{"id":2907,"date":"2008-05-16T10:46:24","date_gmt":"2008-05-16T17:46:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2008\/05\/16\/howdy-revenire\/"},"modified":"2008-05-16T10:46:24","modified_gmt":"2008-05-16T17:46:24","slug":"howdy-revenire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2008\/05\/16\/howdy-revenire\/","title":{"rendered":"Howdy, revenire"},"content":{"rendered":"

Discuss:
\nOne thing I want to remark on<\/em><\/a> is how utterly vulgar LaRouchism is.<\/p>\n

But more–as to the identity of revenire–I still can’t quite shake the feeling that the [a] the individual is drunk, [b] the individual is the misbegotten product of the LaRouche\/PsyWar\/Beneath the Basement project–that is, LaRouche in his cups directs his faithful Igors in various “psywar” attacks on various enemies, OR [also high probability] this is satire, something I’ve said before about the wildly pro-LaRouche rants that sometimes appear on this board, so overstated as to be hilarious and perhaps intentionally so.<\/p>\n

Because as an advertisement for LaRouchean humanism, hylozoic monism, golden souls, etc., revenire is a flop.<\/p>\n

Anyhow–comments–<\/p>\n

make something of yourself, like ken kronberg did with his life<\/p>\n

1. This has to be a joke, one in very bad taste. By taking his own life during the week that he was in the legal process of shutting down WorldComp and PMR,<\/strong> the printing operations to which he had devoted nearly 30 years of his life, Ken might reasonably have been supposed to be saying that he felt he had NOT made something of his life.<\/p>\n

2. Everything Ken DID feel that he made of his life–in the drama work, the Shakespeare classes, the poetry classes and writing, the Yiddish Renaissance work, the study of Ancient Rome, the work on William Gilbert–all the way back, in other words–he felt was being taken from him or had been taken from him by the intellectual quicksand of the org, and in particular (the Shakespeare work) by the vicious stupidity of Lyn LaRouche and Tony Papert.<\/p>\n

How do I know? He told me.<\/p>\n

who cares about his wife? did it ever occur to any of you clowns that husbands and wives sometimes don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t get along? they call the end of a marriage d-i-v-o-r-c-e<\/p>\n

Please note the complete disjunction between the first and second sentences. The first question that comes to mind: Does this mean that if someone’s divorced we’re not to care about them?<\/p>\n

Second, and more serious: The thought here expressed goes to the kernel of LaRouche’s small, hard, sclerotic, piece-of-coal heart: “who cares about his wife?”<\/p>\n

Who indeed? In fact, who in the org cares about anyone else–especially if LaRouche has told you NOT to care about him or her? Who cares about Carol or Chris, Nick, Uwe, Gus, Mel, Warren, Webster, Fernando, Robyn, Linda, Christina, Pidge, Dalto, Leif, Nora, Kathy, Laura, Don, Paul, Andy, Steve, Uwe F, Gabriele, Michael, Anno, Elisabeth, Hartmut, Ortrun, Renate, Dino, Cristina, Fiorella, Philip, Hans, Laurent, Lana, Thierry, Mary, Bill, Sander, Joyce, Bobby, Sandy, Margaret?–just to name a few of the leaders and members of the org who have quit over the years.<\/p>\n

Revenire doesn’t. Lyn says these are Bad People Doing Bad Things. Why, they may even be Government Agents out to get Lyn!?!<\/p>\n

Now, we recall, those of us (fewer than 7) who have been following revenire, that he has told us that he is not a member of the LaRouche org and not based in Leesburg.<\/p>\n

If any of that is true, then revenire, of course, didn’t know Ken or Molly or any of these people just listed. Wouldn’t know them if they slapped him silly (there’s a thought….)<\/em><\/p>\n

(rest of messages in the “comments”)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Discuss: One thing I want to remark on is how utterly vulgar LaRouchism is. But more–as to the identity of revenire–I still can’t quite shake the feeling that the [a] the individual is drunk, [b] the individual is the misbegotten product of the LaRouche\/PsyWar\/Beneath the Basement project–that is, LaRouche in his cups directs his faithful […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2907","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2907","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2907"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2907\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2907"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2907"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2907"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}