span> Rod Adams a real person, or just a composite?<\/p>\n

At least he didn’t cite Ramsey Clark<\/a>:<\/p>\n

… but\u00c2\u00a0Ramsey Clark is\u00c2\u00a0now working to free the remains of Geronomo from the Skull and Bones secret society, so that makes up for all that, right?<\/p>\n

In truth, the “so bad even Larouche makes sense” entity linked to something where Larouche’s thoughts are corraled well enough that it makes sense of a sort — it could have been worse for him.\u00c2\u00a0 Might have linked to this all:<\/p>\n

“This is fascism combined with insanity. It is a case of the criminal mind going insane.” […]<\/em><\/p>\n

LaRouche pointed out that the British suckered him based precisely on this profile he has of himself as the forger of consensus. As a consequence, LaRouche said, Obama is “on the edge of going down. They didn’t have to control him, because he could control himself. This is tragic.”<\/em><\/span><\/div>\n
“This agreement cannot be accepted,” LaRouche said. “If it were, it could very well lead to riots in the United States, the the breakup of the nation and to terrorism. Therefore, this must be rejected. The U.S. must not sign any treaty agreement with these elements. No patriot will allow this to be confirmed, no matter which side of the aisle he or she is on. To sign this would be to betray the United States.<\/em><\/span><\/div>\n
“This is one ego trip from which the President may return, but the nation may not come back. The price of his ego trip is too high a price to pay. No man has a right to have his ego used in this way. Our country can’t be put into jeopardy, humanity can’t be put into jeopardy, because he wants to win a popularity contest.”<\/em><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/em><\/span><\/div>\n
Hm.\u00c2\u00a0 Stoking all that further, here’s Jeff Steinberg on the controversy surrounding Chas Freeman:<\/span><\/div>\n

Perhaps no recent event better proves the point that the United States, and the Obama Presidency in particular, is under a vicious assault from an apparatus that, a half century ago, would have been openly called what it is\u00e2\u20ac\u201da bunch of lying Fascists\u00e2\u20ac\u201dthan the forced resignation of Ambassador Chas Freeman from his designated post as head of the National Intelligence Council (NIC).<\/em><\/p>\n

Not that I’m going to call anyone who disagrees with the dumping of Chas Freeman as anti-semitic, but for the love of Gawd, really?\u00c2\u00a0 Half a century the “Israel Lobby” would have been called “fascist”?<\/p>\n

And here’s your Webster Tarpley accolade fix<\/a>!<\/p>\n

Webster does an outstanding job articulating our collective reality and the way back from the brink of a new dark age. I suggest we listen and learn………..<\/em><\/p>\n

Indeed.\u00c2\u00a0 He crafted that Venetian Conspiracy that Larouche is still using, didn’t he?\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 See also this list of evil-doers<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Okay.\u00c2\u00a0 Can somebody explain to me what the hell “Howie G” is talking about here, because I’m not entirely sure. Howie G said…\u00c2\u00a0 European, I would like you to prove you are a real person. Your point of view is absurd. You are actually, or like a compilation of a team of intelligence (or stupidity) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3671"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3671\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3768,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3671\/revisions\/3768"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}