{"id":26189,"date":"2021-10-18T11:11:37","date_gmt":"2021-10-18T18:11:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=26189"},"modified":"2021-10-18T11:11:37","modified_gmt":"2021-10-18T18:11:37","slug":"creating-click-bait-commenting-without-having-clicked","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2021\/10\/18\/creating-click-bait-commenting-without-having-clicked\/","title":{"rendered":"creating click bait, commenting without having clicked"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>There are headlines in which I have to decide if I care to dip into the details, and where the details will provide some nuance on what I think of this headline, which not knowing gives the advantage of leaving the story in the abstract so I can stick to considering the abstract values &#8212; or splitting the differences in parallel stories.  Or, if I knew there is a strong possibility there just isn&#8217;t a story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So, I do not know what is up with The Rolling Stones dropping &#8220;Brown Sugar&#8221; from their playlist.  As a matter of course I approve.  As a matter of course I would approve if they left it in their concerts.  By now we all know that The Rolling Stones have amassed a large collection of songs to draw from, and the disappearance of any one can hardly be thought of as maybe even noticeable.  Go ahead &#8212; you can listen to &#8220;Brown Sugar&#8221; right this instant if need be &#8212; I and no one else is stopping you!  But therein lay the problem, and splintered realities.  How did this come to light?  If it were a press release, delivered I would go ahead and blast Mic Jagger and company (this &#8220;Blues Cover Band&#8221;, and there Paul McCartney is just amusing himself in good natured ribbing of a rival band he never really had truck with in the first place) as engaging in &#8220;virtue signaling&#8221;.  And maybe there are worse things in the world, bigger faults, then deciphering an audience and playing to it &#8212; probably badly as I can not imagine Generation Zoomers rolling into a Rolling Stones concert checking off a list of objectionable materials in song lyrics, or of the famous &#8221; woke mob&#8221; detouring from a Dave Chapelle protest to concern themselves with a Legacy Rock Act playing their old time music.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>.  The matter might get a little more wearisome if this were an answer to an interview, and there I would have to look and see what it is the aging rock star says &#8212; and to what question&#8230; And if the questions were the focus point for any interviewing.  Like, if the media outlet called up the PR flacks for a &#8220;we want to interview your opinion on &#8216;cancel culture&#8217; and shifting cultural awareness&#8221;, and Jagger said &#8220;yes, my thoughts are that is exactly what is needed!&#8221; &#8212; I guess I would a little less of Jagger.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And why do I not look into this?  If I knew the matter would be settled, and it will likely show up as not in any way interesting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.comics.org\/issue\/205511\/cover\/4\/\">cliche as far back as 1988 (<\/a>though, in his shirtlessness &#8220;Grandpa Randy&#8221; more resembles Iggy Pop than the usually shirted Rolling Stones.)  Archie generally lagging &#8212; so this motif could probably be set by the late 1970s.  (Worth noting, the latest edition of &#8216;Betty and Veronica Jumbo Digest&#8217; includes a reprint from 1960 where Betty &#8220;introduces&#8221; the term &#8220;frenemy&#8221;, apparently a use which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cbr.com\/archie-betty-veronica-fremeny-mitford-sisters\/\">prompted an Internet comics site q and a column A year back &#8212; <\/a> Cold War terminology in the 1950s put it in print, or an upper class snob constellation of Socialites bandied about in the 1940s so, I guess, it could peter down to the lower class pieces at the end of century &#8212; sure, but that does not answer the question &#8212; was it midwifed here in 1960 by the hands of Frank Doyle?  Nay.  I do gather there is probably a direct correlation between this online column and Archie Comics reprinting it, claim partial ownership of interest.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There are headlines in which I have to decide if I care to dip into the details, and where the details will provide some nuance on what I think of this headline, which not knowing gives the advantage of leaving the story in the abstract so I can stick to considering the abstract values &#8212; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26189","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26189","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26189"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26189\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26195,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26189\/revisions\/26195"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26189"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26189"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26189"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}