<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: post truncated a week later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.struat.com/election/2009/07/03/a-little-less-flippant-than-my-last-several-larouche-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.struat.com/election/2009/07/03/a-little-less-flippant-than-my-last-several-larouche-posts/</link>
	<description>Political discourse.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:48:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.struat.com/election/2009/07/03/a-little-less-flippant-than-my-last-several-larouche-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-80395</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.struat.com/election/?p=4240#comment-80395</guid>
		<description>Correction noted.  I&#039;ve blurred the two: &quot;Consciously Lying&quot; and &quot;still trapped by the Progressive Labor Party&quot; -- which, I gather, the former comes with the latter but the latter does not necessitate the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction noted.  I&#8217;ve blurred the two: &#8220;Consciously Lying&#8221; and &#8220;still trapped by the Progressive Labor Party&#8221; &#8212; which, I gather, the former comes with the latter but the latter does not necessitate the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis King</title>
		<link>http://www.struat.com/election/2009/07/03/a-little-less-flippant-than-my-last-several-larouche-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-80335</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.struat.com/election/?p=4240#comment-80335</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hylozoic Hedgehog&quot; has never said he thinks I&#039;m lying; he merely disagrees with me while suggesting that I&#039;m enslaved to dialectical materialism. The person who says I&#039;m lying is &quot;Boris Maglev,&quot; who seems to forget about all the time I took to edit and footnote his extraordinary 
Factnet posting about intellectual subversion inside the LaR org so it could reach the wider audience it deserved. But I prefer him to &quot;Poe,&quot; who says I&#039;m a &quot;dog&quot; (mild compared to what LaRouche calls me).

As to LaRouche&#039;s Nazi space swirls (actually his four-crooked-armed plasmoid glowing with light), you can view it at http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/images/plasmoid1.jpg or as an illustration to my satiric explication of the swirling armies in LaRouche&#039;s head at http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/larouche-warlord1.htm

Regarding the unnamed Scandinavian LaRouche watcher whom blogger &quot;European&quot; said believes the LaRouchians sit around reading Mein Kampf, this may have its origins in a story in my book about Paul Goldstein&#039;s brother-in-law storming around the LaRouche national office on W. 58 St. in Manhattan waving a copy of Mein Kampf as evidence that LaRouche had gone anti-Semitic, and saying LaRouche was getting it from Mein Kampf. HH and Boris M know this story is true--they were probably there. But it actually proves the opposite of what the unnamed LaRouche watcher said: if other LaRouchians had read Mein Kampf and spotted the comparisons to LaRouche, more of them would have left pronto. Ergo, most of them didn&#039;t, and don&#039;t, read Mein Kampf. Indeed, many of them don&#039;t even read LaRouche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hylozoic Hedgehog&#8221; has never said he thinks I&#8217;m lying; he merely disagrees with me while suggesting that I&#8217;m enslaved to dialectical materialism. The person who says I&#8217;m lying is &#8220;Boris Maglev,&#8221; who seems to forget about all the time I took to edit and footnote his extraordinary<br />
Factnet posting about intellectual subversion inside the LaR org so it could reach the wider audience it deserved. But I prefer him to &#8220;Poe,&#8221; who says I&#8217;m a &#8220;dog&#8221; (mild compared to what LaRouche calls me).</p>
<p>As to LaRouche&#8217;s Nazi space swirls (actually his four-crooked-armed plasmoid glowing with light), you can view it at <a href="http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/images/plasmoid1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/images/plasmoid1.jpg</a> or as an illustration to my satiric explication of the swirling armies in LaRouche&#8217;s head at <a href="http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/larouche-warlord1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/larouche-warlord1.htm</a></p>
<p>Regarding the unnamed Scandinavian LaRouche watcher whom blogger &#8220;European&#8221; said believes the LaRouchians sit around reading Mein Kampf, this may have its origins in a story in my book about Paul Goldstein&#8217;s brother-in-law storming around the LaRouche national office on W. 58 St. in Manhattan waving a copy of Mein Kampf as evidence that LaRouche had gone anti-Semitic, and saying LaRouche was getting it from Mein Kampf. HH and Boris M know this story is true&#8211;they were probably there. But it actually proves the opposite of what the unnamed LaRouche watcher said: if other LaRouchians had read Mein Kampf and spotted the comparisons to LaRouche, more of them would have left pronto. Ergo, most of them didn&#8217;t, and don&#8217;t, read Mein Kampf. Indeed, many of them don&#8217;t even read LaRouche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
