{"id":19991,"date":"2020-11-09T15:24:49","date_gmt":"2020-11-09T22:24:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=19991"},"modified":"2020-11-15T19:44:03","modified_gmt":"2020-11-16T02:44:03","slug":"daniel-burke-wins-99-6-percent-of-new-jersey-vote-british-empire-fraudulently-steals-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2020\/11\/09\/daniel-burke-wins-99-6-percent-of-new-jersey-vote-british-empire-fraudulently-steals-it\/","title":{"rendered":"Daniel Burke wins 99.6 percent of New Jersey vote, British Empire fraudulently steals it."},"content":{"rendered":"

Meet the face of the anti-Biden Resistance<\/a>, an every guy, easy for coastal elites to mock but the salt of the Earth. But herefor, a battle rages for his soul and loyalty<\/a>. On one side, Alex Jones<\/a>. On another side, there is… the Larouche org<\/a>, who when npt in the streets directing the crowd to a cardboard table off on the side are holding these webcasts. Who will the guy gravitate to? The answer may come down to… Who would he rather have a beer with?<\/p>\n

II. ate lunch with him in the 70s<\/a>, movie ideas<\/a>, and dream castings<\/a>.
\nGotta love the see nothing, hear nothing<\/a> respnse to citations of inconsistency.
\nNigel Farage, Supposed Trump “international nationalist” movement head for Brtain, (and compared to Larouche here<\/a>) claims Biden as Foe of Brtish Empire<\/a>.
\nBlack larouche support<\/a> in early oughts.
\nSometimes the reason for Larouche success is just this simple<\/a>.
\nOne dollar donation<\/a> proves dividends.
\nThat’s one way of describing “Beyond Psychanalysis”<\/a>.
\nCampaign stories<\/a> from a one time campaign journalist, New Hampshire.
\nfriend who dated a girl<\/a>
\nWhy Polls are off these days<\/a>.
\nCommunity college memories<\/a>.
\nUniversity of Chicago<\/a>.
\nUber Driver<\/a>.
\nHammer and Scoreboard<\/a> supposedly a “Larouche radio station”?
\nthe colorful back history of one Larouchie<\/a>.
\nDem precint chair and Larouchies<\/a>.
\nThe post office tour had its results<\/a>.
\nThe current battle<\/a> probably will get about same after-effects.
\nDick Cheney remains the enemy<\/a>.
\nOut in St Paul, shouting “freedom!” over and over. But, I thought he was dead.
\nand Trenton<\/a>, nay … Isn’t Biden Irish?
\nAt least they didn’t do the “the Ukraine”<\/a>. Maybe not Putin lackeys<\/a> after all.<\/p>\n

III. Did not answer the question<\/a>, but I guess they have answered the question by their post-election actions<\/a>. No.
\nThen again, the Larouche org’s motives may just dovetail perfectly with Trump’s<\/a>.
\nthe campaign is soliciting donations for its \u00e2\u20ac\u0153official election defense fund,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d but the fine print shows half of the donations are to be used for another purpose: to retire the campaign\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s debt. That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a particularly conspicuous clause given Trump had previously said he might put up his own money for his reelection effort; even as he swears he has a legitimate legal case, he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not just declining to use his own money, but he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s diverting half the money raised for it to another purpose tied to the winding down of the campaign. (The imbalance is even bigger for a related effort, with 40 percent going to the Republican National Committee and 60 percent going to retire Trump\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s campaign debt.)<\/i>
\nSuch may be the real story of the silarity noted by Matthew Sweet<\/a>.
\nThen again, Trump legal action is reminding people of Larouche at many a corner<\/a>.<\/p>\n

IV. New Jerseyans saw<\/a> and noticed<\/a> the Daniel Burke<\/a> campaign<\/a>.
\nIt should be noted in at least one webcaster’s interview, he was identified as a “Larouche Republican”<\/a>. But in his rally and “drop money at my table” speech he definitey provided an off-ramp. The news mefia settled on supporter of the late political extremist<\/a>.<\/p>\n

(Funny, Burke was not alone in his Larouche reference<\/a> to this gop tweet<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

Also admired, the campaigning for Trump<\/a>, “greatest revolution in history”<\/a> and on<\/a>, sure to be repaid by a post presidential appearance on an LPAC webcast after the current tireless efforts<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Final tally for Burke… Oh, point four percent of the vote. Probably the result of election fraud… He really won 99.6 petcent, you see.<\/p>\n

V. 432<\/a>. One guy speaks out<\/a>. Counterpoint<\/a>. Values to raise your kid by<\/a>. To be fair, I had a similar problem with a lot of antiwar left wing groups, but it trended to that “Free Mumia” crap<\/a>.
\nWhen the John Birch congressman fought Larouche on the floor<\/a>.
\nRobbie Barwick<\/a>.
\nLPAC versus Heaven’s Gate<\/a>.
\nNeoplatonists versis Paleoplatonists<\/a>.
\nRock and Roll will never die<\/a>. Though, male pattern balding will<\/a>.
\nOne theory<\/a>.<\/p>\n

VI. I personally have a hard time swallowing the facebook and twitter and youtube* “warnings” now seen on lpac material, though this is not necessarily the examples of where I would cite its problem, and I have less of a problem dumping it on elected officials — see D Trump. But nonetheless, when we see the right allies in the struggle against “big tech censorship”, as with Alex Jones and his bullhorn<\/a>, they have at least some leeway and consistency in referring to a foreign example of whete this leads… China.
\nThe current LPAC matrydom is against these private corporation ” disputed” notices, as opposed to how the Chinese government would simply wipe the message out, or disallow anyone from even seeing it Something the Bards Logic podcast<\/a> appears to know, and that the Larouchie quoted and Larouchoe intervirwed apparently won’t argue against — there, at least. (The tables provide a big tent<\/a> outlier for China<\/a> attitudes<\/a>, reciprocated in part and kind<\/a>). It may be that their adoption of qanon phraings Wr Are Many, they are few<\/a> momentarily obscures the difference.<\/p>\n

Aso not brought up anywhere: the Larouche fight against Voter Improprietries in the 2004 presidential election on behalf of John Kerry, with ally Democratic Congressman John Conyers<\/a>.<\/p>\n

*Youtube has a somewhat more subtle disclaimer model than the tag on twitter that had LPAC declaring ” badges of honor” — a link right below the webcast on vote fraud conspiracies to detail how “robust safeguards help ensure the integrity” of results.<\/p>\n

In one sense, we do see the larouchies block<\/a>, fairly I supposr.<\/p>\n

A comedian and his Biden Dream cabinet<\/a>, following your Republican anti Trump loaded one.<\/p>\n

VII. En route to Operation Mop Up<\/a>.
\nA logical mid-point<\/a> — the perenial use of the term “mass strike”, last deployed in citing Rosa Luxemberg for the Tea Party.
\nAND A logical end-point<\/a>. (Or is it this?<\/a>)
\nIn all, McDuff talks of his conversion to Larouche thought<\/a>.<\/p>\n

VII. A National Revirw article by Robert Zubrin<\/a> LPAC may want to crib while moving beyond into the ” funded by Soros and various Jewish surnames” line.<\/p>\n

Intetesting, space was atbthe crux of what appears Daniel Burke’s most commented upon tweet<\/a>.<\/p>\n

IX. Rebuttal<\/a>.
\nIt is where the most common tweeter reference to Larouche is in reference to a Trump 2024 run and an imagined imprisonment with a reminder that ” Larouche ran from prison”.<\/p>\n

Blast from Past name Christophet Earl Strunck<\/a>, uh huh… follow at your leisure.<\/p>\n

Binney now on Russian media<\/a>, now skipping to one removed from lpac apparently. His associations and reputation proceed<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Final word comes from the ultimate in under-represented swing voters<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Meet the face of the anti-Biden Resistance, an every guy, easy for coastal elites to mock but the salt of the Earth. But herefor, a battle rages for his soul and loyalty. On one side, Alex Jones. On another side, there is… the Larouche org, who when npt in the streets directing the crowd to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19991","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19991","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19991"}],"version-history":[{"count":79,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19991\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20270,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19991\/revisions\/20270"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}