{"id":16743,"date":"2017-10-19T17:48:16","date_gmt":"2017-10-20T00:48:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=16743"},"modified":"2017-10-27T17:26:25","modified_gmt":"2017-10-28T00:26:25","slug":"what-in-the-estulin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2017\/10\/19\/what-in-the-estulin\/","title":{"rendered":"what in the estulin?"},"content":{"rendered":"

ITEM NUMBER ONE:\u00c2\u00a0 It is instructive to take a gander at the Daniel Estulin 2015 book covering the Tavickstock Institue<\/a>, on the question of what portion of this book is simply replaying the works of the Lyndon Larouche Movement.\u00c2\u00a0 54.5 percent.\u00c2\u00a0 Therabouts.<\/p>\n

Skip to the endnotes for each chapter, and count the sources to Larouche publications — from the 1970s on into the 2010s.\u00c2\u00a0 I note that a weakness in my ability to spot things quickly, as the citations get a little slippery — sometimes skipping over to the American Almanac website instead of the orginial EIR source, for instance.\u00c2\u00a0 As well some unfamiliarity with names throws me off.\u00c2\u00a0 The result is that in two countings, I myself have slighly diverging numbers.<\/p>\n

Introduction: 5 out of 8
\nChapter one:\u00c2\u00a0 52 out of 84
\nChapter two:\u00c2\u00a0 14 out of 29
\nChapter three:\u00c2\u00a0 1 out of 18
\nChapter four:\u00c2\u00a0 48 out of 80
\nChapter five:\u00c2\u00a0 50 out of 91
\nChapter six:\u00c2\u00a0 42 out of 68… with an additional 3 going to, believe it or not, the Larouche Planet website (“Larouche in Wiener World”)
\nChapter seven:\u00c2\u00a0 17 out of 31<\/p>\n

The one that stands out in this group — Chapter three, is instructive.\u00c2\u00a0 Here we have a study of how the Illuminati is sending messages through popular music.\u00c2\u00a0 It makes a big deal of hip artists’s boasts on being the “Rain Man”, never making clear what this is supposed to entail — is this transferred to simply the Illuminati’s boastings of “Rain Man” dom, conditioning the public to accept the current metaphorical rain, or a signal to its puppets to switch on some “rain” switch?\u00c2\u00a0 On the dealings with Rihanni’s song “Under the Umbrella”, we have the issues of robots dancing and goat heads in music videos — the robots Estulin spells out as being conditioning us to accept our robot overlord future — though what this has to do with the Umbrella I don’t know… maybe we’re just all under the Umbrella of the Unseeing Eye?
\nAnd what of the echoing of Rihanni with “Umbrella… Brella… Brella… A?”<\/p>\n

Anyway.\u00c2\u00a0 We can see why Larouche hasn’t much to say about this, being the Larouchies don’t much deal in popular music.<\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER TWO.\u00c2\u00a0 Hey now.\u00c2\u00a0 An interesting recent attempt at editing wikipedia for some actual analytical purpose on Larouche and his movement.<\/p>\n

The\u00c2\u00a0Wikipedia editing attempts<\/a>…\u00c2\u00a0far-right<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0Perhaps now more clear than ever,\u00c2\u00a0 which espouses deeply [[antisemitic]] ideas and conspiracy theories characteristic of the far-right<\/em>, Sure… the movement’s underlying ideology entails a series of [[anti-semitic]], [[Holocaust-denying]] [[conspiracy theories]] that are paradigmatic of the far-right<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0No.\u00c2\u00a0 They stand for … um… Silk Roads and Land Bridges and… um stuff — foremost of all,\u00c2\u00a0 its leadership, in particular, LaRouche’s wife, [[Helga Zepp-LaRouche]], has made the conspiratorial, far-right, and [[anti-Semitic]] underpinnings of the movement evident to the public in a 1979 statement that refers to the Holocaust as a “hoax”<\/em>.\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0Good to point out a leadership shifting.
\nIn her statement, Zepp-LaRouche, writes: “While in the US, no one especially cherishes even the slightest illusions about the power of the Zionist lobby the present administration, the influence of a covert Zionist lobby in the Federal Republic has been only a few initiated political figures known, but not the general public. And so we have to take the hypocritical Holocaust hoax as an opportunity to blow the whistle on these foreign agents.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Interestingly enough, the “Anti-Zionist” tag is removed on Lyndon.<\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER THREE… too clever by half.<\/p>\n

The peinlich presentation of the Ignoble Prize in Economics to Richard Thaler\u00e2\u20ac\u201dthe latest in a long line of Stockholm and Oslo<\/em><\/p>\n

There actually is an “Ignoble Award”.\u00c2\u00a0 Here’s who won it this year<\/a>…<\/p>\n

ECONOMICS PRIZE\u00c2\u00a0[AUSTRALIA, USA] \u00e2\u20ac\u201d\u00c2\u00a0Matthew Rockloff<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0and\u00c2\u00a0Nancy Greer<\/a>, for their experiments to see how contact with a live crocodile affects a person’s willingness to gamble.<\/em>
\nREFERENCE: “Never Smile at a Crocodile: Betting on Electronic Gaming Machines is Intensified by Reptile-Induced Arousal<\/a>,” Matthew J. Rockloff and Nancy Greer,\u00c2\u00a0Journal of Gambling Studies, vol. 26, no. 4, December 2010, pp. 571-81.<\/em>
\nWHO ATTENDED THE CEREMONY: Matthew Rockloff and Nancy Greer<\/em><\/p>\n

Surely the Larouche Movement can be put in the running and win something one of these years… just like, say… Jack Van Impe once won an award.<\/p>\n

Webster Tarpley wins a mention for a dubious honor<\/a>… but when was he ever a star bright enough to become dimmer?<\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER FOUR:\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0Once again, they’re hitting the Farm Circuit<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Oct. 28 will be a day full of expert presentations. Bob Baker is an economic policy consultant and specializes in agriculture economic research. He is currently a correspondent for the Executive Intelligence Review news service.<\/em><\/p>\n

Will Kansas farmers go for the Silk Road?\u00c2\u00a0 Only time will tell.<\/p>\n

They’re also hitting the Italian Engineer circuit<\/a>.<\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER FIVE<\/p>\n

Run down of BUSO campaigning in Germany.<\/a>..<\/p>\n

\u00e2\u20ac\u0153The future of Germany is the New Silk Road!\u00e2\u20ac\u009d reads one pinned to a streetlight near Berlin\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s main train station.
\n<\/em>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Cultural renaissance instead of barbarism,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d reads another. And, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Germans can stop world war!\u00e2\u20ac\u009d
\n<\/em>These posters, in a matching blue and yellow color scheme, all urge Berliners to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153vote B\u00c3\u00bcSo.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n

More or less, a “What is this? item from Foreign Policy.\u00c2\u00a0 The Larouche Movement responds.<\/p>\n

The author of the attack, Bethany Allen-Ebrahemian, comes from the East-West Institute in Hawaii, and the detestable contempt she affects for Chinese intelligencia and leaders is a mark of neo-Con geopoliticians. But it belies a real fear of the New Silk Road policy, and the LaRouches as leaders of it.
\n<\/em>Foreign Policy\u00c2\u00a0will be one U.S.-based observer nervously counting the votes of the parliamentary slate of Germany’s Civil Rights Movement Solidarity (B\u00c3\u00bcSo) party.<\/em><\/p>\n

Sure.\u00c2\u00a0 The members of Foreign Policy magazine watched the results,biting their fingernails as the results came in, wearily counting BUSO votes, like they were liberals watching the election results map of Michigan last November.<\/p>\n

Results of the German national election are in:<\/em>
\n Out of 46.4 million votes, B\u00c3\u0153SO gains 6735.<\/em><\/p>\n

Then they… partied?<\/p>\n

It is interesting to note that there has been a shift of media, from Russia’s propaganda outlets to Chi<\/a>n<\/a>a’<\/a>s.\u00c2\u00a0 And it gets rather comical<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0— Helga’s really laying it on thick, ain’t she?<\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER SIX<\/p>\n

Hunter Cobb sells the China “work” — “rarely<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0does one see the name LaRouche in print, despite his visionary leadership and willingness to take on the powers of Wall Street and London, weathering wild defamation, proven targeting by the FBI, etc.<\/em>
\n I have been an ally of LaRouche for more than 40 years and have seen his vision becoming a reality in much of the world in the recent years.\u00c2\u00a0 […]<\/em>
\n One of the two Americans who traveled to China for this conference is a close associate of LaRouche. He gave a presentation here in Alameda Sept. 30. Those who would like to know more, may contact me at hunter<\/em><\/p>\n

Interesting to see just what was happening at this conference<\/a>…<\/p>\n

“… I think we have to go for the full thing.\u00c2\u00a0I want\u00c2\u00a0full victory.\u00c2\u00a0I want\u00c2\u00a0to crush Mueller, crush the entire apparatus that’s out to destroy Trump, this country, this organization, and\u00c2\u00a0I want\u00c2\u00a0to build up this country over the next 20 years.\u00c2\u00a0I see\u00c2\u00a0Americans as optimistic and hardworking and mission-oriented, and having fun the way I see young people in China doing today.”<\/em><\/p>\n

On paper it looks like a rousing speech, but then he closes the meeting and the applause makes us feel there are like 5-10 people in the room. If Mike think he’s “on to something,” I think he’s very sadly fooling himself.<\/em><\/p>\n

And elsewhere…\u00c2\u00a0American intellectual Lyndon LaRouche<\/a>… so he’s got that.<\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER SEVEN.\u00c2\u00a0 Historical notes<\/p>\n

One<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In October 1983, an article in the Executive Intelligence Review, a publication linked to controversial American politician Lyndon LaRouche, proposed the building of a Kra canal to the Thai Ministry of Transportation.<\/em><\/p>\n

TWO:<\/p>\n

Atlas Novack opposes a constitutional convention in California<\/a>–\u00c2\u00a0don’t vote for this ballot measure; do what you did to the larouche one<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Three<\/a>:<\/p>\n

So, way back in 2004, I decided to engage one of them in conversation, which I quickly learned was like entering an alternate universe where up is down and the Pope is Hitler.<\/em>
\nSomehow, we shifted from politics to science. They believed that “reductionism” — the notion that complex phenomena are best understood through a process of reducing them down to simpler parts — was Satanic. Not wrong or oversimplified, but Satanic. As in something the Dark Prince himself would approve of. They also didn’t like Isaac Newton very much. […]<\/em><\/p>\n

In other words, Lyndon LaRouche is some strange combination of Paul Ehrlich, Ray Kurzweil, and Alex Jones, with just a dash of Naziism. If that’s not a winning campaign, then what is?<\/em><\/p>\n

I came across him when researching history of mathematics.\u00c2\u00a0 He had a thing about Archytas, and in contrast a list of great mathematicians he didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t like.<\/em>
\nEspecially \u00e2\u20ac\u0153putting down\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Euler \u00e2\u20ac\u201d that was really over the top.<\/em><\/p>\n

I’m sure we can find some non over the top Euler critics out there.<\/p>\n

FOUR.\u00c2\u00a0 Illinois\u00c2\u00a01986<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Five:\u00c2\u00a0 a quick mention of a Citizen Electoral Council win<\/a>.<\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER EIGHT<\/p>\n

An item published by the org:\u00c2\u00a0An article published The Nation\u00c2\u00a0Caves, Attacks VIPS Report<\/em><\/p>\n

Yeah, but I think this is more worthwhile reading<\/a>… at least in terms of what’s important here..<\/p>\n

Appalled<\/a>?<\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER NINE<\/p>\n

David Neiwart’s new “What Happened” book — Alt America — on the so called “alt right” and its rise through the Obama administration into the new Trump administration does not have a mention of Larouche in the index page.\u00c2\u00a0 But somehow we get this…<\/p>\n

The phrase “cultural Marxism” had first appeared in right-wing circles only a few months before, in July 1998, when William Lind, leader of the far right Free Congress Foundation, gave a speech he titled “The Origins of Political Correctness”.<\/p>\n

It then slides into a mention of Norweigian terrorist Anders Breivick.<\/p>\n

Notable here because William Lind made the coinage for the Larouche Movement in 1992 …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ITEM NUMBER ONE:\u00c2\u00a0 It is instructive to take a gander at the Daniel Estulin 2015 book covering the Tavickstock Institue, on the question of what portion of this book is simply replaying the works of the Lyndon Larouche Movement.\u00c2\u00a0 54.5 percent.\u00c2\u00a0 Therabouts. Skip to the endnotes for each chapter, and count the sources to Larouche […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16743","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16743"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16743\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16865,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16743\/revisions\/16865"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16743"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16743"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}