{"id":10825,"date":"2013-01-02T11:57:28","date_gmt":"2013-01-02T18:57:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=10825"},"modified":"2013-01-03T10:16:54","modified_gmt":"2013-01-03T17:16:54","slug":"centuries-to-go-to-acceptance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2013\/01\/02\/centuries-to-go-to-acceptance\/","title":{"rendered":"Centuries to go to acceptance"},"content":{"rendered":"

ITEM NUMBER ONE:THE BIG WASHINGTON TIMES INTERVIEW<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

J<\/em>oseph F Cotto. \u00c2\u00a0The name rings a bell. \u00c2\u00a0Okay, I remember reading a piece on the Presidential campaign of Rocky Anderson. \u00c2\u00a0Go through the “recent” archives here<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0Larouche is just moving a bit more into the fringes of an interviewer looking away from the Beltway for political interviews.
\nI note that the Washington Times’s history and record precedes itself, though its politics (out of Moonie land) has weaved into the Larouche-sphere on several occasions, and Larouche’s publications have taken aim enough at Sun Myung Moon and his Empire that if a designated “enemy” were interviewed by the Washington Times — they would be pilloried by the org.<\/p>\n

Joseph F Cotto <\/a>\u00c2\u00a0 gets the introduction wrong, but I suppose it may as well just be passed over for approval from his subject matter:
\n Lyndon LaRouche was a lightning rod of controversy 20 years ago. <\/em>\u00c2\u00a0 (Urm. \u00c2\u00a0Not really. \u00c2\u00a0This is past the days of PANIC.)
\n
\nPOINT:<\/strong> \u00c2\u00a0LaRouche\u00c2\u00a0 is still alive?<\/em>
\n COUNTERPOINT<\/strong>: \u00c2\u00a0Not only is LaRouche alive, at the age of 90, but unlike all you wretched Struhldbruggs out there, his mind has accumulated 90 years of development. \u00c2\u00a0For his entire life, he has refused to pay the tribute that is demanded of us as the price for social acceptance: consent to stupidity! \u00c2\u00a0[…]<\/em>
\nAND: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a099% of people with a strong opinion of LaRouche have read nothing from\u00c2\u00a0the voluminous source material that he has written over the years, but, \u00c2\u00a0instead, rely on the hysterical wave offs, blatant and witting \u00c2\u00a0mischaracterizations and outright libel from LaRouche’s detractors, for\u00c2\u00a0their extreme low resolution picture of the man.\u00c2\u00a0 More information than \u00c2\u00a0you can handle in a lifetime, most of it written by LaRouche himself, \u00c2\u00a0but also from his many associates, is available at the half dozen \u00c2\u00a0websites dedicated to his work and thought,
\n<\/em>(… Strangely the Larouche org gets snippy and sarcastic when 1960s Marxist era Larouche material, for instance, is brought out…)<\/p>\n

Further<\/a>, a couple points made by this cult leader, reflecting on the problems confronting the world.: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0Next to the already lurking threat of thermonuclear war on our planet itself, the need for defense of Earth against asteroids, and comets, with their actually significant prospective hits on Earth, is of the highest priority.<\/em>
\nWhat was that big blockbuster movie of the 1990s? \u00c2\u00a0Some bad Aerosmith songs are rolling into my mind right now.
\nAnd, reflecting on his life lived: \u00c2\u00a0Cotto:\u00c2\u00a0What has been the greatest reward of your career?
\nLaRouche:\u00c2\u00a0In net effect, I would reply: it is a life which has been immensely worth the practice and experience of living.\u00c2\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Incidentally<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0Can anybody imagine today what LaRouche or Helga or Kesha would actually have written about JFK during the highly tense days of the Cuban missile crisis, when the world really was on the brink of thermonuclear war?
\n<\/em>AND<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0 …\u00c2\u00a0<\/em>Howie G’s take-away<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0After this take-away: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Howie G<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0If you want to stop nuclear war, the hour is growing late, so get into the mobilization, and read below. Copy and paste this all over the Internet.<\/em><\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER TWO: \u00c2\u00a0LAROUCHIE OF THE YEAR: \u00c2\u00a0THE CARD TABLE SHRINER<\/strong><\/p>\n

I always mocked Time Magazine’s “Concept” decisions for “Person of the Year”. \u00c2\u00a0The greatest point of absurdity in this regard was a few years’ back when they gave us “You”. \u00c2\u00a0It’s a botched and forced zeitgeist search.
\nOn the other hand, it’s a tough decision, somewhat arbitrary. \u00c2\u00a0This year they give us … urm… the President who just won re-election. \u00c2\u00a0Not a terribly original decision, but I guess it works as well as anyone. \u00c2\u00a0Lest they decide to give it to<\/p>\n

But to take a page out of the Time Magazine playbook… I’ll amass a group for my annual “Larouchie of the Year”. \u00c2\u00a0Why not? \u00c2\u00a0They dominate the Larouche News coverage. \u00c2\u00a0And I gather when Larouche finally croaks it, memories of encounters of them will dominate the bloggy eulogies.<\/p>\n

In the meantime we have them calling themselves “Missionaries” and trying to distance themselves from the “Tea Party” (even as other Larouchies are trying to fuse the org to the tea party.)<\/p>\n

Dateline Rehoboth Beach\u00c2\u00a0<\/a>:
\nAs Esposito talked, a man walking out of the post office pointed to LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s picture, and said, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153That guy\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a whack job, right there,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d as he went to his car.<\/em>
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Obama is going to destroy the country,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Esposito said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153He\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s going to get us into World War III. We have to get him impeached.” […]<\/em>
\nBillington said post offices are usually a good place to meet people. LaRouche himself is 90 years old, but Esposito said he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s stronger than ever<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

<\/em>From the comments. \u00c2\u00a0A satisfied honker!: \u00c2\u00a0There’s no law against being a whack job and these two just prove it! \u00c2\u00a0We must Impeach Obama for Benghazi, and place him on trial for Treason. He lied to the American people about his birth certificate. He has no proof he is an American citizen.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline –???<\/a>—
\nI don’t think the Larouche people are used to old people flipping them off from moving\u00c2\u00a0vehicles.<\/em>
\nThey stood with their Obama\/Hitler posters in front of Bank of America. \u00c2\u00a0We flipped them off. We’re so mature.<\/em>
\nOnly two inside a Revolutionary Orange Honda Fit.<\/em>
\nThey just gaped back at us…like neanderthals.<\/em>
\nPresumably, they couldn’t return the gesture because of their straighttjackets.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline Wellsboro<\/a>
\nAccording to Tony Esposito, of Delaware County outside Philadelphia, Obama is \u00e2\u20ac\u0153the worst president ever. \u00c2\u00a0(<\/em>worse than Andrew Jackson?) He\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a national security threat to the United States. He is the American equivalent of Adolph Hitler.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em>
\nEsposito is a part of LaRouche Pac, an effort founded by political activist Lyndon LaRouche with the goal of impeaching President Obama.<\/em>
\nOn Tuesday, Dec. 5, Esposito and Joe Billington, also of Delaware County, set up a booth with literature about the movement in front of the Wellsboro Post Office. The effort has \u00e2\u20ac\u0153hundreds and hundreds of supporters\u00e2\u20ac\u009d in the local area, said Esposito.\u00c2\u00a0This is the pair\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s second stop to Wellsboro and they are holding similar protests across the state.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline Manchester<\/a>
\nWhat’s with those guys in Manchester with the signs of Obama with a hitler mustache I have a pic but can’t upload on my itouch and my puter is down Offensive to say the least To Americans and Jews<\/em>
\nWillie get loose from the asylum?<\/em>
\nI believe they are supporters of Lyndon LaRouche. They have been in either Gloucester or Rockport recently with this Obama-as-Hitler nonsense.<\/em>
\nIs he still in jail?<\/em>
\nThanks for the links, Martin. Lyndon LaDouchebag still attracts fringe weirdos. I agree that they are within their rights, but get a clue – this isn’t exactly a receptive audience around here.<\/em><\/p>\n

Anthony Guerrero on what it’s like to be a Larouche Organize<\/a>r… \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0But I remember one day a friend from school got me to come to a meeting of this particular group of people, and so I came. \u00c2\u00a0It was after work, so I kind of missed the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153political stuff\u00e2\u20ac\u009d in the beginning. \u00c2\u00a0But when I came something funny happened.<\/em>
\nThey were talking about astronomy!<\/em>
\nI thought, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153what the heck are a bunch of young people talking about astronomy for! Isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t this supposed to be a political meeting?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em>
\nBut no matter. \u00c2\u00a0As the meeting went on, I became intrigued. \u00c2\u00a0And the more I was introduced to the ideas of the movement, the more I became convinced that maybe \u00e2\u20ac\u0153politics\u00e2\u20ac\u009d was different than what I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d thought. \u00c2\u00a0Maybe science and politics were one and same thing. […]<\/em>
\nOn a deeper level, I learned about the value of human creativity, or, what makes us different from the animals, which helped me to inspire others who got involved, and challenge their limiting beliefs that held them back from knowing just how awesome they really are.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline Brenham<\/a>
\n<\/a>This is a second-hand account relayed by my right-wing brother, but apparently the LaRouche PAC people were distributing literature such as “Obama in Bed with Al Qaeda in Syria & Libya” and “Impeach Obama for Criminal Conspiracy in Murder of U. S. Ambassador”. Women were also lining up to have their picture taken with the cardboard cutout of Obama with the Hitler mustache.<\/em>
\nLet them waste their time with their silly petitions since impeachment will never happen. The hatred for the president is abundant and the stupidity is on high out here in Blue-Bell country.<\/em>
\nI need to return to the sanity of Urban Life.<\/em>
\nmy sister in law passed them \u00c2\u00a0going in to her post office and said – “you guys are nuts.”<\/em>
\nOn her way out one of them said – “we’re not republicans you know!”<\/em>
\nI tell them they are making our town ugly when all the shopkeepers are trying so hard to beautify our little downtown.<\/em>
\nThey are narcissists so they hear nothing.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline\u00c2\u00a0Northborough<\/a>
\nA Shrewsbury man is facing charges after two men told police he took a table they had set up with literature comparing President Barack Obama to Hitler and hurled it into the street. […]<\/em>
\nimages of Obama wearing a moustache similar to Hitler\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s, he said.\u00c2\u00a0Various groups have used similar images throughout Obama\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s presidency. \u00c2\u00a0[hm…]<\/em>
\nLund was not arrested, Scesny said. He was cooperative with police, Scesny said, telling them he stood by his actions and would accept the consequences.<\/em>
\nScesny said police had received another complaint regarding the signs from a different veteran earlier in the day.<\/em>
\nI notice these clowns are usually from a younger generation and don ‘t understand the horror of the holocaust. [hrm…] \u00c2\u00a0I asked one of them how many people died on 9\/11…they knew. I asked them how many died at the hands of Hitler ..blank expression. I make a point of telling them they are a disgrace to our country and our Jewish community…and then move on. I can fully understand this man ‘s rage.<\/em>
\nsounds like some of the nutjobs that post on here. I’m looking right at you, Mr. first guy to post on every single article.<\/em>
\nWhen I see these little pr-cks, I prefer to make comments about the fact that they will never, ever have girlfriends.<\/em>
\nMore… and this is a common thought on these stories<\/a>.
\nIf this guy sets up a Paypal account for donations for his legal expenses, I’ll be the first one to kick in some $$.<\/em>
\nThis man has done what most of us have wanted to do for years, but our Yankee manners wouldn’t let us. Well done, sir.<\/em>
\nThe Larouchies have been around forever. Are they crazy? I dunno, the first ones I met were denouncing the British monarchy as the world’s greatest band of drug dealers. Cited the Boxer Rebellion and all. \u00c2\u00a0They were entertaining. \u00c2\u00a0I actually ran into some Trotskyites in the late seventies. I complimented them on their perseverance.<\/em>
\nI also had a chance to chat with a few english speaking members in Berlin as I was heading to class one morning. I was new to the city, looking for friends, maybe a little naieve and wondered if perhaps the Euro version of the Larouchies were a little more rational. Far from it it turned out, it was more baseless shouting and crowd bullying, thankfully I was on my bike and started to pull away only to have one of them block my path. Long story short, my ambitions to study sustainable architecture was met with accusations and shouting of Al Gore’s massive global warming conspiracy design to bring a new world order. So I should just drop out, come to one of their “parties” and see what their world was like. No thank you, I’ve heard stories of the group bullying they employ to breakdown new recruits and indoctrinate them to the movement. Scary stuff from these people.<\/em>
\nSpinorama gives just a few personal interactions with the Larouchies, experiences that mirror my own and pretty much everyone I’ve ever talked with about them. They are nasty, mean conspiracy nuts who take over sidewalks and are much more aggressive than “Save the Whales” or “Amnesty International” kids, and a lot angrier.<\/em>
\nOn September 11, 2001, at about 11:30am, a LaRouchie with a table set up outside the entrance of a T stop engaged me in a some anti-government conversation and was asking me to consider supporting LaRouche. I don’t remember what exactly was his position, but I remember that they were asinine and offensive obnoxious for any day of the year.<\/em>
\nI then asked, “Haven’t you heard about all those people in the Twin Towers?” And this is in those first few hours where the nation’s best guess of people killed were erroneously numbered 10,000 people and above. He replied that he was aware of the situation and\u00c2\u00a0the people in the towers got what they deserved and it was all the more reason to rally against the government. \u00c2\u00a0[hrm.]<\/em>
\nI was left stunned and speechless. I walked away shaking in fury. I got one of those adrenaline rushes that make you feel like you got punched in the nose. It was the single most disgusting thing I have ever heard in person.<\/em>
\nTo this day I regret not flipping over his table and causing a scene, even if it was his goal to provoke people. What a human piece of shit.
\n<\/em>He apparently swindled my friends Grandma out of hundreds of thousands of dollars when he was running for office. They are still shaking their heads at that one years later.
\n<\/em>One of these LaRouchies sneaked into a medium-sized classroom and covered the desks with their silly booklets. It was an undergrad Constitutional Law class on the First Amendment, and it turned into an exam question, ie: free speech vs. public figure vs. libel. All while we spent half the semester laughing at “Dick Cheney, Child of Satan IV.” (Apparently, there were 3 other Children of Satan in our government.) \u00c2\u00a0<\/em>We kind of found it amusing that these meth-mouthed morons were trying to educate us.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline Gibsonville<\/a>
\nScialdone and another volunteer were on The Town Green in the center of Gibsonville. She said they were initially situated on a public walkway in front of the town\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s post office, but moved to The Town Green after a police officer suggested they might be more visible there. […]<\/em>
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re sort of like missionaries,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d she said.<\/em>
\nA sign Scialdone carried read: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Stop World War III. Impeach Obama.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em>
\nThe sign drew a fair amount of attention \u00e2\u20ac\u201c prompting numerous motorists to toot their horns and wave, though most seemed to have no idea why Scialdone was there.<\/em>
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d be nice to do, but I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t see it happening,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d one woman who\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d rolled down her window shouted as she passed, apparently referring to Obama\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s impeachment.<\/em>
\nTo those who approached for more information, Scialdone didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t hold back.<\/em>
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153This guy is a monster who\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s destroying the country,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d she said to one couple, referring to Obama.<\/em><\/p>\n

Lyndon LaRouche: Perennial failed Presidential candidate; convicted felon; conspiracy theorist.<\/em>
\nWhat’s not to like?<\/em>
\nNO! but I would help any idiot associated with Lyndon LaRouche find the quickest way to the loon bin and a 500 miiligram dose of thorazine to calm them down.
\n<\/em>Puzzling: \u00c2\u00a0Margaret Silver Fairchild<\/a>?<\/p>\n

Dateline\u00c2\u00a0Waxahachie
\n<\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Third is we want to rid the Federal Reserve of $30 trillion in debt by creating jobs. If we don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t have that we don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t have a future,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Fourth is that we will create jobs like John F. Kennedy and Roosevelt through industry, like when Roosevelt created jobs with his program to build reservoirs in Texas. That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s why we have all the water we do now.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d
\n<\/em>Point:<\/strong> \u00c2\u00a0Holtzclaw noted that the LaRouche PAC was not like the Tea Party movement, because they are not anti-government, they are for \u00e2\u20ac\u0153the right role of government.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d
\n<\/em>Counterpoint<\/strong>: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Tea Party Command Center posting<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0s<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0Fits right there with the “Not Eligible” Birther icon on the right.
\nHe and Overton said they would be moving on to another city by Tuesday in hopes of rallying more members for their cause. \u00c2\u00a0(Missionaries are they…)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

Dateline Bath, Pennsylvania<\/a>
\nToday, driving thru this small town of Bath, Pa. I notice this stand set up with big signs saying, “Dump Obama”. I beeped on my way bye and gave’em thumbs up. I saw a few guys on the sidewalk talking to the two guys behind it. I went on my way, but when I returned I saw a small mob of people so I pulled over and walked down the sidewalk. The literature that they were handing out was saying that they have 6 concrete charges against Obama which are all grounds for impeachment. They were asking people to donate and sign a partition. I didn’t have any money with me but I told him I’d sign the thing altho’ I seriously doubt if anyone would ever throw his ass out. When I was leaving I looked over at this guy getting these signatures and donations. This guy had a fist full of money, I can only assume this was from people that donated thru the day. This was of money in his hand was easily three (3) inches thick. Has anyone ever heard of: LAROUCHEPAC. Com Is this group legit? I was thinking SCAM until I saw all those people giving money. I googled it and they show a film about. The results of a Nuclear war.<\/em>
\nWas’nt Larouche a whacko Pres candidate a few years ago?? Name rings a bell.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Dateline Santee<\/a>
\nSanteeans young and old stopped by the booth to discuss politics and many car horns honked as they drove by, along with a fair number of disapproving glances from passing cars. The booth offered no tangible way to impeach Obama- no petition to sign or anything like that, but passers by could sign up to financially support LaRouchePAC.
\nIdeas promoted by the PAC range from ousting Obama for colluding with Al Queda in Syria and Libya, “How Andrew Jackson destroyed the United States,” to advocating the development of major economic\u00c2\u00a0infrastructure projects.<\/em><\/p>\n

if you’re looking for cults, there they are..right alongside the worldwide church of whatever the hell it is the koreans are exporting to us..<\/em>
\nNothing in today’s society surprises me any more as we have more whack-jobs than we do sane individuals; however, I appreciate and treasure that we still have liberty to express those same beliefs, no matter whether we agree with them or not, thanks to our men and women in the military who continue to defend this same freedom all of America enjoys.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline Somewhere<\/a>
\nAlmost refreshingly crazy.
\nThis theory came at me unexpectedly yesterday. A women had a card table spread with literature in front of my bank. She asked if I wanted to help put Obama in Jail. To the question, “why?” she answered “because he supports al-Qaeda.<\/em><\/p>\n

The continual drain<\/a>
\nGood old Lyndon — batspit crazy as he ever was.<\/em>
\none time in 3004 i went to the grocery store in the dead of winter, during primary season. there where two guys, in t-shirts, no jackets, passing out brochures for larouche. they were accosting everyone coming out of the store. scary guys.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dateline Hackettown<\/a>:
\nTwo representatives from LaRouche Political Action Committee have arranged a tableau in front of the post office on Grand Avenue here, encouraging passing pedestrians and motorists to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153impeach Obama.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em>
\nThe action comes on the heels of last night\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s fiscal cliff deal, though the timing is just a coincidence, said Dana Carsrud from LaRouche<\/em>. [hrm. \u00c2\u00a0“from Larouche”][…]
\nPoint: \u00c2\u00a0A motorist passing the group honks in apparent support.<\/em>
\nCounterpoint: \u00c2\u00a0\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Why waste your time?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d asks another woman who recommends they spend their time “cleaning up around the community.”
\n<\/em>Sarcasm: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0bunch of rational people, those LaRouchies are<\/em><\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER THREE: \u00c2\u00a0RACHEL BROWN COMES OUT AGAINST JOHN KERRY for Secretary of State.
\n<\/strong>Apparently this item<\/a> appeared at lpac’s website momentarily, then was erased. \u00c2\u00a0Oh how times change, from the year 2004 when a Larouchie told me they were supporting John Kerry for the Presidency because “we need to take over the Democratic Party!” \u00c2\u00a0Now he’s a traitor. \u00c2\u00a0Curiously, even the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth have punted this cause.<\/p>\n

\u00c2\u00a0<\/em>ITEM NUMBER FOUR: \u00c2\u00a0Bill Murray is Franklin Roosevelt<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00c2\u00a0<\/em>Larouche’s favorite American President, since roughly 1983. \u00c2\u00a0Bill Murry stars in a new movie, it’s getting some positive reviews<\/a> (and I note a few negative reviews). \u00c2\u00a0A note about the times of Roosevelt…<\/p>\n

Hyde Park on Hudson\u00c2\u00a0dramatizes the\u00c2\u00a0weekend\u00c2\u00a0the Roosevelts spent with King George VI and Queen Consort Elizabeth at FDR’s estate in Hyde Park, NY, in 1939. The film also focuses on the president’s intimate relationship with his aide\u00c2\u00a0Margaret Suckley, played by Laura Linney. It is a slight but endearing little picture, with a comic grace and some ace digital photography.<\/em><\/p>\n

An interesting story. \u00c2\u00a0Roosevelt was edging a basically isolationist America into \u00c2\u00a0US into a war footing. \u00c2\u00a0 You’ll understand he didn’t particularly trust the British Prime Minister, Chamberlain. \u00c2\u00a0The British Royalty visit was a bit of a propaganda play. \u00c2\u00a0Make the Royal Family sympathetic and all that…<\/p>\n

Jump to the larouchian factnet posting:
\n\u00c2\u00a0Contrary to what many anti Larouchers think ( most sincerely , i;m sure) the British Monarchy is no joke.\u00c2\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

And Roosevelt used what ceremonial power they had to his advantage…<\/p>\n

A bit of demented humor off of a tragedy, with implications on shock jock dj humor<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0—
\nShe didn’t kill herself….she was murdered! By the Queen! In the foyer, with the scepter.<\/em>
\nFenris: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0….Lyndon LaRouche? Is that you??<\/em>
\nNo, it’s Colonel Mustard\u00c2\u00a0pretending\u00c2\u00a0to be Lyndon LaRouche.<\/em><\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER FIVE: \u00c2\u00a0LINKY INSULTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

Trying to be comprehensive. \u00c2\u00a0This is how people discuss the Larouchies, when they bother to…
\nPosted to Wonkette:\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0junior high,\u00c2\u00a0one\u00c2\u00a0of\u00c2\u00a0my classmates had parents\u00c2\u00a0who\u00c2\u00a0were Larouchies.\u00c2\u00a0They’d set up\u00c2\u00a0atable\u00c2\u00a0on the\u00c2\u00a0sidewalk\u00c2\u00a0in\u00c2\u00a0front\u00c2\u00a0of the\u00c2\u00a0post office\u00c2\u00a0and\u00c2\u00a0try\u00c2\u00a0to\u00c2\u00a0hand out literature\u00c2\u00a0andtalk\u00c2\u00a0to\u00c2\u00a0people.\u00c2\u00a0Worst\u00c2\u00a0of\u00c2\u00a0all,\u00c2\u00a0they’d make their daughter stand\u00c2\u00a0there with them<\/em><\/p>\n

never heard of Lyndon\u00c2\u00a0LaRouchebut his organisation seems to be full of fruitcakes.
\n<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Post revolutionary Whigs or Jacksonian Whigs?\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0…\u00c2\u00a0Tea Party is nothing but neo-libertarians. Linden Larouche with a PR agency<\/a>.
\n<\/em>.<\/em>..\u00c2\u00a0N<\/a>ames continue… \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0In a story that was exposed by a Dutch Security Intelligence insider Frits\u00c2\u00a0Hoekstra who graced for years the pages of such publications as the Larouche Executive Intelligence Review,though the left plays catch u,\u00c2\u00a0one has to ask why even though the Cold War seems to have ended,<\/em><\/p>\n

From Commentary Magazine: \u00c2\u00a0Taraf<\/em><\/a>, often described as a liberal, pro-democracy paper, behaved as a Turkish version of Lyndon LaRouche\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s\u00c2\u00a0Executive Intelligence Review<\/em>, breathlessly reporting stories regarding fantastic conspiracies and alleged plots against elected officials.
\nA story on the Independence Party … tags Lenora Fulani as \u00c2\u00a0“a former associate of Lyndon Larouche<\/a>“, [hrm?<\/strong>] \u00c2\u00a0or…\u00c2\u00a0could be Larouche’s mob in mufti. \u00c2\u00a0Or…\u00c2\u00a0Fits the Obama re-election campaign to a T.
\n<\/em>Hey! \u00c2\u00a0Here’s Jackie Salit on Fox News! \u00c2\u00a0<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0 Different cults have different media ins, it appears.
\n<\/strong>
\nWhat this guy thinks of a larouche vide<\/a>o.<\/em>
\nTime for a general strike?<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0How to avoid Violent political\/social change, hard-line communists, terrorist-apologists, America-haters, kooks, crackpots,\u00c2\u00a0LaRouchies, and the like<\/em>
\nRon Paul fans having a problem with call for “Ron Paul 2016<\/a>“: \u00c2\u00a0Stop trying to tarnish Ron’s legacy and turn him into Lyndon\u00c2\u00a0LaRouche. Rand 2016. Daily Paul should change their name to Daily Pravda.<\/em>
\n\u00c2\u00a0The more of yoru comments I read, the more obvious it becomes that you have no idea what you’re talking about. I’ve heard more coherent-sounding bollocks from homeopaths,\u00c2\u00a0Larouchies\u00c2\u00a0and Pop<\/a>e<\/em>
\n\u00c2\u00a0Now THIS is larouche as insult done right!<\/a><\/em>
\nI\u00c2\u00a0s quite simply the wannabe Lyndon\u00c2\u00a0LaRouche\u00c2\u00a0of Social-Democracy.\u00c2\u00a0…<\/strong>\u00c2\u00a0play this game: DNZ is the Lyndon\u00c2\u00a0LaRouche\u00c2\u00a0of Social-Proletocracy<\/em><\/p>\n

The thread died on page 2 when you posted your batshit crazy Manchurian Candidate bullshit, you sour, twisted, ruined shitstain. Crawl up in your crazy cocoon and cry yourself to extinction before the bad men in the black helicopters come to get you.<\/a><\/em>
\nAt this point even the LaRouche people would reject you as unstable, and they took these guys<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

compared to Fred Phelps due to party registration<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0He’s a “Democrat”, but only in the sense that Lyndon LaRouche is.<\/p>\n

Note: won 30 plus once.
\nYeah, that’s why I mentioned LaRouche: he’s a professional candidate.. \u00c2\u00a0He raises “campaign” money to finance his whole life.<\/p>\n

Indeed<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0was originally Lyndon LaRouche’s roach that morphed\u00c2\u00a0into Mr. Potato head “Spudnick”, then rasterspace” &\u00c2\u00a0“tensegriboy” & is now an perverted \u00c2\u00a0brain-fossil on<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0[etc.]<\/p>\n

Carolers booted out of somewhere, lost link, not worth digging up:
\nSo they allow Carolers. That’s cool, kind of nice.
\nWhat happens when a local mosque decides that live “calls to prayer” are in order in all the T stations during certain holidays?
\nHow about Larouchies with a bullhorn? […]\u00c2\u00a0It won’t discern other religious group but one can say if this open the door to other religions (not\u00c2\u00a0Larouchies<\/em>, they can be discerned and disallowed as a political group), but we can worry about that if it really happens. [might be why they’re calling themselves\u00c2\u00a0missionaries?<\/strong>]<\/p>\n

play this game: DNZ is the Lyndon\u00c2\u00a0LaRouche<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0of Social-Proletocracy<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Point: \u00c2\u00a0FUSION! \u00c2\u00a0<\/a>
\nCounterpoint: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0In how many forums\/times do you have to post your video? Jee<\/a>z.<\/p>\n

I\u00c2\u00a0love seeing attacks on the integrity of Lyndon Larouche at a David Icke foru<\/a>m.
\nSame as how Carroll Quigley focuses on the Anglo-American but forgets conveniently his whore house Georgetown \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcmilitary fortress\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 University and the Jesuits. Just another Jesuit diversion to keep you from sniffing at the Roman power in plain sight. Just like Lyndon LaRouche promoting the wicked vile Roosevelt of the Opium smuggling connected click of The Worshipful Company of Apothecaries and how he was Knight of Malta connected vermin. The only true American Presidents at the end was Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln and of course U.S. President John F. Kennedy. Lyndon LaRouche of course has connections to both French Masonry and the Scottish Rite with his KKK connection.<\/em><\/p>\n

Friend and unfriend etiquette on facebook, what to do when someone posts something on Obama — Hitler<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0Is she a LaRouchie? \u00c2\u00a0No idea.\u00c2\u00a0 Her page says she “likes” Mitt Romney.\u00c2\u00a0 That’s all I know<\/em>.<\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER SIX: \u00c2\u00a0ONLINE MISSIONARY WOR<\/strong>K, and other media appearances:
\nCold Reality News, linking to larouche irish brigade<\/a>.
\nDiscussing Beatle-Mania<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0Also, I don’t want to belabor a point, just to get the real deal out there, the Tavistock rumour has been on the web for a decade, first published by some troll, or POSSIBLY it came from the LaRouche people, and anything affiliated with this guy’s organization is VERY dodgy.<\/em><\/p>\n

Granny D links to Stop Obama No<\/a>w.
\nHarley Schlanger in Austria … and the Mayans are at work st<\/a>ill.
\nInterviewed by the SGT Report for the Gold \/ Silver Paulite<\/a>s. \u00c2\u00a0 Marked as a “Truth Teller”
\nAND posting at Occupy Wall Street<\/a>.
\nThe state of the Occupy Wall Street forum. \u00c2\u00a0Can you say, “Bull Shit?”\u00c2\u00a0jeeezzaazz! Lyndon LaRouche lives!
\n<\/a>Hitting the Occupy circuit, and the comment<\/a>: \u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0Is this what Occupy has come to? Blaming video games for violence? \u00c2\u00a0If Occupy believes that, I am out.<\/a><\/p>\n

David Icke! \u00c2\u00a0plenty more on Anthony Blunt written about in\u00c2\u00a0larouche<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0publications<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Jeffrey Steinberg of EIR on Russia T<\/a>V.
\nSteinberg blames it on Marijuana Legalization efforts on Press T<\/a>V.<\/p>\n

Sudan Vision Dail<\/a>y: \u00c2\u00a0US weekly\u00c2\u00a0Executive Intelligence Review<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0said U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice is not fit for public office due to her hostile stand against Africa<\/p>\n

The Lyndon LaRouche-ites (remember them? the Queen is a drug pusher) had a similar line for a while, under the heading of “Verdi pitch”. I’d need a *lot* of convincing.<\/a><\/p>\n

ITEM NUMBER SEVEN: \u00c2\u00a0Who COVERed the big WALTER JONES PRESSER?<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Walter Jones Press Conference attended by World Net Daily and Executive Intelligence Review<\/a>.
\nRon Paul fans annoyed:\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Why does only larouche cover this<\/a>?
\nAlaska Citizens Militia<\/a>.<\/p>\n

2012 Election Results, and on into 2013!
\n<\/strong>Perry Clark …\u00c2\u00a0Won 58.58% (+17.17%)<\/a>.
\nKesha Rogers … Lost 31.96% (-32.07%) <\/a>.
\nWon 50.71% (+1.42%).
\nDiane Sare … Lost 10.36% (-44.58%)<\/a>.
\nDave Christie … Lost 3.07% (-58.09%)<\/a>.
\nBill Roberts … \u00c2\u00a0Lost 41.13% (-17.74%)<\/a>.
\nSummer Shields …\u00c2\u00a0Lost 1.80% (-73.08%)<\/a>.
\nBob Lauten. …\u00c2\u00a0Lost 1.16% (-48.12%)<\/a><\/p>\n

And now Diane Sare is running for Governor. \u00c2\u00a0Is part of today’s “New Presidency” series, Ed Hamler sat down with\u00c2\u00a0Diane Sare, for an interview discussing her region’s role in building NAWAPA…
\n<\/em>If it’s the Democratic nomination she’s seeking, she’s these \u00c2\u00a0these two candidates<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0in speculation. \u00c2\u00a0Otherwise, an Independent bid (Is that where the Larouchies are going?) might get her that Reform Party endorser and… maybe<\/p>\n

Finally… keeping the long view in check for the Org:
\nAn observation that offers hope for Team Larouche<\/a>:\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Being New World, I don’t know much about that Queen of England Conspiracy type stuff except from having read a handout from Lyndon Larouche’s people once<\/em>… […]\u00c2\u00a0Fringe theories sometimes make their way to the mainstream or are proven correct\u00c2\u00a0centuries later<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ITEM NUMBER ONE:THE BIG WASHINGTON TIMES INTERVIEW Joseph F Cotto. \u00c2\u00a0The name rings a bell. \u00c2\u00a0Okay, I remember reading a piece on the Presidential campaign of Rocky Anderson. \u00c2\u00a0Go through the “recent” archives here. \u00c2\u00a0Larouche is just moving a bit more into the fringes of an interviewer looking away from the Beltway for political interviews. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-larouche-challenge","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10825"}],"version-history":[{"count":46,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10825\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10981,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10825\/revisions\/10981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}