Other wikipedia sockpuppet deletions this week — a “Dern Tootin“, who wanted to get the bolded part of this into the “Citizens Electoral Council” entry:
The CEC also includes the ”’Australian LaRouche Youth Movement (ALYM)”’, the Australian branch of the International LaRouche Youth Movement.  It was founded in August 2002, and focusses on the economic thought of Lyndon LaRouche as well as what they regard as Australia’s republican tradition, including figures such as John Curtin, King O’Malley, and John Dunmore Lang.
Do the estates of John Curtin, King O’Malley, and John Dunmore Lang object?

(from factnet):  PS. Since I’m posting, I probably should check the election results from this weekend. The CEC got 0.07% of the lower house vote (that’s a swing of -0.15%) and 0.13% in the senate (swing of +0.06%). An unsuprisingly pathetic result, given that this election is significant for it’s swing away from the “major” parties, and given that the financial crisis should have been a dream come true for an organisation who’s been saying “the economic sky is falling!” for so long.Once the numbers are finalised I might look a bit closer (and laugh a bit more) at their election performance now and in the past, if anyone is at all interested.

Captain Boycott edited Kit Coleman in August 2009, remained dormant for a year, then re-emerged with “previous wording implies that the views are universally held, which I don’t believe the case.”  Universal enough, I guess.

We’re galloping straight forward to the Massachusetts primary Day.  Rachel Brown versus Barney Frank.  The Big Mystery that surrounds the Rachel Brown for Congress Campaign is … whatever happened to the One Year Anniversary “Weenie Roast”?  It disappeared off the schedule before the day it would be held, and — even though it was mentioned on the website “wonkette.com”, increasing the chance of “Citizen’s Journalism” of blogging or flickr pointing a camera to bear witness — never showed up again.  Is it buried in one of the LPAC campaign reports?  Or do things like this come into the picture?

The Rachel Brown for Congress campaign asked selectmen to allow a political rally on the town green, but selectmen were hesitant to allow a political rally least it open the green up to other, less suitable, requests.

“There’s a big difference between letting the COA or the Boy Scouts use it and letting a political campaign use the green,” Selectman Kim Roy said. “It opens us up to all kinds of distasteful things.”
Chariman Troy Garron worried that saying no would open up the town to a First Amendment lawsuit, but hesitated to say yes because he agreed with Roy.

Other news from the Rachel Brown for Congress Campaign — she has challenged Barney Frank to a debate.   Eh. As we can see from Barney Frank’s not accepting a debate, he is “chicken” or “ducking” the debate.  And now here I turn to advising the Rachel Brown Campaign on campaign tactics.  Turn to the classic itemes of political theater, tied and true.  Have someone in a chicken costume and someone in a duck costume chasing after Barney Frank.
WITH A HITLER MUSTCHE!!!
Damned it, I should bill them for Political Consultant fees.”
It should be noted that had Larouche been invited to any of the presidential debates, he would surely have won and gone on to become President.  Eight times.  In perpetuality.  As it were, we’re stuck with a hypothetical vice presidential slot:

I’d love to see a RP/LL successful ticket, but I don’t think Lyndon has recovered enough political clout yet.

The campaign, as always, continues:

Join the Rachel Brown campaign for classical concerts of a complete choral work by J.S. Bach (Jesu Meine Freude) and American Patriotic Songs. Let’s defeat that moral degenerate Barney Frank on Sept 14th, and bring beauty and optimism back into politics.

Point / Counterpoint!

This time around, Frank has a completely irrelevant primary challenger, Rachel Brown  whom he will utterly defeat.

Curious

Why wasn’t this titled
“One on One with Democrat Crazy Woman Rachel LaRouche Brown”
I’m confused,there is no thought forming opinion cleverly placed in this report.
Oh, you’re not a cheap,petty,hardcore ideologue,partisan hack liberal.
The two “one on one”s are synonymous?

We turn now to the Kesha Rogers for Congress camapgin.  Rogers has added “NASA” to the NAWAPA formulation, and is running with “NAWPA + NASA = VICTORY!”  Or, she should be.
Okay, nothing’s happening with her campaign.  Let’s turn to the Post Office Campaign.
Mound, Minnesota!

“That is what Hitler and Obama have in common, they believe in killing what they call the end of life years,” a woman seated by the poster told WCCO, before hurling epithets at the camera operator. “You are full of lies and treason. You are the reason we are at war, you are the reason we are bankrupt and the reason Obama is president,” the unidentified woman shouted.
See too!

When further questioned by WCCO-TV, the couple working the booth then called the police and became combative, yelling obscenities at the camera.
“You are full of lies and treason. You are the reason we are at war, you are the reason we are bankrupt and the reason Obama is president,” the unidentified woman shouted. [...]
Nick Johnson, a college student from Mound, stopped by the booth to disagree. [...]Rick Lenkki of Mound, was passing by and refused to accept the literature.
“I don’t care for Obama either, but the Nazi symbolism is overblown, too far,” said Rick Lenkki.

And over the Rust-belt Tour!

Billington said the group been traveling all over Pennsylvania and New Jersey with their message. He said they go to post offices because it’s a “good place to talk to people.”

See too in the comments:

Sign the petition and get a free snack.

There’s chaos going on in Alaska, but I haven’t had a time to focus in on it.  Watch my comments for a linking and reporting.

On to the Summer Shields Campaign:
where he redefines his campaign as the NAWAPA candidate, and also a town hall meeting with Basement leader, Sky Shields. AND

In San Francisco, rallies with a 30-foot-by-8-foot banner (one might say it is also bigger than Texas!) are causing eyes to bug, tempers to flare, and excitement to flow. The head of an engineering department at a local campus said he wants to be part of an organizing committee for NAWAPA, and we are activating decades’ old LaRouche networks at the area’s scientific labs, who are enthused about NAWAPA.

Don’t discount Rachel Brown yet!

“You’re all talking about a Stevenson victory this second time around. Ah but there is one thing that can reelect Thompson. As you know, Lyndon Larouche has a field of candidates running in the Democratic party against Stevenson’s slate. If some of those candidates were to get through—particularly the candidate for lieutenant governor, Mark Fairchild—Stevenson would be in a terrible bind. He would have a choice of either running with a decided nut for lieutenant governor…someone who says that the Queen of England is engaged in a lesbian love affair with Golda Meir, the prime minister of Israel…or having to leave the Democratic party and run as a third party candidate which would surely cause him to lose to Thompson.”

We all sat transfixed at the theory but were highly skeptical.. Most of the supposedly alert media was reporting that Stevenson’s choice for lieutenant governor, State Rep. George Sangmeister of Frankfort was unopposed. He was a fine lawmaker and his name was well-known to Illinois Democrats. Similarly, Stevenson’s choice for secretary of state was Aurelia Pucinski, the daughter of Roman Pucinski a longtime congressman and alderman and a leader in the Polish community. We dismissed Phil’s analysis as fatuous.

Or, you know.  Do.

This is Gerald Pechenuk; I was the Campagign Manager for the LaRouche Democratic Candidates in the 1980′s and 1990′s.
Phil impressed me as a wise person in the times I heard him speak in various settings, so your report on his forecast of victories by LaRouche candidates certainly shows he had his ears to the ground, and detect a pulse that others, such as David Axelrod, Stevenson’s Campaign Manager at that time, could NOT “SEE,” or “HEAR!”
One irony to be noted in light of a recent trial of an impeached Governor.
Suppose, let’s just suppose for a minute, Adlai, who is still alive and kicking, could add to this picture, suppose Adlai had taken the advice of Sen. Alan Dixon, and Cook County Democratic Chairman Ed Vrodolyak and STAYED ON THE TICKET of the Democratic Party in 1986. HE WOULD HAVE BEEN ELECTED GOVERNOR!!!! (I know some would disagree with that, but I KNOW EXACTLY HOW HE WOULD HAVE ELECTED).
Then Jim Edgar, and George Ryan, and Rod Blagojevich WOULD NEVER HAVE BECOME Governors of Illinois!!!!
And, probably most consequential of all, Adlai Stevenson would have been the Democratic Nominee for US PRESIDENT in 1988 or 1992, and probably gone on to become PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!!!!!

So, the threats that were delivered to Adlai to drop off, by Sen. Paul Simon, among others, (again Adlai could be asked to fill in more of the picture here) changed the course of US and World History.

I wonder if Phil Krone can ask a few people from his present vantage point about that!!!!
Or, if not president, Adlai Stevenson III would have become a laughingstock.

Solving the question of where the org gets its money — apparently from the Aerospace Industry and from a Kathy Magraw.  The money goes to… well, make a chart and see if it flows right.
$3,142,142 was paid to LaRouche Youth. This is not child support (LaRouche is said to have a rather comprehensive prescriptive abortion program) – it’s the cadre of young LaRouche followers, known as LaRouchies, who are instructed and who instruct in the teachings of LaRouche. The LaRouche Youth group has been compared to a cult. Photos show that members of the group wear pajamas in public.
Maybe the can hit Ed Asner up again?  Disatisfaction is growing, and for all we know he might be a late Hillary supporter:
He demanded I give them $10. I explained to him that I was a college student (probably a mistake based on what I read today online after this happened!) and that I couldn’t give much. I eventually gave him $2 just to shut him up. He also took my name, address, and e-mail (I refused to give out my phone number) and gave me a bunch of bogus literature–this old issue of a Scientific American wannabe magazine and these flyers he suggested I give to my local congressman (whom I know, and I know he would dismiss them as being garbage–Britain is our enemy and needs to be wiped out?!? Yeah right, and if that’s true, Al Gore may as well be a supporter of dino oil over green alternatives). The dude told me to invite everyone to come so he could raise $1000.
I bolted from that place as soon as I could. I lost $2, but it’s better than losing $10. Then I got home and looked up LaRouche, whose name was on some of these flyers. The more I read the less I wanted to know. I wrote to Mr. King, who runs a site detailing the evilness of these activities, to get some answers about what to do from here.
Mr. King told me not to panic and that the worst they’d probably do is call. Considering I never gave them my phone number, this seems likely. Junk mail doesn’t bother me, as it just goes in the recycling bin, and junk e-mail is even easier to filter. However, I’m still concerned about these guys–what if they come to my door or something?

Interesting…

The only really controversial bunch was a handful of people waving signs for the loony activist Lyndon LaRouche. I’m loathe to even show them, because they represent no actual constituency or ideology; their biggest interest is in drawing Hitler mustaches on people and handing out leaflets filled with conspiracy theories. They can be reliably expected to show up to any rally held for whatever reason in Seattle. But for the sake of completeness…

According to the Lloyd Dangle cartoon, the “Vocational Right” is hiring.

Chester A Arthur with a Hitler mustache.  Get on it now!

Some observations.  Summer Sheilds had a total of one media mention this week.  This is one more than Kesha Rogers.  Meanwhile, Rachel Brown Mania is sweeping — and we should note that she’s changed her middle name.

The new Ipsofacto poll has come out.  Rachel Brown is now heading straight on a collision course with destiny — bolting ahead to a 60 to 40 lead over Barney Frank.  Reports are, some are saying, that Bareny Frank is already working on his concession speech, and will shortly make it available on the website www.concessionspeechtothatladyIreferredtoasadiningroomtable.com.  Barney Frank will then follow the career trajectory of Jerry Vorhiss, who spent his life after his 1946 Congressional loss to Richard Nixon writing anti-Nixon books, and write periodic books blasting dining room tables.

The primary contest now just a mere formality, attention turns to Rachel Brown’s general election campaign against Republican Joel Pollack (No… he’s running in Illinois.).– or maybe Sean Hannity favorite Sean Bielet.  Reports are, some are saying, that the Republican campaigns are keeping a close eye on the upcoming Weenie Roost, which as of the 19th has mysteriously disappeared from the Rachel Brown campaign website listing of upcoming events.  They ready themselves to file a frivolous complaint to the FEC, should the hot dogs not properly be itemized in the filing report.

Interesting to note as we approach the one year anniversary of the speech that propelled Rachel Brown’s candidacy, from the book “That’s Not an Angry Mob, that’s My Mom”:
Chief among the trash talkers is Congressman Barney Frank.  During the health care debate he “quipped” (a word the press uses for remarks that are supposed to be jokes but aren’t actually funny) that being among tea party protesters was “like being trapped in a furniture warehouse.”  This echoed an insult he hurled at a constituent during a townhall meeting.  “Trying to have a conversation with you would be like trying to argue with a dining room table.”
Granted, the target of that second insult was a Lyndon Larouche kook, but she was a citizen.  Why not just tell her, “I disagree with you” and politely move on to a more sane questioner. — Michael Graham, p 103
The book also contains a prominently placed blurb from Glenn Beck, who recently promised that after his radio tv and other media gigs go away, he will be keeping up the fight by yelling jeremiads against Woodrow Wilson to passing cars.

Wait.  Is this person calling it all a scam?

If Rachel Brown is as wily as I expect she is (or maybe I’m just cynical from having seen too much precedent), she’s not looking to win — but to run a controversial campaign that titillates national hard-right groups into sending their carpetbagging money, in their dream of unseating Barney Frank. Add a shrewd accountant, and there’s potential to build up some nice benefits even as the campaign loses.Follow the money. To me, this looks like the Westboro Baptist Church (of Kansas) — causing controversy and offense for profit.  [...]
Now that I’ve been to the web site, I take it all back. Rachel Brown is a Lyndon LaRouche supporter, described (I think accurately) as ‘one of the strangest political groups in American history’.I got as far as Rachel rambling on in a video on her site about mining sources of Helium(3) on the moon that can be used as a power source for fusion nuclear reactors, and quantizing light waves …. I’m done.

He might be glad to hear that:

Meanwhile, a group has has been formed to oppose Brown and her tactics.  I believe they’ve registered under the name Everyone.

Meantime, reports are — some are saying — that trouble is brewing with the Summer Shields write-in campaign.  It comes from a rumored break of support from radio commentator Michael Savage.  It has not gone unnoticed that Mr. Savage has failed to mention the Shields campaign for months now.  Speculation has arisen that Michael Savage has grown angry over the lack of mention in the campaign literature and campaign appearances of Mr. Shields.  The Ipsofacto exit poll for the Primary showed a full 63 percent of the zero votes that Summer Shields received in the primary contest against Nancy Pelosi came as a direct result of the Savage word of Endorsement, and the lack of reciprocality has angered the radio host.  Alternate speculations rest on the idea that perhaps Michael Savage has simply forgotten about the whole monolouge, and moved back to his generic spiel about how all ther residents of the city he lives in and loathes with a passion are a bunch of sausages.  One other possibility is that he disagrees with this Big Bad Government.

Armed with posters showing Democratic leaders with Hitler moustaches, two San Francisco women took to Red Bluff streets Wednesday, setting up just outside the Post Office on Walnut Street.
Campaigning on behalf of Lyndon LaRouche and LaRouche-backed congressional candidate Summer Shields, Tiffiny W and Joelle W, both of whom declined to give their last names, called for greater infrastructure spending and President Barack Obama’s impeachment.

Has gained one Republican supporter, you see at the end of the article.  We await to see if he takes the time to write his name on the ballot.

At the time of Kesha Rogers’s primary victory in March, I was informed that this is “huge”, huger than Scott Brown’s victory in Massachusetts — and watch out for that “other” Brown in Massachusetts.  Name dropping is kind of cool. Regionally, we turn to a neighboring state of Texas — where Oklahoma Democrats have nominated a Rogers of their own!
A man who runs for office nearly every election year but doesn’t formally campaign is the Democratic nominee to take on U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., this year.
Jim Rogers, a colorful perennial candidate, walked away the winner of the Democratic primary Tuesday with 65 percent of the vote over an Oklahoma City lawyer with an extensive career in business.
Name recognition and a well-known last name in Oklahoma fueled Rogers’ vote totals. The former college professor, who refuses to say where he taught, received 157,926 votes. His opponent, Mark Myles, who worked for IBM for 20 years before he went to law school, got 83,709 votes.
“Names matter,” said Ben Odom, a lawyer who is a longtime political consultant. “If you’re going to run for office in Oklahoma, you can’t have a better name than Rogers.”

Kesha Rogers has amped up her campaign rhetoric.

“Obama is clinically insane. The deep personality flaws of an obsessively self-obsessed President Obama, driving him to destroy the United States, are of the same failed quality as the Emperor Nero who destroyed Rome, and the Adolf Hitler who destroyed Germany (and much of Europe, too).
“Real patriots won’t sit around complaining about how Obama is going to murder the country; knowing his personality and intentions, they will act now, to force him out of office before the crime is committed. Anyone who doesn’t join my campaign, and demand that President Obama be impeached or resign now, has proven themselves to be just as insane, or as much of a traitor as Barack Obama is.”

Meh.  What does Jim Rogers have to say about this?

In other election news, Ron Paulite favorite Peter Schiff — who ran on a campaign “if elected, Doom; if not elected, Doom” — lost the Connecticut Republican Primary for Senate.  How is this relevant?  I don’t know — you tell me.

It could be worse.

Those who have tended to compromise themselves by doubting this forecast during the past weeks, should think back to Aug 15, 1971, just 39 years ago today. Remember how Lyndon LaRouche stood alone against the whole world then, with just a tiny handful of friends, and fully and precisely forecast that epoch-making point of inflection. Every known economist stood on the other side; not only did they mock LaRouche and deny his forecast,— they even proved that it was a scientific impossibility, or so they claimed. In those days, LaRouche had relatively almost none of the international influence that he enjoys today. But he not only stuck to his egregious forecast; he loudly and abrasively insisted upon it, fully confident in the true scientific method of human creativity, of which we know so much more today than we did then. [...]

This military-cum-scientific leadership role of ours has required successive scientific breakthroughs throughout, but even qualitatively much more so today, when LaRouche’s collaboration with “the Basement” has quite transformed this function.

Why is this tagged with “neo-con”?

The Jonathan Chait book “The Big Con”, makes a good mention of Lyndon Larouche — blames someone one degree of separation, maybe two, for Economic Disaster.  Jude Wanninski.  The upshot is that liberals called him a crackpot from back to the 1980s on, and conservatives called him a crackpot from the 1990s on, and one item of evidence presented is … y’know.  Was she the chief person behind that widely believed claim that Hussein never gassed the Kurds?  Somethings were annoying — sitting there in the “Now Saddam Hussein is not a nice guy, But” alongside some people who wouldn’t even accept that much..

This week’s banished sock puppet is  Hanë qen qimedredhur.  I have not translated it to know its meaning.  I assume it’s very clever.

Elections in Australia!  I’ll be sure to note the results.

I don’t get out to the Maple Valley Farmers Market as often as I should. Apparently, I missed the Lyndon LaRouche supporters (yes, he is still alive) displaying posters of President Obama sporting a Hitler mustache. [...]Fiery language that motivates your voting base is good if you are trying to wake up inactive members, but if you are a fringe group like the LaRouche political action committee, you just look like an angry lunatic. No one likes to hang out with angry lunatics; especially voters with moderate sensibilities, and the politicians that are trying to appeal to those voters.
What these folks have completely ignored is the simple art of persuasion.

Howie G chimes in to disagree, and offers the “If you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen” approach.

I think Godwin’s Law is pretty funny, actually. And I’ve seen it in web forums a million times!

You know who else thought that Godwin’s Law was funny? Hitler!

These people hate Lyndon LaRouche, because with meager resources LaRouche has been effective in exposing them and changing history. These are fundamental issues LaRouche has addressed that go back to ancient Greece and Plato and Socrates.

Then again, they have a way of not saying any of this.

Two supporters of Lyndon LaRouche offended passersby in Mukilteo on Monday when they campaigned for the LaRouche Political Action Committee using Obama-as-Hitler posters outside the Mukilteo post office.

The supporters refused to talk to the Beacon for this story.

More discussion on this vital issue follows here. Interesting item that marks the Youth against the Boomers:

(Note: I say “supporters” because I secretly think they hire young actors to hand out fliers… they are suspiciously younger and more hip than what I suspect the typical LaRouche supporter would appear.)

The “supporters” here are not young and hip but appear to be middle-aged working class guys, which adds to the sense of sadness about the whole thing.

This is another interesting bulletpoint discussion.

Those people were SO crazy. I was scared.
That’s nuts. I like your disclaimer at the bottom.
Yeah, stay away from them.
CRAZY!!!!

SO… The new “American System Rothschild” poll has been released.  It shows some surprising results.  First of all, the percentage of Americans who want to remove Barack Obama from the White House is either 75 percent or 85 percent.  Analysts suggest that this result shows that we are ripe for a Mass Strike if only enough people stationed themselves at enough post offices.  What percentage of the public would need to serve as these Shock Troops?  Analysts suggest that it might take the square root of one percent of the public in order to off-set the competing vibes sent by the Transcendental Meditation Movement.

According to the new polling, Kesha Rogers has surged up to within just six points of Pete Sessions, and is now down just 55 to 49 percent.  What accounts for this surge?  Analysts suspect it may be due to new tactics in trying to appeal to the Religious Right and district Christian Democrats by referencing the biblical precepts that undermine her proposed platform.

The Rachel Brown Congressional campaign hosted a very high level and unorthodox campaign event on Thursday, August 5th; a community classical concert aimed at getting under the skins and into the souls of the generally liberal community of Brookline and Newton, MA. Here, in the heart of Barney Frank’s supposed-strong-hold, more than thirty people came to the concert held at the Brookline Library. Some were just curious, and didn’t stay for very long, but others were absolutely concentrated and riveted by the combination of music and Rachel Brown’s speech on the optimism and creative spirit of the North American Water and Power Alliance (NAWAPA) infrastructure project.

It appears that the public is growing weary of wandering bands of singers.

The campaign’s organizing into the event was varied, and the attendees of the event reflected that. One key flank was the revival of an old Boston LaRouche Youth Movement tradition; singing on the trains! The campaign also took their music to the streets in the days leading into the event, and distributed leaflets advertising the event at various classical concerts in and around Boston. But, it was not so much the form of the organizing, but the fact that the members of the campaign challenged people to reject the degenerate culture of the Baby Boomer generation that keeps electing Barney Frank, acknowledging that, in a revolutionary period, people are open to recognizing how destructive the culture has been and are ready to embrace something much more beautiful. [...]

The Mainstream Media concurs with the description of curiosity seekers.

Indeed, their renditions of classical works from Robert Schumann and other composers were good enough to retain nearly 40 random and possibly duped attendees in the Brookline Main Library last week, at a Rachel-Brown-for-Congress event that at moments transcended ordinary fringe craziness.

At a glance, the show flyers that Brown operatives hung around Brookline appeared to be largely apolitical, with a portrait of Schumann filling the page and the words CLASSICAL CONCERT in big letters. But a closer look quickly revealed something much more insidious: in addition to honoring Schumann’s 200th birthday, the performance was tuned to metaphorically reject “the crazy Obama administration and moral degenerate ‘Bail-Out’ Barney Frank,” whom Brown is now challenging in Massachusetts’s fourth congressional district.

The content of Brown’s half-hour diatribe, which came between the first and second pieces on the program, was no surprise to anyone familiar with her former work. To be found in Brown’s trash heap of unintelligible talking points: “[Obama] would rather the nation collapse than admit he is wrong,” American citizens are no longer being trained to make discoveries, and the United States should tunnel underneath the Bering Strait so as to connect Russia and Alaska. Brown also spent much of her time touting a “future-oriented Mars colonization” proposal, which might answer the question Frank asked her back in Dartmouth: “On what planet do you spend most of your time?” (Watch the entire loony performance — with rant — above.)

The senior citizens and non-English-speakers in the crowd seemed untroubled by, if not unaware of, Brown’s comical indictment of her opponent and Obama. Everybody else just seemed relieved when she shut up and let her comrades bless the gallery with their gracefully executed classical selections. Two apparently well-off 60-something couples simply chuckled at Brown’s inanity, perhaps unaware that her literature tied their lifestyle to the Third Reich: “The culture which [the notoriously anti-Semitic] Wagner represented,” according to the flyer, “was later imposed upon and accepted by the failed Baby-Boomer generation.”

Various respondents to the “American System Rothschild Poll” were largely negative.  One person wondered why the tune was set at 256.  Still others expressed horror at the morbid allusion to Lyndon Larouche’s death and how everyone needs to start thinking about it.

Malene Robinson, during her discussion of the historic personality of Mozart, set the scene: “imagine you are a group of mourners who are looking at the dead corpse of your leader, who led a revolution, and is now dead, and the whole world is collapsing around you. . .and you ask yourself, ‘what does this mean for me?’” This suddenly became a very real question for everybody in that room. Ask yourself: has it become a real question for you?

The Rachel Brown campaign appears to be not worried about this public relations set-back, perhaps believing that the upcoming “Wienie Roost” set on the day of the anniversary of the day Barney Frank roosted Rachel Brown but good will remind people why she is vaguely memorable.  The high profile web-blog wonkette has provided the Event some publicity.

Polling for Summer Shields shows that he has fallen further behind in his Write-In campaign against Donald Duck, Spongebob Squarepants, and oddly enough Lyndon Larouche.  Analysts believe that Donald Duck’s rise comes out of renewed name recognition from news stories about sexual assault cases against Disneyland employees.  Spongebob Squarepants is expected to win the write-in election, due to his continued omnipresence.  Lyndon Larouche is harder to peg, considering:

Speaking of funny on the square in front of our office today a Lyndon Larouche stand was set up. Another bunch of crazies — unfortunately they don’t get nearly as much airtime as the Tea Party. [...]

Larouche is ancient news. Sheesh, how long have those crazies been around? Three decades-ish? And yet, despite their very best efforts otherwise, they never viably influenced the Dem Party or its policies. [...]

The answers to the above tell you why virtually no one’s the least bit interested in old Larouche idiocy, and why virtually everyone’s interested in recent new TeaP idiocy.

Though it appears Summer Shields has one voter in him, Analysts suspect that Summer Shields’s fall behind Larouche in the polls may be due to Shields’s disappearance when he speaks, and the invariable propping up of the name “Lyndon Larouche”.  Analysts suggest that in order to beat Larouche in the coming November election, Summer Shields will have to find a way to distance himself from him.  While they believe that Donald Duck has reached his ceiling and can easily be jumped, they are stumped on how he might pull ahead of Spongebob Squarepants — perhaps Shields will have to go on the attack against Spongebob.

This week’s Wikipedia Sockpuppet Banned list includes  Manger le caniche, Outings Chair, Forge Tipsy, and Amy Ferrous Mix.

Chris Sare, left, and Bob Wesser set up a table outside town center’s post office on Monday to hand out literature. — in the town of Redding.

“We’re everywhere. We’re going to every post office we can go to,” said Chris Sare, who said he works full-time with the group.

It is a fantastic tour.  See, here they are in Dryden — Bob Wesser and Chris Sare.  What’s even better is that they are going into places that are not used to seeing people standing around post offices with Hitler Mustache images.  I love it when a band that’s achieved some fame makes a point in taking out-of-the-way detours away from the biggest venues.

Also see Winfield.

The woman in the picture was very interested in talking with me up until the second I started taking pictures. I wish I had known that was going to be her reaction because I would have asked more questions before I pulled out the camera. She became even less enchanted with me when I switched to video. I thought it was quite bizarre behavior to get squirrelly when talking to a guy with a camera when the whole point of her protest, petition and information cart was to get her point across to people. You would think she would be overjoyed to have her point of view put on the local news. The people she had at her cart that were signing up for information were alternating between shy and evasive and aggressive albeit through veiled threats. [...]

The bottom line is, it pays to be wary of who to hop in bed with politically. These days with the power of a Google search at your fingertips there is no excuse for being uninformed.

A different tour takes a different group through West St. Louis County in Missouri.

As I approached her, I took a photograph. This set her off, and she began a tirade that I had no right to photograph her without identifying myself. (While she is quite incorrect, as she had set herself up in a public place and made herself a public spectacle – thereby becoming NEWS…) I did identify myself. I then attempted to get SOME comment on video.

I have never understood this fascination of people drawing a mustache on Obama to show him as “evil”.

Draw a Vinn Diagram, and in a lot of people’s heads the word “Evil” and the word “Hitler” will morph into one giant circle.
Don’t misquote me on that one.

Anyway, these are a little bit roguish, in the sense that they don’t mete up with the Biggie of the 2010 Electoral Season, and the candidacies of Rachel Brown, Kesha Rogers, and Summer Shields.

Summer Shields’s campaign hit an exciting note.  According to LPAC, the Chinese Press Covered Summer Shields’.  I’ve seen headlines like that one from this news source.  Anyway, it’s the biggest notable reference to the campaign since the endorsement/word of encouragement from Michael Savage.
This week ahead for the Summer Shields campaign, starting right as I post this:

U.S. Army Corp Bay Model Tour – All are welcomed to join us!  Missed it.
Economic Policy Workshop 7: The Historical Development of California with special guest Mark Calney.  No, really: you can hear from THE Mark Calney!!!
There will be an appendix tomorrow — A Conceptual Tour of San Francisco lead by, yes again, Mark Calney!
And keep your eye on Next Saturday, when SKY SHIELDS will host a policy workshop (Workshop Number 8, baby!) on the BASEMENT PROJECT.

Kesha Rogers’s campaign made news this week, as she actually moved beyond broadsides against the President and went on the attack against her opponent in the race that she is in, alleging that Pete Olson is working too closely with the President.

Kesha Rogers Blasts Pete Olson’s “Deal With The Devil”
In a statement issued Saturday, Democratic Congressional candidate for the 22nd District in Texas Kesha Rogers blasted incumbent Republican Pete Olson for his “deal with the Devil,” namely President Obama, around the shutdown of NASA. Rogers’ full statement appears below. [...]

“Anyone who still thinks that Pete Olson is serious about saving the Constellation program, guess again. He has already given up the fight, he will continue to ‘go along to get along’, and compromise on principle. As I have said repeatedly, anyone who tries to make a deal with an insane President, is unfit to serve in office; we must force Obama to resign, and reinstate Glass-Steagall protections of our commercial banking system. Over 75% of the population wants Obama out now, and that is why I am unwavering in leading my campaign’s drive to force his resignation, before the November 2010 elections. Nothing short of this could save NASA, or the country.

That’s an interesting figure — the 75 percent mark that want “Obama out now”.  Variously LPAC insists the number at 75, 80, or 85 percent.

Kesha Rogers’s campaign schedule has  Campaign organizer Ian Overton leading “a discussion of LaRouche’s September forecast, of a physical economic boundary condition that will push the world into a hyperinflationary collapse” — see it now at Coffee Oasis.

As for Rachel Brown, stay tuned to learn the details of next week’s “Meet and Greet” in Fall River. Details have not been either decided yet, or relayed.

The press is already writing about her campaign in the past tense.

She recalls her encounter with Frank, which was recorded in a widely viewed You Tube video, as a high point of her record as a political activist. “The occasion on which most of you saw me, was one instance of this activity, when I challenged Barney Frank on his defense of the Wall St. bailout and Obama’s Hitler healthcare policy, both of which policies only further harm the American population, even to death,” she said.

Several Republicans are also vying for their party’s nomination to run against Frank in the fall, calling him “Bailout Barney” for his role as chairman of the House Financial Services committee. But Frank has a firm grip on his party’s nomination and victory in the fall election.

Memories.
Anyway, this Rockwellian political activism has struck other public figures.

He introduced himself as a representative of L-Pac (LaRouche PAC), and launched into a song to the tune of “Funiculi, Funicula.” “Peter Orszag and Larry Summers, they’re fascist pigs, they’re fascist pigs,” he began in a loud, strong voice. The lyrics went downhill from there, quickly veering into the unprintable along with Hitler references – even while William Gale, a senior Brookings economist with the build and look of a professor, not a bouncer, escorted the songster to the exit.

Orszag then turned to a more familiar face, Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus, who steadfastly refused to sing her question about the budget deficit.

Orszag was more gracious than Frank.

“thank you for that”.

This whole array of Post Office Tours and Workshop laden Political causes and choral singing is part of an attempt to affect this Birthday Present for their hero.

On Thursday, Lyndon LaRouche let it be known that the best 88th birthday gift that he could receive this coming September, is the removal of Barack Obama from the Presidency.

All the chips are falling into place.

The LPAC release on Porter Goss’s role in the targeting of Maxine Waters has gone viral on the Internet.  (Interesting. Basil Marceaux’s campaign went viral.  Never heard of this one.  Have to check to see if anything other than some ‘usual suspects’ sent it out.)
It is not only feasible; it is vital, if humanity is to survive by rediscovering the true nature of man. The first step is to get Obama rapidly, and safely out of office. He is a failed personality, and his continued occupancy of the Oval Office is an abomination that cannot be tolerated.
The Obamas are also coming under more and more attack. The latest bombshell appeared in Thursday’s Daily News, comparing Michelle Obama to Marie Antoinette. (Great.)
Eighty-five percent of the American people want Obama out! Let us mobilize to make that a reality, and let us celebrate Lyndon LaRouche’s 88th birthday this September by the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall and the launching of NAWAPA.

Anyway…

Ickes plagarizing Lyndon Larouche?

Reportedly, the staff in the National Committee of the Larouche org believe that the answer is … yes.  Some members have flipped their lid over different items.
And I am not making that up.

Then again, this information has pretty much been validated.  Only Seven narrative plots out there, so says Issac Asimov.

Wikipedia is an uneven and rough reflection of public historical memory.  Look into it and we see this spectacle of people ready to defend his character.

It is well known that Howard Scott was smeared in the press. You are republishing old information. Did you read the link I directed you to? I gave you a link that provided evidence. Why are you wholesale reverting everything ?
Why be a continuing part of a smear effort? Why try and assassinate this persons character. It is unseemly and really uncalled for. skip sievert (talk) 16:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

User Johnphos… Scott was smeared in the press, and you are dredging up that material now again, please do not use the Times link in this article on Scott. It is not sourced in the article. The article is a known designed attack on Howard Scott and includes things like this How this transformation from dollar economy to energy economy is to come about, Howard Scott never explains. Says he at times: “Technocracy proposes no solution.” At other times he silences questions with a pontifical belch That is the level of this unsourced anon article. Along with the Hearst corporation there was a concerted effort to make a fool and chide Scott in the press. skip sievert (talk) 04:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Obviously the article is meant to be a satire and not a serious piece. It has no author and came out after the Hearst corporation and others put out a directive to discredit the group. His early career is not notable at least the way you have measured or portrayed it. Obvious to see where the piece is aimed. Please do not add this again. Johnfos I have asked you previously not to disruptive edit or trail my edits. skip sievert (talk) 01:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I imagine the wikipedia article on “Technocracy Inc” clashes with Hyzoloic Hedgehog’s piece round about where it places the organization in the present day and fails to concur with a split.

Technocracy Incorporated’s headquarters were originally situated in New York. It has moved several times through its history, and is currently located in Ferndale, Washington. Howard Scott became the first Director of Technocracy Incorporated in 1933, a position he held until his death.[citation needed]

From “Monad Man”:  In spite of the majority’s adherence to Scott, the split devastated the movement. In 1951 Technocracy’s CHQ had to leave its offices in Manhattan and relocate first to Lambertsville, New Jersey, and then to a farm in Bucks County outside Philadelphia. Although some local Technocracy chapters continued to publish small journals, Scott’s CHQ issued its last pamphlet in the late 1940s. Scott sank into even deeper historical obscurity and when he died in 1970 his passing did not even merit a note in the New York Times.

Looking at the citations for the wikipedia article, I have no idea why the current website for “Technocracy, Inc” would delete its founding principles of 1933.  I suppose that you have to be pragmatic and can’t be ideologically driven to your principles in a society you did not create — even if you favor a “No Money Society“, you still have to sell stuff to pay the bills.

I have seen the future of the Larouche org.  It is a website where this is the most popular page — where predictions for 64 years ago are still rationalized away, and the main Ferndale, Washington branch has a sister locale in Vancouver, British Columbia.  It is a loop of appeals to the Youth to the FUTURE!

Technocracy is not a political movement. It is an organization with a dynamic plan for the future–a non-monetary system of distribution, managed by the people most qualified in their particular fields, not by politicians or financiers–we’ve already seen what they do.
We owe our standard at living to science and technology–in the hands of those who know how things work. In the wrong hands, we face an uncertain future. You owe it to yourself to look into Technocracy’s design. After all, that is where you will spend most of your life–in the future.

There are three wikipedia pages that directly concern Howard Scott and “Technocracy, Inc”.  Larouche enjoys a much larger wikipedia tree.  Absent the mass of Larouchites tacking away at wikipedia, I suspect the apparatus would collapse — not quite to the Scott and Technocracy, Inc — but only due to the fact that there are more outlets of information today than there was in the hey-day of the 1930s and 1940s, and more available.  Meantime, the wikipedia team of one for Technocracy, Inc appears to have faded.  A battle lost:

Skip, You’ve said here that “…Technocracy Incorporated and its program.. is perhaps the most important social movement of the 20th. century in my opinion… it influenced and continues to influence many… and was the fastest growing social movement of the early to mid 1930’s.” skip sievert (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC) And this is the general position presented in this article.

But where is the actual evidence that TI has been so important and influential? Perhaps there are some New York Times articles and scholarly books by disinterested historians about TI? Many more third party publications are needed to support what is being said in this article. Sources close to the subject are not very helpful and I’ve tagged the TI Publications section as being an advertisement. Johnfos (talk) 09:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Skip Sievert has failed the Herschel Krustofsky test — he has not kept at it with new names, with a new tag-team (perhaps because the org only consists of one person in Ferndale?), from different isp locales, etc. to badger and bug the wikipedia editors.

In Larouche campaign news:
Summer Shields held an all day press conference in Chinatown on the 29th.  I’m sure it filtered into LPAC press releases.  The Summer Shields for Congress Chorus held a concert at St. Mary’s Square Park.  And this week, all are welcomed to join the U.S. Army Corp Bay Model Tour, and an Economic Policy Workshop on The Historical Development of California with special guest Mark Calney on Saturday, followed by a Conceptual Tour of San Francisco lead by Mark Calney on Sunday.

The Kesha Rogers campaign held a “Save the U.S.A. Layoff Obama!” Intersection Rally, and Ian Overton will lead a discussion of LaRouche’s September forecast on Saturday at Coffee Oasis.

The Rachel Brown campaign has received a bit of press, and a columinist calling for a debate with Barney Frank, here:
You may remember her as the person Frank likened to a dining room table at a Dartmouth town meeting last summer. According to her campaign website, Ms. Brown favors the impeachment of President Obama, in part because of what she calls his “Hitler healthcare policy.” She also advocates the American colonization of Mars. That’s Mars, the planet — not the candy company. I hope Frank debates her on live television.

But she will appear alongside the two Republican challengers to Barney Frank on Newton radio station NECN’s program “Broadside”, on Monday, August 2nd at 6pm.  For a suggested 25 dollar donation you can go to the Brookline Main Library to “participate in an evening of beauty, dignity, and joy in honor of the 200th birth year of Robert Schumann and the beautiful culture he fought to create” in fighting “the Obama administration and lackeys such as Barney Frank, are degrading and killing off the population.”  On Saturday, you too can meet Rachel Brown and dine on some pizza.

Go ahead and make fun of Lyndon Larouche, but when the Mossad, the Freemasons, and the House of Windsor come after your pancreas DONT COME CRYING TO ME.

And with that warning…
Years ago, someone — college aged — posted something on youtube.  An interview with a LYMer manning a table just outside an Art College (or maybe the UW) in Seattle.  It was this passive allowance with mock agreement on whatever the LYMer said, a phony phone number exchanged, all leading to an agreement to a meeting / encounter that never happened.  There was a line in the video that was quite good — the interviewer asked, “What do you think of the students’ art here?”  The LYMer answered with a feh, and a statement that “They aren’t even interested in launching a new Renaissance!”

This production from the LYM — fails to ignite a new Renaissance.
Which is just as well.  We are on the verge of a New Dark Ages, inevitible if Obama is not removed from office before the date of Lyndon Larouche’s next birthday in September, you’ll hear after 5 minutes on this Internet radio broadcast.  I don’t know what to make of that thing — struggle past the minute and a half of the “Everything Politics” rap and see how long you can survive this.  I didn’t make it to hear Kesha Rogers.

I am not sure what I am supposed to be on the look-out on Larouche’s birthday.  It’s apparently another “Phase Shift” vaguity — it’s all over even if nothing tangible happens.  Seeing that the concept is always that on these days, 14th Century Dark Ages beckon — I’ll go ahead and say that unless 1 Billion people on Planet Earth die out within a week, Larouche will be wrong once again, and this Doomsday Cult can go ahead and call it quits, and — I don’t know, split off to work to elect Tom Tancredo or Alvin Greene.

I’m reading this fan of Larouchian economics.
In my blog dated June 27, 2010, I say that Lyndon LaRouche (1922- ) is one of seventeen ‘big thinkers.’ (click) He became one of these thinkers when he modernized the economy that Jesus Christ spoke about in Ch. 24 of Matthew in the New Testament.
Wow.  Was this part of the work he came up with in prison with Jim Bakker?

The content of the natural economy is measured annually with pie charts. A pie chart example is shown below. As an economy grows, more and more pie charts are necessary to study the natural growth. This natural economy will move humans from planet to planet.

All right.  All this time I thought the only useful graph for the Larouche organization was this one:

  But I guess not.  They’re all into pie charts? 

I’ve got a good pie chart.  It’s right here.  I regret to say that the chart is already out of date, and the situation has deteroiated since.  I better get the situation rectified before the Wimar Hyperinflationary Triple Curve sets in again.

Say, WHERE’S MY WEIMAR INFLATION?  July 16th has passed.  There is no Weimar Inflation.  These things have a romantic glean to them — 60 percent of respondents to an Alex Jones website poll forsee a “Road Warrior Future”, I imagine because these 60 percent want to experience the thrill of one of their favorite science fiction dystopias.

Here’s something interesting.  A case of a person looking out over the material online and coming to one conclusion about Larouche – “Hey!  Kesha Rogers!”.
And another who comes to a different conclusion.
Well, I imagine they’re just seeking to affirm their own biases and see in the web what they want.

What’s fantastic for them is how the web provides a useful recruiting platform.  Check this one out!

…………………………………………………………
Pleasanton4Life — This IS exactly what we need in this country. I’m definitely going to their townhall meeting in Livermore this Friday.

livermore925 –  Now, I normally don’t agree with LaRouche’s controversial ideas, but for some reason he is making a lot of sense to me. I found myself even donating $50 to get one of his books and DVDs. [...] I think their Townhall info is at our Public Library this Friday starting at 3pm. I’ll see you there!

Nancy — Yeah, seems like you are a bit cooky Stacey. I’m not sure if your a pro-Obama freak, but I think the message is correct. I got a membership just recently and probably will go to the town hall on Friday. Don’t drink the kool-aid Stacey. I recommend you listen to Savage Nation to get your facts straight. Summer Shields was on there too!  (Wait.  Did Summer Shields get an interview on Savage?)

Tri-Valley Teacher – You seem to have a wrong definition of totalitarian fascism. The only fascist I see who is hurting my family and friends is Obama. I don’t know much about LaRouche, but anyone with the balls to put a Hitler mustache on this insane “empty-suit” community organizer you call President is good with me.  I would suggest you pick up a few history books, because the policies being rammed down our throats by the Obama team, is literally and silently killing people.
When I went to the LaRouche website I personally enjoyed this discussion at this link:
(link to Harley Schlanger excitedly talking with Larouche about Basement tehniques linking the Asteroid Belt with exciting new princples in confronting the British Empire)
And, I have often asked myself, why can’t this President (and the last one as well), engage in this quality of dialogue, with the American people.

Jeff –  I’ve been a Democrat all my life, my parents were FDR Democrats and switched over in the Carter days. I’ve felt the same need to switch over my card to a more independent ticket considering the disgrace and highly disappointing year and a half.
 Everything, this country has fought for. We were pioneers in almost everything. Now, what can I really say to my children. “Oh wait, we have a black president.” Well, who gives a fly F@#$, I’m BLACK, what the heck does that mean if he is destroying our country.
If I had the time, since I’m barely making it because of Obama’s “economic recovery”, I would protest with those young lads.  I’ll give whatever time I have to see this guy out. When is that Townhall meeting?
……………………………………………..

What with Jeff, Tri-Valley Teacher, Nancy, livermore925, and Pleasantown4life all in attendence, That meeting  — on “Our Extraterrestrial Imperiative” — must have raked in the big bucks, moved ideas about, and landed the necessary signatures to become an official write-in candidate.

It turns out that a group of Lyndon LaRouche supporters were in town to drum up support for write-in candidate Summer Shields to face Nancy Pelosi for a seat in the 8th Congressional District. This seemed odd to me as Tracy is in the 11th Congressional District. They were merely looking for supporters to help in their campaign. They were told “it was a good area”. [...]  I’m not sure whether they got enough signatures or they decided too much controversy and publicity. Now I just have to wait for the next sign.

Kesha Rogers held a chorus in Sugar Land Town Center yesterday.  Still haven’t seen her prize winning 4th of July Parade float.  There will be an ice cream social at Ben and Jerry’s tomorrow.  Today there’s an um… unspecified location… discussion about Leibniz.  I’m sure it’s fascinating.  It’s sure to defeat Pete Sessions in November!

Meanwhile, over in Rachel Brown’s purview:
Today’s volunteer, sporting a tricorn hat, had set up a table with a poster reading “Pull over, stop Obama.” There did not appear to be much room in which passing motorists could comply.

Title of blog post taken from a David Frum post.  Some of David Frum’s best friends are ex-larouchies…

…

Regarding the Tea Party “Lenin, Obama, Hitler” sign controversy –

– leave it to prison planet to provide commenters deploring the cowardice of the movement for taking the sign down.

Also not always that difficult to find a fusion point for Larouche Inc.

I wonder how long they had to search for someone who didn’t actually agree with the sign?

So, I went over and contacted Adolf Hitler for comment on the “Lenin, Obama, Hitler” sign.
He responded with such a fury upon seeing the sign, that I had to run out of the room in fear of my life.  Quite a spectacle.  I don’t speak German, so I didn’t quite get what he said.

Such a thing as “neo-cons” and “paleo-cons” exist, don’t they? Also, quite a lot of the politically left/progressive people posting on the countless Internet forums based in the United States who use language like ‘NeoCon’ and ‘Zionist’ and ‘PaleoCon’ are either Lyndon LaRouche acolytes or have been unwittingly influenced by LaRouche’s propaganda without being entirely certain of where they picked up that language and ideology. Any time you read an Internet posting where the OP sounds like Rosie O’Donnell with a conspiracist opinion about everything, you’ve basically entered LaRouche-land.

Reaches a frustration point.

Noteworthy.  Rick Barber.  The Republican Congressional Candidate who ran a campaign where he told various Founding Fathers that “He would impeach” Obama.  He lost the nomination — 60 to 40.  Discounting intimations surrounding Darrell Issa — which remain intimations, albeit of a type you can probably find with, say, Bob Barr in 1994 — that leaves Kesha Rogers in the “Impeachment” Caucus.

… Breaking News! …

Okay, we’re done with the breaking news, we now return to regularly scheduled programming.

Update on the Summer Shields campaign!

As they were packing up, Joe E. boasted that they’d interested many locals in the LaRouche platform during their afternoon stint in front of the Post Office.   They loaded up their literature and umbrella and were off to retrieve two other true believers who had been posted in a small foothill town for the day.  In our thirty minute discussion Joe continually tapped his finger on one of LaRouche’s books as if it contained Biblical prophecy; their candidate, Summer Shields, seemed barely an afterthought.

Today’s wikipedia updates.

Well, first of all, I knew full well what this question was getting at.

But is the current picture the best we can do for this movement or is this picture a fair representative of the movement’s Political Advocacy? Weaponbb7 (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
It might be surprising that I’m not a fan of the image for that purpose, though I don’t know if the mass choral singing will get the Larouchies any better propaganda points.
Anyway, looking at Weaponbb7’s profile — I guess he’s not your HK sock puppet.  But this is the reason the  Larouchies would hate that photograph use.

Face front and smile. Maybe wikipedia can get permission for that photograph?  I don’t know.

Wikipedia is currently stumbling on how to cover the activity surrounding Obama.
Meantime, Marshal MacMahon has been removed for “Sock Puppetry“.   He’s a big fan of Stanislav Menshikov, and resents a description of the word “blather” to describe his praise for Larouche.

And this seems a bit self-serving a “solution“.

If you were to move this section because there is an article devoted to LaRouche’s views, wouldn’t you also have to move the sections on the US Labor Party, Jeremiah Duggan and Kenneth Kronberg as well, because there are articles about them? That might actually be a good idea, because this article is too long. Marshal MacMahon (talk) 12:47, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia presents some problems on certain topics.  Here’s an issue with Webster Tarpley, for instance.  By any reasonable measure, the “Kennebunkport Warning” controversy should be covered in the Wesbter Tarpley topic, as it was a demonstration of his methodology in trying to claim credence from anti-war activists such as Cindy Shehan, and in the recripocal relationship whereby anti-war activists such as Shehan ask Tarpley to buzz off.  Yet, it was a controversy which existed in a very limited universe — the 9/11 Truth land — outside mainstream media not noting it.  There was this strange instigation from this cartoon published by rense, and rense.com served up several articles on this.   So, there you go : it exists in the weird virtual space that Webster Tarpley resides in, and can shuffle things away whenever he pops his head out of the ground.
So we get this as an explanation for its deletion.

Is that right?  We passed another Crash Point of Hyper-Inflation?

Another world-historical Lyn-forecasted “crash” was to occur, too. Crash, Crash, Crash. I am for skin. For skin. No more knife fights.
I thought July 16th 2010 was date certain and with interest. He has NEVER been wrong. Never. I thought I had lived THIS history. This is living history? Is this living? Living this is, or should be.
Does bread cost $100,000 in your area today? I bought hot dog rolls last night and got a good deal — two eight-packs for $1.50. Sale price. A two-fer right before Weimar. Wow. And in see-through plastic bags. Oil was used, somewhere.

You know, David Lindsay is really odd.

In fact, LaRouche’s theory of a nefarious global Anglophile network is also held by neoconservatives. And there is more than a touch of New Labour about him, with his hysterical hatred of Britain and his incessant abuse of the Queen.

Tony Blair and Gordon Brown hate the Queen?

Anyway, while I’m trying to create a political coalition as described by David Linday, it seems a moot point.  The End Game is ON!!!

More centered here.  Oh, yeah.  Dark Ages round the Bend!  Dark Ages for Everyone!  It’ll be fun.

Nope.

LaRouche (with his following) seems a throwback to the early 20th century; wherein scientists like the Huxleys also mused upon spiritualism. LaRouche claims descent from Vladimir Vernadsky, specifically. [...]  Vernadsky and LaRouche remind me of Ayn Rand and other such holistic, secular prophets. LaRouche, perhaps more Randian in his interest in politics.

It’s enough to follow this: voiceofelijah2012  Says: July 14th, 2010 at 4:45 pm economy is tanking, the system is failing, but make sure you spend your money on this guy and make him rich. lol foolish people.
OR…

look my way through email spam.

My grief counselor suggested I make a list of things that might fill the sudden – but expected – void in my existence. [...]

Clear out e-mail; send credit card information to Nigerian prince and Lyndon Larouche.

Help us, Commander Chakotay.  Only he can save us from the Impending Dark Ages Interval.

I went to a LYM meeting once they yelled about Cheney and then tried to get me to come back with promises of Commander Chakotay from Star Trek Voyager at the next meeting. I would have gone for Riker.

I confused LaRouche with LaVey for a second and got pretty excited over the OP but then I read on and was rather disappointed.

i wanna meet a larouche nut so i can tell him to stick a square up his rear end and double it.

I think in plasting this revisionist Soviet nostalgia of Igor Panarin, the Larouche org just wants to validate the theory of Cliff Kincaid, percolating about, that Larouche and Alex Jones are Russian agents.  See too that prison planet reference!  It makes as much sense as launching yourself at Glass Steagal and claiming it as your own.
Lyndon LaRouche summed it up: “That’s what I expected. I’ve been waiting for these things to show up, because I knew they would tend to have to show up. In what form, I wouldn’t know in advance, but I knew it would have to happen.”
Or, the strange spectacle of Republicans wondering where their nation went since the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980?  Why does John Boehner refer to the “America they grew up in” – Tom Coburn contemplate loss of freedom from ”30 years ago” and Glenn Beck on the better times of 1979?

As I skip from Michael Moore’s to “Dude, Where’s My Country?” — 2003 — over to Jerry Doyle’s “Have You Seen My Country Lately?”, I recognize one major difference.  The “Left” throws a greater jab at contemporary popular culture than the “Right”.
Here I would encourage you to read the wikipedia synopsis of “Dude Where’s My Car?”  In part because there’s a good chance you didn’t see it, and it behooves you to know a little bit more than you did before about various trifling irrelevancies.

Impeachment History:

As the public tempest had swelled, some wanted Washington impeached.  Cartoons showed the President being marched to a guillotine.  Even in the President’s beloved Virginia, Revolutionary veterans raised glasses and cried “A Speedy Death to General Washington!”
With the national surge of anger toward Washington, some Americans complained that he was living luxuriously as George III.  Using old forgeries, several columnists insisted that Washington had been secretly bribed during the war by British agents.
Still others charged that the President stole military credit from soldiers who had bled and died.  “With what justice do you monopolize the glories of the American Revolution?”
Reeling from the blows, the 63 year old Washington wrote that the “infamous scribblers” were calling him “a common pickpocket” in “such exaggerated and indecent terms as could scarcely be applied for Nero.”

Okay.  Let’s finish by pointing to a big event in the Rachel Brown for Congress campaign, coming up in a month.

Come and participate in an evening of beauty, dignity, and joy in honor of the 200th birth year of Robert Schumann and the beautiful culture he fought to create. A concert of choral and solo works by Robert Schumann, W.A. Mozart, J.S. Bach, and other great, will be performed by campaign staff and guests. The Rachel Brown campaign is committed to reviving Classical humanist culture in a time where the Obama administration and lackeys such as Barney Frank, are degrading and killing off the population through savage budget cuts and fascist economic policies. Please bring your families and friends.

Bring your family and friends! as we battle the British Obama Frank stooges as they wipe off the population!  Weee.  Weeee.   Weeee.

Anyway, Michael Winstead explains some cult dynamics, and Erica Duggan explains her feelings of paranoia in looking into her son’s death.

Eventually, he became accustomed to the humiliating insults and tirades. “They call it making somebody a self-conscious organizer,” he says. “It is about getting somebody to break down and cry, just to have an emotional collapse. Once you do that, then people are malleable.” [...]  

According to Winstead, attacking someone for having “mother issues,” being homosexual or sexually perverse seemed to be a common strategy for controlling members in the office where he worked. Leaders directed the group to gang up on colleagues for minor infractions, a phenomenon Winstead calls “wolf-packing.” It was effective, he says.

Once he witnessed organizers surround and berate a woman, he says. The sobbing woman tried to leave, but one organizer wrestled her back into a chair, Winstead says. She didn’t resist again, he says.

Another time, Winstead says, a member having second thoughts about the group asked him for a ride to the bus station so he could visit relatives. Winstead obliged, infuriating movement leaders. “That whole week I just got pounded [by] everyone in the organization. It was comments like . . . ‘Mike, you’ve been driving people away from this movement! You are an agent, aren’t you?’ “

And Erica Duggan:

It is an irony not lost on Erica that LaRouche, veteran weaver of conspiracy theories involving the British and Zionists, is being pursued by a Jewish mother from Britain. She has become an accidental but determined traveler in his realm of plots and apocalyptic fantasies. She even wonders if LaRouche partisans are tracking her movements, hacking into her e-mail.

I high-light that phrase because it appears the Larouche org meant to implant that sense of paranoia in me this week.  I do not want to overstate a statement of empathy (empathy as in “full knowledge of what another has gone through”):  I am not a victim of the cult, and am removed from the insanity of the cult by quite a good distance.  Erica Duggan, on the other hand, one day never heard of Larouche, then met their existence under the absolute worst circumstances imaginable.  And the one thing I can say with certainty about Jeremiah Duggan is that had he not met up with the Schiller Institute and gone to that conference in Wiesbedon, he would be alive today.

I am not altogether sure that this makes sense — that the Larouche organization is still somewhere hawking their 1986 AIDS patients quarantine message, as focused in on the California Ballot Initiative “PANIC” — and these guys seem to love giving their names double meanings to explicate the horrendous nature of their goals, don’t they?

But it comes together in the person of “Heavy Metal Suicide”, who was seen on factnet defending the measure — years later.  And the name of this person appears to derive from comments I made here to the suppositions of one “European”:

I at least have some reference points for where one can conjecture “suicidal”.  For “Suicide Pact”, I really have not the foggiest reference point — outside of, perhaps, the hysterical 1980s anti-Heavy Metal campaigns aped in the Larouche org by Don Phau (for appeals to Christian Conservatives, I suppose?) and currently all the rage in the Islamic World.  This is a bizarre conjecture, made stranger by his denial.

I believe it is from this came the nom de plome of a commenter from the Larouche organization picks up the name “Heavy Metal Suicide”.  See how sick they are?

I’ve long had the basic concept that the Larouche organization has been peddling two tracks with Jeremiah Duggan.  One is something we see with the circumstances of Matthew Shepard — a gay man who was beaten and murdered.  Given that it’s entirely beside the point and doesn’t matter one iota in the case, it does feel scurrilous to suggest that Matthew Shepard was not an angel, or was troubled in some standard ways of humanity.  On that track of suggesting that Mrs. Duggan is not facing up to her son’s supposed pre-death state of mind, we saw European.  and the German Authorities who largely took down the notes from the Larouche organization.  But the fatal flaw in terms of keeping this story straight, as we saw with the recent “round-table” discussion, and why they can’t leave that alone, and have to leave exaggerated suggestions from picking apart the fragmentary bits of information on what happened at that conference that day– and lead to this:

It’s obvious this guy was a suicide, it’s obvious that his mother knew he was a suicide, because he told us that, he told us he had to take drugs to avoid suicide. He told us.

They have no ability to cling to the at least tenuable public relations-acceptable “mother can’t get over it” line, because it would deny the role of the “World Historic Mission” and the forces pitted up against the cult leader.  It leads to their two-track contradiction “stance” on Erica Duggan — is she being “used” for political purposes, or is she someone who (sickly) ”knew” this would happen?

Now what happened? I attacked the, well, — Tony Blair on BBC on two occasions. I was joined,–is or that not or but–not directly, but indirectly, by the followup , by a chief high-ranking intelligence official of the British services

And so it continues on to today, because of the strength of the org as shown with the candidacy of Kesha Rogers.

I got attacked at the TDP convention!! Just got accosted by LaRouchies outside the convention center. I told them NO and no, again, when they tried to give me some Kesha propaganda. Once inside – and by inside, I mean inside the bat cave (press room) – all I can hear is the LaRouche choir, singing something that sounds very hymn-y. My friends said they had “Obama is a Nazi” sign. I wouldn’t know. I turned my back to them and hurt their feelings. They are out in the hall.

The hymn selection so far:

As We Gather By the Center
We’re Marching to Britain, Beautiful, Beautiful Britain!
All Hail the Power of Kesha’s Name
Come Ye Crazy People Come
We’ve Got the Whole Extraterrestial World in Our Hands
LaRouche, LaRouche, We Adore Thee

and. . . Standing in the Need of Prayer. Which they do need . . . a prayer and divine intervention for Kesha to have chance.

– was nominated thusly:
Roger and her band of sign carrying loons took to the street in a simplified form of campaigning know as “standing in a busy intersection waving a sign with Roger’s face on it.”. It was the cheapest form of campaigning in the history of campaigning and it obviously worked.

Will fare better than Summer Shields for obvious reasons.  Though, as “Ace” put it:
If Shields had won 100% of the vote you’d be whining it was fraud or that his name was first on the ballot.
‘ Can’t argure with that.  As it were, he won zero percent because he was not even on the ballot.

They have talks with Putin, you know?

I could not believe that this LaRouche follower actually was honest enough to admit that Putin is working with LaRouche right to my face. When did this happen? At Pastor Manning’s Columbia trial, back in May in NYC.

And the name of the game.

When you were 10 years old, did you ever grab a pen and sit down with the daily newspaper, methodically drawing mustaches on all the photos of politicians, movie stars and ordinary people who happened to make the news that day?

It was a fun, juvenile thing to do — embellishing people’s faces with creepy pencil-thin mustaches, curlicued handlebars and droopy Fu Manchus.

But adding facial hair to photographs is one of those things most people seem to outgrow, once they turn into adults.

… I hold some pessimissim, but hope I’m wrong, about the outcome of the Inquest in Britain.  We go back to techniques such as — note well.  We’ll see.

Interesting tid-bit from the “Rachel Brown for Congress” campaign for the Great Post Office Tour.

I am glad that these were not Southbridge residents. They were members of the Lyndon LaRouche movement stumping for a candidate to oppose Barney Frank in the November election. The LaRouche Democrat is Rachel Brown. Her web site, with its errors in grammar and spelling, speaks for itself. They seem to have a problem with dates as well since at least 2 items are dated July 22, 2010. Perhaps this indicates a forward-looking candidate with clairvoyant premonitions of life on Mars.

Dot your “i’s”, dot your lower case “j’s”, cross the “t’s”, circle your “o’s”…
Or, in Summer Shield’s case… Register as a Democrat in time.  Summer Shields is still running for Congress in an unofficial “write-in” campaign.  The next event is the next event for all of the campaigns — the nth millionth Historic Webcast.  Then it’s back to the Post Office Tour.  I, frankly, don’t understand the point of the Summer Shields campaign from hence-forward.  Theoretically, the election campaign of these individuals would provide a focal point on the ballot for the various issues the org is campaigning on — Glass Steagal and Mars and so forth.  But unless they’ve stumbled on the new “pre-candidacy”, and after Barney Frank wins the nomination Rachel Brown will continue forth a “Write-In” campaign, thus keeping this act up for all three of their candidacies on into November – I imagine they could just cart out the “Obama Hitler” poster in San Francisco sans “Summer Shields for Congress”.

I note as “interesting” that Summer Shields’s Campaign, and what I suppose would be the high point in terms of attention directed at it, was mentioned in a dossier for the Jeremiah Duggan legal inquest.

It is worth noting that out of the sixteen named individuals banned from entering the UK
since October 2009 7 two have publicly shown some support to Lyndon LaRouche’s:
1. STEPHEN DONALD BLACK whose Stormfront.org neo-Nazi website has
published supportive posts for LaRouche. For instance : Why White Nationalists
Should Vote For Lyndon LaRouche in 2004
2. MICHAEL ALAN WEINER (ALSO KNOWN AS MICHAEL SAVAGE) who
commented: “When I read this stuff, it makes sense to me.” — Michael Savage,
reacting to the campaign of Summer Shield, the Larouche candidate for
Congress against Nancy Pelosi.

I can’t say I approve of that disgression, but I guess there is something there in the way of the org’s role as destructive demaougic presence.  Recently factnet has been graced by a poster calling himself “Heavy Metal Suicide” who has been defending the California Ballot Initiative “PANIC”.  How did Michael Savage vote on that one?

It coule be worse.  Kesha Rogers might have this supporter ?
As a man who identifies himself as African in America, I am excited that some folks who look like me might have a brain not wired to the national anti-black jewish cartel. There is a web site to document my statement: JEWISH DOMINATION AND EXPLOITATION OF THE BLACK CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT. Google it and read it with your own eyes. It was written, not by Minister Louis Farrakhan, but by Jewish scholars and has not been refuted. Grio should be about truth, not propaganda. Hence, I suggest that you pursue the truth about America and its disease.

Article fail.
Those who have stopped by the Fort Washington Post Office the past two Mondays have been asked about more than just stamps and shipping rates. They’ve been asked to get involved in politics.

Thomas Sewell has “gone there”, leading a few politicians to follow forth.  This guy – that makes two people on the ballot in Texas for Congress making Obama Hitler Comparisons.  What can I say — It’s raining Hitler!  It always is.  The LYMers are made up of people who feared that Bush was leading us down to Hitler — now they’re raising money from people thinking Obama is leading us to Hitler.  Also a fan of Thomas Sewell’s “Hitler” article: Sarah Palin.   Sarah Palin, interestingly enough, gets this quip:

If you haven’t read LaRouche on deathpanels, than you’re listening to dipshit Sarah Palin. Only LaROuche shrewdly and cogently initiated (that means FIRST) the discription of the ‘health reform’ picked up by know-nothings as simply

I suspect that Kesha Roger’s name has become more engrained as background noise, and I’ll see a small steady rumble of her name mentioned in a way that died off after her March nomination.  She stands on the shoulders of Novelty Candidate Giants — namely Alvin Greene — who has given Republican partisans a narrative to work with.  I do see one supporter of Greene and opponet of Rogers in the comments section here.    Time Magazine caused some ripples of attention, and some bloggers probably picked it up when the Weekly Standard blog picked it up.  Michelle Malkin, wonkette

Pat Noble!
Her program sounds like a winner to me, I don’t care with whom or what party she is affiliated.
AND
It would have been more honest had Pat Noble mentioned she’s also with the LaRouche cult along with Kesha.
I am pretty sure that Pat Noble posted some comments more anonymously at various blogs during this week’s Kesha Rogers burst of attention — I suspect the Larouchies are behind a “shouldn’t give up on comparing Obama to Hitler” at the first things site.

Hey! This is some weird comment circle jerk with Michael Hodgkiss and Howie G.

Michael Hodgkiss Says: June 20th, 2010 at 7:39 pm
LaRouche is great, and Kesha Rogers is wonderful. The world, IS changing, in spite of Obama.
Howard Gibson Says: June 21st, 2010 at 9:01 am
Hi Mike, you know from Washington DC how much crap we went through, like for DC General Hospital which ultimately was shut down. Now, as LaRouche has said, this is our time.
judson Says: June 21st, 2010 at 9:43 am
< -I’m a liberal and i support impeachment as this point.

Hm.
They cannot even whip a senile Trotskyite or a few GOP frat-boys playing “covert operator”.

Some of these coverages are just odd.
People are beginning to see the truth, but better not tell Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton that there are African Americans that are breaking ranks with them. [...]
Like Thomas Sewell, I bet.
Kesha won her primary last week.
She won it in March.  You picked the attention up from a Time Magazine article from this week covering a nomination from March in the wake of a South Carolina election result, off the basis of “two makes a trend”.

I don’t understand why Conservative Bloggers — here and at First Things, not named David P Goldman, are joinging the Larouchies in demanding the media show their photograph.  But it has given Dave Wiegel a shot at a narrative — and who knows?  Maybe there’s something sustainable enough to leave Kesha Rogers some minituae of attention to November.

The video of Kesha Rogers is hilarious, not only because she is incoherent, but because they never show how few people are in the audience.
Classic cropping technique.

How bad are things in the Lone Star State. So bad that the craziness can no longer be contained and controlled by the Texas GOP:
Look.  North Carolina produced this Republican nominee, spouting out a line that may well be adopted by the Larouche org.  Don’t take it too hard.

“”The people have spoken,” (the “sane” Republican defeated) Reeves told the Raleigh, NC News & Observer. “It’s sort of like anarchy out there, where qualifications and credentials don’t matter.”

You want a guage on Rachel Brown’s chances?  Close to nil.  I suppose historically speaking, she has one spot to hitch her wagon toward.  I think John Dingell in the Republican Landslide year of 1994 got a scare on his primary night by an unknown garnering 40 plus points.  That’s the sort of outlier that floats about here — but I wouldn’t bet on it.
But don’t vote for Rachel Brown — Rachel Brown is the puppet of “Big Table”.  She wants to push the “Big Table” agenda on the Middleboro City Council – they won’t let her.

Selectmen have refused to meet with a political action committee that has been demonstrating in front of the post office for months.

The board decided unanimously to deny the LaRouche Political Action Committee’s request for a meeting, on the grounds that the group’s agenda concerns national matters over which the selectmen have no say.

“This is not a local government issue,” the board said in a June 9 e-mail to the group.

Standing somewhere or other:

Despite their efforts to spread word on their cause, the two refused to give their names or speak on the record with the Milford Times.

In other news: everyone thinks George Soros is out to get them.
Larouche’s views on General McChrystal has taken a convenient shift.
Finally, in the guise of “Single Mad Belief”, we have a Larouchie Wikipedia Sock Puppet whose name matches his/her identity.  As you see, his attempted edit is by way of convincing the world that Larouche is Big in Russia and respected by this and that authority.  I also see at wikipedia an attempt to affect the history of where the cult stood on Obama between Election 2008 and sometime when they picked up on the “Tea Party” spots that they could stand about and “lead the mass strike”.