{"id":11691,"date":"2013-05-19T11:27:07","date_gmt":"2013-05-19T18:27:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=11691"},"modified":"2013-05-21T08:44:46","modified_gmt":"2013-05-21T15:44:46","slug":"michael-billington-claims-80-tables-a-day-craig-isherwood-spams-australia-into-oblivion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2013\/05\/19\/michael-billington-claims-80-tables-a-day-craig-isherwood-spams-australia-into-oblivion\/","title":{"rendered":"Michael Billington claims 80 Tables a Day; Craig Isherwood Spams Australia into Oblivion; org insults NRA"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00c2\u00a0ITEM THE FIRST: \u00c2\u00a0The Webster Tarpley Report<\/strong><\/p>\n

For those following the latest on the “Tarpley connects the dots on his old mentor” front<\/a>.<\/p>\n

MEANWHILE, over at “WORLD CRISIS RRRRADIO”, Dr. Webster Griffin Tarpley’s weekly doomsday programme, THE DEAR LEADER gets\u00c2\u00a0stapled to the CIA once more:\u00c2\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

“And what has LaRouche to say about the Boston bombings? Who is responsible for Chechen terrorists? According to LaRouche, the British and the Saudis! Of course! … Watch out for disinformation out there<\/a>.”<\/em><\/p>\n

This particular program apparently sparked one hell of a storm at the blog of Sibel Edmonds, the\u00c2\u00a0Boiling Frogs Blog<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0Here’s the abuse Webster Tarpley gets when he just starts calling everyone CIA agents.<\/p>\n

\u00c2\u00a0James, Eric and Sibel are my favorite people on the Web, so that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a mark against on of my, used-to-be-also, favorite, Webster Tarpley. Maybe it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s time for Webster to fade away in the fog of obscurity<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Eric, I can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t express how much more I value your analysis than Tarpley\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s, to whom I can attach some choice adjectives but won\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t bother, and for whom I have even less regard now that he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s decided to attack BFP and induce you to expend valuable time and effort. He\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s just another broken clock and I feel confident in continuing to ignore him.<\/em><\/p>\n

What funny “Wedge issues”.\u00c2\u00a0and I certainly don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t agree with them about everything, from nuclear power to Issac Newton, and especially their culture Nazi attitude about the degeneracy of all non-Classical music forms, but I find it is not difficult to reserve my disagreements about these matters by considering them as \u00e2\u20ac\u0153wedge issues\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and to work with them on the basis of our common political objectives<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Note: bookmark Sacramento Assemblyman Republican Tim Donally, and see about reaction to literature dumped on him.<\/p>\n

More on the Tarpley Larouche Relationship, and people’s attitudes toward the two<\/a>.
\nWebster Tarpley also has long-standing ties with the LaRouchies.<\/em>
\n I’ve had my own dealings with the LaRouchies, and I have a pretty good sense of what they are.<\/em>
\n The LaRouchies often get genuine insider intelligence, and then filter it through Lyndon’s lens.<\/em>
\n So, their material always needs a health warning and facts should be checked and corroborated independently wherever possible.<\/em>
\n Just as reading an MSM “security correspondent” report should be undertaken with a critical eye.<\/em>
\n Cut outs deserve serious attention.<\/em>
\n There are nuggets glinting in the shit.<\/em>
\n Ultimately, Tarpley at his best is far superior to LaRouche at his best. <\/em>\u00c2\u00a0[Hm… Don’t know if I agree or disagree with that.]<\/p>\n

Tarpley cut his ties with the LaRouche organization a few years back after a nearly 30 year stint with that oufit, if late Tarpley has been very critical of Lyndon on this radio broadcasts. The Larouche cult must be tied into many other intelligence services, but they do come up with important information from time to time. Anything that they provide in regard to the CFR, et al is more than you could ever get from frauds like Chris Matthews, “The Wolf Man”, and Tom Friedman who is at about the bottom of the barrel. Of course reading anyone needs to be done with a jaunduced eye.<\/em><\/p>\n

IMO Tarpley is a superb historian and I deeply admire his ability to synthesize social theory and philosophy. Had I been around in the early Larouche days, I know I would have been drawn to their camp given the anti intellectualism of much of left at that time.<\/em> I think in the beginning I think they had alot of good ideas. A refreshing change from the “more Mao than thou” crowd which still infects the left today.<\/em> Even though I admire his work greatly, I find myself scratching my head at conclusions he draws, like when he suggest programs to colonize Mars (1st Obama book) Im like “huh??”.<\/em> My favorite is the book on Romney “Just too weird…”<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0[That one’s a curiosity… why release a quickie book on a man whose about to drop from public view?] \u00c2\u00a0He’s also a great rhetorician. I love listening to him speak. It seems no matter how long he is away from La Rouche, he still can’t seem to drop the culty inflection “ITS GENOCIDE….”<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0[Ha.] \u00c2\u00a0He drops the words genocide and fascism a little too freely. I love watching the Old Tarpley and other LaRouches speeches from the 1970s and 1980s on youtube. I find them very entertaining….<\/em><\/p>\n

Yeah, you can always just grab both of them and do the same thing to both of them. \u00c2\u00a0See here: \u00c2\u00a0this has been covered extensively by both the LaRouche Show, and World Crisis Radio by Webster Tarpley, this weekend. Both are worth spending two hours every weekend, even when they are occasionally in error<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0<\/em>…. \u00c2\u00a0Occasionally?<\/p>\n

In other Intelligence News… a blast from the Past<\/a>.
\n{………..
\nIn one intriguing 1986 document, political activist and perennial longshot presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche makes a mysterious cameo:
\nChanged: [Redacted] alleged plot to assassinate president Ronald Reagan during the New York statue of Liberty celebration July 3-6, 1986.
\n<\/em>This communication is classified\u00c2\u00a0“secret”<\/s>\u00c2\u00a0in its entirety.
\n<\/em>Title marked changed to more clearly state the\u00c2\u00a0the substance of this case. Title formerly carried as “Libyan terrorist activities: IT-Libya: [unreadable] Muammar Qadhafi, Lyndon Larouche: International terrorism, information concerning.[…]
\n<\/em>The purpose of this teletype is to report the resolution of captioned matter as unfounded.
\n<\/em>I don’t know of any connection between LaRouche and Libya. This was shortly before the politician’s headquarters was\u00c2\u00a0raided by the FBI\u00c2\u00a0as part of a\u00c2\u00a0fraud investigation, but I can’t imagine that’s related.
\n………}
\nCool?<\/p>\n

ITEM THE SECOND: \u00c2\u00a0CRAIG ISHERWOOD Commits CEC to Spamming the Living Daylights out of Australia<\/strong><\/p>\n

Question<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0I keep getting emails from the CEC and of course I have tagged them as spam for ages, but out of curiosity I looked at the latest […]I take it that the CEC is in league with Gerry Harvey and Pauline Hanson maybe? Who is funding these idiots?<\/p>\n

Answer to the question: \u00c2\u00a0Other idiots is the correct answer. \u00c2\u00a0[…]\u00c2\u00a0They get funding from conspiracy nutjobs the world over.<\/em><\/p>\n

The left sees them as far right, the right sees them as far left. That’s because they are so freakin insane that they are impossible to categorize. This is real alien anal probe, nazi bases on the moon, secret tibetan tunnel type conspiracy weirdness. Old Liz wanting to kill 6 billion people is on the saner side of their spectrum. Which runs from insane through freakin insane to WTF, seriously, WTF?<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00c2\u00a0The Big Scoop on the Spam-a-lot nature of this org<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The CECA are as mad as cut snakes. A couple of examples:\u00c2\u00a0Citizens Electoral Council v. Ross Garnaut<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0and their handout The New Citizen at the recent\u00c2\u00a0Melbourne Community Cabinet<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth II have openly, repeatedly proclaimed their intent to kill some six billion human beings, in order to consolidate permanent, worldwide British imperial rule.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d
\n<\/em>They got my email address somehow too but I let them in because about 1 in 20 are so over-the-top crazy there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s more laughs than First Dog – and that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s saying something. Even if Prince Philip and his wife are not really functioning, active war criminals, I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m pleased Craig and his crazies are keeping an eye out on the far right flank.
\nLike clockwork, CEC are on the ball today, landing this in my in-box at 4.29pm:
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Citizens Electoral Council leader Craig Isherwood has today given a half-hour interview to LPAC-TV in the U.S., on the history of the British Crown\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s green fascism, and the CEC\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s political fight in Australia to defeat the green agenda.<\/p>\n

This ugly bunch has been doorknocking businesses in Fyshwick, Canberra. Schtick is about bringing back the Glass-Segal act, er, why campaign in Australia for US legislation? Then they drop off New Citizen – yep, they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re mad as cut snakes.
\nThe Citizens Electoral Council has been accused of harvesting email addresses or buying them from third parties, as people who have never provided their details to the fringe political party have received numerous emails and the occasional phone call from the group.
\nThe claims highlight the fact that registered political parties don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t have to abide by some laws on spam, or the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Do Not Call Register\u00e2\u20ac\u009d rules.<\/p>\n

The CEC is based in the inner-northern Melbourne suburb of Coburg and was formed in 1996. It was briefly de-registered by the Australian Electoral Commission in 2006. […]. In the 2010 federal election it secured 0.06% of the vote<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Melbourne IT consultant Kelvin Eldridge says he received several emails titled \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Wind \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcpower\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 is a fraud\u00e2\u20ac\u009d from the CEC in the lead-up to the last federal election.\u00c2\u00a0\u00e2\u20ac\u009dI requested that I didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t get their stuff, but they still sent it. I previously rang the organisation, and if\u00c2\u00a0I recall correctly they used a third-party mailing list,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said.\u00c2\u00a0\u00e2\u20ac\u009dI didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t provide them with my email address, and I suspect it was harvested in some way.\u00c2\u00a0The CEC could also have purchased a list from someone containing hundreds of thousands of\u00c2\u00a0email addresses.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n

Moreland Socialist Alliance councillor Sue Bolton regularly\u00c2\u00a0receives spam from the CEC. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Every time I look at my junk-mail box I have some from them. Even when I click \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcthis is junk\u00c2\u00a0mail\u00e2\u20ac\u2122, it keeps coming.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n

Bolton has no idea how the party got her email address; \u00e2\u20ac\u0153I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve never signed up to them\u00e2\u20ac\u009d. She said they phoned her about a month ago. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153It was a cold call. I think it was something to do with the elections. They asked if I wanted to find out about the Citizens Electoral Council. I didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t know how they got\u00c2\u00a0my number.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n

CEC media spokesman Robert Barwick dismissed concerns: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153They are just internet junkies having a cry about their in-boxes. You can tell them that from me if\u00c2\u00a0you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d like.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n

He says he \u00e2\u20ac\u0153can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t explain\u00e2\u20ac\u009d how people kept getting emails after asking to be removed from the mailing list. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a\u00c2\u00a0minor stuff-up.\u00c2\u00a0We do not want to send emails to people who don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t want them. If they request to be taken off our\u00c2\u00a0email list, we take them off,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said. […]<\/em><\/p>\n

CEC leader Craig Isherwood has twice contested the safe Labor seat of Wills, which has been held\u00c2\u00a0by ALP stalwart Kelvin Thomson for 17 years.\u00c2\u00a0In 2010,\u00c2\u00a0Crikey\u00c2\u00a0reported Thomson had complained to the AEC after the CEC posted\u00c2\u00a0unauthorised electoral material about him around the electorate.<\/em><\/p>\n

Thomson declined to comment on the CEC\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s email campaigns as he \u00e2\u20ac\u0153doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t intend to give them\u00c2\u00a0any attention or publicity\u00e2\u20ac\u009d. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The CEC are a frightful organisation which makes all manner of outrageous and unsubstantiated\u00c2\u00a0allegations. I therefore do my best to ignore them,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Thomson.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00c2\u00a0And more notes on the CEC<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0In addition to being a mass spam movement, also just a convenient way to knock Lord Monckton, I have seen.:<\/p>\n

Political demagogue Lyndon LaRouche is the most colourful of the conspiracy theorists. Here’s his take on the anti-nuclear movement:
\n<\/em>“This utterly depraved, dionysian cult-formation found its echoed, more violent expression in late 1980s Germany, where the anti-nuclear, fascist rioting reached near to the level of outright civil war …”
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

Australia’s\u00c2\u00a0Leslie Kemeny<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0(think Lord Monckton) agrees:\u00c2\u00a0“Radical green activism and global terrorism can form dangerous, even deadly, alliances. The ‘coercive utopianism’ of radical greens, their avid desire for media publicity and their hidden socio-political agendas can produce societal outcomes that are sometimes violent and ugly.”
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

Kemeny believes the anti-nuclear movement is “supported by immense funds from affluent right-wing interests” and is also tied to the “political left”. Go figure. With such a grab-bag of extreme \u00e2\u02c6\u2019 and extremely contradictory \u00e2\u02c6\u2019 views, Kemeny might be considered a good candidate for Bob Katter’s political party … but he’s already joined Fred Nile’s.<\/em><\/p>\n

It comes down to a lot of thi<\/a>s:
\nWhy on earth would anybody pay the slightest bit of attention to what Lyndon La Rouche thinks about anything at all?<\/em>
\nHe’s little more than a self-deluded and alarmist cult hero with some very shady supporters.<\/em>
\nThe fact that the clown Bananaby Joyce is on the same wavelegth speaks for itself.<\/em><\/p>\n

ITEM THE THIRD : \u00c2\u00a0FICTIONAL ELECTION RESULTS. \u00c2\u00a01984<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00c2\u00a0Hm<\/a> and Hm<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
President Birch Bayh (Democrat-Indiana)\/Governor Mario Cuomo (Democrat-New York)<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\"\"\"-\"\"\"31 (47.7%)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Congressman Jack F. Kemp (Republican-New York)\/Congressman Barry Goldwater, Jr. (Republican-California)<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\"\"\"-\"\"\"26 (40%)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Party Chairman David Bergland (Libertarian-California)\/Dr. Mary Ruwart (Libertarian-Texas)<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\"\"\"-\"\"\"2 (3.1%)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mr. Lyndon LaRouche (Independent-Virginia)\/Mr. Billy Davis (Independent-Mississippi)<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\"\"\"-\"\"\"4 (6.2%)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ms. Sonia Johnson (Citizens-Idaho)\/Mr. Richard Walton (Citizens-Rhode Island)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

That’s a sizeable percentage… FOUR. \u00c2\u00a0FOUR PERCENT. \u00c2\u00a0Wow.<\/p>\n

Then there’s the big matchup of Thatcher versus Larouche<\/a>.
\n<\/a>Point: \u00c2\u00a0LaRouche \u00c2\u00a0I prefer my leaders with a little bit of crazy.
\n<\/a>Counterpoint: \u00c2\u00a0Thatcher. \u00c2\u00a0I like my leaders coherent<\/a>.<\/p>\n

ITEM THE FOURTH: \u00c2\u00a0OCCUPY FORUM UNLOADS ON LAROUCHIE INTROLOPER<\/strong><\/p>\n

The “Occupy Wall Street” forum has for some time been sight of a larouchie introloper, throwing up unwanted larouche links. \u00c2\u00a0(The animus goes back a ways, as we see here<\/a>.) \u00c2\u00a0Today we see a bunch of new links going<\/a> after<\/a> them.<\/p>\n

HERE we see the larouchie trying to convince the left wing activists that this advocacy of NAWAPA is so very “Green”<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Behold! \u00c2\u00a0This brilliant logic of the Occupy Wall Street Larouchie introloper<\/a>:
\nConsidering that he was cut off, I would guess it was because “they” didn’t want the people to hear what he was saying.
\nIt sounds like his speech didn’t make sense to you, I have some friends that same the same about his website. I’ve been reading it for quite a while and am aware of the background, so it mostly makes sense to me.<\/em>
\nHe then goes on to defend the harsh actions taken against Pussy Riot, by siphoning up a “What if it was a\u00c2\u00a0synagogue?” card, which leads into a sort of extremism he doesn’t appear willing to admit to.
\n(Trumpeting Glass Steagall as the “Nothing More Important Right Now<\/a>” is kind of interesting… this would suggest a dropping of all other topics. \u00c2\u00a0I see they’re hugging the Pope right now as a means to get to Obama’s Impeachment<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0Never heard the pope speak up about Glass Steagall.)<\/p>\n

Other boards see something rather… “WOW”: \u00c2\u00a0Anyway, these are serious allegations. Even more serious than being accused of voting for Lyndon Larouche<\/a>.<\/p>\n

A great article describing why Lyndon LaRouche is considered a sociopath by the world’s intellectual eli<\/a>tes.<\/p>\n

ITEM THE FIFTH: \u00c2\u00a0THE NIXON and HITLER REPORTS.<\/strong><\/p>\n

We start with the Hitler report.
\nDennis Small has an LPAC article on the troubling youth employment figures worldwide \u00c2\u00a0global economy entitled “The British Empire’s New Concentration Camps”. \u00c2\u00a0 Xlcer at factnet cites this recent statement, easily lost as I don’t particularly read this stuff, from the cult leader himself:
\n“The one operation that I know is going on,” LaRouche said, “is London’s Hitler-style coup in the U.S.\u00c2\u00a0They are preparing the gas ovens for Americans.”<\/em><\/p>\n

You know, while we’re on the topic of Hitler, let’s plow over to what the Stormfront forum has to say<\/a>.<\/p>\n

LaRouche\u00c2\u00a0to the rescue! But the king of Holland just married a South American. He part of the problem?<\/em>
\nWW3 is not on the foreseeable horizon because there is no benefit to the ‘super’ powers to a declared war, if there were it would have happened by now.<\/em><\/p>\n

The inevitable moment in any Presidential Administration has arrived, when we now get the discussion of the Obama Nixon.<\/p>\n

So… I note that Larouche has been on the matter of “Impeachment” from the vary beginning. \u00c2\u00a0For… well, whatever turns up, basically. \u00c2\u00a0So we have now a glut of this.<\/p>\n

It appears the US Federal Court is taking these charges very seriously.I thought that there was no way Congress would have any backbone and would either delay or ignore any proceedings against Obama<\/a>.
\nThere are forces at work behind the scenes that most are unaware of. Yes he is Commander IC but many many military lifers detest him. There is a push in place that some would call a coup but the timing has to be right. I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t think he makes the end of second term , he will be impeached<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Notable as we start to add up the new “Impeachment” murmurers… like, this congress critter<\/a> along with a couple others<\/a>…<\/p>\n

And we see it in this snarky list of the past few years of cries for Obama’s Impeachment<\/a>…<\/p>\n

Larouche isn’t even listed.<\/p>\n

Yeah, I know. \u00c2\u00a0That’s just the way they like it. \u00c2\u00a0Because they’re driving up to NRA meets and trying to siphon off money off political outrage. \u00c2\u00a0And we see a number of gloms onto some statements by Bob Woodward and ignoring other statements of Bob Woodward… and where were the Larouchies during the Clinton era in quoting “Pulitzer Prize Winner” George Will on the matter<\/strong>?<\/p>\n

It is bottom line time.\u00c2\u00a0Well in the real world you would need to have real charges against a President and not the fantasy charges that can survive the light of day or reality that are so popular here. If you are using the word socialist, communist, facist, NWO, police state, UN, Muslim, Kenyan, nazi, welfare state, gun grabber, CIA plant, illuminate, lizard people, aliens, mind control, clone, UN, satanists, tyrant or anything else along those lines then your charges are only valid in fantasy land. Obama, unless he does something worth impeachment will serve out his Presidency and someone esle will run and win in 2016. Then we will have yet another impeachment thread about that President accusing him of all the above once again. And so the cycle will continue<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

If you think the impeachment of Obama will pick up steam based off anything this clown says I do have a bridge to sell you at a reasonable rate.<\/em><\/p>\n

ITEM THE SIXTH: \u00c2\u00a0DIANE SARE CAMPAIGNS ON<\/strong><\/p>\n

Within a century following the American Revolution, the United States had become the most productive nation on the planet with the highest standard of living. It’s now time for Americans to reject the genocidal policies of Queen Elizabeth and her puppet Obama, and return to the principles of physical economy so well understood and developed by Alexander Hamilton.<\/em><\/p>\n

Diane intervenes at a Town Hall in Camden chaired by Mayor Redd <\/a>who is trying to ram through a takeover of the public schools by Christie\/Norcross. Christie wants to destroy public education in order to keep the electorate stupid enough to keep voting for him and his partner Obama.
\n<\/em>Yes. \u00c2\u00a0Noisy “Interventions”. \u00c2\u00a0There’s a euphemism in that terminology.<\/p>\n

And here we see a\u00c2\u00a0Parsippany Town Hall Meeting<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0A Candidates forum in Keyport. \u00c2\u00a0Sponsored by “Stop New Jersey Corruption”.<\/p>\n

ITEM THE SEVENTH: \u00c2\u00a0THE POST OFFICE TOUR REPORT: with a cameo by both Hitler and Nixon<\/strong><\/p>\n

Something I’m pondering about the fact that Senator Harkin of Iowa’s (good) placing a Glass Steagall bill in the docket. \u00c2\u00a0 Harkin is set to retire, and it’s simply more likely that it’d take a future Congress to get this bill passed. \u00c2\u00a0The probably next Senator from Iowa is Bruce Braley.<\/p>\n

Yeah, Lyndon Larouche is totally insane. \u00c2\u00a0Best thing you can do is ignore him<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Dateline Orange County…<\/a> Discussing the Holocaust with the Larouche Movement
\n<\/a>I went up to a lyndon larouche booth and got a similar spiel when i started explaining why I didn’t feel they were correct they got all pissy and said if I wasn’t interested in listening to them (which I did) or donating (which I wouldn’t) then I should leave because other people needed to hear their message. I then asked\u00c2\u00a0if they could explain the larouche political movement and what they thought about the, theory of hegemony, interesting to me was that they actually knew how it is defined but had no idea what it meant.
\nI also asked why they felt the need to take images of our potus (whichever one was in office as they really don’t care) and make them up to look like hitler. The response was priceless, because they act like him, of course I couldn’t let that pass and I proceeded to provide a historical perspective of the holocaust to which each person in the booth said, in unison, there was no holocaust, I then provided additional historical detail and then one of them said, even if it happened it wasn’t as bad as we are told.<\/em>
\nRealizing each of them (2 boys and a girl) were probably in their late teens or early twenties made me very sad the rest of the day.<\/em>
\n So if the holocaust didn’t happen or wasn’t very bad, why compare U.S. Presidents to Hitler? I mean without the holocaust what made him so evil?<\/em>
\n Obviously you never saw his paintings.<\/em>
\n In any case, WW3 will be a Black Swan event. We won’t be able to foresee it, it will be a total surprise to most people, and it will drastically alter how humans interact with each other.<\/em>
\n So it was you in the booth<\/em><\/p>\n

Interestingly enough, go to ITEM THE FOURTH for the other side of larouchian hitlering.<\/p>\n

Dateline Jackson County.
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We are a political action committee leading the campaign to impeach Barack Obama so that we can rebuild our nation,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d stated Billington. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Step number one is to dump Obama, followed by restoring Glass-Steagall, a new credit system, and last we need to restore NAWAPA.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00c2\u00a0WHAT ABOUT FROGS? And from there we go into a blah de blah,and this creepy statement…<\/p>\n

\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We are building a network of people who are interested in being patriots, saving our country and rebuilding our nation,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Billington. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re just asking people to provide some contact information so we can get back in touch with them.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n

But here’s what I am interested in…<\/p>\n

Billington added, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We have about 80 tables like this one out every day around the country. We normally have a table out at a post office from the time it opens at 8 a.m. until it closes at 4 p.m.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d […]<\/p>\n

\n

The number is 80? \u00c2\u00a0Is that true?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Dateline Destin<\/a><\/p>\n

Reaction from the public appeared mixed \u00e2\u20ac\u201d with some offering support and even money to the pair, while others challenged their beliefs. Longtime Destinite Evelyn Drowne told The Log “This is the most disgusting thing in politics I’ve seen yet.”<\/p>\n

The protest also ignited a verbal firestorm on The Log\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Facebook page.<\/p>\n

Guice told The Log that they usually target post offices because they are centrally located within cities and typically get a lot of foot and vehicle traffic.<\/p>\n

Before stopping in Destin, the duo stopped in Fort Walton Beach and other surrounding areas.<\/p>\n

“We don’t know where we’re going from here,” said Mathis.<\/p>\n

LOL! These fools were outside the Mary Esther post office this past Friday and appeared very lonely.<\/p>\n

Dateline<\/a> Canaan<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\"laronixosalute\"\"nixon-resigns_1974image\"Mostly I just want to know why this Larouchie is giving us the Nixon Salute.
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re going all over the place, and today it is New Canaan\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s turn,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Matt Guice, a member of the LaRouche Political Action Committee.<\/em>
\nGuice and fellow member Frank Mathis stood outside of the New Canaan Post Office with several signs sharing their messages against Obama and other political stances. The two also stopped people walking and driving by in hopes of drawing support to their cause. They also want more people to contact U.S. Rep. Jim Himes to back their beliefs.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00c2\u00a0Dateline NRA<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0Day 2 of NRA show done; got lots of new clients, won guns in a raffle, saw 20 sad antigun protesters, saw kids dressed as ninjas pretending to protest and annoying the protesters, and the Larouche idiots made them all look like geniuses. Drinks with Magpul & Tactical Taylor at a cool dive joint.<\/em>
\nWhat were the Larouche people doing there? They are usually pretty entertaining.
\n<\/em>Fun fact worth noting: The maker of the “printable gun” — who has gotten a good deal of media attention and attention from the likes of Chuck Schumer — and where his Alex Jones appearance has been quoted from in the mainstream media — was on Alex Jones as the headliner with Larouche. \u00c2\u00a0Is this worth something? \u00c2\u00a0I don’t know.<\/p>\n

And\u00c2\u00a0Indeed:<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Over the past few years my local post office has had sporadic LaRouchie protests out front, and the postal clerks I’ve talked to still had no idea of what the LaRouchie beliefs actually were, they were simply “the crazies”. My response to being handed the New Federalist was to “fuck off”, as much as I believe Cheney to be a cyborg, and Obama to be a sophist, they are no worse than any other human scrotum who has held their respective offices. Fuck Lyndon LaRouche and his wannabe Scientologist followers<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Dateline Houston<\/a><\/div>\n
\n

Anyone taking MetroRail to\u00c2\u00a0the Offshore Technology Conference\u00c2\u00a0this week probably saw Craig Holtzclaw setting up his own booth alongside the Reliant Center stop.<\/em>
\nWhile the booths inside Reliant Park\u00c2\u00a0spared no expense\u00e2\u20ac\u201d bringing in either real pieces of equipment or elaborately detailed models \u00e2\u20ac\u201d Holtzclaw\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s booth was decidedly low-definition. […]<\/em>
\nHoltzclaw said he worked the National Rifle Association convention in downtown Houston last weekend, too.<\/em>
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We got a better reaction at the NRA,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153There are some very savvy people there. They are very connected to what LaRouche is saying.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00c2\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>[<\/em>How dare you insult the NRA like that!]
\nBut he said he has had some people request more information as they left OTC, too.<\/em>
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153I signed up a yellow dog Democrat,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said.<\/em>
\nThat\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a dying breed in Texas these days, and especially rare in energy circles.<\/em>
\nBut Holtzclaw shrugged it off.<\/em>
\nLaRouche attracts all kinds, he said, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153as people are looking for alternatives.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline Hel<\/a>l.\u00c2\u00a0Representives of the\u00c2\u00a0LaRouche\u00c2\u00a0PAC were out distributing literature earlier today on West 32nd Street\/Broadway (Manhattan).<\/p>\n

Dateline Sunnyside, Queens, New York<\/a>
\nPOINT: \u00c2\u00a0\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve had all kinds of responses, nothing bad,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Scialdone said.\u00c2\u00a0<\/em>
\nCOUNTERPOINT: \u00c2\u00a0\u00e2\u20ac\u0153I\u00c2\u00a0found them to be quite obnoxious,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Carol of Forest Hills, who was in her old neighborhood to clear her P.O. Box. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153I was surprised at their aggressive nature. It raises my blood pressure.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Passing motorist Allan shook his head at the picture of Obama with a Hitler mustache and said: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a democratic state; they can do what they want, right?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n

WHY MUST John Scialdone and Jeff Rebello TURN THIS Post office table set up into a CAULRDON OF LIES????<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"sunnysideimpeachobamarestorelar\"While Scialdone and Rebello said they experienced no problems presenting the views of LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s political action committee, Post Office Supervisor Danielle said that this is not always the case. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153These guys [other LaRouche reps] come six times a year and we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve had to call the NYPD several times because the arguments have gotten out of hand. The policemen calm the situation down, but that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s about all they can do.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d […]\u00c2\u00a0<\/em>
\n\u00c2\u00a0Passing motorist Allan shook his head at the picture of Obama with a Hitler mustache and said: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a democratic state; they can do what they want, right?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n

They have shown up once or twice a year at that spot for many years. They are typically very insulting, and in ways that have nothing to do with their stated aims. They also mark up the street with chalk messages.
\nThey are not the ones marking the street with chalk. \u00c2\u00a0But I hate them as as much as everyone else.
\nBecause I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t see them around the time there are writings on the sidewalk.. I figured they are not linked, but now that you mentioned it, it may be them\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6
\nAre these guys still alive?<\/p>\n

Dateline Charlestown\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0“Who Are These Nuts?”<\/a><\/p>\n

You may have seen them in Charlestown when they were camped out for a couple of days near the Post Office. \u00c2\u00a0I saw them a few days ago in Westerly on Route One. […]
\nI had far more frequent run ins with what I called the LaRouchniks when I worked in DC. I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d get a call from someone claiming to be a journalist who would do a quick and sloppy interview with me. Later, I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d get misquoted and then get listed as a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153supporter\u00e2\u20ac\u009d of some crazy LaRouche campaign and then had to spend time undoing the mischief.<\/strong>
\nI got pretty good at spotting LaRouchniks early in conversations and trained my staff how to spot them, too. My standing orders were to cut off all conversations as soon as the caller admitted they were connected with LaRouche.<\/strong>
\nLaRouche has found reasons to want to impeach almost every US President since he started his \u00e2\u20ac\u0153movement.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d In 1973, he wanted to go after Richard Nixon not because of Watergate but because\u00c2\u00a0he claimed Nixon was aligned with the Communist Party USA\u00c2\u00a0(again, don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t ask).
\n<\/em>[Interestingly, they did a jump to support Nixon during the Watergate hearings, and carried on that Nixon had been set for a fall by the Kennedy cabal and etc. \u00c2\u00a0I may as well state this next paragraph isn’t quite accurately…]
\nHe opposed Reagan, Bush I, Clinton and Bush II. I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m not sure if he wanted to impeach Gerald Ford or Jimmy Carter \u00e2\u20ac\u201c he probably did, but I didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t find any direct evidence.\u00c2\u00a0<\/em>
\n[This seems accurate enough.] \u00c2\u00a0From watching LaRouche and his followers off and on for around 30 years, I think LaRouche uses any and every angle he can to hook new cult members. He spins yarns that contain a germ of sense wrapped in a puzzling mix of nonsense<\/em>.
\n[I don’t think this is accurate, but there is a bit of funny business going on in certain spots.] \u00c2\u00a0Within the LaRouche organization, there is his own anti-anti-LaRouche program to try to bring former followers back.
\n<\/em>And then the bottom line: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0On the other hand, if you’re one of those folks who hate Obama and find the LaRoucheniks’ Obama-as-Hitler posters compelling, by all means, sign their petition. \u00c2\u00a0Be sure to list your home phone and e-mail on it because then you can count on years of pleasant conversations with the LaRouche folks as they add your phone number to their call list. \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Don’t be surprised to see them publish your name as one of their supporters.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline Fairfield<\/a>
\nThe impeachment drive is sponsored by a PAC bearing the name of\u00c2\u00a0Lyndon LaRouche, who has mounted a fringe candidacy for president several times and whose political movement has sponsored thousands of candidates for other offices<\/strong>.<\/em>
\nQuestion: \u00c2\u00a0Is this true? \u00c2\u00a0THOUSANDS?
\n“What Nixon did wasn’t anywhere near what this guy is doing,” Schubert agreed. “Even Woodward and Bernstein, they’re even coming out saying, `Whoa, what are you guys doing going after reporters?’<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0”
\nAlso iterating that Obama isn’t Nixon. \u00c2\u00a0At least, as a whole.
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153In the Nixon White House, we heard the president of the United States on tape saying \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcUse the IRS to get back on our enemies,\u00e2\u20ac\u009dBernstein said a day earlier, about the IRS scrutiny of Tea Party groups, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We know a lot about President Obama, and I think the idea that he would want the IRS used for retribution, we have no evidence of any such thing<\/a>.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d
\n<\/em>And the Support for LPAC’s Impeachment drive… because of… um… the recently deceased president of Venezuela<\/strong>?
\nEvelyn Toros of Trumbull said she was driving to the local\u00c2\u00a0UPS Store\u00c2\u00a0on Post Road when she saw the booth and made a U-turn. “I think they should have one of these at every corner,” she said.<\/em>
\nToros said Obama should be removed from office based on “a combination of everything.”<\/em>
\n“We do not need a president that bows to Chavez, that kisses the rings of the emirs,” she said. “This is America. Protect our borders. My family had to come through Ellis Island.”
\n<\/em>
\nMore here.
\nLaRouche is a convicted felon whose conviction for credit card theft put him in prison, who in their right mind who hook up with this criminal’s group in order to impeach Obama, do a bit of work, there have to be other misguided people looking to do the same without the stink of LaRouche on them.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

I’m sure the other L-PAC, “Liberty Pac”, will get around to it.<\/p>\n

BEHOLD! \u00c2\u00a0The Rebuttal!
\nIf you do better research you will find out that was the skull and bone members Bush who set Larouche up to put him in jail. Prescott Bush also helped to fund Hitler and killed Kennedy. They are now working to bring America down to hell. And the Americans still not know who are their enemies.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline Middleton<\/a>
\nWhen Brown claimed President Barack Obama\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s healthcare reform bill was \u00e2\u20ac\u0153a Nazi policy,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Frank drew laughter by responding bluntly: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153On what planet do you spend most of your time?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d The video went viral, even prompting the Cuban state newspaper Granma to publish a response by Fidel Castro<\/em>. […]
\nCitizens are permitted to stage such gathering on public rights-of-way, but they are not allowed to block pedestrians. Those in Middleton last week brandished an array of signs, ranging from images of FDR to multiple pictures of President Obama.<\/em>
\nClark gave those who took umbrage a smile and a wave, but other members of LaRouche were more prone to verbal sparring with Middletonians.<\/em>
\nWhile passersby accused them of everything from being unpatriotic to blatant racism, one LaRouche member shot back that Obama – who residents in the City of Middleton supported strongly in both elections – is \u00e2\u20ac\u0153helping the Al Qaida terrorists.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em>
\nWhile the bulk of their message revolved around government bailouts of risky Wall Street investments, they also called for Obama\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s impeachment, warned of an impending World War III, and asked for the FBI to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153come clean\u00e2\u20ac\u009d regarding its handling of Tamerlan Tsarnaev<\/strong>, the accused Boston Marathon bomber who died shortly after the attack.<\/em><\/p>\n

Wait. \u00c2\u00a0They have civil libertarian concerns about the young man, who Alan Dersowitz describes as in popular opinion on how his court case will proceed “He’s accused of placing exploding nails in front of an eight year old, and that will trump everything”. \u00c2\u00a0That’s okay so far as it goes, but… just kind of randomly tossed in here.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

ITEM THE EIGHTH… INSULTS AND MEDIA<\/strong><\/p>\n

Most of my information on modern English economics come from a clique of\u00c2\u00a0La Rouche<\/em>Economists who were running for Nancy Pelosi’s office<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Please note I treated your claims with all the respect they deserved. Trying to play the dirty reds have corrupted you card doesn’t work on me by its nice to see your argument devolve to claims of communist influence. Blame Nazis and the Larouche democrats and you sir shall have a trifecta<\/a>.<\/p>\n

DISCUSSION BREAKS OUT OVER BASEMENT TEAM VIDEO<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Isn’t that Lyndon LaRouche? LPAC is either LaRouche PAC or the Lesbian Super PAC, and while I may be wrong, I don’t thing the speaker is a lesbian nor is his masturbatory activity one a lesbian would enjoy.<\/p>\n

Also, the uploader’s “about” is not to be missed, especially if you’re a TROLL.
\nLaRouche, or LaDOUCHE, amirite???
\n<\/em>I wonder where he filmed this. My guess is either church, elementary school, or garage.
\nLyndon LaRouche is a crazy person who has run for president about 20 times, so I’m sure that his garage has a pretend press conference section. I bet he spends a lot of time there, with or without cameras filming him.<\/em>
\nI’m surprised it took him almost 11 minutes to begin blathering about his conspiracy theories regarding the Queen of England.
\n<\/em>Wow, you’re not kidding with that “long speech that goes nowhere” tag.
\nSample passage from 9:55: “When this case…some authority other than the congress was required to initiate the action that was required. And what I heard, from the reading of the conditions of the charges…of the conclusions of the court…those conclusions were all in correspondence to the requirements, and I go into the…his first term, the president’s first time in office, as also to the second. So there was every reason that reason would demand that this president should be impeached under those circumstances.”
\nThat’s barely even English, much less a political critique.
\nI decided to keep listening until he actually accused Obama of doing something wrong and the first time is at 13:55 into the god damned video when he accuses Obama of violating the War Powers Act by intervening in Libya. That’s what you were building up to all this time? Somehow I doubt the public shares your sense of outrage that our air force flew a few low-risk sorties against the crumbling Gaddafi regime, Lyndon.
\nAnd after that it actually becomes more unhinged. At 16:32 he accuses Obama of literally beating up Hillary Clinton to silence her. In the last two minutes he makes a couple vague accusations about birtherism and campaign funding from foreign drug lords.<\/p>\n

Mocking Charles Johnson: \u00c2\u00a0The\u00c2\u00a0LaRouchies<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0are really, really out there. Even weirder than Ron Paulians<\/a>.
\nAgree or disagree with some points made here, but at the end we do go back to this:\u00c2\u00a0I might add that the\u00c2\u00a0LaRouchies<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0are a core component of the 911 Truth movement<\/a>.<\/p>\n

An interesting response to Robert Lauten on this issue — which, from the outset I’m inclined to support the blogger’s position<\/a>…
\nIt\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Class Warfare\u00e2\u20ac\u009d.
\nLiberty requires that people govern themselves.
\nWhen people act like animals, then governments need to step in and make rules.
\nNo Yow May Not Shit In the Fire Ring, or Burn Trash, or Burn Toxic Matial, etc.<\/p>\n

\n

All those things were already illegal, LaRouchie. Go back to your post office with your Obama = Hitler sign<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Chris Matthews mocked as “Going Full Blown Larouche”<\/a>. (See Strauss.)<\/p>\n

Face of Boomers notes the Larouche boomer fixation<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Insult indeed<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0You most likely learned what you know from watching Glenn Beck or reading pamphlets that you got from Lyndon\u00c2\u00a0LaRouche<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0supporters.<\/em><\/p>\n

Phish fans \u00c2\u00a0relay the cia fbi dulles grateful dead conspiracy, revealed by larouche in 1977<\/a>.
\n“Dude, pass the bong” indeed.<\/em><\/p>\n

The\u00c2\u00a0LaRouchies<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0too, but at least their crap was weird enough to be entertaining (\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Francis Bacon was a Dutch secret agent! Jean-Phillipe Rameau destroyed the tradition of western music!\u00e2\u20ac\u009d (I am not making either of those up.)<\/a>)<\/p>\n

WHY?<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Because according to eminent politician Lyndon LaRouche,\u00c2\u00a0Queen Elizabeth is a major drug dealer.<\/p>\n

AND NOW… WORLD WIDE MEDIA<\/p>\n

Harley Shclanger on Dr. Deagel on the 24th.<\/p>\n

Press TV has interviewed Douglas Degroot, with the Executive Intelligence Review from Leesburg, about the recent death of a French soldier killed in Mali<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Press TV has interviewed Lawrence Freeman, Executive Intelligence review from Baltimore about this issue. The following is an approximate transcription of the interview.<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0 (The issue simply being… US foreign policy destruction.)<\/p>\n

What Carl Osgood of EIR asks at a press conference with General WIERCINSKI<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0China sees the threat of the US.<\/p>\n

How about this: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Money is nothing. Money is not the economy.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d
\n<\/a>Words of doom, or words of redemption? They\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re the words of Michael O. Billington of Washington, D.C., a card-carrying member of the Larouche movement, which does not believe that money makes the world. If you do not believe in money, can you believe in banks, credit and debit, in GDP and GNP? […]
\n<\/em><\/em>What is the future of Europe, granting there is a future Europe? Is the euro to blame? \u00e2\u20ac\u009dOf course it is,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Mr. Billington. But why should we care? We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re a tiny Third World archipelago in another continent. He stressed, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153No country is safe, this is global.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d If no country is safe, then no currency is safe either.
\n<\/em><\/em><\/em>Only one gentleman, a European, spoke up to disagree with some points of the presentation. When I looked around the room, I did not notice anyone else appearing to be overly worried or anxious or about to lose sleep that night.<\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/p>\n

BRAND NEW SPANKING NEW RADIO PROGRAM<\/a>
\nComes now \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Save The Nation,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d born on April 22, 2013, with Butch Valdes as father and midwife. For years a pedigreed radio commentator who\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s also a certified public accountant, Mr. Valdes is the Philippine voice of the Larouche movement, which means he is very much and strictly, or exclusively, a conservative thinker in the realm of economics and finance. For him no sleight-of-hand tricks, no window-dressed data, especially when these are unveiled by government officials using smoke and mirrors to convince a gullible public.<\/em>
\nMr. Valdes was surprised that \u00e2\u20ac\u0153so many\u00e2\u20ac\u009d of his listeners showed up to witness the birth of Save The Nation at an auditorium in UP, and considering how diverse and disparate their backgrounds were, he was even happier at how readily they approved the Three Principles: 1. Nuclear power is the only viable energy source for now. 2. Agriculture aided by science is how to grow the economy. 3. A moratorium on foreign debt is the way out of the poverty trap.<\/em><\/p>\n

From that old SGT Report<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Funny this<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0Funny thing, Huffington Post had a new headline about man expanding beyond Earth this morning quoting Stephen Hawking. LsRouche has been talking about this for a few years… \u00c2\u00a0<\/em>Just goes to show who gets news coverage.<\/em><\/em><\/em><\/p>\n

Press TV<\/a>, and Press TV again<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0US Wants Russia to Back Down on Syria; and US Drills in Provocation Against Iran.<\/p>\n

Demanding the Truth 9\/11 Blog brings up May 4th episode of<\/a> …<\/p>\n

The damned People’s Voice is a curious validator o<\/a>f…<\/p>\n

Glass Steagall on the Rad<\/a>io Reporting. \u00c2\u00a0And see too something with Michael Kirsch for the Holistic Survival<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n

Hm.<\/a>..\u00c2\u00a0Though I do not agree with the LaRouchePac on a Hamiltonian Credit system.
\n<\/em>As a Libertarian I believe a Free Market economy backed by Silver coinage would be ideal to protect the integrity of peoples money.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n

What are ya, a damn\u00c2\u00a0Larouchie<\/em>? Lmao. No.. If I was I’d be telling you all about an impending thermo nuclear attack<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Loudon \u00c2\u00a0Progress asks the question “What happened to the Larouche supporters?”, a rhetorical gambit to knock a local political figure.<\/p>\n

If you’re wondering what happened to the whacky Lyndon LaRouche supporters who promoted Nuclear Fusion in the 1980’s and infiltrated and nearly destroyed the Loudoun Democratic Party, their former spokesperson,\u00c2\u00a0Christina N. Huth, is now writing \u00c2\u00a0letters\u00c2\u00a0of support for Dave LaRock<\/a>.<\/p>\n

John Train comes back in discussions here, complete with link to youtube clip of Bob Dylan supposedly claiming to have sold his soul to Satan<\/a>.<\/p>\n

And… Hm<\/a>… \u00c2\u00a0And so we get to Linden LaRouche. \u00c2\u00a0Is he another politician also? \u00c2\u00a0He was on a radio show recently. \u00c2\u00a0I didn’t listen. \u00c2\u00a0But Dick Eastman did; and Eastman wasn’t impressed at all. \u00c2\u00a0Unless all these would-be political hopefuls get back to basics, begin the slow process of educating the general public on these core issues about money creation and usury, our decline will continue into oblivion. \u00c2\u00a0World War III is at the door; and only an extra-terrestrial intervention will save mankind from destruction.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n

The final wor<\/a>d:
\nWell yeah but the democrats would trample your grandmother if they thought it would give them a political advantage.
\n<\/em>And the libertarians would trample all grandmothers….
\n<\/em><\/em>And the Greens would trample their grandmother, but not the on the grass….
\n<\/em><\/em><\/em>And Statehood would try to trample their grandmothers… but they wouldn’t have the votes to begin the trampling
\n<\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em>And the LaRouchies ARE your grandmother.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n

AND… \u00c2\u00a0Where do I sign up for my\u00c2\u00a0LaRouche\u00c2\u00a0PAC newsletter and helicopter beanie?<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00c2\u00a0ITEM THE FIRST: \u00c2\u00a0The Webster Tarpley Report For those following the latest on the “Tarpley connects the dots on his old mentor” front. MEANWHILE, over at “WORLD CRISIS RRRRADIO”, Dr. Webster Griffin Tarpley’s weekly doomsday programme, THE DEAR LEADER gets\u00c2\u00a0stapled to the CIA once more:\u00c2\u00a0 “And what has LaRouche to say about the Boston bombings? […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11691","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11691","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11691"}],"version-history":[{"count":71,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11691\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11952,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11691\/revisions\/11952"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}