<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beatle-Mania</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.struat.com/election/2007/06/10/beatle-mania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.struat.com/election/2007/06/10/beatle-mania/</link>
	<description>Political discourse.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:48:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.struat.com/election/2007/06/10/beatle-mania/comment-page-1/#comment-10931</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.struat.com/election/2007/06/10/beatle-mania/#comment-10931</guid>
		<description>Unrelated to Larouche, more cock-eyed Beatle analysis of old from the John Birch Society here:  http://www.reason.com/blog/show/120670.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unrelated to Larouche, more cock-eyed Beatle analysis of old from the John Birch Society here:  <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/120670.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reason.com/blog/show/120670.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.struat.com/election/2007/06/10/beatle-mania/comment-page-1/#comment-10887</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.struat.com/election/2007/06/10/beatle-mania/#comment-10887</guid>
		<description>The LaRouche org is a complete success from LaRouche&#039;s point of view. He gets exactly what he wants: A cocooned, protected life in which &quot;security&quot; takes care of his every need, screens him completely from the real world, and protects him from the necessity of having to ever do any real work. 

Even if there is no money, there is always money enough for Lyn and his requirements, his first-class travel, his food and wine, his comfort and above all enough money to keep &quot;security&quot; dancing attendance on him and keeping the &quot;security screen&quot; high enough so that Lyn does not have to have any contact with people--including, and especially, his own followers.

He is free to get up when he wants, go to bed when he wants, hold meetings at which only he talks, about whatever fool thing comes into his mind, and write his endless, mindless, baseless rants.

Lyn doesn&#039;t want to be president. He doesn&#039;t want a mass movement--absolutely not. He wants to be important; he wants to be coddled, he wants to be deferred to.

So he&#039;s perfectly happy, or as happy as possible for someone whose main emotion is unreasoned hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LaRouche org is a complete success from LaRouche&#8217;s point of view. He gets exactly what he wants: A cocooned, protected life in which &#8220;security&#8221; takes care of his every need, screens him completely from the real world, and protects him from the necessity of having to ever do any real work. </p>
<p>Even if there is no money, there is always money enough for Lyn and his requirements, his first-class travel, his food and wine, his comfort and above all enough money to keep &#8220;security&#8221; dancing attendance on him and keeping the &#8220;security screen&#8221; high enough so that Lyn does not have to have any contact with people&#8211;including, and especially, his own followers.</p>
<p>He is free to get up when he wants, go to bed when he wants, hold meetings at which only he talks, about whatever fool thing comes into his mind, and write his endless, mindless, baseless rants.</p>
<p>Lyn doesn&#8217;t want to be president. He doesn&#8217;t want a mass movement&#8211;absolutely not. He wants to be important; he wants to be coddled, he wants to be deferred to.</p>
<p>So he&#8217;s perfectly happy, or as happy as possible for someone whose main emotion is unreasoned hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
