{"id":2262,"date":"2007-05-12T22:38:43","date_gmt":"2007-05-13T05:38:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2007\/05\/12\/du-pont\/"},"modified":"2007-05-12T22:49:58","modified_gmt":"2007-05-13T05:49:58","slug":"du-pont","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2007\/05\/12\/du-pont\/","title":{"rendered":"Du Pont."},"content":{"rendered":"

Sometimes I get email that I can’t tell what it is.\u00c2\u00a0 I understand that there is a type of spam that is a random series of phrases and words, hatched to see if you click to it.\u00c2\u00a0 But these emails come across as relatively coherent — if loopy, and thus… who knows?\u00c2\u00a0 Maybe somebody is reading my blog and thinks they have insight into something I care about.\u00c2\u00a0 Example, and if you clear out some clutter it is a coherent story I hear about from time to time, worth some activists’ attention:<\/p>\n

Why? Why?? Why??? If pirates should be punished, how about Du Pont<\/span>, the robber? Could you (intellectual property proprietors in U.S.A.) avoid shouldering loss for hoodlum Du Pont<\/span>\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00afs shameful behaviors for profit? (If you log on <\/a>, copy and paste the 8-Chinese character full name of Du Pont<\/span> \u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b0\u00c3\u0192\u00c3\u20ac \u00c2\u00b9\u00c3\u00ba\u00c2\u00b6\u00c3\u2026\u00c2\u00b0\u00c3\u00ae\u00c2\u00bb\u00c2\u00af\u00c3\u2018\u00c2\u00a7\u00c2\u00b9\u00c2\u00ab\u00c3\u2039\u00c2\u00be\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b1, you could see more than 10 published English or\/and Chinese open letters by me on more than 10 pages from the first one.) All intellectual property proprietors in U.S., how are you? Your government sued Chinese government for \u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b0not doing its best to fight against piracy\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b1 to WTO on April 9, 2007. Chinese government publicly reiterated its resolution to strictly crash piracy, and compensated related companies in your country with several billions USD for their loss. As a result, enterprises involved in piracy were devastatingly struck, but related company in your country still thought Chinese government was not in its best to crash piracy. If now your government still fails to convince or force Du Pont<\/span> to fulfill its obligations in Agreement 1995, world public may have a series of doubt and concern below. Since Du Pont<\/span> could 100% publicly possessed by power (exclusive possession) Mr. Huang\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00afs patent technology of effective and nontoxic agricultural pesticide, why venders in other countries were accused of violation of law for just selling some piratical disks, which is far from 100% publicly possessing by power the right of production and sales of the disks worldwide? Why could Du Pont<\/span> distain and trample the law, but venders have to observe all laws? Why must laws be strictly enforced by other country\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00afs government? Although other country\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00afs government has the intention to strictly enforce the laws and take relevant actions, since Du Pont<\/span>\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00afs behaviors-publicly possession of Mr. Huang\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00afs patent by force, refusing to fulfill its commitments in Agreement 1995 to pay patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang for many years, slandering China<\/span> \u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b0a raffish country\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b1, and Mr. Huang \u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b0a rascal\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b1, writing letter to threaten and intimidate Mr. Huang and bringing false charge against him before Chinese police-did not deserve what they should have, with the feeling of unfairness and negative mentality caused in the public worldwide, would that take the effect of \u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b0strictly enforcing the laws\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b1 as expected? Whether it would instigate a minority of people to breach your intellectual property as revenge? Whether it will lead to a vicious circle of competitively violating the others\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00af intellectual property? If these doubt and concerns unfortunately come true, would it be an absurd situation in which other intellectual property proprietors in your country should shoulder the loss for Du Pont<\/span>\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00afs unashamed violation of agreement? Then why should trade intellectual property proprietors\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00af legal benefits for illegal benefits of Du Pont<\/span> and its accomplice? Why?Why??Why??? Is it necessary? Implementation of a law, regulation or agreement should rely on not only compulsory measures adopted by government, but also, or more important, on conscious abidance of related parties worldwide. To achieve that goal, related law-executing departments must bear \u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b0all are equal before the law\u00c2\u00a1\u00c2\u00b1 in mind during execution process, but must not ignore open and brutal trample of laws, regulations and agreements of one certain member, who is with great power or has special interest relations with the executor. Otherwise, any agreement between governments will become blank before public without any sanction. Disputes between Mr. Huang and Du Pont<\/span> comprise of adequate fact evidence and clear legal relations (rights and obligations), namely Du Pont<\/span> has been fully entitled to the rights regulated in Agreement 1995, now simply carrying out the corresponding obligations will solve all problems. What we are waiting for now is just forced fulfillment of Du Pont<\/span> of obligations in Agreement 1995 by law-executing departments in your country. Best wishes! Universal Agent: SXF<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sometimes I get email that I can’t tell what it is.\u00c2\u00a0 I understand that there is a type of spam that is a random series of phrases and words, hatched to see if you click to it.\u00c2\u00a0 But these emails come across as relatively coherent — if loopy, and thus… who knows?\u00c2\u00a0 Maybe somebody is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2262"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2262\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}