![](\"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/justin\/disintegration2010map2.jpg\")
<\/p>\nY’know…<\/p>\n
During the late 1990s, I was a frequent listener of Art Bell.\u00c2\u00a0 Less so now, as I don’t much like George Noory and don’t have a huge block of high school which would be best served to be half asleep through.\u00c2\u00a0 A lot of psuedo-science, a good dash of paranoia.\u00c2\u00a0 None of them should get the time on CNN.\u00c2\u00a0 There might occasionally be people who would serve well to find their way into the mainstream media — I remember a good tutorial on String Theory coming out of the Art Bell show once for example — but I would say that those\u00c2\u00a0examples\u00c2\u00a0fall into a definite minority\u00c2\u00a0 of show guests.<\/p>\n
Such is the case with one Igor Panarin.\u00c2\u00a0 If you want to put him on Coast to Coast, that’s fine, and if Drudge wants to blare his existance, that’s fine too, but what is this?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Further,\u00c2\u00a0if this is a prediction he’s had for the past decade, how is it a “developing story?”\u00c2\u00a0 This is along the same lines of seeing “Exclusive Interview” for an interview subject who has made him\/herself available to every media outlet everywhere — an occurance which happens with jarring frequency.<\/p>\n
Maybe I’m part of the problem.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s a variation of the “Water skiing Squirrel” Syndrome — they cover what interests the public — I posted that Drudge noted this inanity a month ago and posted the Wall Street Journal article two days ago.\u00c2\u00a0 Fine… from now on it’s just details of budgetary processes for me.<\/p>\n