I. \u00c2\u00a0Once again, we have that Larouche \/ Jones \/ Beck confluence. \u00c2\u00a0Larouche has always claimed an “I Got there First” on 9\/11 Conspiracy. \u00c2\u00a0He was on the radio in Utah when the attacks happened, on one of his big media validators, and he threw out “Mossad!” \u00c2\u00a0Whether this can credit him as first or not, when numbskulls all over the place were doing about the same, I don’t really kno. \u00c2\u00a0But from somewhere, the rightwing source of “AIM” picked up the phrase, “Intellectual author of the 9\/11 Truth Movement” to describe Larouche — more in the ground of the logic othat pulls the conspiracy world together than the conspiracy theories themselves.<\/p>\n
And, wait, I thought this was Tavistock. \u00c2\u00a0Or… Columbia University? \u00c2\u00a0He also called MIT, where the suspects reportedly killed a police officer, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153mind control central<\/a>.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n For the Boston Maratahon bombers, we have Alex Jones able to claim “FIRST!” \u00c2\u00a0Because, apparently, he jumped in to tweet right as it came about, complete with the hash-tag “FALSE FLAG”. \u00c2\u00a0When we throw in the fact that the first question asked in a press conference from Massachusetts Governor Duvall Patrick was for Jones’s Infowars — something to do with a supposed glitch in the timeline — there we have it — Alex Jones is here cornering the market on “Fill in the Blank Latest Tragedy” Truth Movement. \u00c2\u00a0Not to say the mainstream and particularly<\/a> 24 Hour News Channels are particularly useful in relaying information at a time like this — just because they have 24 hours to fill doesn’t mean I feel obliged to “stay on top of the moment” — and we have here basically Fox News speculating on Islamic Terrorism and MSNBC speculating on McVeigh — which, naturally, beats Alex Jones which tosses up all the Internet speculation concerning a reworked Family Guy episode hoax, a random Guy on the Roof that left corners of the Internet buzzing, and all manner of useless crap. \u00c2\u00a0And after all that, his site has the galls to “demand” an apology from those whose speculations steered over toward “patriot” groups.<\/p>\n POINT<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0OTOH, Jones and the Infowars crew on my shitlist now. Not even LaRouche is that fucking stupid, or runs such a shit cult org. (Yes, you just heard me call Infowars a cult.) Sure, shock jock gotta shock, but there are limits and AJ & Company fucking moonwalked over that line<\/em>.<\/p>\n COUNTERPOINT<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0Especially if you’re going cite sources from the\u00c2\u00a0LaRouche\u00c2\u00a0Loons. Those people make Alex Jones look totally mainstream<\/em>.<\/p>\n For the record, the word from Larouche himself… \u00c2\u00a0So, I would \u00c2\u00a0say: Well, somebody wants to make a mess. And I would say, the present administration, Presidential administration, becomes one of the first areas which you have to look at. Can he prove that he was not in some way Glenn Beck has called for the President’s Impeachment because of — well, see it yourself<\/a>— and the good news for Larouche’s cause of rattling for money, Benghazi gets thrown into the mix. \u00c2\u00a0 For whatever reason, Alex Jones thinks Beck’s beck and call to “come clean by Monday” is worth relaying. \u00c2\u00a0Naturally, Beck slides more mainstream and partisan than Jones, and moreso than Larouche, but there’s a tail chasing a dog somewhere that becomes fascinating to slice apart.<\/p>\n What say Larouche favorite Vladamir Putin? \u00c2\u00a0Oh wait… this works well with his war with Chechnyn Rebels<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0It’s a little difficult to align the causes to fit Putin for Russian TV exposure. \u00c2\u00a0In waiting for a line, the Larouchies fell back to this for Iran’s Press TV.:<\/p>\n Acts of terror are often rooted in social and financial problems and the U.S. should \u00e2\u20ac\u0153create a road toward prosperity and hope for all people<\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d to stop acts of terror from happening, says Bill Jones of Executive Intelligence Review.<\/em> And they don’t get to Obama yet with this:<\/p>\n \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Whether it [the bombing] be internal, domestic in the United States or whether it be some kind of an international operation<\/a>, it was obviously sending a signal on a very important holiday for Americans and for Bostonians specially,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Jones in a phone interview with the U.S. Desk on Tuesday. \u00c2\u00a0\u00e2\u20ac\u0153I think it [the bombing] is a continuation of a general threat which the world, not only the United States but the world, is living under now because of the very unstable international economic situation,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he added.<\/em><\/p>\n Hard to tell if this had ANYTHING to do with the “holiday”. \u00c2\u00a0But I suppose we’ll still see the sign slogan “Glass Steagal or Die”. \u00c2\u00a0They’ll take it even more literally.<\/p>\n II. \u00c2\u00a0A bit of “Comparative Cult Studies”. More worth watching… the current state of Team Fred Newman, post Fred Newman’s death.<\/p>\n As the reflections of the mayoral term of Bloomberg come in — national focus will always be on the soda ban attempt and gun control — this will always be tucked right in as we close in on New York media<\/a>.<\/p>\n Not to pile on the mayor, but there really is more. So we have the strange tale of the Independence Party, a bizarre amalgam of right-wing populists married to black leftists and once led by Fred Newman, a Marxist therapist who, The Daily News reported, advocated \u00e2\u20ac\u0153friendosexuality\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00e2\u20ac\u201d translated as having sex with patients.<\/em> And, aha…\u00c2\u00a0Bloomberg Remarks for 2012 IPNYC Anti-Corruption Awards<\/a>.<\/p>\n And they march on to the next mayoral election<\/a>.<\/p>\n Pressed by the News about criticisms of the party by people like Manhattan Media Publisher — and Democrat-turned-Republican mayoral hopeful — Tom Allon, who has characterized\u00c2\u00a0past statements by IPNYC figures Fred Newman and Lenora Fulani<\/a>, as\u00c2\u00a0grossly anti-Semitic<\/a>, Carrion responded forcefully.<\/em> Surely ye jest.<\/p>\n Always worth lobbing the Jackie Salit in there<\/a>… \u00c2\u00a0And we seem to have that Post Modernist Marxist Multidirectional Centrist Independence<\/a>, what Salit and company can glue in on is a media friendly item that seems to pop up with a different name each election cycle.<\/p>\n A No Labels a ha movement, eh? \u00c2\u00a0Never had one of those. \u00c2\u00a0But they’ll give us this “social innovation<\/a>” through destruction of partisan fighting.<\/p>\n ITEM NUMBER THREE: \u00c2\u00a0PO TOUR UPDATES<\/p>\n Dateline Seattle<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0Anastasia Mares, a Seattle-based organizer for LaRouche PAC, laughs freely as she hands out anti-Obama and anti-bailout literature outside the Coos Bay post office Wednesday afternoon. LaRouche PAC seeks to advocate public policy based on the ideology of 90-year-old Lyndon LaRouche, a perennial presidential candidate\u00c2\u00a0 who was convicted of mail fraud and conspiracy in 1988. LaRouche\u00c2\u00a0 contends the bailout is an attempt to reduce the world\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s population by starving the poor.<\/em><\/p>\n Dateline Hudson Valley<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0I went to a militaria show here in the Hudson Valley, NY on Saturday. As I was pulling into the parking lot, I saw a huge \u00e2\u20ac\u0153IMPEACH OBAMA\u00e2\u20ac\u009d sign on the corner. Now, as someone who is not a fan of the President, I approached the table where the sign was with great interest. My disappointment grew as I saw the sign next to the big impeach sign, which was an ad for LaRouchePAC<\/em>. \u00c2\u00a0That really would suck.<\/p>\n BURN! \u00c2\u00a0I wonder how often you stand around your local county annex trying to collect money for Lyndon\u00c2\u00a0<\/a>Larouche<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n Dateline Chicago0<\/a>:<\/p>\n Frank Mathis, a LaRouche PAC representative from New Jersey, said they were touring the Panhandle. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153This is where (U.S. Representatives) Jeff Miller and Steve Southerland are,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Mathis said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153In 2011, Miller said he would not support restoring the Glass-Steagall Act. We want to know what he thinks now.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00c2\u00a0<\/em>Sounds good so far as it goes. Dateline Chipley<\/a>:<\/p>\n The City Council was not happy <\/a>with the LaRouche Political Action Committee\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s visit to Chipley. <\/em>\u00c2\u00a0Must be an Obama Police State Town. […] Here’s a quasi-supporter<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0Won’t defend his lifestyle of the man, apparently, but is for mass transit. \u00c2\u00a0 I won’t comment further — I haven’t taken a time to a’listen.<\/p>\n ITEM NUMBER FOUR:<\/p>\n If Glass-Steagall is not immediately rammed through both houses of the US Congress, get ready to do just that.<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0 […]\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Call your US Senator and demand that he or she stop acting like a British subject or Wall Street slave, and introduce and pass Glass-Steagall now.<\/em><\/p>\n Be there or be Square. \u00c2\u00a0They should use that phrase, actually.<\/p>\n ITEM NUMBER FIVE:<\/p>\n Selling for Philipino sympa<\/a>thy.\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0Noted election results<\/a>. ITEM NUMBER SIX: \u00c2\u00a0Your neo-nazi corner. \u00c2\u00a0A bit of fun.<\/p>\n VNN FORUM<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0We must beware of Zionist disinformation. The jew, Makow, apparently maintains his view of Holocaust Veracity.<\/em> And then there’s the “swept into a Larouche Conspiracy” corner:<\/p>\n For MN GunTalk<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0The\u00c2\u00a0Larouchies<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0claimed (and do yet today) that I was an agent of MI-5. At the time of the small window war over Obamacare, I was denounced by Kurt Nimmo.<\/p>\n The Wenzel trying to get web traffic conspiracy<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0No, this is all kind of … dopey?<\/p>\n And this is just mean<\/a>. Notice the question mark after the Lyndon Larouche quip. He knows full well that I have never been affiliated with Lyndon Larouche. He’s afraid of a lawsuit and throws in the question mark. Sleazy. No facts, total innuendo. I have been a libertarian since the early 1970s when Harry Browne’s first book came out. I said so in an\u00c2\u00a0interview<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0back in February. Well…<\/p>\n \u00c2\u00a0Look into it<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0Connecto ameutuers.<\/p>\n \u00c2\u00a0Did you know that Glencore once had a secretive hedge fund called Asteri Capital, and that its senior managers had\u00c2\u00a0weird past connections to Lyndon LaRouche? Did you know that the guy who ran it ended up at J.P. Morgan, presiding over Bruno Iskil, the trader implicated in the \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcLondon Whale\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 scandal? Questions need answering, so check out this\u00c2\u00a0secret history of Glencore\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s hedge fund<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n meh.<\/p>\n Per Dr. Webster G. Tarpley, former long-time associate of Lyndon LaRouche, his organization is a CIA operation for many years now. This was the reason for Tarpley\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s departure after 20 years of collaboration. There are strong links between LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s NCLC and Cantor-Fitzgerald in the N. America and LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Schiller Institute and Dresdner Bank in Germany. The two are tied to CIA money laundering, and LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s people provide \u00e2\u20ac\u0153intellectual cover\u00e2\u20ac\u009d. LaRouche has always denounced strategic threats to the drug trade, such as Hugo Chavez, while letting the real kingpins off the hook. Tarpley is among those who claim Tower 7 of the World Trade Center was deliberately destroyed by the CIA because it held all Cantor-Fitzgerald\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s records pertaining to its funneling CIA drug money into the markets.<\/em><\/p>\n
\ninvolved, either directly or indirectly in some of this? Or that people who were working so-called in his interest might not have been doing it?
\nI think what we have to do as a nation, is simply realize that this pattern of incidents, coincides with nothing, except somebody being clever and popping off terrorist effects in various parts of the United States, all in the same short time. Who has an interest in doing that? The question is out there to be asked. But the question remains.
\nBecause, as he told Alex Jones last month<\/a>… and as we see Massachusetts’s own perenial Congressional candidate Rachel Brown reiterate<\/a>… Obama’s out to kill 6 Billion people for the love of the Queen of England.<\/p>\n
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Creating again a road toward prosperity and hope for all people should be the long-term goal and unfortunately this is not the goal today of the present administration and the measures that are being taken are simply defensive and not positive,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he added.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nI note that Bob Avakian<\/a> showed up out of nowhere on a telephone pole. \u00c2\u00a0Kind of<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Hard to figure the meaning here<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0But this one stray photocopy… is more a literature dropping than I’ve seen from the Larouche Movement for quite some time. \u00c2\u00a0But I guess they’re running around gun shows and what exists of Tea Party<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0— and the Occupy Wall Stree<\/a>t. \u00c2\u00a0(Note: \u00c2\u00a0Links mixed up for the Hell of it.)<\/p>\n
\nWhatever. Mr. Newman controlled a party line and Mr. Bloomberg all but purchased it. He gave the party more than $400,000 over the years and promised to support nonpartisan elections<\/em>.<\/p>\n
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Anybody who knows me — I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m a Puerto Rican kid from New York City who\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s practically half-Jewish by virtue of… by birth and association here in this city,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153So give me a break!<\/em>
\n“You know, I would never be associated with anything that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s anti-Semitic. I can see it a mile away,” Carrion said. “Every Jewish leader in this town and in this country knows I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m a friend of Israel. I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve been there five times. I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve fought for all their causes, and I will continue to do that.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n
\nMonday in Chipley, the PAC was taking money from new members. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We need to spread out the organization\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s support,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Mathis said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m from New Jersey, and there isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t much support or awareness of what we do. We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re trying to get the message out.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00c2\u00a0<\/em>Yeah, sucks to be them.
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153The people that support us suspect that Obama and the government are not on their side,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Vullo said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The people who don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t support us are in denial.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d” \u00c2\u00a0<\/em>Hm.<\/p>\n
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Our ordinances don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t really have the teeth in them to let us enforce them,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Police Chief Crews. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Normally, when we arrest someone, we use the state statute, and we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re dealing with criminals.”
\n<\/em>Miner said toward the end of the day, he and Crews had decided that arresting the LaRouche representatives was really the only way the city could respond, and that had the potential of opening the city up to a lawsuit. \u00c2\u00a0<\/em>If it’s any consolation, I’m not sure they want to deal with their lawsuit either. \u00c2\u00a0If it’s any grief, I’d be siding with the Larouchies… I think.
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153When she finds out what can be done, I think we should bring this ordinance back to the council and fix it,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Councilman Kevin Russell.
\n<\/em>And the basic problem. \u00c2\u00a0Councilman Reed said he saw one person write a check to the LaRouche people for $200. He asked for a copy of the membership form that Mathis was having donors complete, but was refused a copy. \u00c2\u00a0<\/em>Yeah, you can get people to throw two hundred dollars away down the toilet.
\n<\/em>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153I was there for about two hours, and every time they got a donor, he would fold that form up and put it in his hip pocket, then he would put the check in his front pocket,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Reed said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Then they would laugh about it.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
\nSaturday, April 27, 2013 -\u00c2\u00a02:00pm\u00c2\u00a0to\u00c2\u00a05:00pm
\nSare for Governor Town Hall Meeting<\/div>\n
\nGerald Celente EXPOSED — and … compared to … we<\/a>ll.
\nBTW American has a Socialist Party, did you know that? They always try to\u00c2\u00a0<\/a>compete on the ballots. There was one guys called Lyndon LaRouche who had\u00c2\u00a0<\/a>some money and every election time he would buy TV time talking and talking\u00c2\u00a0<\/a>and talking! Sometimes he gets a few vot<\/a>es.
\nWhy couldn’t we have someone like him as President? Scratch that, I know why, we don’t vote for anything, the “Powers that Be,” would NEVER put someone like Mr.\u00c2\u00a0Larouche<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0in, he would do too much g<\/a>ood.
\nLawrence Freeman of EIR on Syria on R<\/a>T.
\nMichael Billington regarding WW3 and Ko<\/a>rea.
\nHarley Schlanger on Dr. Deagle<\/a>.
\nHarley Schlanger blog talk radio<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0— John J Mazzone.
\nThe Daily Tribune references Iran’s Press TV appearance by Mike Billington, noting him with Larouche, which is something worth watching — when the validators mention Larouche and when it doesn’t.
\nAnd we see the reaction from the paranoid peanut gallery … “Let the Fight Begin<\/a>“. \u00c2\u00a0yes. \u00c2\u00a0World War 3.
\nLunatic Outpost posits a grand debate between the Larouche Movement and Bill Still as an epic Hamilton versus Jackson debat<\/a>e.
\nSure, whatever. \u00c2\u00a0Lyndon Larouche is BRILLIANT!!! Why couldn’t we have someone like him as President? Scratch that, I know why, we don’t vote for anything, the “Powers that Be,” would NEVER put someone like Mr. Larouche in, he would do too much good for this country<\/a>.
\nMike Billington of the LaRouche movement in an interview with Iran\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Press TV had this to say: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153There has been a concerted effort in the Western press\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 to falsify the warning coming from China \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 Xi Jinping\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 in a forum yesterday said no country should have the right to create a regional or even global crisis for their own self-interests \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 That was recorded in the New York Times this morning adding falsely the words in front of that speech that no \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcAsian country\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 should have the right to do tha<\/a>t.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
\nPreviously, another kosher club, perhaps the LaRouchies, alleged that there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d be a \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcwar\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 between the Rothschilds & Rockefellers.<\/em>
\nNow, it seems that Makow, Fulford et al. are promoting the allegation of a split between western & eastern drug & money mafias in regard to the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153inoculation of diseases\u00e2\u20ac\u009d mentioned as jew policy in The Protocols.<\/p>\n
\nFor the record, Kinsella is a very sleazy, dirty fighter. \u00c2\u00a0His personal attacks against me don’t seem to stop, as bizarre as they might be. I am not going to spend the rest of my career going over every one of his attacks. This is just a blanket warning to all about the sleazy tactics used by this guy. I will provide only two examples to show you what I mean.
\nThere’s this: \u00c2\u00a0” Wenzel is a shadowy character. Who knows where he came from. Some former Lyndon Larouche type? Who knows.”<\/em><\/p>\n
\n<\/em>There is a Robert Wenzel that did\u00c2\u00a0contribute\u00c2\u00a0<\/a>to the Lyndon Larouche Political Action Committee in 2007. He lives in Spring Lake, New Jersey. I have never lived in Spring Lake, NJ and I don’t think I have ever even passed through it. It appears this Robert Wenzel was85 years old<\/a>, when he made the contributions. I am not quite 85 years old, even now, 6 years later.
\n<\/em>It’s a total Kinsella smear. As was this slimy move by him during the debate, in the same cute way, discussing me and Scientology, where it’s not really clear whether he has facts. Total smear.
\n<\/em>For the record, I will pay anyone $250,000 if they can link me with Scientology. Good luck. I have never as much stopped to take one of their sidewalk stress tests. Come to think of it, I will offer $500,000 to anyone who can link me to Lyndon Larouche.<\/em><\/p>\n