Okay.\u00c2\u00a0 Where were we?<\/p>\n
Writing in the Oct. 31 edition of Executive Intelligence Review, leading U.S. statesman and economist Lyndon LaRouche issued a major report, one which, he wrote, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153may come to be considered by some among the world\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s leading circles of today, as the most important political document you have read, or might have read, during your lifetime to date.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n You know how television shows always advertise with “The final 15 minutes of\u00c2\u00a0Tuesday’s night\u00c2\u00a0program will be the most shocking 15 minutes in television history”?\u00c2\u00a0 You know how the major comic book publishers always used to plaster their covers with “Special Collector’s Edition”, salted liberally?\u00c2\u00a0 You know how a used car seller or a mattress seller advertises with “The Deal of the Century”?\u00c2\u00a0 How many of these proclamations of “most important political document you have read, or might have read, during your lifetime to date” can there be?<\/p>\n But this is all old and stupid.\u00c2\u00a0 When I get the chance I am going to look into the functionality of Alex Jones’s websites — are these things user input with a helpful editor that tracks the desired conspiracy mongering to the front?– because I note this<\/a>:<\/p>\n Conspiracy theories abound throughout the Internet, as occurs when anything of this magnitude occurs – and one of the most astounding theories I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve come across is that Great Britain was actually behind the attacks as published on Alex Jone\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s site.<\/em><\/p>\n That actually is a rather unastounding and very boring theory.\u00c2\u00a0 And you know why that is.\u00c2\u00a0 If I hadn’t plucked this from the realms of the Internet by way of the keyword search “Larouche”, I would still know the source of this crap.\u00c2\u00a0 The British Empire — to quote the fellow, “And the British are also in heat right now.”<\/strong><\/em>\u00c2\u00a0 Is there no end to their sex-starved treachery?\u00c2\u00a0 What will they think of next?\u00c2\u00a0 (Well, this<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 But that’s been floating in Larouche’s mind since the summer.\u00c2\u00a0 To paraphrase a drunk Mel Gibson<\/a>, “The British are responsible for all the wars in the world.\u00c2\u00a0 And presidential assassinations.\u00c2\u00a0 Are you a Brit<\/em>?”\u00c2\u00a0 I look forward to the upcoming Robert Beltran narrated L-Pac video on the British treachery of germ warfare which gave President William Henry Harrison pneumonia.)<\/p>\n Continuing: Is there some sort of memo on how a Larouchie interacts on the Internet?\u00c2\u00a0 “Always act surprised, yet intrigued\u00c2\u00a0at the reading of a Larouche tract.\u00c2\u00a0 State that you’ve heard about him, and some bad things, but have never looked into him yourself.”\u00c2\u00a0 Anyway, I’m eating my 20 dollar loaves of bread and am waiting with the horror of our up-coming Michael Bloomberg Administration.<\/p>\n The link, I guess, came to us from sort of the fringes of the Alex Jones website.\u00c2\u00a0 Meaning, the fringe of the fringe.\u00c2\u00a0 The front page would tend to entreat you with information that Webster Tarpley will be on the next Alex Jones show, Alex Jones to be on the next Webster Tarpley show — Tarpley having more credence in the world of Kookery than Larouche (though, this may be by design).\u00c2\u00a0 The last time I spotted, in my slightly askewed glance over the Internet, Larouche being in the Alex Jones web-sphere — it was with a youtube clip where Larouche babbled on about how everyone is going to be killing everyone else<\/a> — and, if you imagine\u00c2\u00a02 straight days of\u00c2\u00a0speeches along those lines,\u00c2\u00a0the not entirely unfeasible portrait of a lone\u00c2\u00a0LYM taking things into his own hands at an isolated\u00c2\u00a0conference in Germany becomes a little easy to picture.<\/p>\n If the Alex Jones sites operated with this sort of user-based variety,\u00c2\u00a0I can entertain myself with an\u00c2\u00a0odd version of how things work with dailykos — where we see this post has been deleted<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Karole Noymann <\/em>contributed for consideration and deletion an entry which began:\u00c2\u00a0 Maybe Lyndon LaRouche isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t so crazy after all25 Nov 2008 But,\u00c2\u00a0in terms of\u00c2\u00a0the Internet, wikipedia is probably the front-line of any Larouchian fight.\u00c2\u00a0 I tend think the wikipedia article on Larouche right now is a little lame, the Larouchies have successfully gotten a good focus on their roaming batch of any figure who has given the man validation.\u00c2\u00a0 On the other hand, I appear to have indirectly affected the entry on “James Bevel”, this post <\/a>seeming to have lead to a further explication of Bevel’s career of the time <\/a>— which had been posted at wikipedia as simply “getting his educational viewpoinits to the public” (appreciate the dark humor there)\u00c2\u00a0to include such items as “booed off stage in front of black Nationalists” and more importantly the Nebraska Child Molestation hoax he played a part in propagating (irony or ironies)\u00c2\u00a0and… Perhaps there is more to the story of Bevel’s career in his Larouchian phase and why, but researchers would have to figure it out and document it.<\/p>\n In other news, Funny this<\/a>, though ironically something of a Larouchian tactic:<\/p>\n The lowest of low blows was lodged anonymously against a House GOP leader candidate, New Hampton Rep. Fran Wendleboe. And,\u00c2\u00a0 Satanists are upset\u00c2\u00a0with Larouche<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 Supposedly a pivot for the org would be to seek funding sources and feign support for and around\u00c2\u00a0a sort of Sarah Palin supporting Christian sources — this \u00c2\u00a0a good start to that goal, I suppose.\u00c2\u00a0 (Look into this story yourself<\/a>.)<\/p>\n In other news — David Icke has been making some rounds and figuring in the Franken — Coleman recount<\/a> here in the states… in Britain — it gets even odder<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 (Franken is seen here<\/a> playing Henry Kissinger in an enactment of the scholarly polemic “Henry Kissinger and the Politics of Faggery.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Okay.\u00c2\u00a0 Where were we? Writing in the Oct. 31 edition of Executive Intelligence Review, leading U.S. statesman and economist Lyndon LaRouche issued a major report, one which, he wrote, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153may come to be considered by some among the world\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s leading circles of today, as the most important political document you have read, or might have […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3223\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nThis is an article that all should read, and when I first read it, my first thought was \u00e2\u20ac\u0153WTF???\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Then, I took the time to read-up on Lyndon LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s track-record for being correct – and if you read it yourself – it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s mind-numbing how often Mr. LaRouche has been correct in his predictions and analysis of several issues that have actually been absolutely correct, and this time, I hope that he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s dead-wrong!<\/em><\/p>\n
\nOK maybe my title is a bit misleading since this diary is about Mrs. Helga Zepp-LaRouche, for over thirty years the wife of Lyndon LaRouche, who has worked closely with her husband and reflects his own views and philosophy.\u00c2\u00a0 <\/em>Perhaps this makes\u00c2\u00a0Markos Moulitsas and his website are\u00c2\u00a0one of those\u00c2\u00a0dreaded “Gate-keepers” conspiracy theorists talk about, keeping this view or that view outside the purview of respectable opinion.\u00c2\u00a0 I wonder if I were to create an account and post some rather tame donkey versus elephant partisan horse race item at Alex Jones’s website if I would be similarly deleted.\u00c2\u00a0 Well, it’s a thought.<\/p>\n
\nTitled \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Truth About Fran,\u00e2\u20ac\u2122\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 the two-page attack called her the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Lyndon LaRouche of NH politics\u00e2\u20ac\u2122\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 in referring to her past unsuccessful bids for Congress, party chairwoman and state Senate.
\nIt had a character assassination of Sam Pimm, who had led the Reagan Network political action committee that Wendleboe formed and which opposed the renomination of moderate-to-liberal GOP House members.
\nAnd it contained a picture of Miss Piggy the Muppet and a picture of Wendleboe with the caption \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Separated at birth?\u00e2\u20ac\u2122\u00e2\u20ac\u2122
\nThe letter was sent with no return address to all House Republican members the weekend before Monday\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s leadership vote.<\/em><\/p>\n