{"id":1057,"date":"2004-07-17T22:24:28","date_gmt":"2004-07-18T05:24:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/?p=1057"},"modified":"2004-07-17T22:24:28","modified_gmt":"2004-07-18T05:24:28","slug":"kansas-voting-record","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/2004\/07\/17\/kansas-voting-record\/","title":{"rendered":"Kansas Voting Record"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name=\"002501\"><\/a>This query was placed in the Reason Magazine blog&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Regarding Tom Frank&#8217;s book <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/0805073396\/qid=1090126388\/sr=2-1\/ref=sr_2_1\/102-0327649-9568174\">What&#8217;s the Matter with Kansas<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>If what&#8217;s wrong with Kansas is that they elect Right-leaning Republicans&#8230; when was anything <i>right<\/i> with Kansas?<\/p>\n<p>2000:<br \/>\nBush: 58.04% 6<br \/>\nGore:  37.24%<br \/>\n1996<br \/>\nDole      54.29%<br \/>\nClinton  36.08%<br \/>\n1992<br \/>\nBush     38.88%<br \/>\nClinton  33.74%<br \/>\n1988<br \/>\nBush      55.79%<br \/>\nDukakis  42.56%<br \/>\n1984<br \/>\nReagan  66.27%<br \/>\nMondale 32.60%<br \/>\n1980<br \/>\nReagan  57.85%<br \/>\nCarter    33.29%<br \/>\n1976<br \/>\nFord      52.49%<br \/>\nCarter   44.94%<br \/>\n1972<br \/>\nNixon        67.66%<br \/>\nMcGovern  29.50%<br \/>\n1968<br \/>\nNixon        54.84%<br \/>\nHumphrey 34.72%<br \/>\n1964<br \/>\nJohnson     54.09%<br \/>\nGoldwater   45.06%<br \/>\n1960<br \/>\nNixon         60.45%<br \/>\nKennedy     39.10%<br \/>\n1956<br \/>\nEisenhower   65.44%<br \/>\nStevenson     34.21%<br \/>\n1952<br \/>\nEisenhower 68.77%<br \/>\nStevenson  30.50%<br \/>\n1948<br \/>\nDewey   53.63%<br \/>\nTruman  44.61%<br \/>\n1944<br \/>\nDewey     60.25%<br \/>\nRoosevelt 39.18%<br \/>\n1940<br \/>\nWillkie       56.86%<br \/>\nRoosevelt   42.40%<br \/>\n1936<br \/>\nRoosevelt   53.67%<br \/>\nLandon       45.95%<br \/>\n1932<br \/>\nRoosevelt   53.56%<br \/>\nHoover       44.13%<br \/>\n1928<br \/>\nHoover        72.02%<br \/>\nSmith          27.06%<br \/>\n1924<br \/>\nCoolidge      61.54%<br \/>\nDavis           23.60%<br \/>\n1920<br \/>\nHarding         64.75%<br \/>\nCox               32.52%<br \/>\n1916<br \/>\nWilson         49.95%<br \/>\nHughes        44.09%<br \/>\n1912<br \/>\nWilson        39.30%<br \/>\nRoosevelt    32.88%<br \/>\n1908<br \/>\nTaft            52.46%<br \/>\nBryan         42.88%<br \/>\n1904<br \/>\nRoosevelt   64.81%<br \/>\nParker        26.23%<br \/>\n1900<br \/>\nMcKinley     52.56%<br \/>\nBryan         45.96%<br \/>\n1896<br \/>\nBryan         51.32%<br \/>\nMcKinley      47.63% <\/p>\n<p>You have to go back to 1896 through 1912 to see the more clearly &#8220;progressive&#8221; candidate garner the Kansas vote noticably above the national average (and even that is befuddled by the 1900 election of McKinley. owned by more corporate interests than just about any president in American history.)  Other than that, whatever&#8217;s wrong with Kansas has been wrong before the Cultural Shifts of the 60s and the subsequent backlash, and was wrong with Kansas as Roosevelt introduced his New Deal Reforms (in what is the largest Electoral Landslide in US History*, Roosevelt really only squeaked by Landon in 1936.)<\/p>\n<p>Looking at the late nineteenth century voting record, through the post Lincoln era that historians have tended to think of as stacked with unimpressive presidents, I&#8217;m struck by how often a third party pretty well threw the election either to the Democratic and Republican Party in Kansas, but here it seems to be a 50-50 state.<\/p>\n<p>*for the nay-sayers who&#8217;d look at Reagan&#8217;s 49 state victory over Mondale as the pinacle of Presidential Landslides:  Reagan: 525 ev,  97.58% Mondale: 13  ev, 2.42% &#8230; Roosevelt: 523 ev 98.49% ; Landon:  8 ev  1.51%.  Landon won Maine and Vermont.  Now, here&#8217;s a question: What&#8217;s Right With Vermont?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This query was placed in the Reason Magazine blog&#8230; Regarding Tom Frank&#8217;s book What&#8217;s the Matter with Kansas: If what&#8217;s wrong with Kansas is that they elect Right-leaning Republicans&#8230; when was anything right with Kansas? 2000: Bush: 58.04% 6 Gore: 37.24% 1996 Dole 54.29% Clinton 36.08% 1992 Bush 38.88% Clinton 33.74% 1988 Bush 55.79% Dukakis [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history-regurgitates-forward"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1057"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1057\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.struat.com\/election\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}