{"id":16433,"date":"2017-05-30T15:26:54","date_gmt":"2017-05-30T22:26:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=16433"},"modified":"2017-06-01T16:03:30","modified_gmt":"2017-06-01T23:03:30","slug":"new-silky-new-road","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2017\/05\/30\/new-silky-new-road\/","title":{"rendered":"new silky new road"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

I. \u00c2\u00a0We see the Larouche org making hay about the various mechanitions of the “Deep State” against the President Trump. \u00c2\u00a0Hailing recent comments deriding the “coup” from Robert Parry, Dennis Kucinich, and Daniel McCarthy — and here we must note McCarthy’s warning, which is favorably quoted by Team Larouche.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

“If [Trump] is impeached and removed on anything but the most ironclad and universally accepted grounds, the country will experience a great paroxysm, not of violence, one hopes, but a much more radical rejection of the political establishment in both parties, and of the beyond-partisan deep state, than anything we have seen before. The crisis of legitimacy that led to Trump\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s election in the first place will only get worse. The brutal truth is that an impeachment is already underway\u00e2\u20ac\u201dnot of the President, but of Washington\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s entire political elite.”<\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Yes. \u00c2\u00a0This from the “Impeach Cheney First” and the group that — right until the last days of the “Existential Threat” that was the Obama Presidency demanded his ouster to Save the Universe.<\/p>\n

Elsewhere we see the praising of the ironclad universally mocked Nixonian comments of Trump — parsed with this editorial commentary —<\/p>\n

“Look at the way I’ve been treated lately \u00e2\u20ac\u201d (laughter) \u00e2\u20ac\u201d especially by the media. No politician in history \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and I say this with great surety \u00e2\u20ac\u201d has been treated worse or more unfairly. [Except Lyndon LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u201ded.] You can’t let them get you down. You can’t let the critics and the naysayers get in the way of your dreams. (Applause.) I guess that’s why I \u00e2\u20ac\u201d thank you. I guess that’s why we won.
\n<\/em>“Adversity makes you stronger. Don’t give in. Don’t back down. And never stop doing what you know is right. Nothing worth doing ever, ever, ever came easy. And the more righteous your right, the more opposition that you will face.”
\n<\/em>Nixonian or Larouchian?<\/p>\n

Interestingly, the obsession of Larouche is\u00c2\u00a0Robert Mueller’s past\u00c2\u00a0pros<\/span>e<\/span>cu<\/span>to<\/span>rial<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00c2\u00a0role with Larouche in the big Trials of the 1980s. \u00c2\u00a0And so Trump and Larouche are now joined at the hip — the “Get Larouche Task Force” up and running to “Get Trump”.<\/p>\n

Even though…<\/p>\n

Lyndon LaRouche today warned that there is a British-run coup d\u00e2\u20ac\u2122\u00c3\u00a9tat in process against the Trump Administration in the United States, which threatens to parlay the stupid and dangerous April 6 air strike against Syria, into a full-fledged thermonuclear confrontation with Russia and China.
\n<\/em>It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s the British bastards who duped President Trump into attacking Syria, with their lies and false intelligence, LaRouche charged.<\/em><\/p>\n

See. \u00c2\u00a0When Trump does wrong. \u00c2\u00a0It’s the British who did it. \u00c2\u00a0Got that?<\/p>\n

So where are the Larouchies<\/a>?, asks the Chicago Tribune:
\nAnybody else notice that the Larouchies who were out on street corners for the last eight years braying for Obama to be impeached are suddenly nowhere to be seen? Wonder why that is, certainly not because they’re a gaggle of bigots.
\n<\/em>Or it might have something to do with Kinkos costing a bit more after merging with Fed Ex.<\/p>\n

II. \u00c2\u00a0The Larouchies are right now moving on full speed trumpeting up the “New Silk Road” project. \u00c2\u00a0Speculators are speculating, and noting increased mention of Lyndon Larouche in past tense terminology, that this suggests a pivot toward Helga Zepp Larouche.
\nI ponder whatever happened to Glass Steagall, and why the movement hasn’t abandoned Trump due to his abandoning of the Glass Steagall. \u00c2\u00a0And if they don’t care so much about Glass Steagall, how can anyone trust them to stick to a New Silk Road?
\nNote: \u00c2\u00a0Big enough to get into the house organ for the John Birch Society<\/a>.<\/p>\n

III. \u00c2\u00a0Amusing footnote in the creation of Bull Durham.<\/p>\n

For Nuke LaLoosh\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s name, Shelton had to travel to Columbia, South Carolina, where he was preparing one evening to dine at the Radisson Hotel. As he sat down for a cocktail, the waiter greeted him.
\n<\/em>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Hello, sir, my name is Ebby Calvin LaRouche, and I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll be your server tonight,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d the waiter said, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153but you can just call me \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcNuke.\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 \u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em>
\n<\/a>Shelton jotted the name down on a napkin, wondering whether \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Nuke\u00e2\u20ac\u009d was spelled like a nuclear meltdown or like the nickname \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Newk,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d as in the former Brooklyn Dodgers pitcher Don Newcombe.<\/em>He went with the former, then altered the last name because he did not want it associated with the radical leftwing LaRouche Movement authored in the 1970s and 1980s by Lyndon LaRouche.
\n<\/a>Shelton worried ever after that the waiter would one day demandroyalty fees from the movie for using his name as Robbins\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 character. He never got the call.<\/em><\/p>\n

IV. \u00c2\u00a0Interesting terminology to parse.
\nSenior American Political Expert Michael Billington<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

In a recent interview with the far-right LaRouche PAC<\/a>, Black also suggests a recent chemical weapons attack in Syria \u00e2\u20ac\u201d carried out by Syrian government forces, according to eyewitnesses \u00e2\u20ac\u201d was likely a “false flag<\/a>.”<\/em><\/div>\n
Steinberg on Russia media<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Prins joined Paul Gallagher of the Executive Intelligence Review (EIR) to discuss the state of the current financial system and what the economy is showing us. While meeting in Washington D.C the previous week, Prins\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 offered her analysis as a former Wall Street banker who currently works on calling truth to power in the world of government and finance<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dan Scmitt asks — do you know who George Soros is<\/a>?<\/p>\n

More propaganda for Russian consumption at Sputnik news!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
V. \u00c2\u00a0 Historical Legacies Noted.
\nRecalling the Obama Hitler era posters of yore<\/a>…<\/div>\n
\u00c2\u00a0Country Music sings more about Pot than even Rap<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0Lyndon LaRouche’s war on drugs wanted to punish anyone playing or selling rock and roll, but country artists have gotten off scot free<\/em>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Disillusioned with activism, Weinstein briefly ran a candy business in Los Angeles before returning to politics to face an unlikely antagonist. In 1986, the right-wing conspiracy theorist Lyndon LaRouche introduced a ballot referendum in California that would have enabled employers to fire people with AIDS and empowered the government to quarantine them. Early polling suggested that LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s initiative had broad support. Along with Brownlie and other friends, Weinstein started his own group to fight LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s proposition. In a move that anticipated his later shock-marketing campaigns, Weinstein distributed leaflets with the headline \u00e2\u20ac\u0153STOP AIDS CONCENTRATION CAMPS\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and organized a torch-lit march on LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Silver Lake office. Mainstream gay activists abhorred Weinstein\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s strong-arm tactics, fearing he might alienate suburban voters. But after the measure lost in a landslide, with 71 percent opposed, L.A. Weekly named Weinstein \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Best Young Activist.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Weinstein determined that there was far greater support for his militant approach than he had realized<\/a>.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
25 Years Ago \u00e2\u20ac\u201c 1992: A third Democrat has announced his candidacy for the 7th District Congressional seat held by Republican incumbent Curt Weldon \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Donald \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Tony\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Hadley of Drexel Hill, a follower of jailed extremist Lyndon LaRouche. It will be the fourth Congressional campaign for Hadley, and his first in the 7th District<\/a>.<\/div>\n
\n

The West Texas-born Linklater is a self-identified libertarian who put a Ron Paul sign into Slacker<\/i>, so it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not surprising that he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d stumble onto Jones, who exemplifies the spirit of an area where you can pick up a Lyndon LaRouche newsletter at Whole Foods. Austin has a reputation as a cozy liberal college town, but it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s still part of Texas, and ambient libertarianism is a constant. Jones\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 appearance in Linklater\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s films is entirely in keeping with his then-normalized local celebrity presence: He used to curate a small shelf of conspiracy theory docs at locally beloved video store I Luv Video and in 2007 screened his work at the Alamo Drafthouse South<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Interesting remarks by Unger. One should compare them to those of Lyndon Larouche and his organization. (Who actually are much more precise. Unger is somewhat vague and hortatory.)<\/a>
\nDo they use Larouche in their course? because that has been his subject since the 50s<\/a>.<\/p>\n

That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not to say Mr. Rockefeller\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s spokesman never made mistakes. (Occasionally, he made some real doozies, like the time he allowed an anti-Rockefeller Lyndon Larouche stooge in to interview his client, believing the man\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s story that he was a stringer from Forbes<\/em>! Ooofa!<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

VI. \u00c2\u00a0This is funny.<\/div>\n
\u00c2\u00a0Discussing the French national election.\u00c2\u00a0 They don’t know that they’re talking about Cheminade, and who Cheminade is…<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

‘one dark horse even claiming that the Queen of England was involved in drug smuggling. ‘<\/a><\/em>
\n You’re probably too young to remember, but for many years this was Lyndon Larouche’s signature conspiracy theory.<\/em>
\n Ha! I do remember that, and I was talking about Lyndon Larouche a couple of weeks ago with a friend of mine (who is a music professor) because I remembered something about Larouche wanting the musical standard to be changed from middle C = 440 Hz to A = 256 Hz. Something to do with 256 being 2^8 and that somehow being in tune with the universe. It almost makes sense if you ignore that Hz is cycles per second, and a second is a unit people agreed on to measure time by the same standard. It doesn’t have any significant value derived from the universe.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

I really can’t imagine why you would apply a binary structure to music anyway, it doesn’t make sense on a conceptual level.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
Yeah. \u00c2\u00a0Notes from the campaign. \u00c2\u00a0Jacques Cheminade, head of the LaRouche movement, railed against what he called the “financial dictatorship” and Philippe Poutou of the New Anti-Capitalist Party slammed “those who stuff themselves<\/a>“.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
small far left wing party<\/a>.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\u00c2\u00a0As this suggests, politicians are not merely engaged in prestige games, but have more imperial ambitions at stake. The maverick\u00c2\u00a0French presidential candidate Jacques Cheminade <\/a>has openly expressed a desire to\u00c2\u00a0build a settlement\u00c2\u00a0on Mars, calling it the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153promised land\u00e2\u20ac\u009d.<\/em><\/div>\n
\n

By strictly leveling the playing field<\/a>, the temps de parole rule certainly boosts the visibility of smaller contenders polling below five percent \u00e2\u20ac\u201c including for Jacques Cheminade, who wants to colonise Mars, and Jean Lassalle, a centrist who has campaigned around France on foot<\/a>.
\nHowever, for years broadcasters have blasted the strict equality rule as being incredibly difficult to enforce in practice. They said it actually risked discouraging them from hosting political shows.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Communist firebrand Nathalie Arthaud vowed to protect French workers from being \u00e2\u20ac\u0153strangled by the capitalist system\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, while anti-EU nationalists such as Francois Asselineau, Nicolas DuPont-Aignan and Jacques Cheminade enjoyed rare<\/a> airtime<\/em>.<\/p>\n

And then there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Jacques Cheminade (0.5 per cent), who has been running since 1995 and is planning<\/a> to colonise Mars<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Three candidates — Philippe Poutou of the New Anticapitalist Party, Jacques Cheminade of Solidarity and Progress, and the unaffiliated centrist representative Jean Lassalle were qualified at the last minute and will join the list of the first eight candidates that have each collected a minimum 500 signatures necessary to run<\/a>.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Jacques Cheminade, 75: Veteran former civil servant who received 0.25 percent of the vote in the 2012 presidential election<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Any of these candidates could pull ahead in race. It seems Trump\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s win as the U.S. President has opened the door of opportunity for chaos and upheaval around the presidential election in France<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Jacques Cheminade and Philippe Poutou both of small far-left parties<\/a>…<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I. \u00c2\u00a0We see the Larouche org making hay about the various mechanitions of the “Deep State” against the President Trump. \u00c2\u00a0Hailing recent comments deriding the “coup” from Robert Parry, Dennis Kucinich, and Daniel McCarthy — and here we must note McCarthy’s warning, which is favorably quoted by Team Larouche. “If [Trump] is impeached and removed […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16433","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16433","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16433"}],"version-history":[{"count":31,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16433\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16602,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16433\/revisions\/16602"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}