Comments on: from the lower 80 percent, though I consider myself in the mid 50s http://www.struat.com/election/2008/03/24/from-the-lower-80-percent-though-i-consider-myself-in-the-mid-50s/ Political discourse. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:50:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Rachel Holmes http://www.struat.com/election/2008/03/24/from-the-lower-80-percent-though-i-consider-myself-in-the-mid-50s/#comment-31651 Rachel Holmes Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:50:31 +0000 http://www.struat.com/election/2008/03/24/from-the-lower-80-percent-though-i-consider-myself-in-the-mid-50s/#comment-31651 Jeez, I always thought Molly Kronberg had some kind of guts for standing up to LaRouche, as she famously did during the New York trial of 1989 and thereafter. It was really funny in the 1990s watching the NEC pray that she would quit, and her not quitting for some reason. Actually, there were two reasons, both totally intelligible: 1. First, and most important, Ken didn't want her to quit. 2. The fact that she wouldn't quit drove LaRouche bananas. As for cowardice, what can you say about a guy who hasn't dared go out in public alone since 1974? A guy who thought he was being murdered by colonoscopy? I wish someone would give THAT archival material to Dennis King--the fall 1989 LaRouche press releases about the government's villainous colonoscopy gambit. Jeez, I always thought Molly Kronberg had some kind of guts for standing up to LaRouche, as she famously did during the New York trial of 1989 and thereafter.

It was really funny in the 1990s watching the NEC pray that she would quit, and her not quitting for some reason. Actually, there were two reasons, both totally intelligible:

1. First, and most important, Ken didn’t want her to quit.
2. The fact that she wouldn’t quit drove LaRouche bananas.

As for cowardice, what can you say about a guy who hasn’t dared go out in public alone since 1974? A guy who thought he was being murdered by colonoscopy?

I wish someone would give THAT archival material to Dennis King–the fall 1989 LaRouche press releases about the government’s villainous colonoscopy gambit.

]]> By: Justin http://www.struat.com/election/2008/03/24/from-the-lower-80-percent-though-i-consider-myself-in-the-mid-50s/#comment-31643 Justin Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:11:33 +0000 http://www.struat.com/election/2008/03/24/from-the-lower-80-percent-though-i-consider-myself-in-the-mid-50s/#comment-31643 And so it continues, wearily. <i>Cowardice, and related forms of personal moral corruption, among former associates, as exemplified by the case of the Molly Kronberg who, in 1989, went, like Benedict Arnold, out of corrupting fears under threats from government, over to the cause of civilization’s and our own association’s leading adversary, the British Empire, have taken their toll in such forms as virtual treason to that cause of our republic and humanity generally which we continue to serve. Now we have reached the great historic hour of decision which I foretold nearly thirty-seven years ago. Never has there been a moment during that interval, when, except for the political or moral equivalent of victims of either sexual ejaculatio praecox or rage provoked by fears of sexual impotence, that that perspective I set forth between August and December 1971 not been the most crucial feature of the way in which history since that time has actually unfolded, up to the present moment. It is important, especially for us, who remain troubled by the morally disappointing patterns of personal behavior among some former and some present colleagues, that we understand the deeper implications of the indicated pathological tendencies. Liberally Corrupted!</i> Oh by the way, Howdy Mr. Ossifur. And so it continues, wearily.

Cowardice, and related forms of personal moral corruption, among former associates, as exemplified by the case of the Molly Kronberg who, in 1989, went, like Benedict Arnold, out of corrupting fears under threats from government, over to the cause of civilization’s and our own association’s leading adversary, the British Empire, have taken their toll in such forms as virtual treason to that cause of our republic and humanity generally which we continue to serve.

Now we have reached the great historic hour of decision which I foretold nearly thirty-seven years ago. Never has there been a moment during that interval, when, except for the political or moral equivalent of victims of either sexual ejaculatio praecox or rage provoked by fears of sexual impotence, that that perspective I set forth between August and December 1971 not been the most crucial feature of the way in which history since that time has actually unfolded, up to the present moment.

It is important, especially for us, who remain troubled by the morally disappointing patterns of personal behavior among some former and some present colleagues, that we understand the deeper implications of the indicated pathological tendencies.

Liberally Corrupted!

Oh by the way, Howdy Mr. Ossifur.

]]> By: Philossifur http://www.struat.com/election/2008/03/24/from-the-lower-80-percent-though-i-consider-myself-in-the-mid-50s/#comment-31616 Philossifur Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:56:10 +0000 http://www.struat.com/election/2008/03/24/from-the-lower-80-percent-though-i-consider-myself-in-the-mid-50s/#comment-31616 At first, I thought you were pro-Larouche-- but then I realized your toungue was in your cheek. At least you're reading some of the Larouche perspective and considering it. Consider BAE system-- for example. That didn't go away. It still exists-- but what I'm finding is that the issues and problems are exploding at a rate that we can't cycle back through everything often enough. Right now, the Empire has been moving toward the Lisbon Treaty in Europe-- so BAE systems reasearch is set aside. What's needed is a multi-dimensional tracking system to watch the British Empire in action. Nothing Larouche wrote about goes away. Take one more item-- the crash in 1987. The effect of that was to bring in Greenspan whose solution made things worse. The catastrphiic efffects haven'nt' been really felt in terms of starvation, disease and death "YET" because the economy was so big and the monetary system was so thick that we've been insulted. In reality, howver-- you can plainly see the problem from a physics point of view-- You're a monetarist and you believe in money-- and this is what Larouche sees as the problem-- becaues without the physics-- it IS doomed and the sudden collapse will occur like it would for an SUV on thin ice.. At first, I thought you were pro-Larouche– but then I realized your toungue was in your cheek.

At least you’re reading some of the Larouche perspective and considering it. Consider BAE system– for example. That didn’t go away. It still exists– but what I’m finding is that the issues and problems are exploding at a rate that we can’t cycle back through everything often enough.

Right now, the Empire has been moving toward the Lisbon Treaty in Europe– so BAE systems reasearch is set aside. What’s needed is a multi-dimensional tracking system to watch the British Empire in action. Nothing Larouche wrote about goes away.

Take one more item– the crash in 1987. The effect of that was to bring in Greenspan whose solution made things worse. The catastrphiic efffects haven’nt’ been really felt in terms of starvation, disease and death “YET” because the economy was so big and the monetary system was so thick that we’ve been insulted. In reality, howver– you can plainly see the problem from a physics point of view– You’re a monetarist and you believe in money– and this is what Larouche sees as the problem– becaues without the physics– it IS doomed and the sudden collapse will occur like it would for an SUV on thin ice..

]]>